Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4. Adult habitus. A–B. D. seguyi Smart, 1945 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar

Fig. 4. Adult habitus. A–B. D. seguyi Smart, 1945 (MNHN). A. ♂. B. ♀. C–D. D. malagassya Tsacas & Rafael, 1982 (MNHN). C. ♂. D. ♀. E–F. D. curta Chassagnard & Tsacas, 1997 (MNHN). E. ♂. F. ♀. G–H. D. chocolata Yassin & David sp. nov. (MNHN). G. ♂. H. ♀. Only dark morphs of females of species with female-limited color dimorphism are shown. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 8. Adult habitus. A–B. D. vulcana Graber, 1957 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar

Fig. 8. Adult habitus. A–B. D. vulcana Graber, 1957 (MNHN). A. ♂. B. ♀. C–D. D. mylenae David & Yassin sp. nov. (MNHN). C. ♂. D. ♀. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar

Fig. 7. Photomicrographs of D. ifestia Tsacas, 1984. A. Holotype (P. Vanschuytbroeck and J. Kelenbosch leg.; MNHN). B. Paratype (P. Vanschuytbroeck and J. Kelenbosch leg.; MNHN). Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of male periphallic organs. A. D. seguyi Smart, 1945 (MNHN). B. D. aff. tsacasi Bock & Wheeler, 1972 (MNHN). C. D. mylenae David & Yassin sp. nov. (MNHN). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 19 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 19. Punctation in front of the medial ocellus of females. A. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) (France: Uchaux). B. L. villosulum (Kirby, 1802) (Luxembourg: Stadtbredimus).

Fig. 22 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 22. Geographical distribution of the two pseudocryptic species in the Western Palaearctic. A. Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802). B. L. medinai (Vachal, 1895).

Fig. 6. Melitta villosula Kirby, 1802 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 6. Melitta villosula Kirby, 1802, lectotype, ♂ (= Lasioglossum villosulum). A. Habitus. B. Head. C. Scutum. D. Propodeum. E. First tergum. F. Sterna.

Fig. 8. Halictus pauperatulellus Strand, 1909 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 8. Halictus pauperatulellus Strand, 1909, holotype, ♂. A. Head. B. Scutum. C. Propodeum. D. First tergum. E. Metasoma, dorsal view. F Metasoma, ventral view.

Fig. 21 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 21. Fringe on sternum 5 of males (arrow showing the fringe). A. Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802). B. L. medinai (Vachal, 1895).

Fig. 2 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 2. Colouration and relative size of the species and subspecies. A–B. Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802), ♀ and ♂. C–D. L. medinai (Vachal, 1895), ♀ and ♂ (holotype). E–F. L. villosulum arabicum Ebmer, 2008, ♀ and ♂.

Fig. 6. Neopanorpa lungtaushana Cheng, 1957. A, C–I. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. T3 and T4 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 6. Neopanorpa lungtaushana Cheng, 1957. A, C–I. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. T3 and T4, left-lateral view. E. Epandrium and hypandrium, right-lateral view. F–G. Genital bulb, ventral and dorsal views, respectively. H–I. Aedeagal complex, ventral and rightlateral views, respectively. – B, J–L. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. J. Subgenital plate, ventral view. K–L. Medigynium, right-lateral and ventral views, respectively.

Fig. 4 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 4. Ultrametric tree constructed using Bayesian inference and based on 29 haplotype sequences (658bp) of the cytochrome oxidase c subunit I gene of specimens currently identified as Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802), Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) and one as Lasioglossum berberum (Benoist, 1941). Each label corresponds to one roman letter which encompasses all sequence from a haplotype (for more details see Table 3). A. Lasioglossum medinai; B–D: three supported clusters (a fourth cluster could be defined in C) within Lasioglossum villosulum. This phylogenetic tree is rooted using Lasioglossum bluethgeni Ebmer, 1971 as outgroup (label III, voucher AP222). Posterior probabilities are given at nodes. The three colour gradients on the tree correspond to morphological delineation. Results of the species delimitations analyses are represented on the right side of the figure: the Bayesian Poisson Tree Process (bPTP) analyses based on the trees obtained using Bayesian inference (BI) or maximum likelihood (ML); The Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) analysis resulting in seven candidate species (using the single threshold represented as a red line on the tree) and five alternative scenarios. Numbers at the top of the columns corresponds to the number of candidate species in the GMYC analysis.

Fig. 1 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 1. Distribution of Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802) throughout the Palaearctic and Oriental Regions.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 4. Neopanorpa ocellaris (Navás, 1908), living female. The female is feeding on a dead crane fly. Photo by Wei-Liang Xie from Huanjiang County, Guangxi Province, China.

Fig. 15 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 15. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895), holotype, ♂. A. Head. B. Scutum. C. Propodeum. D. Metasoma.

Fig. 23 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 23. Lasioglossum berberum (Benoist, 1941), holotype, ♂. A. Head. B. Scutum. C. Propodeum. D. First tergum. E. Metasoma.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 2. Neopanorpa luojishana Wang & Hua sp. nov., paratypes (NWAU). A, C–J. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Abdomen, left-lateral view. E–F. Genital bulb, dorsal and ventral views, respectively. G. Right gonostylus, left-lateral view. H. Epandrium and hypandrium, rightlateral view. I–J. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, K–L. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. K. Subgenital plate, ventral view. L. Medigynium, ventral view.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 5. Neopanorpa ocellaris (Navás, 1908). A, C–K. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Epandrium, dorsal view. D. Head, frontal view. E. T3 and T4, left-lateral view. F. Genital bulb, ventral view. G. Habitus, left-lateral view. H. Left gonostylus, ventral view. I. Epandrium and hypandrium, leftlateral view. J–K. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, L–N. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. L. Subgenital plate, ventral view. M–N. Medigynium, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 1. Neopanorpa luojishana Wang & Hua sp. nov., living male. Photo by Ji-Shen Wang from Mt. Luoji, Sichuan, China.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 3. Neopanorpa xingmini Wang & Hua sp. nov., paratypes (NWAU). A, C–L. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Abdomen, left-lateral view. E. Apical portion of epandrium, ventral view. F. Hypovalves, caudal view. G–H. Genital bulb, dorsal and ventral views, respectively. I. Epandrium and hypandrium, right-lateral view. J. Left gonostylus, ventral view. K–L. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, M–N. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. M. Subgenital plate, ventral view. N. Medigynium, ventral view.