Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15,277
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15,277 results for “GENETICS”
Fig. 11 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 11.—ICAMER (Iteration of Cuspal Area with Mirror Effect and Rotation) topology analysis of the m1 and M1 of: (A, E) Onychomys leucogaster (MVZ 76624); (B, F) O. torridus (CNMA 3345); (C, G) O. arenicola (CNMA 46447); (D) Acrolophomys rhodopetros (LACM 124878). See Barbière et al (2019) and Supplementary Data SD1 for ICAMER nomenclature and color coding. All scaled to the same size.
Fig. 8 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 8.—Majority-rule consensus tree obtained from Bayesian inference analysis of combined morphological and molecular data sets, in part. Details of the consensus tree corresponding to the ingroup taxa less the Neotomini tribe and outgroups. See Fig. 9 for part of the consensus tree corresponding to Neotominae and non-neotomine outgroup taxa. Posterior probabilities values are indicated in grayscale circles for each node. Terminals in bold indicate the Onychomyini and fossil species (†, extinct).
Fig. 6 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 6.—Phylogenetic consensus tree obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of the concatenated mitochondrial and nuclear independent loci. Bootstrap support is indicated in grayscale circles for each node. Terminal in bold indicates the Onychomyini species.
Fig. 7 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 7.—Phylogenetic consensus tree obtained from maximum parsimony (MP) analysis of the concatenated mitochondrial and nuclear independent loci. MP analysis yielded a single most parsimonious tree of 14,471 steps (consistency index [CI] = 0.399, retention index [RI] = 0.546). Bootstrap support is indicated in grayscale circles for each node. Terminal in bold indicates the Onychomyini species.
Fig. 3 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 3.—Examples of upper molars of species included in the morphological cladistic analysis, upper molars unknown for Acrolophomys. A— LM1–3, UCMP 317400, from Ronez et al. (2020). B—RM1–3, reversed, FMNH 230688, photo by C. Ronez. C—LM1–3, MVZ 105624, photo by A. Pacheco-Castro. D—LM1–3, MNCN-275, photo by P. Peláz-Campomanes. E—LM1–3, USNM 272116, photo by R. Martin. F—LM1–3, USNM 272176, photo by R. Martin. G—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 219614. H—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 225121. I—RM1–3, reversed, MVZ 219161. Photos G, H, and I by Jessica L. Blois, UC Merced. All occlusal views. Not to scale, all M1s adjusted to equal lengths.
Fig. 5 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 5.—Phylogenetic consensus tree obtained from Bayesian inference (BI) analysis of the concatenated mitochondrial and nuclear independent loci. Posterior probabilities support are indicated in grayscale circles for each node. Terminal in bold indicates the Onychomyini species.
Fig. 1 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 1.—First lower molars of Onychomys and Acrolophomys. Onychomys: A—Lm1, UALP 13963, 111 Ranch, Arizona, Blancan (from Tomida, 1985); B—Rm1, FHSM VP-19867, reversed, Hornet, Meade Basin, Kansas, Blancan, photo by P. Peláez-Campomanes; C—Lm1, USNM 525590; D—Lm1, USNM 017881; E—Lm1, USNM 272116; F–H—Rm1, FHSM VP-19868, reversed, Borchers, Meade Basin, Kansas, Blancan; I–K— Lm1, FHSM VP-19869, Borchers, Meade Basin, Kansas. Acrolophomys: L–N—Rm1, reversed, LACM 124878; O–Q—Lm1, LACM 124912; R–T—Rm1, reversed, LACM 156372, Dove Springs, California, latest Hemphillian–earliest Blancan, from Kelly and Whistler (2014). Occlusal views, A–F, I, L, O, and R. Labial views, G, J, M, P, and S. Lingual views, H, K, N, Q. All m1s adjusted to equal length.
Fig. 2 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 2.—Examples of lower molars of species included in the morphological cladistic analysis. A—Rm1–3, reversed, UCMP 317546, from Ronez et al. (2020). B—Rm1–3, reversed, MVZ 105624, photo by A. Pacheco-Castro. C—Rm1–3, reversed, MNCN-275, photo by P. PeláezCompomanes. D—Rm1–3, reversed, USNM 27211. E—Rm1–3, reversed, LACM 125052, from Kelly and Whistler (2014). F—Lm1–3, FMNH 230688, photo by C. Ronez. G—Lm1–3, UNSM 272173, photo by R. Martin. H—Rm1–3, reversed, MVZ 219614. I—Lm1–3, MVZ 225121. J—Lm1–3, MVZ 219161. Photos H, I, and J by Jessica L. Blois, UC Merced. All occlusal views. Not to scale, all m1s adjusted to equal length.
Fig. 4 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 4.—Single most parsimonious tree, 42 steps, consistency index (CI) = 0.857, retention index (RI) = 0.926. The cladogram is supported by the following list of hypothesized ancestral synapomorphies (number to left of period denotes character number and to right of period character state). Node 1, 6.1, 13.1, 17.1; Node 2, 5.2, 7.1, 11.2, 15.1, 18.1, 25.1; Node 3, 20.1, 21.1, 24.1; Node 4, 3.1, 16.1, 17.2, 23.2; Node 5, 5.1, 11.1; Node 6, 1.1, 16.2; Node 7, 12.2, 14.1; Node 8, 2.1, 4.1, 7.1, 8.1, 9.1, 10.1. Additional apomorphies for terminal taxa are: B. taylori, 5.2; R. montanus, 15.2; and O. leucogaster, 12.1, 14.1, 15.2.
Fig. 10 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 10.—Divergence times tree for Neotominae subfamily based on a concatenated analysis of the mitochondrial protein-coding gene cytochrome-b, and intron 2 and parts of exons 2 and 3 of acid phosphatase type V, intron 2 of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene, exon 6 of the protein-coding dentin matrix protein 1 gene, intron 7 of the beta-fibrinogen gene, exon 10 of the growth hormone receptor, single exon of the recombination activation 1 gene, and the first exon of the nuclear gene interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein. Divergence date estimates are indicated in millions of years. Bars indicate the minimum and maximum date at the 95% highest posterior density for node height (95% HPD).
Fig. 13 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 13.—Relative proportions of crown divisions in extant genera of tribes of Neotominae following the interpretation of Koenigswald (2020). Relative lengths of differentiated roots of some taxa not available due to breakage or buried in alveolus. Numbers correspond to the following genera: 1, Neotoma; 2, Ochrotomys; 3, Scotinomys; 4, Baiomys; 5, Isthmomys; 6, Reithrodontomys; 7, Onychomys; 8, Acrolophomys; 9, Habromys; 10, Megadontomys; 11, Neotomodon; 12, Osgoodomys; 13, Peromyscus; 14, Podomys.
Fig. 12 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 12.—Selected dental, mandibular, and cranial characters of Onychomys: (A) oblique occlusal view of m1 showing tubercular hypsodonty of procingulid and primary cusps that taper to sharp apices; (B) lateral view of sword or scimitar-like, elongated coronoid process of mandible that extends well posterior of incisor capsule; (C) lateral view of mandible showing dorsoventrally narrowed masseteric scar that terminates anteriorly under anterior root of m1 and dorsal of mental foramen; (D) ventral view of palate showing positions of posterior borders of incisive foramina relative anterior border of M1 and anterior border of posterior nares relative to posterior border of M3; (E) dorsal view of skull showing posteriorly tapered nasals with wedgeshaped termination, and anterior inflation of frontals (arrows). (A–C) O leucogaster, MACN 13433. (D–E) O. torridus, CNP 6482.
Fig. 9 in Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Fig. 9.—Majority-rule consensus tree obtained from Bayesian inference analysis of combined morphological and molecular data sets continued. Part of the consensus tree corresponding to Neotominae and non-neotomine outgroup taxa. Posterior probabilities values are indicated in grayscale circles for each node. Terminal in bold indicates fossil species (†, extinct).
The Positional Bias might not Influence Cartesian Genetic Programming with Crossover
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Genetic resistance of Musa spp. to phytoparasitic nematode species: a systematic review
<p><span>This article is a systematic review of studies carried out over the last thirteen years on the </span><span>existing banana breeding methods to aid the management and control of nematodes in banana and plantain crops.</span></p>
Genetic resistance of Musa spp. to phytoparasitic nematode species: a systematic review
<p><span>This article is a systematic review of studies carried out over the last thirteen years on the </span><span>existing banana breeding methods to aid the management and control of nematodes in banana and plantain crops.</span></p>
Data and R scripts supporting the article: "Evolution of genetic (co)variances during the worldwide invasion of Drosophila suzukii"
<p>This repository contains raw data, processed data (.RData files) and R scripts necessary to replicate the analyses, figures and tables from the manuscript "Evolution of genetic (co)variances during the worldwide invasion of Drosophila suzukii" (Fraimout, A., Chantepie, S., Navarro, N., Teplitsky, C. & Debat, V.).</p> <p>Each R script contains detailed information about the location of each analysis in the manuscript (i.e., line numbering and paragraph title as in Fraimout et al. 2024: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.02.573869v1)</p>
On the utility of Cas13d for genetic interaction mapping
<p>Scripts to calculate tau values and genetic interaction (GI) scores in knockdown experiments using Cas13d. </p>
Fig. 8 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data
Fig. 8. Myosotis antarctica subsp. traillii photographs and distribution map. (a) Habit. (b, d) Rosette leaf tips: (b) adaxial and (d) abaxial sides. (c) Flower. (e) Nutlets. (f) Map of georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (35). Whie scale bars: 2 mm; black scale bars: 1 mm. Photo credits: a, e by J. M. Prebble (a: WELT SP100487, Tiwai Point, Southland, South Island; e: WELT SP104518, cultivated ex Mason Bay, Stewart Island). b, c © Te Papa by H. M. Meudt (b: WELT SP090544, Manihi Rd, Taranaki, North Island; c: WELT SP090629, Hukanui, Gisborne, North Island; d: WELT SP090631, Waipuna, Gisborne, North Island).
Fig. 2 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data
Fig. 2. Maps of MaxEnt niche models for pygmy Myosotis in New Zealand and southern South America. (a) Myosotis glauca (light blue circles). (b) M. pygmaea (green circles). (c, h) M. "Volcanic Plateau" (grey triangles). (d) M. brevis (yellow cir-cles). (e) M. drucei (dark blue circles; excluding individuals identified as M. "Volcanic Plateau"). (f) M. drucei (dark blue circles) + M. pygmaea (green circles) + M. "Volcanic Plateau" (grey triangles) (g) M. antarctica (pink circles; Chilean locations), note scale is the same as for maps of New Zealand. a–f use models based on the nine-layer model (see Table 1), whereas g and h are based on the sevenlayer model.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.