Find research datasets worth reusing

Figures 165–167 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 165–167. Parosteodes species: 165, P. grisea; 166, P. procurata, ♂ genitalia; 167; P. fictiliaria, ♀ genitalia.

Figures 153–158 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 153–158. Macaria species: 153, M. carbonaria, ♂ genitalia; 154, M. carbonaria, sternum A8 of ♂; 155, M. brunneata, ♂ genitalia; 156, M. infirmata, ♂ genitalia; 157, M. rimosata, ♂ genitalia; 158, M. subdiversa, ♂ genitalia.

Figures 124–129 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 124–129. Gnopharmia species: 124, G. colchidaria, ♂ genitalia; 125, G. colchidaria, sternum A8 of ♂; 126, G. irakensis, ♂ genitalia; 127, G. irakensis, sternum A8 of ♂; 128, 129, G. objectaria, ♀ genitalia (128, showing oviposi-

Figures 72–79 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 72–79. Narraga species: 72, N. fasciolaria, ♂ genitalia; 73, N. fasciolaria, sternum A8 of ♂; 74, N. nelvae, ♂ genitalia; 75, N. tessularia, ♂ genitalia; 76, N. fimetaria, ♂ genitalia; 77, N. fimetaria ♀ genitalia; 78, N. fimetaria, ♀ genitalia, ostium and antrum; 79, N. fimetaria, ♀ genitalia, signa.

Figures 68–71 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 68–71. Plateoplia acrobelia: 68, ♂ genitalia; 69, sternum A8 of ♂; 70, ♀ genitalia, ostium region; 71, ♀ genitalia.

Figures 90–95 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 90–95. Isturgia species, ♂ genitalia and sternum A8 of ♂: 90, 91 I. contexta; 92, 93, I. ossea; 94, 95, undescribed

Figures 108–110 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 108–110. Isturgia species, ♀ genitalia. 108, I. limbaria; 109, I. famula; 110, I. hopfferaria.

Figures 102–107 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 102–107. Isturgia species, ♂ genitalia and sternum A8 of ♂: 102, 103, I. murinaria; 104, 105, I. hopfferaria; 106, 107, I. arenacearia.

Figures 64–67 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 64–67. Milocera species: 64, M. horaria, ♂ genitalia; 65, M. horaria, ♀ genitalia; 66, M. arcifera, ♂ genitalia; 67, M. arcifera, ♀ genitalia.

Figures 96–101 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 96–101. Isturgia species, ♂ genitalia and sternum A8 of ♂: 96, 97, I. quadriplaga; 98, 99, I. disputaria; 100, 101, I. sublimbata.

Figures 84–89 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 84–89. Isturgia species: 84, 85, I. roraria, 84, ♂ genitalia, 85, detail; 86, 87, I. miniosaria, 86, ♂ genitalia, 87,

Figures 80–83 in A review of the genera of Macariini with a revised classification of the tribe (Geometridae: Ennominae)

Figures 80–83. Heliomata species: 80, H. cycladata, ♂ genitalia; 81, H. glarearia, ♂ genitalia; 82, H. glarearia, sternum A8 of ♂; 83, H. glarearia, ♀ genitalia.

Figure 11 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 11. Strict consensus of the 30 000 most parsimonious trees obtained from each of three different character sets examined in this study following the QHS strategy. Numbers above branches show bootstrap values ≥ 50. A, strict consensus (length 502) including only the external characters for all taxa (ONLY EXTERNAL); B, strict consensus (length 556) including only taxa with ≥ 70% scored characters (> 70% DATA); C, strict consensus (length 180) including only characters systems others than external morphology and taxa with ≥ 50% of scored characters (REPRODUCTIVE + LARVAL).

Figure 10 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 10. Strict consensus of 30 000 most parsimonious trees (length 790) produced by the QHS strategy using all the available information for all taxa (ALL DATA). Only resolved clades of Doryctinae are shown. Numbers above branches show bootstrap values ≥ 50. Numbers below branches refer to the major clades recovered (see text).

Figure 9 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 9. Selected features of the venom apparatus in the Doryctinae. A, Megaloproctus sp.; B, Nervellius sp.; C, Aleiodes pulchripes Wesmael; D, Halycaea sp.; E, Hecabolus sp.; F, Syngaster sp. v, venom reservoir; p, primary venom duct; s, secondary venom duct.

Figure 8 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 8. Male genitalia in the Doryctinae. A, Doryctes striatellus (Nees); B, Hecabolus sulcatus Curtis; C, Euscelinus sarawacus Westwood; D, Monarea sp.; E, Zombrus bicolor Enderlein; F, Acanthodoryctes morleyi (Froggatt); G, Syngaster lepidus Brullé; H, Ecphylus silesiacus (Ratzerburg); I, Dendrosoter protuberans Wesmael.

Figure 7 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 7. External morphological features in the Doryctinae. A, C, D, F, G, female; B, E, male. A–F, metasoma, dorsal view; G, metasoma, lateral view. A, B, Halycaea rubata Belokobylskij; C, Rhaconotus ceylonicus Belokobylskij; D, R. excavatus Belokobylskij; E, Dendrosoter hartigii (Ratzeburg); F, G, Arhaconotus papuanus Belokobylskij.

Figure 6 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 6. External morphological features in the Doryctinae. A, C, first metasomal tergite, lateral view; B, F–J, metasoma, dorsal view; D, first tergite, ventral view; E, first-third metasomal tergites, dorsal view. A, B, Spathius wusheensis Belokobylskij; C–E, Fijibracon insularis Belokobylskij; F, Heterospilus hemitestaceus Belokobylskij; G, Liodoryctes australiensis (Szépligeti); H, Glyptocolastes rugulosus (Cresson); I, Bathycentor kraesselini Saussure; J, Siragra nitida Cameron.

Figure 4 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 4. External morphological features in the Doryctinae. Wing venation characters, fore and hind wings. A, Labania straminea Hedqvist; B, Doryctes fulviceps Reinhard; C, Percnobracon secundus Muesebeck; D, Dendrosoter hartigi (Ratzeburg); E, Fijibracon insularis Belokobylskij; F, Rhaconotus insularis Belokobylskij; G, Nipponecphylus matsumurai Belokobylskij & Konishi; H, Doryctophasmus ferrugineiceps Enderlein.

Figure 3 in Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence

Figure 3. External morphological features in the Doryctinae. Wing venation characters, fore and hind wings. A, Holcobracon fulvus Cameron; B, Caenophanes luculentus Belokobylskij; C, Acanthodoryctes morleyi (Froggatt); D, Heterospilus tirnax Papp; E, Neurocrassus fabimaculatus Belokobylskij; F, Pambolidea yuma Ashmead.