Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 2 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 2. – Dories belonging to the association called "Les Zigotos" (http://www.spm-tourisme.fr/nos-iles-dexception/bienvenue-cheznous/les-zigotos/) in the foreground of the picture and the large blue fish plants Interpêche and Interfreeze, with a fishing vessel, in the background.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 8 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 8. – Evolution of the exports (in black) and imports (in grey) for Saint-Pierre and Miquelon since 2002. Data are from IEDOM reports (https://www.iedom.fr/saint-pierre-et-miquelon/).

Fig. 9 in Pleistocene South American native ungulates (Notoungulata and Litopterna) of the historical Roth collections in Switzerland, from the Pampean Region of Argentina

Fig. 9 Cervical (C2–7) and thoracic (T1–5) vertebrae of Macrauchenia patachonica (PIMUZ A/V 5700). A1–3 Second cervical vertebra (C2) in anterior (A1), left lateral (A2), and ventral (A3) views. B1–3 Third cervical vertebra (C3) in anterior (B1), left lateral (B2; mirrored), and ventral (B3) views. C1–3 Fourth cervical vertebra (C4) in anterior (C1), left lateral (C2), and ventral (C3) views. D1–3 Fifth cervical vertebra (C5) in anterior (D1), left lateral (D2), and ventral (D3) views. E1–3 Sixth cervical vertebra (C6) in anterior (E1), left lateral (E2; mirrored), and ventral (E3) views. F1–3 Seventh cervical vertebra (C7) in anterior (F1), left lateral (F2), and ventral (F3) views. G1–3 First thoracic vertebra (T1) in anterior (G1), left lateral (G2; mirrored), and ventral (G3) views. H1–3 Second thoracic vertebra (T2) in anterior (H1), left lateral (H2), and ventral (H3) views. I1–3. Third thoracic vertebra (T3) in anterior (I1), left lateral (I2), and ventral (I3) views. J1–3. Fourth thoracic vertebra (T4) in anterior (J1), left lateral (J2), and ventral (J3) views. K1–3 Fifth thoracic vertebra (T5) in anterior (K1), left lateral (K2; mirrored), and ventral (K3) views. ant fov anterior costal fovea, dor dorsal, fov tran costal fovea of transverse process, nu can nutrient canal, odon proc odontoid process, postzyg postzygapophysis, pos fov posterior costal fovea, prezyg prezygapophysis, spin proc spinous process, tr for transverse foramen, tr proc transverse process, tub small posterior transverse process tubercle, vent ventral

Fig. 8 in Pleistocene South American native ungulates (Notoungulata and Litopterna) of the historical Roth collections in Switzerland, from the Pampean Region of Argentina

Fig. 8 Upper dentition of Macraucheniidae. A Illustration of a Cramauchenia normalis upper molar (M1) indicating the cusps and cristae. B Illustration of a Theosodon lydekkeri upper molar (M1) indicating the cusps and cristae. C Illustration of a Macrauchenia patachonica upper molar (M1) indicating the cusps and cristae. D–F Relatively unworn left upper molar (M2) of Ma. patachonica (PIMUZ A/V 4119) in occlusal (D), lingual (E), and mesial (F) views. G–I. Worn right upper molar (M2; here mirrored) of Ma. patachonica (PIMUZ A/V 4118) in occlusal (G), lingual (H), and mesial (I) views. J–L. Unworn right deciduous premolar (dP4; here mirrored) of Ma. patachonica (MHNG GEPI V3659) in occlusal (J), buccal (K), and lingual (L) views. M Left maxilla fragment with P4, M1–2 of Ma. patachonica (MHNG GEPI V3659). The illustration of C. normalis' M1 in A of was based on the specimens MLP 83-III-2–1 and MLP 85-V-VII-3-38a. The illustration of T. lydekkeri' s M1 in B was based on the specimens MACN-A 9269–88 and YPM VPPU 015717.The illustration of Ma. patachonica's M1 in C was based on the specimen MACN-PV 11361, among other specimens. In A–C, the labels of controversial structures are in bold and relevant cusps are highlighted in different colours: blue for paraconule, red for protocone, green for metaconule, yellow for hypocone, and dark yellow for hypocone–metaconule. Notice that even though the dP4 (J–L) and the maxilla fragment with P4, M1–2 (M) share the same specimen number (MHNG GEPI V3659), these are from different individuals considering their different and incompatible ontogenetic stage (see the extreme wear in the permanent P4 in M). dif distolingual fossette, ecg ectocingulum, ets entostyle, hy hypocone, hy-mtl hypocone–metaconule, lmef lingual median fossete, maf mesiolabial fossette, me metacone, mef median fossette, mif mesiolingual fossette, ms mesostyle, mt metastyle, mtl metaconule, pa paracone, pcg precingulum, pplc preparaconule crista, pprc preprotocrista, pr protocone, prl paraconule, ps parastyle, pscg postcingulum, psmlc postmetaconule crista, psplc postparaconule crista, psprc postprotocrista, tb trigon basin

Fig. 10 in Pleistocene South American native ungulates (Notoungulata and Litopterna) of the historical Roth collections in Switzerland, from the Pampean Region of Argentina

Fig. 10 Right forelimb of Macrauchenia patachonica (PIMUZ A/V 5700). A–C Scapula in lateral (A), medial (B), and distal (C) views. D–H Humerus in proximal (D), anterior (E), posterior (F), medial (G), and lateral (H) views. I–J Ulna-radius in anterior (I) and posterior (J) views. K Manus (carpals, metacarpals and phalanges) in anterior view. In E the olecranon fossa was restored, so it in PIMUZ is not as deep as it should be. In K the carpals and metacarpals were glued together with the different elements in the right position, but in many cases with a wrong orientation (e.g., pisiform and Mc IV). In addition, the ungual phalanx of the third digit is fragmentary, preserving only its distomedial portion. ae aliform expansion of the radius, bg bicipital groove; ca, capitulum, ce capitular eminence, ch crest of the humerus, ctm crista tuberculi minoris, cu cuneiform, dpc deltopectoral crest, dt deltoid tuberosity, gl glenoid cavity; gt, greater tubercle, h head of the humerus, hp hamatus process, ht humeral trochlea, if fossa infraspinata, it intermediate tubercle, le lateral epicondyle, lt lesser tubercle; lu lunate, ma magnum, mcp medial coronoid process (processus coronoideus medialis), me medial epicondyle, of olecranon fossa, ol olecranon (tuber olecrani), pa anconeal process (processus anconeus), pi pisiform, ra radius, rf radial fossa; rt, radial or bicipital tuberosity (tuberositas radii), sc scaphoid, scn scapular notch, sf fossa supraspinata, shp suprahamatus process, sp styloid process (processus styloideus), sr supracondylar ridge, st supraglenoid tubercle, tr trapezium, trd trapezoid, trl tricipital line, tsp tuber of the scapular spine, ttm tuberosity of the teres major, ul ulna, un unciform

Fig. 2 in Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Fig. 2 - Documents in the primary and secondary datasets and the cumulative number of documents issued between 1810 and 2022. / Documenti nei dataset primario e secondario e numero cumulativo di documenti prodotti tra il 1810 e il 2022.

Fig. 5 in Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Fig. 5 - Distribution of the primary dataset, secondary dataset, and total documents according to research areas and used methods. / Distribuzione del dataset primario, del dataset secondario e del totale dei documenti in base alle aree di ricerca e ai metodi utilizzati.

Fig. 1 in Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Fig. 1 - Flow diagram showing the selection steps of eligible documents obtained from primary and secondary datasets. / Diagramma di flusso che mostra le fasi di selezione dei documenti eligibili ottenuti dai dataset primario e secondario.

Fig. 4 in Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Fig. 4 - (A) Bar plot showing the distribution of studies across different habitats (caves, forest, urban area, riparian areas). (B) Species conservation status across Sicilian bat families classified according to the IUCN categories: Least Concern (LC), Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), and Data Deficient (DD). / (A) Grafico a barre che mostra la distribuzione degli studi nei diversi habitat (grotte, foreste, aree urbane, aree ripariali). (B) Stato di conservazione delle specie delle famiglie di pipistrelli siciliani classificate secondo le categorie IUCN: Minima preoccupazione (LC), Vulnerabile (VU), Quasi minacciata (NT) e Carenza di dati (DD).

Fig. 3 in Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Fig. 3 - Variation of Bat Research Efficiency scores (BRE) in the nine Sicilian provinces. The colour gradient (darker to lighter) indicates a higher to lower BRE. / Variazione dei punteggi di efficienza della ricerca sui pipistrelli (BRE) nelle nove province siciliane. Il gradiente di colore (da più scuro a più chiaro) indica un BRE da più alto a più basso.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 1. Historical illustrations and photographs from published literature. A in Fig. 23. Saiva formosana Kato, 1929, male genitalia. A in Lanternflies (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) of Taiwan.

Fig. 1. Historical illustrations and photographs from published literature. A: ñ Xerosoma canaliculatum Serville, 1831 holotype illustrated by Serville (1838). B: Xerosoma canaliculatum ò and X. senticosum Stål, 1875 (= X. canaliculatum) ñ syntype illustrated by Redtenbacher (1906). C: egg of Dinelytron neptunus Kaup, 1871 (= X. canaliculatum) illustrated by Kaup (1871), which does not correspond to eggs of Xerosoma. D: ñ Dinelytron neptunus (= X. canaliculatum) holotype photographed by Oliver Zompro, available in Phasmida Species File Online (Brock et al. 2022, CCBY 4.0). Image not to scale.

Fig. 16. Xeruca formosensis, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 16. Xeruca formosensis, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 15. Tubuca paradussumieri, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 15. Tubuca paradussumieri, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 13. Tubuca coarctata, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 13. Tubuca coarctata, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 12. Tubuca arcuata, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 12. Tubuca arcuata, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 11. Tubuca acuta, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 11. Tubuca acuta, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 9. Paraleptuca crassipes, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 9. Paraleptuca crassipes, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 8. Gelasimus vocans, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 8. Gelasimus vocans, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 10. Paraleptuca splendida, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 10. Paraleptuca splendida, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 7. Gelasimus tetragonon, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 7. Gelasimus tetragonon, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.