Find research datasets worth reusing

Supplementary material 1 from: Aketarawong N, Isasawin S, Sojikul P, Thanaphum S (2015) Gene flow and genetic structure of Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera, Tephritidae) among geographical differences and sister species, B. dorsalis, inferred from microsatellite DNA data. In: De Meyer M, Clarke AR, Vera MT, Hendrichs J (Eds) Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Enhance SIT Application and Facilitate International Trade. ZooKeys 540: 239-272. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.10058

Component data at the five successive thresholds used to illustrate Figure 4: Explanation note: Component data are used to illustrate the structure of the subset of Bactrocera carambolae populations. The Highest Betweenness-centrality is highlighted in blue.

Supplementary material 1 from: Colihueque N, Gantz A, Rau JR, Parraguez M (2015) Genetic divergence analysis of the Common Barn Owl Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) and the Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763) from southern Chile using COI sequence. ZooKeys 534: 135-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.534.5953

Pictures of external morphology of specimens of Tyto alba and Asio flammeus collected in southern Chile: Explanation note: Pictures of ventral and dorsal views of specimens showing plumage color and overall appearance. Data on body mass of these specimens are also provided.

Supplementary material 4 from: Aketarawong N, Isasawin S, Sojikul P, Thanaphum S (2015) Gene flow and genetic structure of Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera, Tephritidae) among geographical differences and sister species, B. dorsalis, inferred from microsatellite DNA data. In: De Meyer M, Clarke AR, Vera MT, Hendrichs J (Eds) Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Enhance SIT Application and Facilitate International Trade. ZooKeys 540: 239-272. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.10058

Comparisons among three different the individual admixture plots: Explanation note: Comparisons among the individual admixture plots of 289 individuals, for K = 3, considering correlated allele frequency, uncorrelated allele frequency, and missing data as recessive homozygotes for the null alleles, respectively.

Supplementary material 3 from: Aketarawong N, Isasawin S, Sojikul P, Thanaphum S (2015) Gene flow and genetic structure of Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera, Tephritidae) among geographical differences and sister species, B. dorsalis, inferred from microsatellite DNA data. In: De Meyer M, Clarke AR, Vera MT, Hendrichs J (Eds) Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Enhance SIT Application and Facilitate International Trade. ZooKeys 540: 239-272. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.10058

Component data at the four successive thresholds used to illustrate Figure 6: Explanation note: Component data are used to illustrate the structure of the subset of the Salaya5 strain and wild populations. The highest Betweenness-centrality is highlighted in blue.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →

FIGURE 10 in Where are the species limits? Morphology versus genetics in Neotropical chewing lice of the genus Myrsidea (Phthiraptera: Menoponidae), with description of three new species

FIGURE 10. Phylogenetic tree of the Neotropical Myrsidea species (including additional non-Neotropical Myrsidea closest to species examined) based on partial COI sequences. The tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the GTR+G+I model. The tree with the highest log likelihood is shown. Bootstrap support is shown next to the branches (values <50 % not shown). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Species of Myrsidea discussed in the present paper are in bold type.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →

FIGURES 1–5. Myrsidea new species. Figs 1–3 in Where are the species limits? Morphology versus genetics in Neotropical chewing lice of the genus Myrsidea (Phthiraptera: Menoponidae), with description of three new species

FIGURES 1–5. Myrsidea new species. Figs 1–3, male genital sac sclerites: 1, Myrsidea flaveolae n. sp.; 2, Myrsidea habiae n. sp.; 3, Myrsidea sayacae n. sp. Figs 4–5, habitus: 4, Myrsidea flaveolae female; 5, Myrsidea flaveolae male.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →

FIGURES 6–9. Myrsidea new species, habitus. Myrsidea habiae n in Where are the species limits? Morphology versus genetics in Neotropical chewing lice of the genus Myrsidea (Phthiraptera: Menoponidae), with description of three new species

FIGURES 6–9. Myrsidea new species, habitus. Myrsidea habiae n. sp.: 6, female; 7, male. Myrsidea sayacae n. sp.: 8, female; 9, male.

opengpl-2.0Aug 2017View details →

Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning

Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning Jeffrey O. Hanson, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Cynthia Riginos, Richard A. Fuller. Correspondence should be addressed to jeffrey.hanson@uqconnect.edu.au. Research summary Protected areas buffer species from anthropogenic threats and provide places for the processes that generate and maintain biodiversity to continue. However, genetic variation, the raw material for evolution, is difficult to capture in conservation planning, not least because genetic data require considerable resources to obtain and analyze. Here we show that freely available environmental and geographic distance variables can be highly effective surrogates in conservation planning for representing adaptive and neutral intra-specific genetic variation. We obtained occurrence and genetic data from the IntraBioDiv project for 27 plant species collected over the European Alps using a gridded sampling scheme. For each species, we identified loci that were potentially under selection using outlier loci methods, and mapped their main gradients of adaptive and neutral genetic variation across the grid cells. We then used the cells as planning units to prioritize protected area acquisitions. First, we verified that the spatial patterns of environmental and geographic variation were correlated, respectively, with adaptive and neutral genetic variation. Second, we showed that these surrogates can predict the proportion of genetic variation secured in randomly generated solutions. Finally, we discovered that solutions based only on surrogate information secured substantial amounts of adaptive and neutral genetic variation. Our work paves the way for widespread integration of surrogates for genetic variation into conservation Overview This repository contains the data and source code that underpins the findings in our manuscript "Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning". To rerun all computational analyses, run `make clean && make all`. <ul> <li>article <ul> <li>manuscript main text, figures, and supporting information</li> </ul> </li> <li>code <ul> <li>R: scripts used to run the analysis</li> <li>parameters: files used to run analysis in TOML format</li> <li>rmarkdown: files used to compile them manuscript</li> </ul> </li> <li>data <ul> <li>raw: raw data used to run the analysis</li> <li>intermediate_ results generated during processing</li> <li>final: results used in the paper</li> </ul> </li> </ul> Software required <ul> <li>Operating system <ul> <li>Ubuntu (Trusty 14.04 LTS)</li> </ul> </li> <li>Programs <ul> <li>[R (version 3.3.2)](https://www.r-project.org)</li> <li>GNU make</li> <li>pandoc (version 1.16.0.2+)</li> <li>Gurobi (version 7.0.2; academic licenses are available for no cost)</li> <li>LaTeX</li> </ul> </li> </ul>

opencc-by-nc-4.0Oct 2017View details →

Data from: Inferring causalities in landscape genetics: An extension of Wright's causal modeling to distance matrices

Data files from Inferring causalities in landscape genetics: An extension of Wright's causal modeling to distance matrices.

FIGURES 41–45. 41 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 41–45. 41, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: pronotum, right lateral view; 42, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: pronotum, right lateral view; 43, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: pronotum, right lateral view; 44, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: pronotum, right lateral view; 45, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976 (left), and D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković- Gospodnetić, 1976 (right): parietal part of the head at eye level showing spinules, right lateral view.

FIGURES 37–40. 37 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 37–40. 37, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: posterior part of the head, right lateral view; 38, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: posterior part of the head, right lateral view; 39, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: parietal part of the head at eye level, right lateral view; 40, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: parietal part of the head at eye level, right lateral view.

FIGURES 33–36. 33 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 33–36. 33, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: head and pronotum protruding from case, right lateral view; 34, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: head and pronotum, right lateral view; 35, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: head and pronotum, right lateral view; 36, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: head and pronotum, right lateral view.

FIGURES 27–32 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 27–32. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 27, right foreleg, lateral view; 28, right mid-leg, lateral view; 29, right hind-leg, lateral view; 30, gill diagram: position of filaments on left side of abdominal segments I– VIII, ●, gills always present, O, gills not always present; 31, abdominal segment IX, dorsal view; 32, anal proleg, left lateral view.

FIGURES 46–53 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 46–53. Metanota of Drusus spp., showing anteromedian (sa1) and posteromedian (sa2) sclerites. 46–47, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976; 48–49, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971; 50–51, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976; 52–53, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971.

FIGURES 13–15 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 13–15. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 13, gill diagram: position of filaments on left side of abdominal segments I–VIII; ●, gills always present; O, gills not always present; 14, abdominal segment IX, dorsal view; 15, anal proleg, left lateral view.

FIGURES 22–26 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 22–26. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 22, head, frontal view; 23, right mandible, dorsal view; 24, pronotum, right lateral view; 25, white recumbent setae on posterior part of pronotum, right lateral view; 26, thorax (pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum), dorsal view.

FIGURES 16–21 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 16–21. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 16, larva in its case, right lateral view; 17, larva, right lateral view; 18, head, pronotum and mesonotum, right lateral view; 19, head with spinules above eye, right lateral view; 20, area with spinules, right lateral view; 21, spinules, right lateral view.

FIGURES 7–12 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 7–12. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 7, pronotum left lateral view; 8, pronotum, right lateral view; 9, thorax (pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum), dorsal view; 10, right foreleg, lateral view; 11, right mid-leg, lateral view; 12, hind-leg, lateral view.

FIGURES 1–6 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes

FIGURES 1–6. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 1, larva in its case, right lateral view; 2, larva, right lateral view; 3, head and pronotum, right lateral view; 4, head and pronotum, left dorsolateral view; 5, head, frontal view; 6, right mandible, dorsal view.