Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

6,704

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

6,704 results for “reports”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad28/100

Data from: Calculating maximum morphine equivalent daily dose from prescription directions for use in the electronic health record: a case report

Objective To demonstrate a process of calculating the maximum potential morphine milligram equivalent daily dose (MEDD) based on the prescription Sig for use in quality improvement initiatives. Methods To calculate an opioid prescription's maximum potential Sig-MEDD, we developed SQL code to determine a prescription's maximum units/day using discrete field data and text-parsing in the prescription instructions. We validated the derived units/day calculation using 3,000 Sigs, then compared the Sig-MEDD calculation against the Epic MEDD calculator. Results Of the 101,782 outpatient opioid prescriptions ordered over one year, 80% used discrete-field Sigs, 7% used free-text Sigs, and 3% used both types. We determined units/day and calculated a Sig-MEDD for 98.3% of all prescriptions, 99.99% of discrete-Sig prescriptions, and 81.5% of free-text-Sig prescriptions. Conclusion Analyzing opioid prescription Sigs to determine a maximum potential Sig-MEDD provides greater insight into a patient's risk for opioid exposure.

opencc-zeroAug 2019View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Do failures in non-technical skills contribute to fatal medical accidents in Japan? A review of the 2010–2013 national accident reports

Objectives: We sought to clarify how large a proportion of fatal medical accidents can be considered to be caused by poor Non-Technical Skills, and to support development of a policy to reduce numbers of such accidents by making recommendations about possible training requirements. Design: Summaries of reports of fatal medical accidents, published by the Japan Medical Safety Research Organization, were reviewed individually. Three experienced clinicians and one patient safety expert conducted the reviews to determine the cause of death. Views of the patient safety expert were given additional weight in the overall determination. Setting: A total of 73 summary reports of fatal medical accidents were reviewed. These reports had been submitted by healthcare organisations across Japan to the Japan Medical Safety Research Organization between April 2010 and March 2013. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The cause of death in fatal medical accidents, categorised into technical skills, non-technical skills, and inevitable progress of disease were evaluated. Non-technical skills were further sub-divided into situation awareness, decision-making, communication, team working, leadership, managing stress, and coping with fatigue. Results: Overall, the cause of death was identified as non-technical skills in 34 cases (46.6%), disease progression in 33 cases (45.2%), and technical skills in two cases (5.5%). In two cases, no consensual determination could be achieved. Further categorisation of cases of non-technical skills were identified 14 cases (41.2%) of problems with situation awareness, eight (23.5%) with team-working, and three (8.8%) with decision-making. These three sub-categories, or combinations of them, were identified as the cause of death in 33 cases (97.1%). Conclusions: Poor non-technical skills were considered to be a significant cause of adverse events in nearly half of the fatal medical accidents examined. Improving non-technical skills may be effective for reducing accidents, and training in particular sub-categories of non-technical skills may be especially relevant.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: A call for more transparent reporting of error rates: the quality of AFLP data in ecological and evolutionary research

Despite much discussion of the importance of quantifying and reporting genotyping error in molecular studies, it is still not standard practice in the literature. This is particularly a concern for amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) studies, where differences in laboratory, peak-calling and locus-selection protocols can generate data sets varying widely in genotyping error rate, the number of loci used and potentially estimates of genetic diversity or differentiation. In our experience, papers rarely provide adequate information on AFLP reproducibility, making meaningful comparisons among studies difficult. To quantify the extent of this problem, we reviewed the current molecular ecology literature (470 recent AFLP articles) to determine the proportion of studies that report an error rate and follow established guidelines for assessing error. Fifty-four per cent of recent articles do not report any assessment of data set reproducibility. Of those studies that do claim to have assessed reproducibility, the majority (~90%) either do not report a specific error rate or do not provide sufficient details to allow the reader to judge whether error was assessed correctly. Even of the papers that do report an error rate and provide details, many (≥23%) do not follow recommended standards for quantifying error. These issues also exist for other marker types such as microsatellites, and next-generation sequencing techniques, particularly those which use restriction enzymes for fragment generation. Therefore, we urge all researchers conducting genotyping studies to estimate and more transparently report genotyping error using existing guidelines and encourage journals to enforce stricter standards for the publication of genotyping studies.

opencc-zeroDec 2011View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and subsequent self-reported life satisfaction

Objective: To compare life satisfaction between women with successful or unsuccessful outcome after assisted reproductive treatment (ART) by taking into account the time since the last ART. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patients: A total of 987 consecutive women who had undergone ART during 1996–2007 were invited and altogether 505 women participated in the study. Interventions: A postal enquiry with a life satisfaction scale. Main Outcome Measure: Self-reported life satisfaction in respect to the time since the last ART. Results: In general, women who achieved a live birth after ART had a significantly higher life satisfaction than those who had unsuccessful ART, especially when compared in the first three years. The difference disappeared in the time period of 6–9 years after ART. The unsuccessfully treated women who had a child by some other means before or after the unsuccessful ART had comparable life satisfaction with successfully treated women even earlier. Conclusions: Even if unsuccessful ART outcome is associated with subsequent lower level of life satisfaction, it does not seem to threaten the long-term wellbeing.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →
dryad28/100

A vigiPoint characterisation of female versus male reports in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports

<p><strong>General information</strong></p> <p>This data is supplementary material to the paper by Watson <em>et al</em>. on sex differences in global reporting of adverse drug reactions [1]. Readers are referred to this paper for a detailed description of the context in which the data was generated. Anyone intending to use this data for any purpose should read the publicly available information on the VigiBase source data [2, 3]. The conditions specified in the caveat document [3] must be adhered to.</p> <p><b>Source dataset</b></p> <p>The dataset published here is based on analyses performed in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports [4]. All reports entered into VigiBase from its inception in 1967 up to 2 January 2018 with patient sex coded as either female or male have been included, except suspected duplicate reports [5]. In total, the source dataset contained 9,056,566 female and 6,012,804 male reports.</p> <p><strong>Statistical analysis</strong></p> <p>The characteristics of the female reports were compared to those of the male reports using a method called vigiPoint [6]. This is a method for comparing two or more sets of reports (here female and male reports) on a large set of reporting variables, and highlight any feature in which the sets are different in a statistically and clinically relevant manner. For example, patient age group is a reporting variable, and the different age groups 0 - 27 days, 28 days - 23 months et cetera are features within this variable. The statistical analysis is based on shrinkage log odds ratios computed as a comparison between the two sets of reports for each feature, including all reports without missing information for the variable under consideration. The specific output from vigiPoint is defined precisely below. Here, the results for 18 different variables with a total of 44,486 features are presented. 74 of these features were highlighted as so called vigiPoint key features, suggesting a statistically and clinically significant difference between female and male reports in VigiBase.</p> <p><strong>Description of published dataset</strong></p> <p>The dataset is provided in the form of a MS Excel spreadsheet (.xlsx file) with nine columns and 44,486 rows (excluding the header), each corresponding to a specific feature. Below follows a detailed description of the data included in the different columns.</p> <p><em>Variable</em>: This column indicates the reporting variable to which the specific feature belongs. Six of these variables are described in the original publication by Watson <em>et al</em>.: <em>country of origin</em>, <em>geographical region of origin</em>, <em>type of reporter</em>, <em>patient age group</em>, <em>MedDRA SOC</em>, <em>ATC level 2 of reported drugs</em>, <em>seriousness</em>, and <em>fatality </em>[1]. The remaining 12 are described here:</p> <ul> <li> <em>MedDRA HLGT</em> (high-level group term), <em>MedDRA HLT </em>(high-level term) and <em>MedDRA PT</em> (preferred term) are defined analogously to the <em>MedDRA SOC</em> (system organ class) [1], only at lower levels of the <a href="https://www.meddra.org/">MedDRA </a>(Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) hierarchy. Here, MedDRA version 20.1 has been used.</li> <li> <em>ATC level 3 of reported drugs</em> is defined analogously to the variable <em>ATC level 2 of reported drugs </em>[1], only one step further down in the <a href="https://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles">ATC</a> (Anatomical Therapeutical Classification) hierarchy.</li> <li>The vigiGrade <i>completeness score</i> is a measure of how complete each report is with respect to certain report fields useful for causality assessment [7]. The completeness score has been dichotomised into two features, 'Above or equal to 0.8' and 'Below 0.8'. The maximum possible score for an individual report is 1.0.</li> <li>The <em>date of VigiBase entry </em>is simply the time when a report was entered into VigiBase. This variable is divided into 14 features that are either individual years or ranges of years.</li> <li> The <em>number of reported drugs</em> is the number of unique drugs that are coded on a report as either suspected, interacting, or concomitant. A drug is here defined as an entry at the preferred base (i.e. substance) level of the WHODRUG terminology. The variable is divided into four features: 'One drug', 'Two drugs', '3-5 drugs', and 'More than 5 drugs'.</li> <li> The <em>number of reported MedDRA PTs</em> is the number of unique MedDRA preferred terms that are coded as events on a report. This variable is divided into four features in exactly the same way as the reported drugs.</li> <li> A <i>reported drug</i> is a drug coded on a report as either suspected, interacting, or concomitant. As above, a drug is defined as an entry at the preferred base (i.e. substance) level of the WHODRUG terminology. This variable has almost 23,000 features, one for each drug that occurs in at least one female or one male report.</li> <li> The <em>type of report</em> indicates the type of individual case report. The vast majority belongs to the feature 'Spontaneous', but there are four other possible features for this variable.</li> </ul> <p>The <em>Variable </em>column can be useful for filtering the data, for example if one is interested in one or a few specific variables.</p> <p><i>Feature: </i>This column contains each of the 44,486 included features. The vast majority should be self-explanatory, or else they have been explained above, or in the original paper [1].</p> <p><em>Female reports</em> and <em>Male reports</em>: These columns show the number of female and male reports, respectively, for which the specific feature is present.</p> <p><em>Proportion among female reports</em> and <em>Proportion among male reports</em>: These columns show the proportions within the female and male reports, respectively, for which the specific feature is present. Comparing these crude proportions is the simplest and most intuitive way to contrast the female and male reports, and a useful complement to the specific vigiPoint output.</p> <p><em>Odds ratio</em>: The odds ratio is a basic measure of association between the classification of reports into female and male reports and a given reporting feature, and hence can be used to compare female and male reports with respect to this feature. It is formally defined as <em>a / (bc / d)</em>, where</p> <ul> <li> <em>a</em> is the number of female reports with the feature</li> <li> <em>b</em> is the number of female reports without the feature (excluding reports where the variable is missing)</li> <li> <em>c</em> is the number of male reports with the feature</li> <li> <i>d</i> is the number of male reports without the feature (excluding reports where the variable is missing).</li> </ul> <p>This crude odds ratio can also be computed as <em>(p<sub>female</sub> / (1-p<sub>female</sub>)) / (p<sub>male</sub> / (1-p<sub>male</sub>))</em>, where <em>p<sub>female</sub></em> and <em>p<sub>male</sub></em> are the proportions described earlier. If the odds ratio is above 1, the feature is more common among the female than the male reports; if below 1, the feature is less common among the female than the male reports. Note that the odds ratio can be mathematically undefined, in which case it is missing in the published data.</p> <p><em>vigiPoint score</em>: This score is defined based on an odds ratio with added statistical shrinkage, defined as (<em>a + k) / ((bc / d) + k)</em>, where <em>k</em> is 1% of the total number of female reports, or about 9,000. While the shrinkage adds robustness to the measure of association, it makes interpretation more difficult, which is why the crude proportions and unshrunk odds ratios are also presented. Further, 99% credibility intervals are computed for the shrinkage odds ratios, and these intervals are transformed onto a log<sub>2</sub> scale [6]. The vigiPoint score is then defined as the lower endpoint of the interval, if that endpoint is above 0; as the higher endpoint of the interval, if that endpoint is below 0; and otherwise as 0. The vigiPoint score is useful for sorting the features from strongest positive to strongest negative associations, and/or to filter the features according to some user-defined criteria.</p> <p><em>vigiPoint key feature</em>: Features are classified as vigiPoint key features if their vigiPoint score is either above 0.5 or below -0.5. The specific thereshold of 0.5 is arbitrary, but chosen to identify features where the two sets of reports (here female and male reports) differ in a clinically significant way.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <ol> <li>Watson S, Caster O, Rochon PA, den Ruijter H. Reported adverse drug reactions in women and men: Aggregated evidence from globally collected individual case reports during half a decade. <em>EClinicalMedicine</em> 2019.</li> <li>Uppsala Monitoring Centre. <a href="https://www.who-umc.org/media/164772/guidelineusingvigibaseinstudies.pdf">Guideline for using VigiBase data in studies</a>.</li> <li>Uppsala Monitoring Centre. <a href="https://www.who-umc.org/media/164610/umc_caveat.pdf">Caveat document: Statement of reservations, limitations, and conditions relating to data released from VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs)</a>.</li> <li>Lindquist M. VigiBase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic Facts. <i>The Drug Information Journal</i> 2008; <b>42</b>(5): 409-19.</li> <li>Norén GN, Orre R, Bate A, Edwards IR. Duplicate detection in adverse drug reaction surveillance. <em>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</em> 2007; <strong>14</strong>(3): 305-28.</li> <li>Juhlin K, Star K, Norén GN. A method for data-driven exploration to pinpoint key features in medical data and facilitate expert review. <i>Pharmacoepidemiology and  Drug Safety</i> 2017; <b>26</b>(10): 1256-65.</li> <li>Bergvall T, Norén GN, Lindquist M. vigiGrade: A tool to identify well-documented individual case reports and highlight systematic data quality issues. <em>Drug Safety </em>2014; <strong>37</strong>(1): 65-77.</li> </ol>

opencc-zeroOct 2019View details →
dryad28/100

CLSM data of CLE40, CLV3, WUS, BAM1, and CLV1 reporter lines in Arabidopsis thaliana

<p>Stem cell homeostasis in plant shoot meristems requires tight coordiantion between stem cell proliferation and cell differentiation. In Arabidopsis, stem cells express the secreted dodecapeptide CLAVATA3 (CLV3), which signals through the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)–receptor kinase CLAVATA1 (CLV1) and related CLV1-family members to downregulate expression of the homeodomain transcription factor <i>WUSCHEL</i> (<i>WUS</i>). WUS protein moves from cells below the stem cell domain to the meristem tip and promotes stem cell identity, together with <i>CLV3</i> expression, generating a negative feedback loop. How stem cell activity in the meristem centre is coordinated with organ initiation and cell differentiation at the periphery is unknown. We show here that the <i>CLE40</i> gene, encoding a secreted peptide closely related to CLV3, is expressed in the SAM in differentiating cells in a pattern complementary to that of <i>CLV3</i>. <i>CLE40</i> promotes <i>WUS</i> expression via BAM1, a CLV1-family receptor, and <i>CLE40</i> expression is in turn repressed in a <i>WUS</i>-dependent manner. Together, <i>CLE40-BAM1-WUS</i> establish a second negative feedback loop. We propose that stem cell homeostasis is achieved through two intertwined pathways that adjust WUS activity and incorporate information on the size of the stem cell domain, via <i>CLV3-CLV1</i>, and on cell differentiation via <i>CLE40-BAM1</i>.</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURES 3–4. Tambitnotia peruviana n in A new species of Tambitnotia from Peru, with the first reported female of the genus (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae)

FIGURES 3–4. Tambitnotia peruviana n. sp., male, head close-ups (lateral and dorsal views).

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 1 in First report of Aethaloptera dispar Brauer 1875 (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) from Ile­Ife, southwestern Nigeria, West Africa

FIGURE 1. Map of Africa showing the location of Ile­Ife in southwestern Nigeria.

opennotspecifiedDec 2005View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 7 in First Asian report of the genus Chilibathynella Noodt, 1963 (Bathynellacea, Syncarida), with the description and biogeographic significance of a new species from Kotumsar Cave, India

FIGURE 7. Map to show the distribution of the three known species of Chilibathynella.

opennotspecifiedDec 2006View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 1 in First Asian report of the genus Chilibathynella Noodt, 1963 (Bathynellacea, Syncarida), with the description and biogeographic significance of a new species from Kotumsar Cave, India

FIGURE 1. Location map of the Kotumsar Cave (adapted from Pati &amp; Agrawal, 2002).

opennotspecifiedDec 2006View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 5 in A summary of reports of abyssal and hadal Monoplacophora and Polyplacophora (Mollusca) *

FIGURE 5. Depth range (m) of abyssal and hadal Polyplacophora.

opennotspecifiedDec 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 3 in A summary of reports of abyssal and hadal Monoplacophora and Polyplacophora (Mollusca) *

FIGURE 3. Depth range (m) of abyssal and hadal Monoplacophora.

opennotspecifiedDec 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE21. Brama brama MZUSP 80495 41.8 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE21. Brama brama MZUSP 80495 41.8 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 18 C & D in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 18 C &amp; D Taractichthys longipinnis, UF 168739, young, 50.0 mm SL, from Bahamas.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 13. Pteraclis aesticola MZUSP 61590, 59.7 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 13. Pteraclis aesticola MZUSP 61590, 59.7 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 16. Pterycombus brama MZUSP 61623, 84.2 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 16. Pterycombus brama MZUSP 61623, 84.2 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 20. Brama dussumieri MZUSP 61634, 94.3 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 20. Brama dussumieri MZUSP 61634, 94.3 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 15. Pterycombus petersii MZUSP 61586, 65.2 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 15. Pterycombus petersii MZUSP 61586, 65.2 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 3 The Tropical Pomfret becomes a in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 3 The Tropical Pomfret becomes a daily catch off Bahia, Northeast Brazil.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 17 Taractichthys longipinnis MZUSP 78303, 29.3 in First report of rare pomfrets (Teleostei: Bramidae) from Brazilian waters, with a key to Western Atlantic species

FIGURE 17 Taractichthys longipinnis MZUSP 78303, 29.3 mm SL.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.