Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 8. Xenocheira pirloti Moore, 1988 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 8. Xenocheira pirloti Moore, 1988, male, 7.0 mm, NTM Cr018973, male*, 7.1 mm, NTM Cr018974, male**, 8 mm, NTM Cr018975, male***, 9 mm, NTM Cr018976, Dawson Rock, Bynoe Harbour, Northern Territory (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 1 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 1. Morphological measurements taken for this study, see text for explanation of abbreviations: (a) dorsal, (b) ventral, and (c) lateral views of the skull and (d) mandible of a typical Nyctimene, (e) Skeleton of type specimen for subfamily, N. cephalotes, from Pallas (1767).

Figure 7. Xenocheira pirloti Moore, 1988 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 7. Xenocheira pirloti Moore, 1988, male, 9 mm, NTM Cr018976, Dawson Rock, Bynoe Harbour, Northern Territory (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 8 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 8. First two axes of a LDFA based on 14 factors of combined skull, dental and external body measurements (listed in Table 4), showing separation between N. a. papuanus (circles, n = 44), N. certans (squares, n = 15) and N. wrightae sp. nov. (triangles, n = 11). Holotype of N. wrightae sp. nov. is indicated by star symbol.

Figure 10 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 10. Plot of breadth against M1 breadth for Nyctimene a. papuanus (circles, n = 58) N. certans (squares, n = 27), N. wrightae sp. nov. (triangles, n = 11) and N. cyclotis (diamond, n = 2). Filled symbols are genetically identified. Holotypes of each species indicated by star symbols. Smaller outliers of N. certans are old individuals with smaller teeth due to extensive tooth wear. Outliers of N. wrightae sp. nov. with larger teeth than their conspecifics are young individuals with little tooth wear.

Figure 12 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 12. Xenocheira xandrothrix sp. nov. holotype, 6.4 mm, NTM Cr011636, west of Elizabeth Reef, Cape Hotham, Beagle Gulf, Northern Territory (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 11 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 11. Xenocheira xandrothrix sp. nov. holotype, 6.4 mm, NTM Cr011636, west of Elizabeth Reef, Cape Hotham, Beagle Gulf, Northern Territory (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 7 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 7. Photographs of Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov. and N. certans. (a) Female with young pup attached, showing characteristic long ears with thickened edge and short, brown hair (photograph courtesy of Debra Wright); (b) N. certans, showing darker fur than N. wrightae sp. nov. and round, broad ears (photograph courtesy of Debra Wright); (c) N. wrightae sp. nov. yellow colour morph with large brown spots caught in O-Pio, Chimbu Prov. (field number NRI 721), the dorsal stripe is clear and becomes thinner in upper part of back.

Figure 5 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 5. Dorsal and ventral photographs of the holotypes of Nyctimene certans and N. cyclotis. (a, b) Holotype of N. certans NHMUK 1911.11.29.1; photographs courtesy of Harry Taylor (NHMUK). (c, d) Holotype of N. cyclotis NHMUK 1910.7.16.9; photographs courtesy of Jeff Streicher (NHMUK). The ears are short and rounded in N. certans and N. cyclotis. Both FA's of N. cyclotis are clearly broken. The dorsal stripe is difficult to distinguish in the base of the dorsal in N. certans and N. cyclotis. Overall there is a grizzled grey-brown appearance in the fur in the dorsal of N. certans and N. cyclotis, compared to a more even brown colour in N. wrightae sp. nov. and N. a. papuanus (see Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 6. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879, male, 5.9 mm, AM P.80522, south-west side of Boondelbah Island, east of Port Stephens, New South Wales. Image by Roger Springthorpe.

Figure 3. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 3. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879, male, 4.9 mm, AM P.99086, east of Red Head, New South Wales (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 4 in A new Tube-nosed Fruit Bat from New Guinea, Nyctimene wrightae sp. nov., A Re-diagnosis of N. certans and N. cyclotis (Pteropodidae: Chiroptera), and a Review of their Conservation Status

Figure 4. Dorsal and ventral views of skulls and mandibles of Nyctimene certans (young adult) (AM M.17888), N. certans (old, showing extensive tooth wear) (AM M.30648), N. wrightae sp. nov. (holotype) (AM M.16423) and N. a. papuanus (AM M.16425).

Figure 2. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 2. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879, female lectotype, AM P.25466, Port Jackson, New South Wales (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 1. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879 in Review of Xenocheira Haswell, 1879 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoridae)

Figure 1. Xenocheira fasciata Haswell, 1879, female lectotype, AM P.25466, Port Jackson, New South Wales (scale 0.1 mm).

Figure 31. Thevenetimyia australiensis Hall, 1969 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 31. Thevenetimyia australiensis Hall, 1969, SEM: (a) female wing costa; (b) male wing costa; (c) male scutum, showing scratches; (d) male scutum, showing modified base of microtrichia.

Figure 29 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 29. Thevenetimyia longipalpis (Hardy, 1921) pupal case: (a) dorsal; (b) lateral; (c) head, ventral; (d); head and thorax, ventral; (e) abdominal segments 4 to 6, dorsal; (f) cephalic spines, dorsal; (g) cephalic spines, frontal; (h) cephalic spines, lateral; (i) anal segment, dorsal; (j) anal segment, ventral. Scale bars = 1 mm (c, e–j); 0.1 mm (a, b, d). Abbreviations: aap = anterior antennal process; absr = abdominal spiracle; dpp = dorsal posterolateral process; fsp = frontal spine; lesh 1 = fore leg sheath; lesh 2 = mid leg sheath; lesh 3 = hind leg sheath; lfsp = lateral facial spine; lsh = labral sheath; mfha = median facial hair; msh = maxillary sheath; pap = posterior antennal process; pash = palpal sheath; pmc = posterior mesothoracic callosity; prsh = proboscidal sheath; vpp = ventral posterolateral process; wsh = wing sheath.

Figure 28. Thevenetimyia tenta Hall, 1969 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 28. Thevenetimyia tenta Hall, 1969 genitalia (a–e ♂; f, g ♀): (a) genital capsule, dorsal; (b) genital capsule, ventral; (c) genital capsule, lateral; (d) epandrium, dorsal; (e) epandrium, lateral; (f) sternite 8, ventral; (g) genitalia and spermathecae. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figure 25 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 25.Thevenetimyia nuri Rodrigues and Lamas, sp. nov., genitalia (a–e ♂; f, g ♀): (a) genital capsule, dorsal; (b) genital capsule, ventral; (c) genital capsule, lateral; (d) epandrium, dorsal; (e) epandrium, lateral; (f) sternite 8, ventral; (g) genitalia and spermathecae. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figure 27. Thevenetimyia tenta Hall, 1969 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 27. Thevenetimyia tenta Hall, 1969 ♂: (a) dorsal; (b) lateral; (c) flagellum; (d) wing; (e) head, dorsal; (f) head, lateral; (g) head, frontal; (h) head, profile. Scale bars = 1 mm (a, b, d–h); = 0.1 mm (c).

Figure 18. Thevenetimyia mimula Hall, 1969 in A Review of the Australian Species of Thevenetimyia Bigot, 1875 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini), with Description of Four New Species and the Pupal Case of T. longipalpis (Hardy)

Figure 18. Thevenetimyia mimula Hall, 1969 ♂ holotype: (a) dorsal; (b) lateral; (c) flagellum; (d) wing; (e) head, dorsal; (f) head, lateral; (g) head, frontal; (h) head, profile. Scale bars = 1 mm (a, b, d–h); = 0.1 mm (c).