Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 2 in Distribution of Eimeria uekii and Eimeria raichoi in cage protection environments for the conservation of Japanese rock ptarmigans (Lagopus muta japonica) in the Japanese Alps

Fig. 2. Internal and external appearance of a shelter cage used for cage protection of Japanese rock ptarmigan broods on Mt. Norikuradake (A and B, respectively) with location numbers to indicate the soil sample collection positions within the cages (C). OPG values for the soil samples within the cages at Mt. Norikuradake (D; E. uekii and E; E. raichoi) and Mt. Komagatake (F; E. uekii and G; E. raichoi).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Helminth's assemblage of a small frog in the Brazilian semiarid: parasite-host-environment relationships

Fig. 1. Parasite load (total number of helminths per host) between females (N= 41) and males (N= 53) of Pseudopaludicola pocoto (Anura) from AssÚ municipality, Rio Grande do Norte state, northeastern Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Influence of altitude and seasonality in the termite species richness and nests density in a hill environment of the Brazilian Caatinga

Fig. 2. NMDS of species composition in foot and top of a hill environment in a dry forest, ParaÍba, Brazil (dimensions = 2).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Influence of altitude and seasonality in the termite species richness and nests density in a hill environment of the Brazilian Caatinga

Fig. 1. Rarefaction curves of the richness of termites and number of encounters in a hill environment of a dry forest, ParaÍba, Brazil. a) dry and b) wet seasons.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Helminth's assemblage of Trachemys dorbigni (Testudines: Emydidae) in southern Brazil: implications of anthropogenic environments and host's genders

Fig. 1. Overall layout of the collection environments in the study of helminth assemblage of Trachemys dorbigni in southern Brazil: A, detail of the Centro Agropecuário da Palma (UFPel), rural area of CapÃo do LeÃo, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; B, detail of the urban Área of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Source: extracted and modified the site Google® Earth (©2014 Google – Images ©2014 Digital Globe).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PC1 (29.8% of total variance) Fig. 8. Morphospace plot of the first two PCO axes generated in the R statistical environment (Claddis package). Branches are superimposed from a single representative topology selected from amongst the 48 MPTs. in The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PC1 (29.8% of total variance) Fig. 8. Morphospace plot of the first two PCO axes generated in the R statistical environment (Claddis package). Branches are superimposed from a single representative topology selected from amongst the 48 MPTs.

Рис. 2. Пески Аккумы, окр. с. ЕгинΔыкоΛь – место нахоΔки Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758). Fig 2. The Akkum Sands, Egindykol village environs, habitat of Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758). in Finding of the lesser stag beetle Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) in Kazakhstan

Рис. 2. Пески Аккумы, окр. с. ЕгинΔыкоΛь – место нахоΔки Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758). Fig 2. The Akkum Sands, Egindykol village environs, habitat of Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758).

Рис. 80–86. КопуΛятивные органы Zelotes dagestanus Ponomarev, sp. n. 80–83 – паΛьпа самца: 80–82 – вентраΛьно, 83 – ΛатераΛьно; 84 – буΛьбус ΛатераΛьно; 85–86 – эпигина: 85 – вентраΛьно, 86 – ΑорсаΛьно. 80, 82–86 – экземпΛяры с бархана Сарыкум, Δагестан; 81 – экземпΛяр из окрестностей с. Гаша, Δагестан. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 80–86. Copulatory organs of Zelotes dagestanus Ponomarev, sp. n. 80–83 – male palp: 80–82 – ventral view, 83 – lateral view; 84 – bulbus, lateral view; 85–86 – epigyne: 85 – ventral view, 86 – dorsal view. 80, 82–86 – specimens from barkhan Sarykum, Dagestan; 81 – specimen from Gasha village environs, Dagestan. Scale bar 0.25 mm. in A review of spiders of the genus Zelotes Gistel, 1848 of the subterraneus-group (Aranei: Gnaphosidae) from the Caucasus and Ciscaucasia

Рис. 80–86. КопуΛятивные органы Zelotes dagestanus Ponomarev, sp. n. 80–83 – паΛьпа самца: 80–82 – вентраΛьно, 83 – ΛатераΛьно; 84 – буΛьбус ΛатераΛьно; 85–86 – эпигина: 85 – вентраΛьно, 86 – ΑорсаΛьно. 80, 82–86 – экземпΛяры с бархана Сарыкум, Δагестан; 81 – экземпΛяр из окрестностей с. Гаша, Δагестан. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 80–86. Copulatory organs of Zelotes dagestanus Ponomarev, sp. n. 80–83 – male palp: 80–82 – ventral view, 83 – lateral view; 84 – bulbus, lateral view; 85–86 – epigyne: 85 – ventral view, 86 – dorsal view. 80, 82–86 – specimens from barkhan Sarykum, Dagestan; 81 – specimen from Gasha village environs, Dagestan. Scale bar 0.25 mm.

Рис. 1. Места нахоΔок Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) в ПриураΛье: 1 – окрестности пос. Мухраново (по ЖуравΛеву [1914]); 2 – окрестности с. ЕгинΔыкоΛь (наши Δанные). Fig. 1. Localities of Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) near Southern Ural region: 1 – Mukhranovo village environs (by [Zhuravlev, 1914]); 2 – Egindykol village environs (our data). in Finding of the lesser stag beetle Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) in Kazakhstan

Рис. 1. Места нахоΔок Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) в ПриураΛье: 1 – окрестности пос. Мухраново (по ЖуравΛеву [1914]); 2 – окрестности с. ЕгинΔыкоΛь (наши Δанные). Fig. 1. Localities of Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) near Southern Ural region: 1 – Mukhranovo village environs (by [Zhuravlev, 1914]); 2 – Egindykol village environs (our data).

Рис. 33–46. Эпигины Zelotes fuscus. 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45 – вентраΛьно; 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 – ΑорсаΛьно; 35–46 – посΛе мацерации. ЭкземпΛяры: 33–34, 39–40 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 35–36 – из Крыма; 37–38, 41–44 – из КрасноΑарского края: 37–38 – Тамань, 41–44 – КаΛужская; 45–46 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 34–46. Epigynes of Zelotes fuscus. 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45 – ventral view; 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 – dorsal view; 35–46 – after maceration. Specimens: 33–34, 39–40 – from Rostov Region; 35–36 – from Crimea; 37–38, 41–44 – from Krasnodar Region: 37–38 – Taman, 41–44 – Kaluzhskaya; 45–46 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia. Scale bar 0.25 mm. in A review of spiders of the genus Zelotes Gistel, 1848 of the subterraneus-group (Aranei: Gnaphosidae) from the Caucasus and Ciscaucasia

Рис. 33–46. Эпигины Zelotes fuscus. 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45 – вентраΛьно; 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 – ΑорсаΛьно; 35–46 – посΛе мацерации. ЭкземпΛяры: 33–34, 39–40 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 35–36 – из Крыма; 37–38, 41–44 – из КрасноΑарского края: 37–38 – Тамань, 41–44 – КаΛужская; 45–46 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 34–46. Epigynes of Zelotes fuscus. 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45 – ventral view; 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 – dorsal view; 35–46 – after maceration. Specimens: 33–34, 39–40 – from Rostov Region; 35–36 – from Crimea; 37–38, 41–44 – from Krasnodar Region: 37–38 – Taman, 41–44 – Kaluzhskaya; 45–46 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia. Scale bar 0.25 mm.

Рис. 25–32. БуΛьбусы Zelotes fuscus. 25, 27–32 – ΛатераΛьно; 26 – Αорсо-ΛатераΛьно. ЭкземпΛяры: 25 – из Крыма; 26, 28, 30, 31 – из КрасноΑарского края: 26 – Тамань, 28 – Кущёвская, 30 – КаΛужская, 31 – Горячий кΛюч; 27 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 29 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия; 32 – из ТеберΑинского заповеΑника, Карачаево-Черкесия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 25–32. Bulbus of Zelotes fuscus. 25, 27–32 – lateral view; 26 – dorso-lateral view.Specimens:25 – from Crimea;26, 28, 30, 31 – from Krasnodar Region:26 – Taman, 28 – Kushchevskaya, 30 – Kaluzhskaya, 31 – Goryachiy Klyuch; 27 – from Rostov Region; 29 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia; 32 – from Teberda Reserve, Karachay-Cherkessia. Scale bar 0.25 mm. in A review of spiders of the genus Zelotes Gistel, 1848 of the subterraneus-group (Aranei: Gnaphosidae) from the Caucasus and Ciscaucasia

Рис. 25–32. БуΛьбусы Zelotes fuscus. 25, 27–32 – ΛатераΛьно; 26 – Αорсо-ΛатераΛьно. ЭкземпΛяры: 25 – из Крыма; 26, 28, 30, 31 – из КрасноΑарского края: 26 – Тамань, 28 – Кущёвская, 30 – КаΛужская, 31 – Горячий кΛюч; 27 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 29 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия; 32 – из ТеберΑинского заповеΑника, Карачаево-Черкесия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 25–32. Bulbus of Zelotes fuscus. 25, 27–32 – lateral view; 26 – dorso-lateral view.Specimens:25 – from Crimea;26, 28, 30, 31 – from Krasnodar Region:26 – Taman, 28 – Kushchevskaya, 30 – Kaluzhskaya, 31 – Goryachiy Klyuch; 27 – from Rostov Region; 29 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia; 32 – from Teberda Reserve, Karachay-Cherkessia. Scale bar 0.25 mm.

Рис. 17–24. ПаΛьпы самцов Zelotes fuscus. 17 – вентро-ΛатераΛьно; 18–24 – вентраΛьно. ЭкземпΛяры: 17–18 – из Крыма; 19, 21, 23, 24 – из КрасноΑарского края: 19 – Тамань, 21 – Кущёвская, 23 – Горячий КΛюч, 24 – КаΛужская; 20 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 22 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 17–24. Male palps of Zelotes fuscus. 17 – ventrolateral view; 18–24 – ventral view. Specimens: 17–18 – from Crimea; 19, 21, 23, 24 – from Krasnodar Region: 19 – Taman, 21 – Kushchevskaya, 23 – Goryachiy Klyuch, 24 – Kaluzhskaya; 20 – from Rostov Region; 22 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia. Scale bar 0.25 mm. in A review of spiders of the genus Zelotes Gistel, 1848 of the subterraneus-group (Aranei: Gnaphosidae) from the Caucasus and Ciscaucasia

Рис. 17–24. ПаΛьпы самцов Zelotes fuscus. 17 – вентро-ΛатераΛьно; 18–24 – вентраΛьно. ЭкземпΛяры: 17–18 – из Крыма; 19, 21, 23, 24 – из КрасноΑарского края: 19 – Тамань, 21 – Кущёвская, 23 – Горячий КΛюч, 24 – КаΛужская; 20 – из Ростовской обΛасти; 22 – из окрестностей МозΑока, Северная Осетия. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 17–24. Male palps of Zelotes fuscus. 17 – ventrolateral view; 18–24 – ventral view. Specimens: 17–18 – from Crimea; 19, 21, 23, 24 – from Krasnodar Region: 19 – Taman, 21 – Kushchevskaya, 23 – Goryachiy Klyuch, 24 – Kaluzhskaya; 20 – from Rostov Region; 22 – from Mozdok environs, North Ossetia. Scale bar 0.25 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

Accompanying data for publication: "Learning the Optimal Power Flow: Environment Design Matters"

<p>All the data created for the publication "Learning the Optimal Power Flow: Environment Design Matters" by Wolgast and Nieße. The dataset contains all training runs performed, including the final neural network weights, meta-data about the training run, and various metrics during the course of training, which were used to generate the results and plots. The source code to re-produce the plots for the publication (and everything else) can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/Digitalized-Energy-Systems/rl-opf-env-design</p>

Fig. 10 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 10. Bar graphs showing the ratio of life stages and sexes in each sample. A- Procamallanus (Procamallanus) pseudolaeviconchus Moravec and van As, 2015. B- Paracamallanus cyathopharynx (Baylis, 1923). Prevalence of each group in each month is given in the line graphs. F = female, M = male, L = larvae, US = unknown sex.

Fig. 8 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 8. Lateral view of isolated buccal capsules of Paracamallanus specimens, morphotypes A and B. (i). Brightfield. (ii). Epifluorescence [Filter-set 09 (Ex. 470/40)]. (iii). SEM. 1 = anterior part of posterior capsule; 2 = posterior part of posterior capsule; t = trident; ellipse = elliptical shape of capsule; rectangle = rectangular shape of capsule.

Fig. 9 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 9. Principal Component Analyses (PCA) of Paracamallanus morphometry collected from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). A- PCA using morphometric ratios for both males and females. B- PCA using buccal capsule ratios for both males and females. Each parasite is indicated as a dot, with the fill, shape and colour corresponding to morphotype and lineage (refer to key). F = female; M = male.

Fig. 5 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of male Paracamallanus cyathopharynx (Baylis, 1923) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). A-posterior end, ventrolateral view, arrows show precloacal papillae; Bposterior end, ventral view, solid arrow shows right spicule, dashed arrow shows pair of adcloacal papillae, double arrows show postcloacal papillae; Cisolated right spicule, ventrolateral view, arrow shows shaft; D-right spicule tip, dorsal view; E– right spicule tip, ventral view, arrow shows ventral barb; Fisolated left spicule.

Fig. 3 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Procamallanus (Procamallanus) pseudolaeviconchus Moravec and van As, 2015 from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). A-postequatorial region of female, vulva, ventral view; B- vulva, lateral view, arrows show lips; C- first-stage larva exiting vulva; D-posterior end of male, ventral view, solid arrows show pre-cloacal papillae, dashed arrows show post-cloacal papillae, circles show adcloacal papillae; D(i)- pedunculate papilla; E– isolated right spicule, lateral view, solid arrow shows shaft, dashed arrow shows spicule tip; E (i)- right spicule tip, arrow shows velum; F- posterior end of male, ventrolateral view, arrow shows right spicule; G-isolated left spicule, lateral view; G(i)- left spicule tip, arrow shows velum.

Fig. 2 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of Procamallanus (Procamallanus) pseudolaeviconchus Moravec and van As, 2015 from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). A-anterior end, lateral view; B- anterior end, apical view, solid arrow shows smooth peribuccal flange, dashed arrow shows marginal elevation; Cisolated buccal capsule, lateral view, arrow shows oesophagus; D-isolated buccal capsule, apical view, solid arrows show marginal elevations; E– buccal capsule interior, apical view, dashed arrow shows narrow ring, solid arrow shows basal ring; F- microdissected buccal capsule, lateral view, dashed arrow shows narrow ring, solid arrow shows basal ring; Ganterior region, lateral view, arrow shows excretory pore; G(i)- excretory pore, lateral view; H- lateral deirid, lateral view; I- lateral deirid, apical view. a = amphid; s = submedian papilla.

Fig. 7 in Camallanid nematodes from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in the Crocodile River, Gauteng, South Africa: Exploring diversity and divergence in an acid-mine drainage impacted environment

Fig. 7. Phylogram of Camallanidae based on CO1 mtDNA, with Spirocerca lupi (Rudolphi, 1809) as the outgroup. Procamallanus data and Paracamallanus lineage one (LI1) and two (LI2) from the present study are indicated in purple, orange and green, respectively. Nodal support presented for Bayesian inference and Maximum Likelihood approaches (BI/ML), with support lower than 0.75/75% excluded and support above 0.9/90% indicated by an asterisk (*).