Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 5. Myosotis glauca photographs and distribution map. (a) Habit. (b) Rosette leaves, adaxial and abaxial sides. (c) Calyces, left to right most to least mature. (d) Nutlets. (e) Map of georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (16). White scale bars: 2 mm; black scale bar: 1 mm. Photo credits: all by J. M. Prebble (WELT SP093285, Nevis Valley, Otago).

Fig. 4 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 4. Myosotis brevis photographs and distribution map. (a) Habit. (b) Inflorescence showing cauline leaf abaxial side. (c) Inflorescence showing cauline leaf adaxial side, calyces, and flower. (d) Rosette leaf adaxial side showing colour morphs. (e) Flower. (f) Nutlet. (g) Map of georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (25). White scale bars: 2 mm; black scale bar: 1 mm. Photo credits: a–e © Te Papa by H. M. Meudt (a: WELT SP090549, Te Ikaamaru Bay, Wellington; b, c: WELT SP090545, Ngawi, Wairarapa; d: WELT SP090543, Stent Road, Taranaki; e: WELT SP090550, Ohau Bay, Wellington); f by J. M. Prebble (WELT SP090543, cultivated ex Stent Road, Taranaki).

Fig. 7. Myosotis antarctica subsp. antarctica. Illustration reproduced from Bot. Antarct. Voy. I in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 7. Myosotis antarctica subsp. antarctica. Illustration reproduced from Bot. Antarct. Voy. I. (Fl. Antarct.) Part I, plate 38 (Hooker 1844). Illustration by W. H. Fitch. This image is in the public domain, downloaded from the Biodiversity Heritage Library (https:// www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13448452#page/81/ mode/1up, accessed 8 June 2021). Draft pencil drawings for this figure are attached to the type specimen of M. antarctica (K0007878799; visible online at http:// apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode= K000787899, accessed 8 June 2021), which was collected by J. D. Hooker from Campbell Island.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 6. Myosotis antarctica subsp. antarctica photographs and distribution maps. (a, b) Habit. (c) Rosette leaves abaxial and adaxial sides. (d) Flower. (e) Nutlets. (f) Map of mainland New Zealand distribution based on georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (163). (g) Map of Campbell Island distribution based on georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (14). (h) Map of Chilean distribution based on georeferenced herbarium specimens observed by J. M. Prebble (2). White scale bars: 2 mm; black scale bars: 1 mm. Photo credits: a, c, e by J. M. Prebble (a: WELT SP102777, Mt Azimuth, Campbell Island; c: WELT SP093293, Port Hills, Canterbury, South Island E: WELT SP100466, cultivated ex Mt Peel, Western Nelson. South Island). b, d © Te Papa by H. M. Meudt (b: WELT SP106592, Matiri Range, Western Nelson, South Island; d: WELT SP107322, Mt Starveall, Western Nelson, South Island).

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 3. Plots displaying (a, c) omission and commission values and (b, d) area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) for two pygmy forget-me-not taxa: (a, b) M. "Volcanic Plateau" and (c, d) M. drucei, modelled using MaxEnt and all nine environmental layers for the New Zealand extent.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2024View details →

Stoneflies of Medvednica Nature Park: genetic diversity and morphological variability

Stoneflies of Medvednica Nature Park: genetic diversity and morphological variability Version 2: corrected the sequence lengths

Fig. 1. Maps displaying all 290 in Taxonomic revision of the southern hemisphere pygmy forget-me-not group (Myosotis; Boraginaceae) based on morphological, population genetic and climate-edaphic niche modelling data

Fig. 1. Maps displaying all 290 occurrence points used for Myosotis pygmy species group niche modelling (Supplementary Table S1). Maps, clockwise from top: World, New Zealand, Campbell Island, and southern South America. Colour represents a priori species: M. antarctica (pink circles); M. drucei (dark blue circles); M. pygmaea (green circles); M. brevis (yellow circles); M. glauca (light blue circles); M. "Volcanic Plateau" (grey triangles).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Soil requirements, genetic diversity and population history of the Juniperus sabina L. varieties in Europe and Asia

Dataset comprises genotypes of 335 individuals of J. sabina.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Supplementary Movie 1 from: A genetically encoded biosensor to monitor dynamic changes of c-di-GMP with high temporal resolution

This record contains Supplementary Movie 1 from: A genetically encoded biosensor to monitor dynamic changes of c-di-GMP with high temporal resolution Andreas Kaczmarczyk, Simon van Vliet, Roman Peter Jakob, Raphael Dias Teixeira, Inga Scheidat, Alberto Reinders, Alexander Klotz, Timm Maier, Urs Jenal Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland Correspondence to: urs.jenal[at]unibas.ch, andreas.kaczmarczyk[at]unibas.ch

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Sequence capture data support the taxonomy of Pogonolepis (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and show unexpected genetic structure

Fig. 3. Likelihood phylogeny of concatenated supermatrix of Pogonolepis and outgroups. Numbers above branches indicate UltraFast Bootstrap values, gene Concordance Factors, and site Concordance Factors. The dashed branch was shortened for the figure. Western Australian specimens of P. muelleriana are marked with (WA), all others are from eastern states. A and B indicate informally named clades inside P. stricta.

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Sequence capture data support the taxonomy of Pogonolepis (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and show unexpected genetic structure

Fig. 2. Geographic spread of the specimens of Pogonolepis at CANB sampled for molecular analysis (large, pale circles) and ranges of species according to the Australasian Virtual Herbarium (dots; see https://doi.org/10.26197/ala.6556e234- 7160-49de-bf63-5123af624e94, accessed 31 May 2022). Red: P. muelleriana; blue: P. stricta. Note that specimens of P. muel-leriana geocoded in Canberra and Hobart were likely cultivated.

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Sequence capture data support the taxonomy of Pogonolepis (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and show unexpected genetic structure

Fig. 1. (a) Pogonolepis muelleriana, New South Wales, SchmidtLebuhn 1633 (CANB); (b) Pogonolepis stricta, Western Australia, Schmidt-Lebuhn 1474 (CANB).

FIGURE 7 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 7. Longitudinal patterns of morphological variation in the L. microtis group. The x-axis represents a west–east geographical space across coastal southern Australia, and the y-axis describes important dimensions of morpho-spatial variation: (A) PC1 scores, derived from six mensural characters; (B) nMDS1 scores, and (C) nMDS2 scores, derived from five non-mensural characters. The line of best fit and 95% confidence interval are denoted by the black line and grey shaded zone, respectively. These graphs illustrate a mostly continuous and clinal structuring of phenotypic characters in the Lerista microtis group.

FIGURE 6 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 6. Biplot of non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) performed on five qualitative characters (DP, ULSB, ULSW, MLSW, NSS) and one meristic (MSR; i.e., an integer count) character. These characters are among key traits Storr (1991a) used to diagnose these purported taxa. Specimens (coloured points) that are ordinated closer to one another are phenotypically more similar than those further apart. This graph lends support to the phenotypic distinctiveness of Lerista arenicola from L. microtis.

FIGURE 5 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 5. Biplot of the PCA performed on six mensural characters (SVL, HL, HW, AGD, Forelimb and Hindlimb). Axes show the first two principal components (i.e., PC1 and PC2) and their percentage of explained variation. Large, coloured ovals denote the 90% concentration ellipses for each taxonomic group proposed by Storr (1991a). Small points denote PC scores of individuals, whereas large points denote group centroids. Variables are denoted by arrows, the direction and length of which indicates their degree of contribution to each axis. Each variable is coloured according to its percentage contribution to its associated PC.

FIGURE 1 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 1. Distribution of currently recognized Lerista microtis subspecies and Lerista arenicola. Taxon assignment reflects that of the original museum records and the purported distribution as described in the literature (e.g., Storr 1991a; Wilson & Swan 2021). Note that all confirmed records of L. m. schwaneri are confined to islands near the SA mainland. Photographs of live specimens as follows: L. m. microtis (green)—Anders Zimny; L. m. intermedia (blue)—Jordan Vos; Lerista arenicola (red)— Brad Maryan; L. m. schwaneri (yellow)—Trevor Peters. Record colours are made slightly transparent to show overlapping records better, with more saturated colours indicating greater density of records.

FIGURE 3 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 3. Geographical distribution of the characters states proposed by Storr (1991a) to diagnose Lerista microtis subspecies and L. arenicola. There is geographic predictability for some phenotypes (e.g., width of mid-lateral and upper lateral stripe), but less so for others (e.g., dorsal patterning). Arrows denote specimens from inlands. White points in the SVL map are juvenile specimens, which were removed from morphological analyses.

FIGURE 2 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 2. Examples of variation in colour pattern characters in the Lerista microtis group: upper row—dorsal view; lower row—lateral view. Storr (1991a) proposed that the black upper lateral stripe of L. arenicola (left) is narrow with indistinct edges, whereas that of microtis (right) is wide and boldly edged, thereby distinguishing it from L. arenicola.

FIGURE 9 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 9. Select Lerista microtis specimens showing variability in size and colour pattern. (A) Specimen WAM_R113419 from Margaret River area (south-west WA) with dark grey-brown dorsal colour, orange tail and no dorsal pattering (formerly L. m. microtis); (B) specimen WAM_R129702 from Quagi Beach (south-west WA) with continuous paravertebral stripes and olive brown dorsal colour (formerly L. m. intermedia); (C) pale specimen WAM_R137656 from the Nullarbor coast in SA (formerly L. arenicola); (D) specimen SAMA_R45924 from Wedge Island (SA) showing continuous paravertebral stripes and vertebral stripe (formerly L. m. schwaneri); (E) the holotype of Lerista microtis.

FIGURE 4 in Morphological and genetic data challenge species and subspecies in the Lerista microtis group (Squamata: Scincidae)

FIGURE 4. Comparative violin plots with embedded boxplots of size corrected mensural characters (top six graphs) for each taxon (Lerista arenicola and all Lerista microtis subspecies) showing the mean (white dot), range, frequency, and inter-quartile range (black rectangle). The bottom three graphs are comparative boxplots of meristic characters showing the mean (white dot), range, and inter-quartile range (coloured rectangle). Coloured dots correspond to y-axis values.