Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

Fig. 5. PCA biplot of the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883, with a total of 49.2% of explained variation based on 16 measurements and meristic counts (see Results). Ellipses indicate the confidence interval level set at 0.68 for each group. Arrows represent the direction of the variables projected into the 2D plane of PC1 and PC2.

Fig. 3 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

Fig. 3. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the NU dataset (2340 bp, RAG1: 1440 bp;Rhodopsin: 900 bp; TPM3u + F + G4 (1–1440 bp), TPM2u + F + I (1441– 2340 bp)). Phylogenetic tree branch lengths are proportional to inferred nucleotide substitutions except the connection to distant outgroup Lophiodes mutilus. Node numbers represent 'SH-aLRT / UFBoot' values in percent (%). See the caption of Fig. 2 for locality abbreviations. The terminal names in bold suggest the newly described or resurrected taxa in this study.

Fig. 1 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

Fig. 1. Bathymetric terrain map of eastern Indian Ocean and West Pacific showing the occurrence points of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the samples/sequences included in the analyses of this study. White circle: type locality of the species of Lophiomus.

Fig. 2 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the MT dataset (1806 bp, COI: 663 bp; cytb: 1143 bp; TN + F + I (1–663 bp), GTR + F + I + G4 (664–1806 bp)) with species delimitation analyses (vertical bars on the right side of the tree). Branch lengths of the phylogenetic tree are proportional to the inferred nucleotide substitutions except for the one connecting to the distant outgroup of Lophiodes mutilus. Node numbers represent 'SH-aLRT / UFBoot' values in percent (%). Locality abbreviations: AU = Australia (NSW = New South Wales; Qld = Queensland; WA = Western Australia); CS = Coral Sea; HN = Hainan Island; IN = India; NC = New Caledonia; PH = Penghu Island; PL = Philippine; PNG = Papua New Guinea; SCS = South China Sea; TH = Thailand; TW = Taiwan. Text next to final decisions represents inferred taxon names and numbers of supported criteria covering all available criteria, with proportions in parentheses.

Fig 5 in Using mating-type loci to improve taxonomy of the Tuber indicum complex, and discovery of a new species, T. longispinosum

Fig 5. Phylogenetic relationships among Asian black truffles based on three combined datasets (ITS, β-tublin, and TEF1-α). The phylogram was obtained by maximum likelihood inference under the TN93+I model. SH-aLRT values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown as ML/BPP.

Fig. 3 in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 3. Anacharis belizini sp. nov. A. Head in front view. B. Mesosoma in lateral view. C. Mesosoma in dorsal view. D. Propodeum.

Fig. 2. A–C in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 2. A–C. Mesosoma in dorsal view. A–B. Anacharis eucharoides (Dalman, 1818). C. A. immunis Walker, 1835. – D–F. Mesosoma in lateral view. D. A. eucharoides (Dalman, 1818). E–F. A. immunis Walker, 1835, F is detail of scutellum.

Fig. 4 in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 4. Anacharis fergussoni sp. nov. A. Mesosoma in dorsal view. B. Mesosoma in lateral view. C. Head in dorsal view. – Anacharis norvegica sp. nov. D. Mesosoma in dorsal view. E. Mesosoma in lateral view. F. Petiole.

Fig. 1. A–B. Anacharis antennata Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. – C–D. A. parapsidalis Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. C. Dorsal view. D in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 1. A–B. Anacharis antennata Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. – C–D. A. parapsidalis Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. C. Dorsal view. D. Lateral view.

Fig. 6. Neopanorpa lungtaushana Cheng, 1957. A, C–I. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. T3 and T4 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 6. Neopanorpa lungtaushana Cheng, 1957. A, C–I. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. T3 and T4, left-lateral view. E. Epandrium and hypandrium, right-lateral view. F–G. Genital bulb, ventral and dorsal views, respectively. H–I. Aedeagal complex, ventral and rightlateral views, respectively. – B, J–L. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. J. Subgenital plate, ventral view. K–L. Medigynium, right-lateral and ventral views, respectively.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 4. Neopanorpa ocellaris (Navás, 1908), living female. The female is feeding on a dead crane fly. Photo by Wei-Liang Xie from Huanjiang County, Guangxi Province, China.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 2. Neopanorpa luojishana Wang & Hua sp. nov., paratypes (NWAU). A, C–J. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Abdomen, left-lateral view. E–F. Genital bulb, dorsal and ventral views, respectively. G. Right gonostylus, left-lateral view. H. Epandrium and hypandrium, rightlateral view. I–J. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, K–L. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. K. Subgenital plate, ventral view. L. Medigynium, ventral view.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 5. Neopanorpa ocellaris (Navás, 1908). A, C–K. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Epandrium, dorsal view. D. Head, frontal view. E. T3 and T4, left-lateral view. F. Genital bulb, ventral view. G. Habitus, left-lateral view. H. Left gonostylus, ventral view. I. Epandrium and hypandrium, leftlateral view. J–K. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, L–N. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. L. Subgenital plate, ventral view. M–N. Medigynium, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 1. Neopanorpa luojishana Wang & Hua sp. nov., living male. Photo by Ji-Shen Wang from Mt. Luoji, Sichuan, China.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomy of the genus Neopanorpa van der Weele, 1909 (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) from the Oriental Region, with the description of two new species

Fig. 3. Neopanorpa xingmini Wang & Hua sp. nov., paratypes (NWAU). A, C–L. Male. A. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Abdomen, left-lateral view. E. Apical portion of epandrium, ventral view. F. Hypovalves, caudal view. G–H. Genital bulb, dorsal and ventral views, respectively. I. Epandrium and hypandrium, right-lateral view. J. Left gonostylus, ventral view. K–L. Aedeagal complex, ventral and right-lateral views, respectively. – B, M–N. Female. B. Habitus, dorsal view. M. Subgenital plate, ventral view. N. Medigynium, ventral view.

Figures 7−15 in On the taxonomy of Zeuzera boisduvalii Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 (Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) species complex with description of a new genus and three new species

Figures 7−15. Adult specimens of Davidlivingstonia and their labels: 7. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype (MWM). 8. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Zambia, Samfia (MWM); 9. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 10 km SE Kisangani (MWM); 10. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lokolenge (MRAC); 11. D. prozorovi Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype (NHMUK); 12. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype (ANHRT); 13. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, female, Zambia (ANHRT); 14. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Kenya, Sigor (MWM); 15. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Tansania, Mpanda (ZSM).

Figures 22−24 in On the taxonomy of Zeuzera boisduvalii Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 (Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) species complex with description of a new genus and three new species

Figures 22−24. Genitalia of Davidlivingstonia: 22. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, male, Kenya, Sigor, gen. slide Heterocera No.: 32.933 (MWM); 23. D. boisduvalii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854), female, Côte d'Ivoire, Touba, Biemasso, gen. slide No.: ANHRT 00039 (ANHRT); 24. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, female, Zambia, Ndole Bay, on the shores of the Lake Tanganyika, gen. slide No.: ANHRT 00041 (ANHRT). Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figures 1−6 in On the taxonomy of Zeuzera boisduvalii Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 (Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) species complex with description of a new genus and three new species

Figures 1−6. Adult specimens of Davidlivingstonia boisduvalii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854) and their labels: 1. Holotype (MNHN); 2. Male, Sierra Leone (ANHRT); 3. Male, Côte d'Ivoire (ANHRT); 4. Male, Guinea Konakri (coll. G. Müller, Freising); 5. Male, Benin (MNHN); 6. Female, Côte d'Ivoire (ANHRT).

Figures 16−21 in On the taxonomy of Zeuzera boisduvalii Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 (Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) species complex with description of a new genus and three new species

Figures 16−21. Male genitalia of Davidlivingstonia: 16. D. boisduvalii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854), Sierra Leone, Loma Mountains, gen. slide No.: LG 5183 (ANHRT); 17. D. boisduvalii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854), Côte d'Ivoire, Mt. Tonkoui, gen. slide No.: ANHRT 00038 (ANHRT); 18. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype, Zambia, Samfia, Mukushi, reg. Liubwe, gen. slide Heterocera No.: 32.930 (MWM); 19. D. staudei Yakovlev spec. nov., paratype, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 10 km SE Kisangani, Island Mbiye, Congo River, gen. slide Heterocera No.: 32.932 (MWM); 20. D. prozorovi Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype, male, Congo Belge, Congo River, gen. slide No.: NHMUK 010315467 (NHMUK); 21. D. lenzi Yakovlev spec. nov., holotype, Zambia, Ndole Bay, on the shores of the Lake Tanganyika, gen. slide No.: ANHRT 00040 (ANHRT). Scale bar = 1 mm.