Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 7: Map of localities of the examined specimens of Rhinolophus acrotis (diamonds), R. damarensis (squares) and R. cervenyi sp. n. (circles) in southern Africa (A) and in Lesotho (B); L, Lesotho; M, Mozambique; SZ, Eswatini. Open symbols – localities of origin of the specimens examined by the molecular genetic methods (except those of R. acrotis), numbers at the symbols correspond with the mitochondrial haplotype numbers as in Figure 5 and Table S1, number script denotes the lineage assignation: regular – Namibia1, bold – Namibia2, italics – South Africa & Lesotho bats. Small letters denote known localities of R. cervenyi sp. n.: Lesotho (B): a – Ha Mokoto, b – Ha Natla, c – Hermon, d – Mateanong, e – Moqotoane, f – Mount Moorosi, g – Nkokamele, h – Phallang, i – Roma, cave, j – Sehlabathebe NP, lodge, k – Semonkong, l – Ski Lodge, Oxbow; South Africa (A): m – Jagersfontein, n – Uintjiesburg.

Figure 12 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 12: Occlusal views on the mesial part of the left upper tooth-row (C–M1) and the right lower toothrow (I –M) of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n. 3 1 (NMP 97760, holotype). Scale bar: 2 mm.

Figure 1 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 1: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: condylocanine length of skull (LCc) against length of the upper tooth-row (CM3); values in millimetres. Explanations: Abyssinia = samples of R. acrotis acrotis from Ethiopia, Eritrea and the Sudan; E Africa = samples of R. acrotis augur from East Africa (Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Malawi); S Africa = samples of R. acrotis augur from southern Africa (Mozambique, South Africa); types = holotype specimens of Rhinolophus augur (G), Rhinolophus augur zambesiensis (B), Rhinolophus augur zuluensis (U), and Rhinolophus darlingi damarensis (D); S Africa II = extremely small-sized specimens from South Africa originally identified as R. clivosus (see text for details); polygon = range extremes of the values for R. damarensis from Namibia.

Figure 8 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 8: General view of the type locality of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n.: upper parts of the Sehlabathebe National Park, Lesotho (photo by J. Červený).

Figure 3 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 3: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: relative length of rostrum (CM3/LCc) against relative width of skull (LaZ/LCc); for explanations see Figure 1.

Figure 11 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 11: Skull in lateral view (top) and in dorsal view (below) of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n. (top – NMP 97760, holotype; below – NMP 97758, paratype). Scale bars: 5 mm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2023View details →

Table 1 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Table 1 Historical classification systems of the genus Lepidodesma in Unionidae<table><tbody><tr><th>Author</th><th>Subfamily</th><th>Tribe</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Heude (1874)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Simpson (1896)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Hass (1969)</th><td>Anodontinae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Liu (1979)</th><td>Anodontinae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Prozorova et al. (2005)</th><td>Anodontinae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Huang et al. (2002)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Graf and Cummings (2007)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>Unionini</td></tr><tr><th>Zhou et al. (2016)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Huang et al. (2019)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>Lepidodesmini</td></tr><tr><th>Lopes-Lima et al. (2020)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>Lepidodesmini</td></tr><tr><th>Graf and Cummings (2021)</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>Unionini</td></tr><tr><th>In this study</th><td>Unioninae</td><td>Lepidodesmini</td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedDec 2023View details →

Table 3 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Table 3 Three-gene sequences used for species evolutionary analysis and corresponding GenBank numbers<table><tbody><tr><th>Taxa</th><th>COI</th><th>16S rRNA</th><th>28S rRNA</th></tr><tr><th>Unionidae Rafinesque, 1820</th></tr><tr><th>Unioninae Rafinesque, 1820</th></tr><tr><th>Anodontini Rafinesque, 1820</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Pyganodon grandis (Say, 1829)</th><td>AF231734</td><td>NC_013661</td><td>AF305384</td></tr><tr><th>Strophitus undulatus (Say, 1817)</th><td>AF156505</td><td>AY238491</td><td>DQ191415</td></tr><tr><th>Platynaias compressa (Lea, 1829)</th><td>AF156503</td><td>NC_015481</td><td>DQ191414</td></tr><tr><th>Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758)</th><td>KX822632</td><td>NC_022803</td><td>KX822588</td></tr><tr><th>Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus, 1758)</th><td>KX822633</td><td>JQ253863</td><td>KX822589</td></tr><tr><th>Pseudanodonta complanata (Rossmässler, 1835)</th><td>KX822661</td><td>JQ253868</td><td>KX822617</td></tr><tr><th>Cristariini Lopes-Lima, Bogan & Froufe, 2017 in Lopes-Lima et al., 2017a</th></tr><tr><th>Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)</th><td>HQ283346</td><td>HQ283346</td><td>MG595604</td></tr><tr><th>Sinanodonta tumens (Haas, 1910)</th><td>LC519024</td><td>LC224015</td><td>LC519081</td></tr><tr><th>Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1814)</th><td>NC_012716</td><td>NC_012716</td><td>MG595484</td></tr><tr><th>Anemina arcaeformis (Heude, 1877)</th><td>NC_026674</td><td>NC_026674</td><td>MG595457</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesmini Huang et Wu, 2019 in Huang et al., 2019</th></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) SU 106</th><td>MG463016</td><td>AF389411</td><td>MG595543</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) SU 107</th><td>MG463015</td><td>AF389411</td><td>MG595544</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) SU 108</th><td>MG463017</td><td>AF389411</td><td>MG595545</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) 1 a</th><td>OQ880586</td><td>OQ881064</td><td>OQ881058</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) 2 a</th><td>OQ880587</td><td>OQ881065</td><td>OQ881059</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) 3 a</th><td>OQ880588</td><td>OQ881066</td><td>OQ881060</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma aligera (Heude, 1877) 1 a</th><td>OQ908914</td><td>OQ892281</td><td>OQ892278</td></tr><tr><th>Lepidodesma aligera (Heude, 1877) 2 a</th><td>OQ908915</td><td>OQ892282</td><td>OQ892279</td></tr><tr><th>Ambleminae Rafinesque, 1820</th></tr><tr><th>Lampsilini Ihering, 1901</th></tr><tr><th>Potamilus alatus (Say, 1817)</th><td>KP795037</td><td>KU559011</td><td>KP795019</td></tr><tr><th>Lampsilis cardium Rafinesque, 1820</th><td>AF120653</td><td>KX713226</td><td>AF305386</td></tr><tr><th>Obliquaria reflexa Rafinesque, 1820</th><td>GU085300</td><td>AY655055</td><td>AF400689</td></tr><tr><th>Truncilla truncata Rafinesque, 1820</th><td>AF156513</td><td>AY655080</td><td>DQ191419</td></tr><tr><th>Pleurobemini Hannibal, 1912</th></tr><tr><th>Elliptio complanata (Lightfoot, 1786)</th><td>EU448173</td><td>DQ094144</td><td>JF899181</td></tr><tr><th>Quadrulini Ihering, 1901</th></tr><tr><th>Quadrula quadrula (Rafinesque, 1820)</th><td>AF156511</td><td>NC_013658</td><td>DQ191417</td></tr><tr><th>Margaritiferidae Henderson, 1929</th></tr><tr><th>Margaritifera margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758)</th><td>KX550089</td><td>KX550091</td><td>KX550093</td></tr><tr><th>Margaritifera dahurica (Middendorff, 1850)</th><td>KJ161516</td><td>KJ943526</td><td>KT343747</td></tr></tbody></table>aThe sequence from this study

opennotspecifiedDec 2023View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Fig. 3 Schematic drawing for gene arrangement and structure characteristics of Lepidodesma aligera and Lepidodesma languilati. Protein-coding and tRNA genes are colored to show the difference and commonness of codon (and anti-codon) usage. Arabic numerals in the figure represent the length (bp) of the corresponding gene. Abbreviation of 22 tRNAs: H, tRNAHis; A, tRNAAla; S2, tRNASer2; S1,tRNA Ser1; E, tRNAGlu; M, tRNAMet; W, tRNATrp; R, tRNAArg; K,tRNA Lys; T, tRNAThr; Y, tRNATyr; L1, tRNALeu1; N, tRNAAsn; P,tRNA Pro; F, tRNAPhe; Q, tRNAGln; C, tRNACys; I, tRNAIle; V, tRNA Val; L2, tRNALeu2; G, tRNAGly; D, tRNAAsp

FIGURE 11 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 11. Caudal complex (lateral view), Hemigrammocypris neglecta, KUN-P 43645, 39.6 mm SL. Cartilage is crosshatched. CC, compound centrum; EP, epural; H, hypural; HS, hemal spine; NS, neural spine; OPC, opisthural cartilage; PH, parhypural, PLS, pleurostyle; PU, preural centra; UN, uroneural. Scale bar represents 1 mm.

FIGURE 5 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 5. Suspensorium (A: lateral view), Hyoid arch (B: lateral view) and urohyals (C–D: lateral, dorsal, and ventral views from top to bottom). (A) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL. (B) H. neglecta, KUN-P 43649, 40.2 mm SL. (C) H. neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 30.4 mm SL. (D) Aphyocypris kikuchii, TKPM-P 26050, 58.1 mm SL. Cartilage is crosshatched. ACH, anterior ceratohyal; APA, autopalatine; BR, branchiostegal ray; DHH, dorsal hypohyal; ECPT, ectopterygoid; ENPT, endopterygoid; HY, hyomandibular; IH, interhyal; MPT, metapterygoid; PCH, posterior ceratohyal; Q, quadrate; SY, symplectic; UH, urohyal; VHH, ventral hypohyal. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 8 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 8. Post-Weberian abdominal (A) and caudal (B) regions of the vertebral column. (A) and (B) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL. CE, centrum; EN, epineural; EP, epipleural; HS, haemal spine; NA, neural arch; NS, neural spine; PRA, proximal radial; PU, preural centra; R, rib of vertebral centrum. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 2 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 2. Neurocranium. (A) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL; dorsal, lateral, and ventral views from top to bottom. (B) Metzia lineata, KUN-P 40610, 63.6 mm SL; dorsal view. (C) Aphyocypris kikuchii, TKPM-P 26050, 58.1 mm SL; dorsal view. Cartilage is cross-hatched. AV-VII, anterior opening of the trigeminofacialis chamber; BOC, basioccipital; E, ethmoid; EPOC, epioccipital; EXOC, exoccipital; F, fontanelle; FR, frontal; FX, foramen for the vagus nerve; IC, intercalar; LE, lateral ethmoid; MP, masticatory plate of the basioccipital; NAS, nasal; OSPH, orbitosphenoid; PE, preethmoid; PR, parietal; PRO, prootic; PSPH, parasphenoid; PTO, pterotic; PTSPH, pterosphenoid; PV-VII, posterior opening of the trigeminofacialis chamber; SCA, supraorbital canal; SO, supraorbital; SOC, supraoccipital; SPH, sphenotic; STC, supratemporal canal; STF, subtemporal fossa; VO, vomer. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 1. Hemigrammocypris neglecta. (A) TKPM-P 25884, adult male, 25.7 mm SL; (B) TKPM-P 25884, adult female, 39.7 mm SL. Scale bar represents 10 mm.

FIGURE 4 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 4. Infraorbital series (A–B: lateral views) and opercles (C–D: lateral views). (A) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, KUN- P 43650, 31.7 mm SL. (B) Aphyocypris chinensis, KUN-P 43660, 50.1 mm SL. (C) H. neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL. (D) Metzia lineata, KUN-P 40610, 63.6 mm SL. IO, infraorbital; IOC, intermural opercular canal; IOP, interopercle; OP, opercle; POP, preopercle; SOP, subopercle. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 7 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 7. Weberian apparatus. (A) and (B) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL; lateral (A) and ventral (B) views. Cartilage is cross-hatched. C, claustrum; CE, centrum; I, intercalarium; IOS, inner arm of the os suspensorium; L, lateral process of the vertebral centrum; NA, neural arch; NS, neural spine; OOS, outer arm of os suspensorium; R, rib of vertebral centrum; S, scaphium; SN, supraneural; T, tripus. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 3 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 3. Upper (A–B: lateral views) and lower jaws (C-1, 2: lateral and medial views), and kinethmoids. (A) and (C) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, KUN-P 43646, 32.5 mm SL. (B) Aphyocypris chinensis, KUN-P 43660, 50.1 mm SL. Cartilage is cross-hatched. AN, anguloarticular; CM, coronomeckelian; DEN, dentary; KE, kinethmoid; MC, Meckel's cartilage; MEP, maxilla medial process; MX, maxilla; PMX, premaxilla; RA, retroarticular. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 10 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 10. Dorsal (A–B: lateral views) and anal fin supports (C–F: lateral views). (A) and (C) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 30.4 mm SL. (B) and (D) Aphyocypris kikuchii, TKPM-P 26050, 58.1 mm SL. (E) Metzia lineata, KUN-P 40610, 63.6 mm SL. (F) M. mesembrinum: TKPM-P 26049, 77.7 mm SL. Cartilage is cross-hatched. DR, distal radial; FIR, fin ray; MR, middle radial; PRA, proximal radial; ST, stay. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 9 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 9. Pectoral girdles (A–B: medial views) and Pelvic girdle (C: lateral view). (A) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, KUN-P 43642, 32.4 mm SL. (B) Aphyocypris kikuchii, TKPM-P 26050, 58.1 mm SL. (C) H. neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL. Cartilage is cross-hatched. CL, cleithrum; CO, coracoid; MS, mesocoracoid; PCL, postcleithrum; PER, pectoral radial; PLB, pelvic bone; PR, pelvic radial; PS, pelvic splint; PT, posttemporal; SC, scapula; SCL, supracleithrum. Scale bars represent 1 mm.

FIGURE 6 in Osteology of Hemigrammocypris neglecta (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) with comments on its systematic position

FIGURE 6. Branchial arches (A: dorsal view) and pharyngeal teeth (B–C: lateral view). (A) Hemigrammocypris neglecta, KUN-P 43644, 24.4 mm SL. (B) H. neglecta, TKPM-P 26051, 36.7 mm SL. (C) Aphyocypris kikuchii, TKPM-P 26050, 58.1 mm SL. Cartilage is cross-hatched. BB, basibranchial; BH, basihyal; CB, ceratobranchial; EB, epibranchial; HB, hypobranchial; PB, pharyngobranchial; PC, posterior copula cartilage. Scale bars represent 1 mm.