Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,157
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,157 results for “Survival.”
Fig 3 in Comparative study on the survival and growth performance of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei in ponds cultured with hatchery and nursery reared post larvae
Fig 3: Temperature of P.Vannamei culture at Yazali during the year 2018.
Fig 2 in Comparative study on the survival and growth performance of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei in ponds cultured with hatchery and nursery reared post larvae
Fig 2: pH of P.Vannamei culture in summer crop at Yazali during the year 2018.
Fig 1 in Comparative study on the survival and growth performance of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei in ponds cultured with hatchery and nursery reared post larvae
Fig 1: Salinity of P.Vannamei culture at Yazali during the year 2018.
Percentage survival of wMel-infected Aedes aegypti in UAV trial II in Nausori, Fiji (2019)
<p><span>Triplicates samples of approximately 100-200 mosquitoes were collected from the emergence cages (rearing control), after cold immobilization at 4°C for 30 minutes (immobilization control), and after the end of each flight. Survival % was compared to that of the rearing control and statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA, unless otherwise specified in the data sheet. NS = Not statistically significant and ND = Not done</span></p>
Fig 1 in Growth performance, nutrient utilization and survival rate of Clarias gariepinus fed varied inclusion of processed Moringa oleifera diets
Fig 1: Showing Research Location
Fig 3 in Survival, growth, and biomass of brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) fed with spirulina powder and soybean flour
Fig 3: The biomass of Artemia fed with different feeds at 21 days of rearing
Fig 2 in The effect of sulphur goatfish, sesarma, and green mussel as feed on the growth and survival of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) in recirculation systems
Fig 2: Histogram of Survival Growth Rate (SGR)
Fig 2 in Survival, growth, and biomass of brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) fed with spirulina powder and soybean flour
Fig 2: The body length of Artemia fed with different feeds at 21 days of rearing
Fig 1 in The effect of sulphur goatfish, sesarma, and green mussel as feed on the growth and survival of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) in recirculation systems
Fig 1: Histogram of Food Conversion Ratio (FCR) Calculation
Fig 1 in Survival, growth, and biomass of brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) fed with spirulina powder and soybean flour
Fig 1: The survival rate of Artemia fed with different feeds at 21 days of rearing
Fig 3 in The effect of sulphur goatfish, sesarma, and green mussel as feed on the growth and survival of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) in recirculation systems
Fig 3: Histogram of Survival Rate (SR)
A synthetic dataset for the exploration of survival and classification models: prediction of heart attack or stroke within a 10-year follow-up period
<div> <div></div> </div> <div> <div> <div> <p><span>Machine learning methodologies are increasingly popular in health care research. This shift to integrated data science approaches necessitates professional development of the existing health care data analyst workforce. To enhance a smooth transition, educational resources need to be developed. Barriers to accessing real healthcare datasets, vital for health care data analyses methodologies training purposes, include financial, ethical and patient confidentiality concerns. Synthetic datasets mimicking real-world complexities offer a simpler solution.</span></p> <p>We present a synthetic dataset which mirrors routinely collected primary care data on heart attack and stroke among the adult population. The data incorporates much of the practical challenges encountered in routinely collected primary care systems such as missing data, informative censoring, interactions, variable irrelevance, and noise and can be used for training in methods which handle these difficulties. The intent is for the user to build models of heart/stroke risk using survival-based methodologies.</p> <p>By sharing this synthetic dataset openly, our goal is to contribute a transformative asset for professional training in health and social care data analysis. The dataset covers demographics, lifestyle variables, comorbidities, systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, family history of cardiovascular diseases, respiratory functioning, and experience of heart-attack and/or stroke. This initiative aims to bridge the gap in sophisticated healthcare datasets for training, fostering professional development of the health and social care research workforce.</p> <p>This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ARC Wessex and the National Centre for Research Methods. The views expressed in this summary are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.</p> <p> </p> </div> </div> </div>
Environmentally acquired gut-associated bacteria are not critical for growth and survival in a solitary bee, Megachile rotundata
<p>Social bees have been extensively studied for their gut microbial functions, but the significance of the gut microbiota in solitary bees remain less explored. Solitary bee, <em>Megachile rotundata</em> females provision their offspring with pollen from various plant species, harboring a diverse microbial community that colonizes larvae guts. The <em>Apilactobacillus</em> is the most abundant microbe, but evidence concerning the effects of <em>Apilactobacillus</em> and other provision microbes on growth and survival are lacking. We hypothesized that the presence of <em>Apilactobacillus</em> in abundance would enhance larval and prepupal development, weight, and survival, while the absence of intact microbial communities was expected to have a negative impact on bee fitness. We reared larvae on pollen provisions with naturally collected microbial communities (Natural pollen) or devoid of microbial communities (Sterile pollen). We also assessed the impact of introducing <em>Apilactobacillus</em> <em>micheneri</em> by adding it to both types of pollen provisions. Feeding larvae with sterile pollen + <em>A. micheneri</em> led to the highest mortality rate, followed by natural pollen + <em>A. micheneri</em>, and sterile pollen. Larval development was significantly delayed in groups fed with sterile pollen. Interestingly, larval and prepupal weights did not significantly differ across treatments compared to natural pollen-fed larvae. 16S rRNA gene sequencing found a dominance of <em>Sodalis,</em> when <em>A. micheneri</em> was introduced to natural pollen<em>.</em> The presence of <em>Sodalis</em> with abundant <em>A. michene</em>ri suggests potential crosstalk between both, shaping bee nutrition and health. Hence, this study highlights that the reliance on non-host specific environmental bacteria may not impact fitness of <em>M. rotundata</em>.</p>
Adaptative Survival of Aspergillus fumigatus to Echinocandins Arises from Cell Wall Remodeling Beyond β-1,3-glucan Synthesis Inhibition
<p>Unprocessed Solid-state NMR and Molecular Dynamics data sets for the manuscript titled "Adaptative Survival of Aspergillus fumigatus to Echinocandins Arises from Cell Wall Remodeling Beyond β-1,3-glucan Synthesis Inhibition"</p>
Measuring the benefit of a risk-induced trait response: vigilance and survival probability
<p>Defensive traits are hypothesized to benefit prey by reducing predation risk from a focal predator but come at a cost to the fitness of the prey. Variation in the expression of defensive traits is seen among individuals within the same population, and in the same individual in response to changes in the environment (i.e., phenotypically plastic responses). It is the relative magnitude of the cost and benefit of the defensive trait which underlies the defensive trait expression and its consequences to the community. However, whereas the cost has received much attention in ecological research, the benefit is seldom examined. Even in a defensive trait as extensively studied as vigilance, there are few studies of the purported benefit of the behavior, namely that vigilance enhances survival. We examined if prey vigilance increased survival and quantified that benefit in a natural system, with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) experiencing unmanipulated levels of predation risk from Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Deer that spent more time vigilant (as measured by head position using camera trap data) had a higher probability of survival. Indeed, an individual deer that were vigilant 75% of the time were more than three times as likely to be killed by panthers over the course of a year compared to a deer that were vigilant 95% of the time. Our results therefore show that within-population variation in the expression of a defensive trait has profound consequences to the benefit it confers. Our results provide empirical evidence supporting a long-held but seldom tested hypothesis, that vigilance is a behavior that reduces the probability of predation and quantified the benefit of this defensive trait. Our work furthers an understanding of the net effects of a trait on prey fitness and predator-prey interactions, within-population variation in traits, and predation risk effects.</p>
Fig. 3 in Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Fig. 3. Survival of SMR and Tap-7 strains of Anastrepha ludens afer aerial release.
Temperature-Dependent Development and Freezing Survival of Protostrongylid Nematodes of Arctic Ungulates: Implications for Transmission
<p>Data used to derive the conclusion of the work. Spreadsheets contain raw data.</p>
Ecosystem-Level Factors Affecting the Survival of Open-Source Projects: A Case Study of the PyPI Ecosystem - the dataset
<pre><em>Replication pack, FSE2018 submission #164: </em><em>------------------------------------------ </em></pre> <pre><strong>**</strong>Working title:<strong>** </strong>Ecosystem-Level Factors Affecting the Survival of Open-Source Projects: A Case Study of the PyPI Ecosystem <strong>**</strong>Note:<strong>** </strong>link to data artifacts is already included in the paper. Link to the code will be included in the Camera Ready version as well. <em>Content description </em><em>=================== </em> <strong>- **</strong>ghd-0.1.0.zip<strong>** </strong>- the code archive. This code produces the dataset files described below <strong>- **</strong>settings.py<strong>** </strong>- settings template for the code archive. <strong>- **</strong>dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip<strong>** </strong>- the minimally sufficient version of the dataset. This dataset only includes stats aggregated by the ecosystem (PyPI) <strong>- **</strong>dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz<strong>** </strong>- full version of the dataset, including project-level statistics. It is ~34Gb unpacked. This dataset still doesn't include PyPI packages themselves, which take around 2TB. <strong>- **</strong>build_model.r, helpers.r<strong>** </strong>- R files to process the survival data (`survival_data.csv` in <strong>**</strong>dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip<strong>**</strong>, `common.cache/survival_data.pypi_2008_2017-12_6.csv` in <strong>**</strong>dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz<strong>**</strong>) <strong>- **</strong>Interview protocol.pdf<strong>** </strong>- approximate protocol used for semistructured interviews. <strong>- </strong>LICENSE - text of GPL v3, under which this dataset is published <strong>- </strong>INSTALL.md - replication guide (~2 pages)</pre> <pre><em>Replication guide </em><em>================= </em> <em>Step 0 - prerequisites </em><em>---------------------- </em> <strong>- </strong>Unix-compatible OS (Linux or OS X) <strong>- </strong>Python interpreter (2.7 was used; Python 3 compatibility is highly likely) <strong>- </strong>R 3.4 or higher (3.4.4 was used, 3.2 is known to be incompatible) Depending on detalization level (see Step 2 for more details): <strong>- </strong>up to 2Tb of disk space (see Step 2 detalization levels) <strong>- </strong>at least 16Gb of RAM (64 preferable) <strong>- </strong>few hours to few month of processing time <em>Step 1 - software </em><em>---------------- </em> <strong>- </strong>unpack <strong>**</strong>ghd-0.1.0.zip<strong>**</strong>, or clone from gitlab: git clone https://gitlab.com/user2589/ghd.git git checkout 0.1.0 `cd` into the extracted folder. All commands below assume it as a current directory. <strong>- </strong>copy `settings.py` into the extracted folder. Edit the file: <strong> * </strong>set `DATASET_PATH` to some newly created folder path <strong> * </strong>add at least one GitHub API token to `SCRAPER_GITHUB_API_TOKENS` <strong>- </strong>install docker. For Ubuntu Linux, the command is `sudo apt-get install docker-compose` <strong>- </strong>install libarchive and headers: `sudo apt-get install libarchive-dev` <strong>- </strong>(optional) to replicate on NPM, install yajl: `sudo apt-get install yajl-tools` Without this dependency, you might get an error on the next step, but it's safe to ignore. <strong>- </strong>install Python libraries: `pip install --user -r requirements.txt` . <strong>- </strong>disable all APIs except GitHub (Bitbucket and Gitlab support were not yet implemented when this study was in progress): edit `scraper/init.py`, comment out everything except GitHub support in `PROVIDERS`. <em>Step 2 - obtaining the dataset </em><em>----------------------------- </em> The ultimate goal of this step is to get output of the Python function `common.utils.survival_data()` and save it into a CSV file: # copy and paste into a Python console from common import utils survival_data = utils.survival_data('pypi', '2008', smoothing=6) survival_data.to_csv('survival_data.csv') Since full replication will take several months, here are some ways to speedup the process: <em>####Option 2.a, difficulty level: easiest </em> Just use the precomputed data. Step 1 is not necessary under this scenario. <strong>- </strong>extract <strong>**</strong>dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip<strong>** </strong><strong>- </strong>get `survival_data.csv`, go to the next step <em>####Option 2.b, difficulty level: easy </em> Use precomputed longitudinal feature values to build the final table. The whole process will take 15..30 minutes. <strong>- </strong>create a folder `<DATASET_PATH>/common.cache`, where `<DATASET_PATH>` is the value of the variable `DATASET_PATH` in `settings.py` <strong>- </strong>extract <strong>**</strong>dataset_minimal_Jan_2018<strong>** </strong>to the newly created folder <strong>- </strong>rename files: mv backporting.csv monthly_data.pypi_backporting.csv mv cc_degree.csv monthly_data.pypi_cc_degree.csv mv commercial.csv monthly_data.pypi_commercial.csv mv commits.csv monthly_data.pypi_commits.csv mv contributors.csv monthly_data.pypi_contributors.csv mv dc_katz.csv monthly_data.pypi_dc_katz.csv mv downstreams.csv monthly_data.pypi_downstreams.csv mv d_upstreams.csv monthly_data.pypi_d_upstreams.csv mv github_user_info.csv user_info.pypi.csv mv issues.csv monthly_data.pypi_issues.csv mv non_dev_issues.csv monthly_data.pypi_non_dev_issues.csv mv non_dev_submitters.csv monthly_data.pypi_non_dev_submitters mv package_urls.csv package_urls.pypi.csv mv q90.csv monthly_data.pypi_q90.csv # raw_dependencies.csv is not required # raw_packages_info.csv is not required # Feel free to read README.md for more details about the data mv submitters.csv monthly_data.pypi_submitters.csv # In this scenario we'll generate a new survival_data.csv mv university.csv monthly_data.pypi_university.csv mv upstreams.csv monthly_data.pypi_upstreams.csv <strong>- </strong>edit `common/decorators.py`, set `DEFAULT_EXPIRY` to some higher value, e.g. `DEFAULT_EXPIRY = float('inf') # cache never expires` Then, use the Python code above to obtain `survival_data.csv`. <em>####Option 2.c, difficulty level: medium </em> Use predownloaded raw data to build longitudinal feature values, and then the dataset. Despite most of the data is cached, some functions will pull up updates which might take anywhere from days to couple weeks to run. <strong>- </strong>Download <strong>**</strong>dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz<strong>** </strong>from http://k.soberi.us/dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz . This file is not included in this archive because of its size (5.4Gb compressed, 34Gb unpacked). <strong>- </strong>edit `common/decorators.py`, set `DEFAULT_EXPIRY` to some higher value, e.g. `DEFAULT_EXPIRY = float('inf') # cache never expires` <strong>- </strong>extract the content of this archive into `<DATASET_PATH>`. <strong>- </strong>clean up `<DATASET_PATH>/common.cache` (otherwise you'll get Step 2.a. You can reproduce Step 2.b by deleting only `survival_data.pypi_2008_2017-12_6.csv`) Run the Python code above to obtain `survival_data.csv`. <em>####Option 2.d, difficulty level: hard </em> Build the dataset from scratch. Although most of the processing is parallelized, it will take at least couple months on a reasonably powerful server (32 cores, 512G of RAM, 2Tb+ of HDD space in our setup). <strong>- </strong>ensure the `<DATASET_PATH>` is empty <strong>- </strong>add more GitHub tokens (borrow from your coworkers) to `settings.py`. Run the Python code above to obtain `survival_data.csv`. <em>Step 3 - run the regression </em><em>--------------------------- </em> install R libraries: install.packages(c("htmlTable", "OIsurv", "survival", "car", "survminer", "ggplot2", "sqldf", "pscl", "texreg", "xtable")) Use `build_model.r` (e.g. in RStudio) and produced `survival_data.csv` to build the regressions used in the paper. This process takes at least 16Gb of RAM and takes few hours to run due to the gigantic size of the dataset. </pre>
A Search for a Surviving White Dwarf Companion in SN~1006 - photometric dataset
<p>This is a photometry catalogue obtained by DECam to find hot surviving WD companions to the SN1006 supernova. Please acknowledge the science paper Kerzendorf et al. 2017 if you use this dataset. </p>
neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in early stage breast cancer as predictor of disease free survival
<p>The relationship between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and outcome probably a complex and multifactorial issues. High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is reflect the role of systemic inflammation in accelerate angiogenesis, tumor grow-up, and metastasis development.</p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> The study aimed to estimate the relation between NLR, and PLR with disease free survival (DFS), and assess the values of clinico-pathologic factors on the prognosis.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospectively we reviewed 1167 files and 102 patients with breast cancer included in Babylon Oncology Center from January 2009 to September 2014, and follow up for at least 36 months.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>102 patients, with mean age of 50.4 ± 11.7 years and minimum follow up 40 months, the overall median DFS was 62 months with 5 – years DFS of 52.5%, stage N0 show significant better DFS compared to stage N1 (P value 0.004), also patients with positive hormonal status show significant better DFS compared to negative hormonal status. The isolated local recurrence is 15% while combined local recurrences and distant metastasis is 37%.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR is a prognostic marker, and its establish the prediction models warrants further investigation. Increase NLR is strongly associated with poor DFS, and it can be as a predictive and prognostic factor.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.