Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
461,131
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
461,131 results for “FIGURES”
Figure 3 in A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887
Figure 3. Daphnia curvirostris, large parthenogenetic female from Lake Glubokoe, Moscow area, European Russia, collected on August 9, 2004 by AAK. A, lateral view. B, caudal spine. C–E, head. F, G, armature of postero-ventral and posterior region of valve. H, postabdomen. I, J, postabdominal claw. K, L, antenna I in lateral and posterior view.
Figure 19 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 19. Discodoris ketos (CASIZ 081808), SEM images of the radula, jaws and dorsal tubercles. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 75 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 71 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 42 Mm. D, dorsal tubercles; scale bar = 750 Mm. E, jaw elements; scale bar = 30 Mm.
Figure 5 in A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887
Figure 5. Daphnia curvirostris from Lake Glubokoe, Moscow area, European Russia, collected on September 9, 2004 by N. N. Smirnov. A, B, ephippial female and its postero-dorsal region. C, fresh ephippium. D, adult male. E, male head. F, G, armature of ventral margin of valve. H, armature of posterior portion of valve. I, J, postabdomen and abdomen. K, antenna I. L, antenna II. M, N, limb I and its distal portion. O, armature of distal portion of largest seta of outer distal lobe. P, innerdistal portion of limb II.
Figure 23 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 23. Thordisa rubescens (CASIZ 068976), SEM images of several reproductive structures. A, penial hook; scale bar = 75 Mm. B, copulatory spine; scale bar = 100 Mm.
Figure 11 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 11. Doris kerguelenensis (CASIZ 087312), SEM images of the radula and dorsal tubercles. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 200 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 150 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 100 Mm. D, dorsal tubercles; scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 30 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 30. Peltodoris nobilis (CASIZ 068237), SEM images of the radula and dorsal tubercles. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 200 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 200 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 150 Mm. D, dorsal tubercles; scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 2 in A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887
Figure 2. Mapping the characters of chromosome number and postabdominal claw morphology onto the Daphnia ND2 consensus tree (Fig. 1). A, the left cladogram shows the evolution of chromosome number. Black line denotes 2n = 22, white line denotes 2n = 20 and dot line denotes 2n = 24. B, the right cladogram shows the evolution of postabdominal claw morphology. Black line denotes variable phenotype between the longispina-claw and pulex-claw types, white line denotes the longispina- claw type, dot line denotes the pulex-claw type and grey line denotes equivocal.
Figure 4. Living animals. A in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 4. Living animals. A, Doris pseudoargus (CASIZ 121105). B, Doris immonda (CASIZ 089023), photo by T. M. Gosliner. C, Doris granulosa (CASIZ 073536), photo by T. M. Gosliner. D, Discodoris boholiensis (CASIZ 083654), photo by T. M. Gosliner. E, Discodoris ketos, San Pedrillo, Puntarenas, Costa Rica, photo by T. M. Gosliner. F, Thordisa rubescens (CASIZ 015860), photo by T. M. Gosliner. G, Aphelodoris antillensis (CASIZ 077289), photo by T. M. Gosliner. H, Peltodoris atromaculata (CASIZ 119474). I, Peltodoris nobilis, Monterey Bay, California, photo by A. Smith.
Figure 4 in A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887
Figure 4. Daphnia curvirostris, appendages of parthenogenetic female from Lake Glubokoe, European Russia. A, coxal part of antenna II. B, distal portion of basal segment and basal portion of branches. C, distal portion of endopod. D, swimming seta. E, maxilla I. F, limb I: ODL indicates outer distal lobe; IDL indicates inner distal lobe. G–I, limb II, second seta on its inner-distal end, and gnathobase II. J–L, limb III, its inner-distal portion and filtering seta of gnathobase. M, N, limb IV and its inner-distal portion. O, limb V.
Figure 14 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 14. Hexabranchus sanguineus (CASIZ 071897), SEM images of the radula and jaws. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 100 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 100 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 150 Mm. D, jaw elements; scale bar = 10 Mm.
Figure 22 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 22. Thordisa rubescens (CASIZ 068976). A, general view of the anatomy; scale bar = 1 mm. B, reproductive system; scale bar = 1 mm. C, detail of the ampulla; scale bar = 1 mm. D, lateral view of the buccal bulb; scale bar = 1 mm. E, central nervous system; scale bar = 1 mm. F, ventral view of the mouth area; scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 5 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 5. Doris pseudoargus (CASIZ 081871), SEM images of the radula and dorsal tubercles. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 75 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 75 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 43 Mm. D, dorsal tubercles; scale bar = 750 Mm.
Figure 29 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 29. Peltodoris atromaculata (CASIZ 072584). A, general view of the anatomy; scale bar = 1 mm. B, reproductive system; scale bar = 1 mm. C, detail of several reproductive organs; scale bar = 1 mm. D, lateral view of the buccal bulb; scale bar = 1 mm. E, central nervous system; scale bar = 0.5 mm. F, ventral view of the mouth area; scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 28 in A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia)
Figure 28. Peltodoris atromaculata (CASIZ 072584), SEM images of the radula and dorsal tubercles. A, inner lateral teeth; scale bar = 75 Mm. B, mid-lateral teeth; scale bar = 250 Mm. C, outer lateral teeth; scale bar = 150 Mm. D, dorsal tubercles; scale bar = 250 Mm.
Figure 7. One subtree from a in Two new basal crocodylomorph archosaurs from the Lower Jurassic and the monophyly of the Sphenosuchia
Figure 7. One subtree from a reduced consensus analysis using the RadCon program (Thorley & Page, 2000). The MPTs from the phylogenetic analyses with characters 22 and 23 ordered or replaced by binary characters produced slightly different sets of reduced consensus subtrees. This subtree, from the analysis with 22 and 23 ordered, shows the sphenosuchian Terrestrisuchus closer to the crocodyliforms Protosuchus and Alligator, a relationship not found in any subtree of the other analysis.
Figure 6 in Two new basal crocodylomorph archosaurs from the Lower Jurassic and the monophyly of the Sphenosuchia
Figure 6. Strict consensus (A) and Adams consensus (B) of 151 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) resulting from the PAUP analysis of the data matrix in Table 1 (outgroups omitted in figure). Each MPT has a length of 64 steps, a Consistency Index (C.I.) of 0.609, and a Retention Index (R.I.) of 0.679. Reanalysis with characters 22 and 23 recoded as pairs of additive binary characters recovered 38 MPTs, each with a length of 62 steps, and with a less resolved strict consensus, but the Adams consensus, C, shows much more resolution.
Figure 1 in A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887
Figure 1. ME bootstrap consensus tree of Daphnia ND2 sequences. The numbers on each branch show support values of the branch. Upper numbers indicate ME, and ML bootstrap support values for nucleotide sequences. Middle numbers indicate MP bootstrap support values and Bayesian clade credibility values for nucleotide sequences. Lower numbers indicate MP bootstrap support values and Bayesian clade credibility values for amino acid sequences. Asterisks indicate no support values.
Figure 5 in Two new basal crocodylomorph archosaurs from the Lower Jurassic and the monophyly of the Sphenosuchia
Figure 5. Kayentasuchus walkeri gen. et sp. nov. Holotype. Lateral view of right ilium and femur. Abbreviations: at =?antitrochanter; tq = fourth trochanter; pi.t = possible homologue of pseudointernal trochanter in Hallopus (Walker, 1970). Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group, only including species with sequenced COII. A in A revision of West Palaearctic species of the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group (Diptera: Chironomidae)
Figure 1. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group, only including species with sequenced COII. A, result from Bayesian analysis of COII gene sequences. Posterior probabilities shown above branches, bootstrap support below branches from parsimony analysis of the same data set. B, result from parsimony analysis of the combined molecular and morphological data sets. Bremer support on branches. C, result from parsimony analysis of the combined molecular and morphological data sets, with third positions excluded. Bremer support on branches.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group. A in A revision of West Palaearctic species of the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group (Diptera: Chironomidae)
Figure 2. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the Micropsectra atrofasciata species group. A, result from parsimony analysis of the morphological character matrix, with characters weighted according to their rescaled consistency indices. B, result from parsimony analysis of the combined molecular and morphological matrices, using tree in Figure 1C as backbone constraint.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.