Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 7. Perinereis websteri sp. nov. Non-types (USNM 1660577, from syntype series of Nereis bairdii Webster, 1884). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Anterior end, dorsal view. C. Pharynx, dorsal view. D. Same, ventral view. E. Chaetiger 10, left parapodium. F. Chaetiger 43, left parapodium. G. Chaetiger 69, left parapodium. H. Chaetiger 84, left parapodium. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–D = 0.5 mm; E–G = 0.2 mm; H = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 5. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). Topotype male (USNM 1480197). A. Whole specimen, dorsal view. B. Anterior end, dorsal view. C. Same, lateral view. D. Posterior end, dorsal view. E. Pharynx dissected, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C = 0.5 mm; E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 4 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 4. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). Topotypes (USNM 1480190). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Supra-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 59. D. Sub-acicular heterogomph falcigers, chaetiger 59. E. Right jaw, dorsal view. F. Chaetiger 1, left parapodium. G. Chaetiger 10, left parapodium. H. Chaetiger 21, left parapodium. I. Chaetiger 41, left parapodium. J. Chaetiger 59, left parapodium. K. Chaetiger 72, left parapodium. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 10 μm; E = 0.25 mm; F–K = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 3 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 3. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). A–C, G–J. Lectotype of Nereis bairdii (USNM 4786). D–F. Paralectotypes (USNM 1660576). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Pharynx, ventral view. D. Left jaw, dorsal view. E. Pharynx, ventral view. F. Pharynx, lateral view. G. Chaetiger 2, right parapodium. H. Chaetiger 11, right parapodium. I. Chaetiger 34, right parapodium. J. Chaetiger 57, right parapodium. Scale bars: A–C, E–F = 0.5 mm; D, G–J = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2. Perinereis anderssoni Kinberg, 1865 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 2. Perinereis anderssoni Kinberg, 1865. Topotype (ECOSUR P3208). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Posterodorsal tentacular cirri. D. Left jaw, dorsal view. E. Chaetiger 1, right parapodium. F. Chaetiger 10, right parapodium. G. Chaetiger 28, right parapodium. H. Chaetiger 45, right parapodium. I. Chaetiger 62, right parapodium. J. Supra-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 62. K. Sub-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 28. Scale bars: A–C = 1 mm; D = 0.25 mm; E–I = 0.1 mm; J–K = 10 μm.

Fig. 1 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 1. Parapodial morphology of species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 and points used to obtain segments and length ratios of parapodial structures described in this work. Arrows and labels correspond to points used for the measuring parapodial structures as described in Material and methods section. A. Parapodium from posterior chaetiger of Perinereis floridana (Ehlers, 1868) (ECOSUR P1100). B. Parapodium from natatory region of Perinereis floridana (LACM-AHF 7376). Abbreviations: Dc = dorsal cirrus; DDoL = distal lobe of dorsal ligule; DoL = dorsal ligule; LDc = lower lamella of dorsal cirrus; LoM = lower lamella of median ligule; LVc = lower lamella of ventral cirrus; MeL = median ligule; NeL = neuroacicular ligule; PDoL = proximal lobe of dorsal ligule; PoL = neuropodial postchaetal lobe; PreL = notopodial prechaetal lobe; UDc = upper lamella of dorsal cirrus; UVc = upper lamella of ventral cirrus; Vc = ventral cirrus; VeL = ventral ligule; VeLa = ventral lamella.

Fig. 30 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Fig. 30. Map showing all localities of revised specimens of Otiorhynchus azaleae (black circles), O. gredleri (white circles), O. spaethi (black squares), O. venustus (white squares) and O. hypocrita (white squares with black circle).

Fig. 29 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Fig. 29. Map showing all localities of revised specimens of Otiorhynchus subcostatus (black circles) and those of O. muffi sp. nov. (white circles). Note that O. subcostatus is also recorded from the French Massif Central (records not shown on this map).

Figs 19–24 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Figs 19–24. Spiculum ventrale of selected Otiorhynchus (Nihus) 19. O. subcostatus (lectotype, Engadine), 20. O. spaethi (Campogrosso), 21. O. spaethi (Monte Cavallo), 22. O. azaleae (Koralpe), 23. O. azaleae (Monte Sernio), 24. O. gredleri (Cima Tombea).

Figs 10–13 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Figs 10–13. Habitus of 10. Otiorhynchus gredleri (female from a parthenogenetic population, Piz Clünas), 11. O. azaleae (male from Koralpe), 12. Ditto (female from an amphigonic population, Wöllaner Nock), 13. Ditto (female from a parthenogenetic population, Monte Sernio).

Figs 2–5 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Figs 2–5. Habitus of female specimens of 2. Otiorhynchus uncinatus (Sagno), 3. O. carinatopunctatus (Tarasp), 4. O. muffi sp. nov. (holotype, S-charl), 5. O. subcostatus (lectotype, Engadine).

Figs 6–9 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Figs 6–9. Habitus of 6. Otiorhynchus venustus (female from Valmasque), 7. O. hypocrita (female from Pragelato). 8. O. gredleri (male from Monte Baldo), 9. Ditto female from an amphigonic population, same locality.

Figs 25–28 in On the identity of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) subcostatus STIERLIN, 1866, description of Otiorhynchus muffi sp. nov., and an illustrated key to the species of Nihus REITTER, 1912 with taxonomic comments on both the subgenera Nihus and Eunihus REITTER, 1912 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Figs 25–28. Penis ventral and lateral of 25. O. gredleri (Monte Baldo), 26. O. azaleae (Koralpe), 27. O. spaethi (Campogrosso), 28. O. hypocrita (Albergian).

Fig. 11 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 11. Lateral view of propodeum, showing: A) Propodeal spiracle separated from declivity margin by a distance longer than its diameter (Typhlomyrmex lavra); B) Propodeal spiracle close to the declivous face of propodeum (Holcoponera relicta—USNMENT00412058). Photos by Gabriela Camacho (A) and Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 10 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 10. Lateral view of gaster, showing: A) Second gastric segment (IV abdominal) relatively straight (Gnamptogenys acuminata—USNMENT00441095); B) Second gastric segment (IV abdominal) slightly arched ventrally (Poneracantha mecotyle—CASENT0281530). Photos by Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo (A) and Zach Lieberman (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 8 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 8. Lateral view of gaster, showing: A) Second gastral (IV abdominal) sternite not strongly reduced in relation to the tergite; dorsal profile of gaster gently convex, so that the apex of gaster is only discretely directed ventrally (Gnamptogenys acuminata—USNMENT00441095); B) Second gastral (IV abdominal) sternite strongly reduced in relation to the tergite; dorsal profile of gaster extremely convex, so that the gaster is strongly directed ventrally and anterad (Alfaria minuta—CASENT0281213). Photos by Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo (A) and Estella Ortega (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 5 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 5. Lateral view of pronotum, showing: A) Pronotal tubercles present; mesonotum prominent, separated from propodeum by a deep transversal suture (Ectatomma tuberculatum—CASENT0173380); B) Pronotal tubercles or projections absent; mesonotum not prominent, forming a continuous profile with propodeum (Holcoponera striatula—CASENT0173386). Photos by April Nobile; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 7 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 7. Frontal view of head, showing: A) Expanded frontal lobes (Alfaria falcifera—CASENT0179971); B) Occipital lobes absent (Gnamptogenys continua— CASENT0173383). Photos by Erin Prado (A) and April Nobile (B); available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 1 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 1. In lateral view, workers of the Ectatomminae genera, showing the morphological diversity within the clade. (A) Acanthoponera mucronata (CASENT0173540), (B) Alfaria minuta (CASENT0281213), (C) Ectatomma planidens (CASENT0173379), (D) Gnamptogenys acuminata (USNMENT00441095), (E) Heteroponera panamensis (CASENT0106021), (F) Holcoponera ammophila (CASENT0281512), (G) Poneracantha mecotyle (CASENT0281530), (H) Rhytidoponera metallica (CASENT0172345), (I) Stictoponera biroi (CASENT0172380), (J) Typhlomyrmex rogenhoferi (CASENT0173390). See Fig. 3 for images of Boltonia microps. Images by April Nobile, Estella Ortega, Michael Branstetter, Zach Lieberman, and Jeffrey Sosa-Calvo; available from www.antweb.org (Antweb 2021).

Fig. 3 in UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus

Fig. 3. Worker of Boltonia microps in A) frontal view; B) dorsal view; and C) lateral view. Images by April Nobile (CASENT0173544); available from www.antweb. org (Antweb 2021).