Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,920
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,920 results for “implications”
Figure 9 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 9. Antarctoscyphus fragilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b, c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca (lateral view). Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b–d).
Figure 12 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 12. Antarctoscyphus mawsoni (Briggs, 1938): (a) axillary hydrotheca and paired branches showing hydrothecal disposition; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c, d) hydrothecae; (e) detail of hydrothecal aperture. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, c), 200 µm (d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 8 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 8. Antarctoscyphus encarnae Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997: (a) fragment of lateral branch showing hydrothecal arrangement; (b) shape and arrangement of hydrothecae; (c) hydrotheca; (d) gonotheca; (e) detail of gonothecal aperture. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 250 µm (b–d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 4 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 4. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905): (a) paired branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) fragment of distal part of a branch showing shape and arrangement of hydrothecae; (d, e) hydrothecae; (f) detail of hydrothecal distal part, showing cusps. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 500 µm (c), 250 µm (b, d), 50 µm (f).
Figure 3 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 3. Antarctoscyphus asymmetricus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997: (a) fragment of a lateral branch showing hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and origin of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching (note hydrotheca outside axil of branches); (d, e) hydrothecae (note extreme development of one abcauline cusp); (f, g) gonothecae; (h) detail of gonothecal aperture. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, f), 200 µm (g), 150 µm (d, e), 50 µm (h).
Figure 7 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 7. Antarctoscyphus elongatus (Jäderholm, 1904): (a) fragment of a lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) hydrocladial branching (note hydrotheca outside axil of branches); (c) hydrothecae (lateral view); (d) hydrotheca (frontal view); (e) fragment of lateral branch showing branching, hydrothecae and a gonotheca; (f) gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, c, e, f), 200 µm (d).
Figure 14 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 14. Bathymetric range of the species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997.
Figure 2 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 2. Antarctoscyphus admirabilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (a) two paired branches, showing branch ramification and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis with axillary hydrotheca and basal part of two paired branches; (c, d) hydrothecae; (e) detail of hydrothecal distal part, showing cusps and opercular flaps. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 250 µm (b, c), 150 µm (d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 13 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 13. Antarctoscyphus spiralis (Hickson and Gravely, 1907): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca in lateral view; (e detail of distal part of hydrotheca showing cusps (note two internal cusps); (f) gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 200 µm (b, c, f), 100 µm (d), 25 µm (e).
Figure 11 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 11. Antarctoscyphus gruzovi (Stepanjants, 1979): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c, d) hydrocladial branching; (e) hydrotheca; (f) detail of distal part of hydrotheca showing opercular flaps. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 350 µm (c), 200 µm (b, d), 150 µm (e), 50 µm (f).
Figure 10 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 10. Antarctoscyphus grandis (Blanco, 1977): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca; (e) fragment of branch showing hydrothecae and gonothecae; (f) detail of distal part of gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a, b), 500 µm (e), 250 µm (c), 200 µm (d), 50 µm (f).
Figure 6 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 6. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905) (Holotype): (a), cauline hydrothecae showing alternate arrangement; (b) cauline hydrotheca with paired hydrothecae; (c) hydrotheca (frontal view). Scale bars: 250 µm.
Figure 5 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 5. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905): (a–c) hydrothecal shape and arrangement; (d) distal part of hydrotheca showing abcauline internal cusp (arrow). Antarctoscyphus fragilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (e, f) hydrothecae. Scale bar: 200 µm (a–c, e, f), 100 µm (d).
Figure 2 in Heterospecific mating between distantly related species of stink bugs and its evolutionary implications
Figure 2. Geographic distribution, external genital morphology and phylogenetic positions (modified from Genevcius and Schwertner 2014) of Chinavia erythrocnemis (Berg) and C. obstinata (Stål). Distribution ranges were constructed using the minimum convex polygon method, and the biomes in which species occur are delimited in grey. The yellow star indicates the locality in which the natural heterospecific copula was recorded and all other individuals were collected. Scale bars in genitalia are 0.5 mm.
Figure 1 in Heterospecific mating between distantly related species of stink bugs and its evolutionary implications
Figure 1. (a) an aggregation of Chinavia spp. on Mikania micrantha Kunth; (b) wild couple during heterospecific copula [left: Chinavia obstinata (Stål) male; right: Chinavia erythrocnemis (Berg) female]; (c) heterospecific couple copulating in laboratory conditions [left: C. erythrocnemis female; right: C. obstinata male]; (d) nymphs of C. erythrocnemis from the wild couple.
UK dogs data from: Genome-wide association studies for canine hip dysplasia in single and multiple populations – implications and potential novel risk loci
<p>Background: <span>Association mapping studies of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for canine hip dysplasia (CHD) </span><span>can contribute to the understanding of the genetic background of this common and debilitating disease and might contribute to its genetic improvement. The power of association studies for CHD is limited by relatively small sample numbers for CHD records within countries, suggesting potential benefits of joining data across countries. However, this is complicated due to the use of different scoring systems across countries. In this study, we incorporated routinely assessed CHD records and genotype data of German Shepherd dogs from </span><span><span>two</span></span><span> countries </span><span><span>(UK and Sweden)</span></span><span> to perform </span><span>genome-wide association stud</span><span>ies (GWAS) within populations using different variations of CHD phenotypes. As phenotypes, dogs were either classified into cases and controls based on the </span><i><span>Fédération Cynologique Internationale</span></i><span> (FCI) five-level grading of the worst hip or the FCI grade was treated as an ordinal trait. </span><span><span>In a subsequent meta-analysis, we added publicly available data from a Finnish population and performed the GWAS across all populations.</span></span><span> Genetic associations for the CHD phenotypes were evaluated in a linear mixed model using 62,089 SNPs.</span></p> <p>Results: <span><span>Multiple SNPs with genome-wide significant and suggestive</span></span><span><span> associations</span></span><span> </span><span><span>were detected in single-population GWAS and the meta-analysis.</span></span><span> Few of these SNPs overlapped between populations </span><span><span>or between single-population GWAS and the meta-analysis</span></span><span>, suggesting that many CHD-related QTL are population-specific. More significant or suggestive SNPs were identified when FCI grades were used as phenotypes in comparison to the case-control approach. </span><i><span>MED13</span></i><span> (Chr 9) and </span><i><span>PLEKHA7</span></i><span> (Chr 21) emerged as novel positional candidate genes associated with hip dysplasia.</span></p> <p>Conclusions: <span>Our findings confirm the complex genetic nature of hip dysplasia in dogs, with multiple loci associated with the trait, </span><span><span>most</span></span><span> of which are population-specific. Routinely assessed CHD information collected across countries provide an opportunity to increase sample sizes and statistical power for association studies. While the lack of standardisation of CHD assessment schemes across countries poses a challenge, we showed that conversion of traits can be utilised to overcome this obstacle.</span></p>
Figure 9 in The evolutionary and biomechanical implications of snout and proboscis morphology in Caenogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda)
Figure 9. Transverse histological sections through the proboscis of three caenogastropod taxa. (A) Cabestana spengleri (Ranellidae) everted proboscis and branching ventral odontophoral retractor muscles; (B) C. spengleri proboscis base, ventrolateral and dorsolateral retractor muscles; (C) C. spengleri proboscis wall; (D) Semicassis pyrum (Cassidae) everted proboscis and ventral odontophoral retractor muscles; (E) S. pyrum proboscis wall; (F) Ficus subintermedia (Ficidae) introverted proboscis; (G) F. subintermedia proboscis wall. Scale bars: (A, B, D, F) 1 mm; (C, E, G) 200 µm; for abbreviations see Appendix 2.
Figure 8 in The evolutionary and biomechanical implications of snout and proboscis morphology in Caenogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda)
Figure 8. Transverse histological sections through the proboscis of two epitoniid taxa. (A) Janthina janthina (Epitoniidae) proboscis and aortic muscles; (B) J. janthina proboscis wall; (C) Opalia ballinensis (Epitoniidae) introverted proboscis and accessory proboscis retractor muscles (D) O. ballinensis aortic muscles; (E) O. ballinensis proboscis wall. Scale bars: (A, C) 1 mm; (B, E) 100 µm; (D) 500 µm; for abbreviations see Appendix 2.
Figure 7 in The evolutionary and biomechanical implications of snout and proboscis morphology in Caenogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda)
Figure 7. Transverse histological sections through the proboscis of three "ptenoglossan" taxa. (A) Mesophora fusca (Triphoridae) introverted proboscis and ventral odontophoral retractor muscles; (B) M. fusca proboscis wall; (C) Ataxocerithium sp. (Cerithiopsidae) introverted proboscis and aortic muscles; (D) Ataxocerithium sp. proboscis wall (E) Apicalia cf. brazieri (Eulimidae) partially everted proboscis; (F) Apicalia cf. brazieri introverted proboscis and aortic muscles (G) Apicalia cf. brazieri proboscis wall. Scale bars: (A, C, E, F) 200 µm; (B, D, G) 50 µm; for abbreviations see Appendix 2.
Figure 12 in The evolutionary and biomechanical implications of snout and proboscis morphology in Caenogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda)
Figure 12. Snout and proboscis evolution in Caenogastropoda, illustrated on a phylogeny of Caenogastropoda based on the strict consensus tree generated by Ponder et al. (2008) (Figure 13.16) using maximum parsimony analysis of a morphological dataset. Taxa originally included in their analysis which were not examined in this study have been pruned; Columbellidae, Vanikoridae and Turbinellidae were not included by Ponder et al. (2008) and are not
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.