Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15,519
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15,519 results for “r”
Figure 7 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 7 Polling results of discussion session 3 "Automation", question 1: "Which AI Frameworks are your lab using/planning to use?".
Figure 1 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 1 In-person participants of the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022 (photo credit: Olivier Dugornay, Ifremer).
Figure 12 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 12 Polling results of discussion session 5 "Future of marine imaging", question 1: "Where have you seen the biggest progress of marine imaging during this workshop?.
Figure 4 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 4 Polling results of discussion session 1 "Extent of imaging", question 3: "Which area/volume does all image data you have ever worked with cover?".
Figure 11 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 11 Polling results of discussion session 4 "Reproducibility", question 2: "Can we reproduce studies at all?".
Figure 3 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 3 Polling results of discussion session 1 "Extent of imaging", question 2: "Have you used crowd-sourced marine image data?".
Figure 10 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 10 Polling results of discussion session 4 "Reproducibility", question 1: "Which part of Findable/Accessible/Interoperable/Reusable is most important to improve reproducibility?".
Figure 6 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 6 Polling results of discussion session 2 "Interoperability in marine imaging", question 2: "Who has a mandate to define interfaces for interoperability between marine imaging software tools?".
Figure 5 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 5 Polling results of discussion session 2 "Interoperability in marine imaging", question 1: "Which improvements to interoperability would be most useful to you?".
Figure 8 from: Borremans C, Durden J, Schoening T, Curtis EJ, Adams L, Branzan Albu A, Arnaubec A, Ayata S-D, Baburaj R, Bassin C, Beck M, Bigham KT, Boschen-Rose RE, Collett C, Contini M, Correa PVF, Dominguez-Carrió C, Dreyfus G, Duncan G, Ferrera M, Foulon V, Friedman A, Gaikwad S, Game C, Gaytán-Caballero A, Girard F, Giusti M, Hanafi-Portier M, Howell K, Hulevata I, Itiowe K, Jackett C, Jansen J, Karthäuser C, Katija K, Kernec M, Kim G, Kitahara M, Langenkämper D, Langlois T, Lanteri N, Jianping Li C, Li Q-R, Liabot P-O, Lindsay D, Loulidi A, Marcon Y, Marini S, Marranzino A, Massot-Campos M, Matabos M, Menot L, Moreno B, Morrissey M, Nakath D, Nattkemper T, Neufeld M, Obst M, Olu K, Parimbelli A, Pasotti F, Pelletier D, Perhirin M, Piechaud N, Pizarro O, Purser A, Rodrigues CF, Ceballos Romero E, Schlining B, Song Y, Sosik HM, Sourisseau M, Taormina B, Taucher J, Thornton B, Van Audenhaege L, von der Meden C, Wacquet G, Williams J, Witting K, Zurowietz M (2024) Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2022. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e119782. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e119782
Figure 8 Polling results of discussion session 3 "Automation", question 2: "Is AI for underwater images fundamentally different to existing "in-air" methods?".
Figure 3 from: Chi X-R, Wu H-S, Wang L (2024) Ajania flavida (Asteraceae, Anthemideae), a distinct new species from southwestern China. PhytoKeys 239: 205-213. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.119028
Figure 3 Ajania flavida sp. nov. in the wild (China, Xizang, Jomda) A habitat B habit C basal leaves (adaxial surface) D synflorescence (top view) E synflorescence (side view) F phyllaries (abaxial surface) G marginal female florets H central disk florets. Photographs by Long Wang.
Figure 2 from: Chi X-R, Wu H-S, Wang L (2024) Ajania flavida (Asteraceae, Anthemideae), a distinct new species from southwestern China. PhytoKeys 239: 205-213. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.119028
Figure 2 Ajania ramosa in the wild (China, Shaanxi, Meixian) A habitat B habit C basal leaves (adaxial surface) D synflorescence (top view) E synflorescence (side view) F phyllaries (abaxial surface) G marginal female florets H central disk florets. Photographs by Long Wang.
Figure 1 from: Chi X-R, Wu H-S, Wang L (2024) Ajania flavida (Asteraceae, Anthemideae), a distinct new species from southwestern China. PhytoKeys 239: 205-213. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.119028
Figure 1 Specimens of Ajania flavida sp. nov. previously misidentified as A. ramosa or A. variifoliaA China, Sichuan, Dêgê, D. E. Boufford et al. 36429 (PE) B China, Sichuan, Baiyü, Kham Exped. 10-0662 (PE) C China, Xizang, Jomda, HNWP Xizang Exped. 2195 (HNWP) D China, Xizang, Jomda, Kham Exped. 10-1622 (PE).
Supplementary material 2 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Traits selected for subsequent principal component and cluster analysis after the first PGA
Figure 4 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Figure 4 Cluster plot for the morphological variations among four taxa. C = Bupleurum commelynoideum var. commelynoideumF = B. commelynoideum var. flaviflorumP = B. smithii var. parvifoliumS = B. smithii var. smithii.
Figure 3 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Figure 3 Fruit morphology ABupleurum smithii var. smithiiBB. smithii var. auriculatumCB. smithii var. parvifoliumDB. commelynoideum var. flaviflorum
Figure 2 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Figure 2 Umbel and bract ABupleurum smithii var. smithiiBB. smithii var. parvifoliumCB. commelynoideum var. flaviflorumDB. commelynoideum var. commelynoideum.
Figure 1 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Figure 1 Comparison of the characters A width of middle leaves B width of bracteoles C length of bracteoles D number of rays. BS = Bupleurum smithii var. smithiiBP = B. smithii var. parvifoliumBF = B. commelynoideum var. flaviflorumBC = B. commelynoideum var. commelynoideum.
Supplementary material 1 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Specimens for measurements and initial measurements of traits data
Figure 7 from: Wang L-H, Li S, Zhang D-N, Liu Q-R (2024) A new combination and synonym in Bupleurum (Apiaceae, Apioideae), based on morphological, molecular and cytological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.116877
Figure 7 Distribution area based on specimen records and our field investigation ABupleurum smithii var. smithiiBB. smithii var. parvifoliumCB. commelynoideum var. flaviflorumDB. commelynoideum var. commelynoideum
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.