Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
781
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
781 results for “earthquakes”
Downsample InSAR observations and distributed slip models for 33 shallow small earthquakes
<p>Downsample coseismic InSAR observations and distributed slip models for 33 shallow small earthquakes</p>
The relocated catalog of the 2021 Flores Sea earthquake
<p>The relocated catalog of the 2021 Flores Sea earthquakes</p> <p>Please refer to:</p> <p>Supendi, P., Rawlinson, N., Prayitno, B.S., Widiyantoro, S., Simanjuntak, A., Palgunadi, K.H., Kurniawan, A., Marliyani, G.I., Nugraha, A.D., Daryono, D., Anugrah, S.D., Fatchurochman, I., Gunawan, M.T., Sadly, M., Adi, S.P., Karnawati, D., Arimuko, A. (2022). The Kalaotoa Fault: A newly identified fault that generated the Mw 7.3 Flores Sea Earthquake. The Seismic Record (2022) 2 (3): 176–185.</p>
Groundwater eruption triggered by distant earthquake
<p>The data is the original data of water level and precipitation in the manuscript "Groundwater eruption triggered by distant earthquake".</p>
The 2021 and 2022 Fukushima-Oki Earthquake Doublet: Reactivations of the Bending-Related Faults Inside the Japan Trench Subducting Slab
<p>The strong-motion (K-NET, KiK-net and S-net) waveforms and teleseismic <em>P</em> waves that were processed and used in the joint inversions of the 2021 <em>M</em><sub>w</sub>7.1 and 2022 <em>M</em><sub>w</sub> 7.3 Fukushima-Oki earthquakes are included in this repository.</p>
InSAR coseismic and postseismic deformation for the 2018 Mw 7.5 PNG earthquake
<p>This dataset includes coseismic and postseismic InSAR deformation for the 2018 Mw 7.5 PNG earthquake.</p>
Subspecies and Distribution. D. m. merriami Mearns, 1890 — SW USA and NW Mexico (desert regions from N Nevada and extreme SW Utah, through SE California and SW Arizona, to NE Baja California and Sonora). D. m. ambiguus Merriam, 1890 — SW USA and NW Mexico (N portion of the Chihuahuan Desert from NC New Mexico and W Texas, through E Chihuahua and Coahuila, to NE Durango, N Zacatecas, and C Nuevo Leon). D. m. annulus Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (coastal plains of the Gulf of California, SE Baja California). D. m. arenivagus Elliot, 1904 — SW USA and NW Mexico (S Mojave Desert of SC California and E of Sierra Juarez and Sierra San Pedro Martir to C Baja California). D. m. atronasus Merriam, 1894 — NC Mexico (southern portion of the Chihuahuan Desert from EC Zacatecas, SE Coahuila, and SW Nuevo Leon to Aguascalientes and San Luis Potosi). D. m. brunensis Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (Gulf of California coast of NE Baja California Sur). D. m. collinus Lidicker, 1960 — SW USA (San Felipe, Earthquake, La Puerta, and Aguanga valleys of SW California). D. m. frenatus Bole, 1936 — SW USA (SW Utah and NW Arizona). D. m. insularis Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (San José I, Gulf of California, Baja California Sur). D. m. margaritae Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (Santa Margarita I, Baja California Sur). D. m. mayensis Goldman, 1928 — NW Mexico (Gulf of California coastal plains of S Sonora and N Sinaloa). D. m. melanurus Merriam, 1893 — NW Mexico (Magdalena Plains and Cape Region of S Baja California Sur). D. m. mitchelli Mearns, 1897 — NW Mexico (Tiburon I, Gulf of California, Sonora). D. m. olivaceus Swarth, 1929 — SW USA and NW Mexico (transitional zone between the Sonoran Desert of SE Arizona and NE Sonora, and the Chihuahuan Desert of SW New Mexico and NW Chihuahua). D. m. parvus Rhoads, 1894 — SW USA (San Bernardino and San Jacinto valleys of SW California). D. m. platycephalus Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (Pacific slope S of the Sierra San Pedro Martir, S Baja California to the Vizcaino Desert of N Baja California Sur). D. m. quintinensis Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (San Quintin Plain, Pacific coast of NW Baja California). D. m. trinidadensis Huey, 1951 — SW USA and NW Mexico (S California and N Baja California). D. m. vulcani Benson, 1934 — SW USA (disjunct and restricted distribution in Toroweap Valley, NW Arizona). in Heteromyidae
Subspecies and Distribution. D. m. merriami Mearns, 1890 — SW USA and NW Mexico (desert regions from N Nevada and extreme SW Utah, through SE California and SW Arizona, to NE Baja California and Sonora). D. m. ambiguus Merriam, 1890 — SW USA and NW Mexico (N portion of the Chihuahuan Desert from NC New Mexico and W Texas, through E Chihuahua and Coahuila, to NE Durango, N Zacatecas, and C Nuevo Leon). D. m. annulus Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (coastal plains of the Gulf of California, SE Baja California). D. m. arenivagus Elliot, 1904 — SW USA and NW Mexico (S Mojave Desert of SC California and E of Sierra Juarez and Sierra San Pedro Martir to C Baja California). D. m. atronasus Merriam, 1894 — NC Mexico (southern portion of the Chihuahuan Desert from EC Zacatecas, SE Coahuila, and SW Nuevo Leon to Aguascalientes and San Luis Potosi). D. m. brunensis Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (Gulf of California coast of NE Baja California Sur). D. m. collinus Lidicker, 1960 — SW USA (San Felipe, Earthquake, La Puerta, and Aguanga valleys of SW California). D. m. frenatus Bole, 1936 — SW USA (SW Utah and NW Arizona). D. m. insularis Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (San José I, Gulf of California, Baja California Sur). D. m. margaritae Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (Santa Margarita I, Baja California Sur). D. m. mayensis Goldman, 1928 — NW Mexico (Gulf of California coastal plains of S Sonora and N Sinaloa). D. m. melanurus Merriam, 1893 — NW Mexico (Magdalena Plains and Cape Region of S Baja California Sur). D. m. mitchelli Mearns, 1897 — NW Mexico (Tiburon I, Gulf of California, Sonora). D. m. olivaceus Swarth, 1929 — SW USA and NW Mexico (transitional zone between the Sonoran Desert of SE Arizona and NE Sonora, and the Chihuahuan Desert of SW New Mexico and NW Chihuahua). D. m. parvus Rhoads, 1894 — SW USA (San Bernardino and San Jacinto valleys of SW California). D. m. platycephalus Merriam, 1907 — NW Mexico (Pacific slope S of the Sierra San Pedro Martir, S Baja California to the Vizcaino Desert of N Baja California Sur). D. m. quintinensis Huey, 1951 — NW Mexico (San Quintin Plain, Pacific coast of NW Baja California). D. m. trinidadensis Huey, 1951 — SW USA and NW Mexico (S California and N Baja California). D. m. vulcani Benson, 1934 — SW USA (disjunct and restricted distribution in Toroweap Valley, NW Arizona).
GJI:Learning source, path, and site effects: CNN-based Onsite Intensity Prediction for Earthquake Early Warning
<p>Dataset used for the study. Submitting to GJI. Wish me luck.</p>
Earthquake Archaeological Effects documented in the Cusco area in 2019 (RISC project)
<p>In 2019, the RISC project led to the implementation of an unprecedented archaeoseismological survey in the Cusco area, Peru. The main objective was to identify and map the earthquake-induced damage on the stone architecture of famous Inca archaeological sites. This spreadsheet summarizes all the observations. Each row corresponds to an Earthquake Archaeological Effect (EAE). For each strain structure, the columns contain information relative to the geographical and architectural contexts, the measurements and the level of confidence. The data were extracted from the RISC database, which supported the fieldwork. For more details about the design and structure of the RISC database please read:</p> <p>Combey et al. (2021) Monumental Inca remains and past seismic disasters: A relational database to support archaeoseismological investigations and cultural heritage preservation in the Andes, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Volume 111, 103447,<br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103447.</p> <p>The file is in support of the paper published in Quaternary International in 2022: <span><span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2022.07.003"><span>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2022.07.003</span></a></span></span></p>
Estimation of the hypocenter location and rupture extent of the 1850 Xichang, Sichuan, China, earthquake by dynamic rupture simulations on a multi-segment stepover structure
<p>These datasets accompany the Zemuhe fault surface coordinates that were used for construction of the fault geometry model, the observational fault surface slip of the 1850 Xichang M 7.5 earthquake and the intensity distribution in Estimation of the hypocenter location and rupture extent of the 1850 Xichang, Sichuan, China, earthquake by dynamic rupture simulations on a multi-segment stepover structure submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth by Yu et al. (2022). The data is structured as follows:</p> <p> </p> <p>Once unzipped the data within the archive are six txt files: fault_surface_slip_Feng.txt, which is from Feng et al. (2000); fault_surface_slip_Ren.txt, which is from Ren and Lin (2010), fault_surface_slip_Yu.txt, which is from Yu et al., (2001); intensity.txt, which is from Feng et al. (2000); landslides.txt, which is from Guo et al. (2014) and Cao (2015); zemuhe_fault_surface_coordinates.txt, which is from Working group for geologic mapping on Zemuhe fault (2000).</p>
Finite-Source Model of the M6.0 July 8, 2021 Antelope Valley, CA Earthquake
<p>This zip file contains the InSAR line-of-sight (LOS) displacements derived from Sentinel-1 data collected along four satellite tracks (T42,T64, T137, T144) covering the 2021 M6 Antelope Valley earthquake in Eastern California. For each track, all possible interferograms of roughly 1-month long in time spanning the earthquake without sharing a common scene are stacked to obtain the average coseismic LOS displacement. See text for details.</p> <p> </p> <p># data format: NetCDF grid file</p> <p>"dlos_stack_coseismic.grd" ---- average coseismic LOS displacement (unit: meters); positive value corresponds to surface deformation toward the satellite.</p> <p>look_e/n/u.grd --- East, North, Vertical (Up) components of the line-of-sight direction, so that</p> <p> </p> <p> dlos_displacement = dUe*look_e + dUn*look_n + dUup*look_u</p> <p> </p> <p>where dUe, dUn, and dUup represent the Eastward, Northward, and Upward surface motion.</p> <p> </p> <p>We also provide the ascii-format downsampled LOS displacement of each track that went into the coseismic slip modeling ("dlos_stack_coseismic_samp.txt"). The file contains 6 columns:</p> <p>#longitude latitude dLOS(cm) vE vN vUp</p> <p>Questions: Kang Wang (kangwang@berkeley.edu)</p> <p> </p>
CMT catalog of small-to-moderate earthquakes at off Ibaraki region
<p>CMT catalog of small-to-moderate earthquakes at off Ibaraki region</p> <p> </p> <p>The CMT solutions are obtained in “CMT inversion for small-to-moderate earthquakes applying to dense short-period OBS array at off Ibaraki region” by Lina Yamaya, Kimihiro Mochizuki, Takeshi Akuhara, Shunsuke Takemura, Masanao Shinohara, and Tomoaki Yamada.</p> <ul> <li>Aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake with Mw 9.0</li> <li>March 11, 2011 to September 17, 2011</li> <li>Mw2.5–4.5</li> </ul> <p>Data format: Date (“YYMMDDHHMMSS”), lng, lat, dep, Mrr, Mtt, Mff, Mrt, Mrf, Mtf, 0, 0, exponent (dyne-cm), VR, 68% confidence interval of Kagan angle by bootstrap result, 95% confidence interval of Kagan angle, Mw</p> <p> </p> <p>The seismic velocity model is the input file for using Open SWPC. Note that the details are shown in "Sedimentary structure from multi-mode ambient noise tomography with dense OBS network at the Japan Trench" by Lina Yamaya, Kiminiro Mochizuki, Takeshi Akuhara, and Kiwamu Nishida. Related link: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4719128">10.5281/zenodo.4719128</a></p> <p> </p> <p>For more information, please contact the first author.</p>
InSAR coseismic deformation for the 2021 Yangbi Mw6.1 earthquake
<p>This InSAR coseismic deformation n for the 2021 Yangbi Mw6.1 earthquake from the published paper by Liu et al., (2022, DOI: 10.1785/0220210263). Please cite this paper if you use this deformation data. </p>
The relocated catalog of the 2022 Pasaman (West Sumatra) earthquake
<p>The relocated catalog of the 2022 Pasaman (West Sumatra) earthquake</p> <p>Please refer to:</p> <p>Supendi, P., Rawlinson, N., Prayitno, B.S., Sianipar, D., Simanjuntak, A., Widiyantoro, S., Palgunadi, K.H., Kurniawan, A., Shiddiqi, H.A., Nugraha, A.D., Sahara, D.P., Daryono, D., Triyono, R., Adi, S.P., Karnawati, D., Daniarsyad, G., Ahadi, S., Fatchurochman, I., Anugrah, S.D., Heryandoko, N., Sudrajat, A. (2022). A hidden fault revealed by the February 25, 2022 (Mw 6.1) Pasaman Earthquake, West Sumatra, Indonesia, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 106973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2022.106973</p>
Dataset for "Emerging tremors and increasing seismic noise precede micro-earthquakes triggered in a fluid-activated shale fault slip experiment (2015, Mt Terri URL, Switzerland)"
<p>This dataset contains the raw data of the injection experiment, performed in the Mt Terri Underground Platform in 2015 and used in the article:</p> <p><strong>De Barros, L., </strong>Guglielmi, Y., F. Cappa, C. Nussbaum, J. Birkholzer, 2023. Induced microseismicity and tremor signatures illuminate different slip behaviors in a natural shale fault reactivated by a fluid pressure stimulation (Mont Terri), <em>Geophysical Journal International</em>, 10.1093/gji/ggad231<br> <br> From a horizontal gallery, three vertical boreholes allowed the deployment of an injection probe (called SIMFIP; Guglielmi et al., 2014) and the monitoring sensors in the upper compartment of a N50°-60°SE fault zone. The 2.4 m long injection chamber of the SIMFIP probe was centered at 340.6 m depth, where a 3D displacement sensor was anchored on the borehole walls. A second SIMFIP probe is located 3.1 m northwest of the injection at a depth of 337.65 m, with another deformation sensor. Both deformation sensors measured the full strain tensor thanks to a Bragg optic fiber network, jointly with a fluid pressure sensor. A third borehole, located 2 m north of the monitoring probe, was dedicated to seismic monitoring. Two sets of collocated sensors, composed of a vertical geophone, a 3C accelerometer and an acoustic sensor, were positioned 9 m apart, above and below the main fault zone. These seismic sensors have a flat response in the ranges 0.01-0.5 kHz, 0.01-4 kHz and 0.5-10 kHz, respectively. Finally, the flowrate and pressure were also measured at the injection pump, located in the gallery.<br> For more details on the injection, we refer the reader to:<br> • Jeanne, P., Guglielmi, Y., Rutqvist, J., Nussbaum, C., Birkholzer, J., 2018. Permeability Variations Associated With Fault Reactivation in a Claystone Formation Investigated by Field Experiments and Numerical Simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 1694–1710. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015149<br> • Guglielmi, Y., Nussbaum, C., Cappa, F., De Barros, L., Rutqvist, J., Birkholzer, J., 2021. Field-scale fault reactivation experiments by fluid injection highlight aseismic leakage in caprock analogs: Implications for CO2 sequestration. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 111, 103471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103471<br> • Guglielmi, Y., Nussbaum, C., Jeanne, P., Rutqvist, J., Cappa, F., Birkholzer, J., 2020. Complexity of Fault Rupture and Fluid Leakage in Shale: Insights From a Controlled Fault Activation Experiment. J.Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB017781. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017781<br> • Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Lançon, H., Janowczyk, J.B., Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C.F., Wang, J.S.Y., 2014. ISRM Suggested Method for Step-Rate Injection Method for Fracture In-Situ Properties (SIMFIP): Using a 3-Components Borehole Deformation Sensor. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0517-1</p>
Gedeotic observations and slip distribution for the 2022 Afghanistan earthquake
<p>Gedeotic observations and slip distribution for the 2022 Afghanistan earthquake</p>
Data and program codes to reproduce the results of local earthquake seismic tomography for Central Kamchatka
<p>This file contains the files to reproduce the results presented in the article: <strong>Connections between arc volcanoes in Central Kamchatka and the subducting slab inferred from local earthquake seismic tomography </strong>by Bushenkova N., Koulakov I., Bergal-Kuvikas O., Shapiro N., Gordeev E.I., Chebrov D.V. , Abkadyrov I., Jakovlev A., Stupina T., Novgorodova A., Droznina S., Huang H.-H., <em>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research</em>.</p> <p>This file includes:</p> <p>1. The full folder with the LOTOS code for the passive-source seismic tomography (Koulakov, 2009, BSSA). </p> <p>2. Folder with the dataset including arrival times of the P and S waves from local seismicity in the area of Central Kamchatka.</p> <p>3. README_CEN_KAM.DOC file with the description of the workflow on how to reproduce the tomography models based on experimental and synthetic data presented in the article. </p> <p>Koulakov, I., 2009, LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 99, p. 194–214, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080013.</p>
Geodetic Model of 2017 Kerman earthquake sequences estimated from joint inversion of InSAR and offset tracking techniques
<p>We upload here the inSAR and Pixel offset tracking results obtained based on Radar, Sentinel-1, PlanetScope, and Sentinel-2 satellite data. </p>
Rapid remeasure of dense civilian networks from the Mw 6.4 2020 Petrinja earthquake, Croatia
<p>The directory GNSS_DATA_Petrinja.zip provides GNSS data used in Henriquet et al., (2023). The data set contains :</p> <p>Data Set S1. Coseismic offsets calculated based on daily continuous time series either from day to day or on 10-day averages differences between before and after the main shock. (file bilansautscgps.ods, sheet 1)</p> <p>Data Set S2. Coseismic offsets calculated from kinematic 30s time-series based on different time-spans taken before and after the main shock. (file bilansautscgps.ods, sheet 2)</p> <p>Data Set S3. Raw displacements (before correction for interseismic motion) ob- served over benchmarks in the near field of the fault, part of civilian networks (file cadastralallmeforme.ods). Note that the positions are expressed in the HTRS96/TM Croatian reference frame.</p> <p> </p>
220208 Post-earthquake housing 1916+ Avezzano IT
*Created with Polycam* Part of a daily personal challenge while I commute to work (part 4). Avezzano, in the middle of Italy, was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 1915. Around the city there are a lot of small houses like this one, one floor plan, wooden roofs, mostly constructed during the reconstruction. [More on the earthquake](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1915_Avezzano_earthquake) Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Photographs of earthquake reconnaissance CDMX 2017-10-14 to 2017-10-17
<p>Photographs of reconnaissance trip to document damage in Mexico City resulting from the Puebla-Morelos, Mw 7.1, September 19, 2017 earthquake.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.