Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,144
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,144 results for “ITS barcode”
Fig. 7 in Two New Sandperches (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae: Parapercis) From South China Sea, Based On Morphology And Dna Barcoding
Fig. 7. Neighbour-joining tree of P. rubromaculata and P. randalli inferred from COI gene sequences with 10000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values> 50% are indicated.
Fig. 2 in Two New Sandperches (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae: Parapercis) From South China Sea, Based On Morphology And Dna Barcoding
Fig. 2. Dorsal-lateral view (above) and ventral view (below) of head showing the cephalic pore system of Parapercis kentingensis n. sp., from the holotype.
Fig. 6. Parapercis rubromaculata n in Two New Sandperches (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae: Parapercis) From South China Sea, Based On Morphology And Dna Barcoding
Fig. 6. Parapercis rubromaculata n. sp. A, dorsal view of head of holotype, fresh; B, left side of caudal fin, QM I.33860, paratype, fresh; C, dorsolateral (above) and ventral (below) views of the head showing the cephalic pore system, from the holotype.
Fig. 4 in Two New Sandperches (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae: Parapercis) From South China Sea, Based On Morphology And Dna Barcoding
Fig. 4. Neighbour-joining tree of P. kentingensis and P. shaoi inferred from COI gene sequences with 10000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values> 50% are indicated.
Figures 18–19 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding
Figures 18–19. Colonies of aphids on their respective perennial host plants. 18) Aphis elena sp. nov. on Pycnanthemum virginianum (L.) T. Dur. & B.D. Jacks. ex B.L. Rob. & Fernald. Photograph: David Voegtlin, emeritus University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois. 19) Aphis monardae Oestlund on Monarda fistulosa L. Photograph: David Voegtlin, emeritus INHS of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
Figure 20 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding
Figure 20. Neighbor-joining tree of K2P distances of DNA barcodes of targeted species. Species names are followed by the GenBank accession numbers.
Figures 1–17 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding
Figures 1–17. Holotype (INHS: 511,252 collection number) of Aphis elena 1–8) Apterous vivipara. 1) Body. 2) Antennal segments: II–V. 3) Ultimate rostral segment. 4) Cauda. 5) Siphunculus and marginal tubercle on abdominal segment VII. 6) Marginal tubercle on abdominal segment I, and hind coxa. 7) Setae on subgenital plate. 8) Setae on abdominal tergite VIII. 9–17) Alate vivipara. 9) Body. 10) Fore wing. 11) Antennal segments: II–IV. 12) Ultimate rostral segment. 13) Siphunculus and marginal tubercle on abdominal segment VII. 14) Marginal tubercle on abdominal segment I, and hind coxa. 15) Setae on abdominal tergite VIII. 16) Cauda. 17) Setae on sub-genital plate.
Fig. 3 in Barcoding cryptic bumblebee taxa: B. lucorum, B. crytarum and B. magnus, a case study (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus)
Fig. 3: Observed diagnostic character changes with position numbers mapped onto the Maximum- Likelihood tree. Black box = unambiguous diagnostic character change, grey box = ambiguous diagnostic character change, and white box = unambiguous character change.
Fig. 1 in Barcoding cryptic bumblebee taxa: B. lucorum, B. crytarum and B. magnus, a case study (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus)
Fig. 1: Tree topology calculated as Maximum-Likelihood tree using Bayesian MCMC analysis with the general time reversal model of base substitutions, gamma distribution and 5 000 000 generations.
Fig. 4 in Barcoding cryptic bumblebee taxa: B. lucorum, B. crytarum and B. magnus, a case study (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus)
Fig. 4: Summary of Barcode engine identification requests for specimens with identification problems (LUC-01, LUC-09, LUC-10, MAG-10, CRY-01 and CRY-10) or degraded DNA (B. lucorum terrestricoloratus, B. reinigi, B. magnus turkestanicus and new sequence for B. sp. BVP-A, AY181116). For details of misidentifications and misnamings see text.
Fig. 2.1-4 in Barcoding cryptic bumblebee taxa: B. lucorum, B. crytarum and B. magnus, a case study (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus)
Fig. 2.1-4: Alignment of all parsimonious informative triplets (with uninformative sites deleted -), and with a pointer for position number (numbered for total COI) and codon position. Diagnostic (= private) positions marked with colour: green = Thymine, violet = Cytosine, red = Adenine and yellow = Guanine.
Figures 2–6 in DNA barcoding of the genus Dichopygina, with a new species from China (Diptera: Sciaridae)
Figures 2–6. Dichopygina perfecta (Pettey, 1918), male, (BIN BOLD: ACK5904). 2. Left gonostylus, ventral view. 3. The 4th flagellomere, lateral view. 4. Wing, dorsal view. 5. Genitalia, ventral view. 6. Inner margin of gonocoxites and tegmen with aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 2–3, 5–6 = 0.1 mm; 4 = 1.0 mm.
Figures 7–12 in DNA barcoding of the genus Dichopygina, with a new species from China (Diptera: Sciaridae)
Figures 7–12. Dichopygina tibetana Leng, Heller and Huang, sp. nov., male. 7–11. Holotype (Sample ID: SM02765; Process ID: SCILA001-16); 12. Paratype (SM02766; SCILA002-16). 7. Wing, dorsal view. 8. The 4th flagellomere, lateral view. 9. Genitalia, ventral view. 10. Apex of foretibia, prolateral view. 11. Palpus, lateral view. 12. Left gonostylus, ventral view. Scale bars: 7 = 1.0 mm; 8–12 = 0.1 mm.
Figure 1 in DNA barcoding of the genus Dichopygina, with a new species from China (Diptera: Sciaridae)
Figure 1. Neighbor Joining (NJ) tree of Dichopygina species COI gene. The alignment was performed based on the Kimura twoparameter (K2P) model, with substitutions of transitions and transversions. Each sequence is numbered by its BOLD process ID, with voucher materials in Table 1. The habitus photo is Dichopygina tibetana Leng, Heller & Huang, sp. nov.
Fig. 11 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 11: Beispiel für die Verwendung des mitochondrialen Cytochrom c - Oxidase I Gens (COI) zur Identifizierung unbekannter Larven, d. h. ihrer Zuordnung zu beschriebenen Imagines, hier der Art Philodytes umbrinus (MOTSCHULSKY, 1855) Dytiscidae: Laccophilinae) (Ausschnitt eines Kladogramms auf der Basis einer Parsimony-Analyse der COI Sequenzen) (aus MILLER u. a. 2005).
Fig. 9 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 9: Symbolische Darstellung des "Strichcodes des Lebens" (Ausschnitt des Posters zur 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für biologische Systematik vom 13. bis 16.9.2005 in Basel). Bei einem einfachen Produkt-Strichcode reichen 10 Zeichen auf 12 Positionen aus, um 1 Billion unterschiedliche Produkte zu kennzeichnen.
Fig. 8 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 8: Beispiel für die Verwendung des mitochondrialen Cytochrom c - Oxidase I Gens (COI) zur Rekonstruktion der Phylogenese der Harpalini (Carabidae) (abgebildet ist ein Ausschnitt aus dem strikten Konsensusbaum einer ungewichteten Maximum Parsimony Analyse) (aus MARTINEZ-NAVARRO u. a., 2005).
Fig. 7 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 7: Das ringförmige Mitochondriengenom (hier: des Menschen) mit Lage des Gens für die Untereinheit I der Cytochrom c - Oxidase (COI) (JANNING & KNUST, 2004, verändert).
Fig. 2 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 2: Die Arten und höheren Ränge aus Fig. 1 als hierarchisch angeordnete Aufzählung der Namen. Die phylogenetischen Beziehungen der drei Untergattungen sowie der je drei Arten der Untergattungen B und C sind hieraus nicht ersichtlich. Falls es sich um eine gut bearbeitete Gattung handelt, kann allerdings zumindest unterstellt werden, dass neben der monobasischen Untergattung A auch die Untergattungen B und C Monophyla repräsentieren.
Fig. 10 in PhyloCode und DNA Barcoding - Taxonomische Regeln und Techniken im Wandel?
Fig. 10: Die "Wobble"-Base, d. h. die Base an der ersten Stelle (5'-Ende) des Anticodons in der tRNA kann verschiedene Basenpaarungen mit der dritten Position des Codons der mRNA eingehen. Daher ist die dritte Position eines Codons weniger stark der Selektion unterworfen und Mutationen können hier besonders häufig auftreten (aus JANNING & KNUST, 2004, verändert).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.