Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61,240
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61,240 results for “two”
Fig. 3 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 3. Trees constructed using maximum likelihood (above) and Bayesian inference (below) and based on 29 haplotype sequences (658bp) of the cytochrome oxidase c subunit I gene of specimens currently identified as Lasioglossum villosulum (Kirby, 1802), Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) and one as Lasioglossum berberum (Benoist, 1941). Each label corresponds to one roman letter which encompasses all sequences from a haplotype (for more details see Table 3). A, Lasioglossum medinai; B–D: Lasioglossum villosulum. Label highlighted in blue corresponds to L. berberum. This phylogenetic tree is rooted using Lasioglossum bluethgeni Ebmer, 1971 as outgroup (label III, voucher AP222). Bootstrap support (%) and posterior probabilities are given at nodes.
Fig. 10. Halictus villiersi Benoist, 1941 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 10. Halictus villiersi Benoist, 1941, holotype, ♀. A. Head. B. Scutum. C. Propodeum. D. First tergum. E. Metasoma.
Fig. 18 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 18. Punctation of the first tergum of females. A. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) (France: Uchaux). B. L. villosulum (Kirby, 1802) (France: Visan).
Fig. 14. Lasioglossum villosulum arabicum Ebmer, 2008 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 14. Lasioglossum villosulum arabicum Ebmer, 2008, ♂ (UAE). A. Head. B. Scutum. C. Propodeum. D. First tergum. E. Metasoma.
Fig. 9. Halictus rufotegularis Cockerell, 1938 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 9. Halictus rufotegularis Cockerell, 1938, holotype, ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Head. C. Scutum. D. Propodeum. E. First tergum. F. Metasoma.
Fig. 12. Heads. A in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 12. Heads. A. Lasioglossum villosulum villosulum (Kirby, 1802), ♀ (France, Allier). B. L. medinai, ♀ (France, Vaucluse). C. L. villosulum trichopse (Strand, 1914), ♀ (Taiwan). D. Idem, ♂.
Fig. 17 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)
Fig. 17. Propodeum sculpture of females. A. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) (France: Uchaux). B. L. villosulum (Kirby, 1802).
Dataset including records from the first two generation of selection for feed efficiency in three rabbits lines
<p>This dataset include records from the first two generation of selection of three rabbit lines. The objective was to improve feed efficiency accounting for social interactions within cage. In two lines the feed intake control is done using an electronic feeder, and in the third feed intake is controled at cage level. In the excel book provided, the date from the different lines are recorded in different pages.</p> <p>This dataset has been generated within Feed-a-Gene (H2020) and GENEF (Spanish INIA) projects. It is presented to fullfit the requeriments of Milestone 22 of Feed-a-Gene. This milestone basically aims to show that a selection experiment for feed efficiency on rabbits, accounting for social interactions, can be operationally conducted using an electronic feeder to record individual feed intake of animals raised in groups. This device has also been developed within the frame of these two projects.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Fig. 10 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 10. Niphargus fiseri sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1073). A. Pleopod I. B. Pleopod II. C. Pleopod III. D. Uropod I. E. Uropod II. F. Uropod III. G. Epimeral plates. H. Telson. Scale bars: 1 = 0.5 mm (G–H); 2 = 1 mm (A–E); 3 = 2 mm (F).
Fig. 6 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 6. Niphargus urmiensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1071). A. Pleopod I. B. Pleopod II. C. Pleopod III. D. Uropod I. E. Uropod II. F. Uropod III. G. Epimeral plates. H. Telson. Scale bars: 1 = 0.5 mm (G–H); 2 = 1 mm (A–E); 3 = 2 mm (F).
Fig. 5 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 5. Niphargus urmiensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1071). A. Pereopod III. B. Pereopod IV. C. Pereopod V. D. Pereopod VI. E. Pereopod VII. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Fig. 8 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 8. Niphargus fiseri sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1073). A. Gnathopod I. B. Gnathopod II. C. Maxilliped. D. Labium. E. Maxilla II. Scale bars: 1 = 0.5 mm (C–E); 2 = 1 mm (A–B).
Fig. 4 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 4. Niphargus urmiensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1071). A. Gnathopod I. B. Gnathopod II. C. Labium. D. Maxilliped. E. Maxilla II. Scale bars: 1 = 0.5 mm (C–E); 2 = 1 mm (A–B).
Fig. 3 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 3. Niphargus urmiensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1071). A. Antenna I. B. Antenna II. C. Head. D–E. Maxilla I. F. Left mandible. G. Right mandible. H. Mandibular palp. Scale bars: 1 = 0.25 mm (F–G); 2 = 0.5 mm (C–E); 3 = 1 mm (A–B).
Fig. 2 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 2. Bayesian tree of 43 specimens as inferred from the 28S and COI gene sequences. Species are identified and named according to available taxonomic descriptions. Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.8 are indicated above branches.
Fig. 1 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 1. Distribution map of the species of Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 in Iran. Localities are labelled as: 1. N. fiseri sp. nov. 2. N. urmiensis sp. nov. 3. N. sarii Esmaeili-Rineh, Mohammad-Niakan & Akmali, 2018. 4. N. hakani Esmaeili-Rineh, Mirghaffari & Sharifi, 2017. 5. N. sharifii Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari & Fišer, 2015. 6. N. darvishi Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari & Fišer, 2015. 7. N. borisi Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari & Fišer, 2015 (Siah population). 8. N. borisi (Belqais population). 9. N. bisitunicus Esmaeili- Rineh, Sari & Fišer, 2015. 10. N. khwarizmi Hekmatara, Zakšek, Heidari & Fišer, 2013 (Sarab-e-Niaz). 11. N. khwarizmi (Kahriz population). 12. N. khayyami Hekmatara, Zakšek, Heidari Baladehi & Fišer, 2013. 13. N. kermanshahi Esmaeili-Rineh, Heidari, Fišer & Akmali, 2016. 14. N. daniali Esmaeili- Rineh & Sari, 2013. 15. N. alisadri Esmaeili-Rineh & Sari, 2013. 16. N. kurdistanensis Hekmatara, Zakšek, Heidari Baladehi & Fišer, 2013 (Darvish-Olya population). 17. N. kurdistanensis (Shoei population). 18. N. ilamensis Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari, Fišer & Bargrizaneh, 2017 (Sarab-e-Kanipahn). 19. N. ilamensis (Sarab-e-Mord). 20. N. sohrevardensis Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari, Fišer & Bargrizaneh, 2017 (Razbashi population). 21. N. sohrevardensis (Sohrevard population). 22. N. persicus Esmaeili- Rineh, Sari, Fišer & Bargrizaneh, 2017. 23. N. hosseiniei Esmaeili-Rineh, Sari, Fišer & Bargrizaneh, 2017 (Ghori-Ghale population). 24. N. hosseiniei (Brolan population). 25. N. hosseiniei (Nojivaran population). 26. N. lorestanensis Esmaeili-Rineh, 2018 (Shol-Abad population). 27. N. lorestanensis (Ab-rahmeh population). 28. N. valachicus (Karaman, 1998).
Fig. 7 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 7. Niphargus fiseri sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1073). A. Antenna I. B. Antenna II. C. Head. D–E. Maxilla I. F. Left mandible. G. Right mandible. H. Mandibular palp. Scale bars: 1 = 0.25 mm (F–G); 2 = 0.5 mm (C–E, H); 3 = 1 mm (A–B).
Fig. 9 in Two new species of groundwater amphipods of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849 from northwestern Iran
Fig. 9. Niphargus fiseri sp. nov., holotype, ♂, 8 mm (ZCRU Amph.1073). A. Pereopod III. B. Pereopod IV. C. Pereopod V. D. Pereopod VI. E. Pereopod VII. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Evolution of allele frequencies in two chicken lines divergently selected for meat ultimate pH
<p>Two lines of chicken were divergently selected during 5 generations for high or low meat ultimate pH. Genotypes at about 50K SNPs were obtained for a sample of individuals in each line and at each generation (including the founder population G0). The present dataset provides the allele frequencies for all SNP and generations in the two lines, at plink frq.strat format. The position of the SNP on the chicken genome are provided in another file at plink .map format.</p> <p>These data were first ued in the following publication:</p> <p>Le Bihan-Duval, E., Hennequet-Antier, C., Berri, C., Beauclercq, S. A., Bourin, M. C., Boulay, M., ... & Boitard, S. (2018). Identification of genomic regions and candidate genes for chicken meat ultimate pH by combined detection of selection signatures and QTL. <em>BMC genomics</em>, <em>19</em>(1), 294.</p>
Fig. 6 in Two new species of Engertia Dalla Torre, 1913 and Philacelota Heller, 1900 from Indonesia and the Philippines with a revised identification key (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)
Fig. 6. Shape of 3rd antennomere (arrowed) in males (A–B) and females (C–D) of the type species of the genera Engertia Dalla Torre, 1913 and Philacelota Heller, 1900. A, C. Engertia amboinae (Brenske, 1897). B, D. Philacelota submaculata Heller, 1900. Scale bars = 1.5 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.