Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,849
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,849 results for “Conservancy”
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the herpetofauna of Morelos, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 941: 121-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.941.52011
Figure 4 Vegetation map of the state of Morelos, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía – INEGI 2013).
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the herpetofauna of Morelos, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 941: 121-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.941.52011
Figure 7 Percent of A amphibians and B reptiles listed in protected categories on the IUCN Red List and SEMARNAT. Green is percentage in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to Least Concern in IUCN) (SEMARNAT). Red is percentage in protected categories. N is the number of species assessed by each agency.
WEGE: A NEW METRIC FOR RANKING LOCATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
<p>Here you will find all the maps produced in the paper "WEGE: A NEW METRIC FOR RANKING LOCATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION" that didn't make it into the main MS.</p> <p>It includes global grided maps at 100km x 100km and 20km x 20km of KBA triggering cells, EDGE, ED, WE, ER and our newly developed WEGE index for all amphibians, mammals and birds assessed by IUCN.</p>
Fig. 2 in New acoustic and molecular data shed light on the poorly known Amazonian frog Adenomera simonstuarti (Leptodactylidae): implications for distribution and conservation
Fig. 2. Geographic distribution of the Adenomera simonstuarti species complex in northwestern South America; genetic lineage 3 corresponds to the nominal species. Phylogenetic relationships among the eight lineages are shown on the upper right. Black solid-filled symbols represent the localities reported in the original description (square = type locality at Camisea, Peru; circle = Pando, Bolivia). Blackdotted symbols indicate newly collected specimens from the Juruá River in the Brazilian Amazonia.
Fig. 1 in New acoustic and molecular data shed light on the poorly known Amazonian frog Adenomera simonstuarti (Leptodactylidae): implications for distribution and conservation
Fig. 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Adenomera Steindachner, 1867 inferred from a concatenated dataset of four genes (two mitochondrial + two nuclear), showing the eight major clades delimited by colors. The emphasis on the diversification within the A. simonstuarti species complex shows a deep genetic divergence, with eight distinct lineages (see Fig. 2 for geographic distribution). Symbols above branches indicate posterior probabilities of Bayesian inference (BI) and those below branches indicate bootstraps of maximum likelihood inference (ML). Low support values (BI <80 and ML <70) were omitted. Branch scale is indicated in number of substitution per site.
Fig. 5 in New acoustic and molecular data shed light on the poorly known Amazonian frog Adenomera simonstuarti (Leptodactylidae): implications for distribution and conservation
Fig. 5. Advertisement calls of (A–B) nominal Adenomera simonstuarti (Angulo & Icochea, 2010) (= genetic lineage 3) from the upper Juruá River, in southwestern Amazonia of the Brazilian state of Acre (voucher INPA-H 40976), and (C–D) the sympatric Adenomera sp. from Camisea, in the Region of Cusco, Peru (voucher MUSM 18219). A. Time-domain section containing a multi-note call (18 notes). B. Spectrogram and oscillogram of three notes (5th–7th) from the call in A. C. Time-domain section of two males in antiphonal calling (single-note calls). D. Spectrogram and oscillogram of the 4th note in C. Figures are equally scaled (ca 4.5 s on the x-axis of A and C, each marking corresponding to 1.0 s).
Fig. 4 in New acoustic and molecular data shed light on the poorly known Amazonian frog Adenomera simonstuarti (Leptodactylidae): implications for distribution and conservation
Fig. 4. Specimens of the genetic lineage 2 related to Adenomera simonstuarti (Angulo & Icochea, 2010) from the lower Juruá River, in Juruá, Brazilian state of Amazonas. A−B. Dorsolateral view of the adult male, SVL = 22.6 mm (INPA-H 39792) and the adult female, SVL = 26.1 mm (INPA-H 39814), respectively. C−D. Dorsal and ventral views of the female shown in B. Photographs by L.J.C.L. Moraes. Scale bar = 25 mm.
Figure 1 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 1 Basin of Mexico, circa 1519. Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Basin_of_Mexico_1519_map-en.svg
Figure 5 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 5 Climate map of Mexico City, Mexico (modified from García and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 1998).
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 4 Vegetation map of Mexico City, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía; INEGI 2016).
Figure 8 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 8 Percentage of species included in the IUCN Red List or listed by SEMARNAT, and the Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS). A Amphibians B reptiles. Green is percentage in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to IUCN's Least Concern) (SEMARNAT); low and medium EVS. Red is percentage in protected categories or high EVS. N is the number of species assessed by each agency.
Figure 6 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 6 Satellite map showing the topographic features of Mexico City (source: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 2003) and Regions of Mexico City according to Reygadas-Prado (2016): 1) Forests and Ravines; 2) Wetlands of Xochimilco and Tláhuac; 3) Urban Parks and Gardens; 4) Mountains of Xochimilco and Milpa Alta; 5) Sierra de Guadalupe; 6) Sierra de Santa Catarina.
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 951: 109-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.951.52578
Figure 7 Species accumulation curves for total herpetofauna of Mexico City, Mexico, as well as separately for amphibians and reptiles.
Figure 8 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 8 Proportion of A) amphibians and B) reptiles listed in protected categories on the IUCN Red List, SEMARNAT, and high EVS for the State of Mexico. Green is proportion in Data Deficient and Least Concern (IUCN); Not Listed and Subject to Special Protection (we regarded the category of Subject to Special Protection in SEMARNAT equivalent to Least Concern in IUCN) (SEMARNAT); or low or medium EVS. Red is percentage in protected categories or high EVS. N is the number of species assessed.
Figure 7 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 7 Species accumulation curves for total herpetofauna, amphibians, and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico.
Figure 6 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 6 AAmbystoma lermaenseBChiropterotriton orculusCAbronia deppiiD juvenile Sceloporus sugillatusECrotalus transversus. Photos by Eric Centenero-Alcalá
Figure 5 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 5 Climate map of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from García – Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 1998).
Figure 4 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 4 Vegetation map of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from Dirección General de Geografía – INEGI 2016).
Figure 3 from: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137-159. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.953.50881
Figure 3 Physiographic provinces of the State of Mexico, Mexico (modified from Cervantes-Zamora et al. 1990).
Supplementary material 3 from: Harrington LA, Green J, Muinde P, Macdonald DW, Auliya M, D'Cruze N (2020) Snakes and ladders: A review of ball python production in West Africa for the global pet market. Nature Conservation 41: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.41.51270
Main importing countries: additional data
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.