Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 2. Three-dimensional reconstructions of Diprotodon optatum (A), Zygomaturus trilobus (B), Neohelos stirtoni (C) and Propalorchestes sp. (D) showing the extent of the auditory, squamosal, parietal and frontal sinuses in blue, and brain endocast in red. Skulls are shown in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views. Scale bars represent 10 cm. Bone is 70% transparent.

Figure 3 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 3. Three-dimensional reconstructions of Vombatus ursinus (A), Lasiorhinus latifrons (B) and Phascolarctos cinereus (C) showing the extent of the frontal sinuses in blue and brain endocast in red. Skulls are shown in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views. Scale bars represent 10 cm. Bone is 70% transparent.

Figure 1 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 1. Three-dimensional digital reconstruction of Zygomaturus trilobus cranium, QVM1992 GFV73 from CT scans. Each fragment of the specimen was scanned separately and reconstructed to form the complete cranium on the right.

Figure 5 in A quantitative comparative analysis of the size of the frontoparietal sinuses and brain in vombatiform marsupials

Figure 5. Frontal CT slices showing the braincase (BC), diploe (DIP) and parietal sinuses (PAS) inDiprotodon (A),Neohelos (B),Lasiorhinus (C) and Phascolarctos (D). Scale bars are 3 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →

Figure. Cross-sections of ovaries of Heliconia psittacorum (A,B) and Musa velutina (C,D). Polyethylene glycol–embedded ovaries are on the left (A,C). Paraffin-embedded ovaries are on the right (B,D). Scale bars: 1 mm. Images obtained by Anastasia Romanov (A and C) and Bruce Kirchoff (B and D). in USE OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL (PEG, CARBOWAX) AS AN EMBEDDING MEDIUM PRODUCES RESULTS COMPARABLE TO PARAFFIN

Figure. Cross-sections of ovaries of Heliconia psittacorum (A,B) and Musa velutina (C,D). Polyethylene glycol–embedded ovaries are on the left (A,C). Paraffin-embedded ovaries are on the right (B,D). Scale bars: 1 mm. Images obtained by Anastasia Romanov (A and C) and Bruce Kirchoff (B and D).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2007View details →

Fig. 2 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations

Fig. 2. Scatterplots of population-specific dimension stimulus coordinates as obtained from multidimensional scaling (three-dimensional model); A (up): plot of first and second dimensions, B (down): plot of first and third dimensions. Convex polygons encompass the 20 Austrian (black circles and light grey area) and the eight Bulgarian (white circles and dark grey area) populations, respectively. Black cross indicates the Vojvodina (VOJ) population; for acronymes of Austrian populations see

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2007View details →

Fig. 1 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations

Fig. 1. Unrooted Wagner dendogram based on modified Roger's distances (WRIGHT 1978), representing genetic relationships among brown hares from the Vojvodina (VOJ), 20 Austrian (population acronyme – A), and eight Bulgarian (population acronyme – BL) populations. For acronymes of the Austrian populations see HARTL et al. (1993) and for Bulgarian populations see SUCHENTRUNK et

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2007View details →

Fig. 3 in Allozyme Variability Of Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus) From The Vojvodina (Serbia), Compared To Central And Southeastern European Populations

Fig. 3. Stepwise discriminant analysis (DA): box plots of discriminant scores for the Austrian and Bulgarian populations as well as the discriminant score of the initially unclassified Vojvodina population (cross, VOJ), as obtained from DA of stimulus coordinates from the multidimensional scaling (three-dimensional model). The stippled horizontal line indicates classification of VOJ to the Aus-

Figs 8–9 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Figs 8–9. Thrips atratus (left), Thrips montanus (right): 8 = Sculpture of abdominal sternum VIII in larvae (vs1 – ventral seta 1, vs2 – ventral seta 2); 9 = Larvae – pigmentation of abdominal terga IX

Figs 5–7 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Figs 5–7. Thrips atratus (left), Thrips montanus (right): 5 = Sculpture of abdominal sternum X in males (IX, X – sterna); 6 = Pigmentation of larval pronotum; 7 = Coxa and sculpture of lateral part of

Fig. 4 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Fig. 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) – scatter diagram of individual male specimens of Thrips atratus and T. montanus as OTUs along PC1 and PC2, based on 12 quantitative features (Table 1). For abbreviations see Figure 2

Fig. 1 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Fig. 1. Results of the cluster analysis (Ward's method, with Euclidian distances) for female specimens made on the basis of 8 quantitative features (Table 1), the feature of 3rd antennal segment col-

Fig. 2 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Fig. 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) – scatter diagram of individual female specimens of Thrips atratus and T. montanus as OTUs along PC1 and PC2, based on 8 quantitative features (Table 1). Abbreviations: squares – T. montanus, circles – T. atratus, A-O – features (bold and arrow – fea-

Fig. 3 in Thrips Atratus Haliday, 1836 And T. Montanus Priesner, 1920 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) - One Or Two Species? Comparative Morphological Studies

Fig. 3. Results of the cluster analysis (Ward's method, with Euclidian distances) for male specimens made on the basis of 12 quantitative features (Table 1). Two qualitative features were added: 3rd antennal segment colour: white circles – yellow, black and white circles – yellowish brown, black cir-

Figure 4 in Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in Morocco: Comparative assessment of three diagnostic methods and characterization of parasite forms in Jones' culture medium

Figure 4. Observation under the light microscope (×400) of different forms of cultured Blastocystis sp. in Jones' medium. Panel A: Different sizes of the vacuolar form. Panel B: Granular form (blue arrow) and cystic form (black arrow). Panel C: Granular form (blue arrow) and vacuolar form (red arrow). Panel D: Granular form (black arrow) and vacuolar form (red arrow) stained with methylene blue. Panel E: Illustrates the process of transformation of vacuolar cells into multivacuolar forms in culture, showing the division of the central vacuole into smaller vacuoles. Panel D: Different aspects of the amoeboid form with the presence of a single or several pseudopodia (red arrow).

Figure 5 in Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in Morocco: Comparative assessment of three diagnostic methods and characterization of parasite forms in Jones' culture medium

Figure 5. Representative gel image of PCR products from Blastocystis isolates. Lanes 1 to 13: Blastocystis isolates; lane NC: negative control; lane PC: positive control; DNA ladder – 50 bp.

Figure 3 in Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in Morocco: Comparative assessment of three diagnostic methods and characterization of parasite forms in Jones' culture medium

Figure 3. Various forms of Blastocystis sp. were observed under the light microscope during the direct examination of stool specimens. Panel A: Vacuolar form (red arrow) and cyst form (black arrow) of Blastocystis in an unstained wet mount. N: Nuclei situated at the periphery of the organism. C. b: Central body. Panels B, C, and D: Vacuolar form (red arrow), Granular form (blue arrow), and cyst form (black arrow) stained with Lugol's iodine (×400).

Figure 2 in Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in Morocco: Comparative assessment of three diagnostic methods and characterization of parasite forms in Jones' culture medium

Figure 2. Occurrence of Blastocystis sp. infection on its own or in conjunction with other protozoan species.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2013View details →

Fig. 5 in Comparative cytogenetics in Astyanax (Characiformes: Characidae) with focus on the cytotaxonomy of the group

Fig. 5. DAPI stained karyotypes of Astyanax argyrimarginatus (a), A. aff. bimaculatus (b), A. elachylepis (c), A. xavante (d), Astyanax sp. (e), and A. altiparanae (f). Chromosomes carrying AgNORs and 18S sites are underlined in karyotypes. Bar = 5 µm.