Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
437
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
437 results for “morphological variability”
Figure 5 in Morphological variability of the megalopa of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) in Mediterranean and Atlantic populations
Figure 5. Liocarcinus depurator, megalopa. Second maxilliped. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Figure 32 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)
Figure 32. Erythemis credula distribution map.
Fig. 4 in Morphological and genetic variability of Cotesia tibialis species complex (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae)
Fig. 4. PCA analysis: distribution of fore wings in the morphospace defined by the first two principal components of two morphological forms, early and late summer proposed by Nixon.
FIGURE 17 in Paralomis White, 1856 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) from India, with morphological variability in Paralomis indica Alcock & Anderson, 1899
FIGURE 17. Geographical distribution of the extant species of the genus Paralomis White, 1856 in the Indian Ocean [distribution data, courtesy of Henderson (1888), Alcock & Anderson (1899), Kensley (1981), Macpherson (1988a, 1988b, 1989), Takeda & Bussarawit (2007), Ahyong (2010)]
FIGURE 11 in A taxonomic review of the genus Diolcogaster Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) in Iran, distribution and morphological variability
FIGURE 11. Diolcogaster mayae (Shestakov), female, form B. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Antennae, lateral view; C. Metafemora and metatibiae, lateral view; D. Head, frontal view; E. Head, dorsal view; F. Head, lateral view; G. Mesosoma, lateral view.
FIGURE 14 in A taxonomic review of the genus Diolcogaster Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) in Iran, distribution and morphological variability
FIGURE 14. Diolcogaster mayae (Shestakov), female, form C. A. Mesonotum, dorsal view; B. Metanotum and propodeum, dorsal view; C. T1 and T2, dorsal view; D. Metasoma, dorsal view; E. Metasoma, lateral view; F. Fore and hind wings.
FIGURE 13 in A taxonomic review of the genus Diolcogaster Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) in Iran, distribution and morphological variability
FIGURE 13. Diolcogaster mayae (Shestakov), female, form C. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Antennae, lateral view; C. Metafemora and metatibiae, lateral view; D. Head, frontal view; E. Head, dorsal view; F. Head, lateral view; G. Mesosoma, lateral view.
FIGURE 4 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 4. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar): A–B—a comparison of different pore sizes on scapular plate in different specimens (PCM); C–D—comparison of different pore sizes on scapular plate in different specimens (SEM); E–F—comparison of different pore sizes on median pate I in different specimens (PCM). Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 7 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 7. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar): A –B—cuticular folds (filled arrowheads) and patches of pillars (arrows) on legs (PCM and SEM respectively); C—cuticular fold (filled arrowhead), patch of pillars (arrow) and spine (indented arrowhead) on leg I (PCM); D—cuticular fold (filled arrowhead) and dentate collar (empty arrowhead) on leg IV (PCM); E–F –dentate collar (empty arrowhead), cuticular fold (filled arrowhead) and papilla (empty arrow) on leg IV (PCM and SEM, respectively); G—claws II (PCM); H—claws I (SEM). Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 9 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 9. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar)—larvae: A—dorso-ventral assembled image; B—claws of leg II; C—pores on scapular plate; D—pores on terminal plate. PCM. Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 8 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 8. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar)—juvenile: A—dorso-ventral assembled image; B—claws of leg II; C—pores on scapular plate; D—pores on terminal plate, PCM. Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 5 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 5. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar): A—large pores on head plate (PCM); B paired plate visible in SEM; C–D—a comparison of different density of pores on paired plates in different specimens, arrow (PCM); E–F—a comparison of different pore sizes on terminal pate in different specimens (PCM). Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 26 in Morphological and genetic variability of Baetis (Rhodobaetis) braaschi Zimmermann, 1980 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)
FIGURE 26. Topology of the Bayesian tree of the combined dataset. The numbers above branches are values of Bayesian posterior probability (only values above 0.50 are displayed). Roman numbers indicate individual haplotypes as recognized by the TCS analysis. Specimens exhibiting Eastern Ukrainian morphotype marked by "*", specimens exhibiting Crimean morphotype marked by "#".
FIGURES 18–26. Limotettix striola, dorsal view. 18–20, 22–23, 25 in On the morphological variability of Limotettix (Limotettix) striola (Fallén, 1806) (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Limotettigini) with notes on the taxonomic status and distribution of L. striola ferganensis Dubovskiy, 1966
FIGURES 18–26. Limotettix striola, dorsal view. 18–20, 22–23, 25―males, 21, 24, 26―females.
FIGURES 18–19 in Morphological and genetic variability of Baetis (Rhodobaetis) braaschi Zimmermann, 1980 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)
FIGURES 18–19. Baetis braaschi, surface of terga. (scale marked with arrow).
FIGURE 1 in The intraspecific morphological variability of Styloperla Wu, 1935 (Plecoptera: Styloperlidae)
FIGURE 1. Styloperla inae from Fujian, male and female habitus.
FIGURE 4 in The intraspecific morphological variability of Styloperla Wu, 1935 (Plecoptera: Styloperlidae)
FIGURE 4. Published illustrations of terminalia of Styloperla obtusispina (from Wu, 1973).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.