Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

10,950

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

10,950 results for “hosting”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Life history and host utilization pattern of a strepsipteran parasite (Insecta: Strepsiptera) on the Blissine bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) living under dwarf bamboo leaf sheaths

Figure 5. Summarized life cycles of the host dwarf bamboo, Macropes obnubilus, and Blissoxenos esakii. Solid and broken lines indicate major and infrequent occurrences, respectively.

opennotspecifiedApr 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Species status of two colour morphs of Eupelmus vesicularis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) as revealed by allozyme electrophoresis, morphometric and host preference data

Figure 2. Scaterplots of pairs of variables for Eupelmus vesicularis light colour and dark colour forms. Note: All measurements in mm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in Species status of two colour morphs of Eupelmus vesicularis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) as revealed by allozyme electrophoresis, morphometric and host preference data

Figure 4. Enzyme electromorphs of Eupelmus vesicularis light colour form (left) and dark colour form (right). Notes: The direction of current flow is indicated by +; the specimen loading point is shown by an arrow.

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Species status of two colour morphs of Eupelmus vesicularis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) as revealed by allozyme electrophoresis, morphometric and host preference data

Figure 3. Plot of the first two factors from the principal component analysis of the log-transformed raw measurements.

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Species status of two colour morphs of Eupelmus vesicularis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) as revealed by allozyme electrophoresis, morphometric and host preference data

Figure 1. Measurements of forewing rudiment and hind tibia for morphometric analysis of Eupelmus vesicularis (female). Notes: ti3L, hind tibia length; waL, forewing apical part length; wbL, forewing base length.

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
dryad32/100

Alpha-diversity, Beta-diversity and host-specificity of wood-boring longhorn beetle (Cerambycidea) in Asian tropical and subtropical forests

<p><span>A long-debated question in ecology is whether the hyper-diversity of tropical plant-feeding insects is a direct consequence of high tropical plant diversity and/or should be attributed to increases in host plant specialization. To address this debate, we used the longhorn beetle as a study system because their larval stages feed on the xylems of trees and lianas. We hypothesized that longhorn beetles show higher host-specificity in tropical forests than in other forests; alternatively, the high longhorn beetle diversity in the tropics may simply be owing to more diverse host plants. We therefore designed an investigation in tropical and subtropical forests to test these hypotheses. We adapted several analyses (i.e., non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis, alpha-diversity, beta-dissimilarity indices comparisons, and variation partitioning based on redundancy analysis) to compare the species diversity of plants and longhorn beetles in different forests. Our results show that both the plant and beetle species in the tropical and subtropical areas were well-stratified (non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis). The beetle alpha-diversity in the tropical forests was significantly higher than that in the subtropical forests, but the plant alpha-diversity in the two types of forests were not significantly different. The beta-dissimilarity comparison showed that the plant species exerted a significant influence on beetle compositional assemblage in the tropical forests, but not in the subtropical forests. Finally, the variation partitioning results showed that both plant species and plant phylogenetic beta-diversity possessed significant explanatory power for beetle assemblage composition in the tropical forests, but not in the subtropical forests. We conclude that wood-boring longhorn beetles show higher host-specificity in tropical forests than in subtropical forests, and the high diversity of wood-boring longhorn beetles in tropical forests might be explained to a large extent by their more finely partitioned diet-breadth.</span></p>

opencc-zeroAug 2021View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Studies in European ant-decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae): ant alarm pheromone as host finding cue in Pseudacteon brevicauda, a parasite of Myrmica rubra (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

Figure 2. Percentage of flies showing flight activity as a reaction to synthetic 3-octanone, nonanone and 3-octanol. Water was used as a control (n = 30 each).

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Studies in European ant-decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae): ant alarm pheromone as host finding cue in Pseudacteon brevicauda, a parasite of Myrmica rubra (Formicidae: Myrmicinae)

Figure 1. Percentage of alerted flies from the total number tested. Control (C), intact worker ants (A), crushed gaster and thorax (G + T), crushed head (H) and two crushed mandibular glands (MG).

opennotspecifiedMar 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Leaf-mining beetles carry plant pathogenic fungi amongst hosts

Figure 1. (A) A pandanus tree (Pandanus boninensis, height: 1.5–2.0 m), a species endemic to the Ogasawara Islands. (B) A leaf mined by Phylloplatypus pandani. (C) Phylloplatypus pandani using the entrance hole of a mine. (D) Phylloplatypus pandani within a mine. Scale bars represent 1.0 mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Two new Encarsia species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) reared from eggs of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) in Argentina: an unusual new host association

Figure 1. Encarsia dalbulae sp. nov. (A) Head; (B) dorsal mesosoma; (C) forewing; (D) male genitalia; (E) antenna. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Two new Encarsia species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) reared from eggs of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) in Argentina: an unusual new host association

Figure 3. Encarsia mollicellae sp. nov. (A) Head; (B) dorsal mesosoma; (C) male genitalia; (D) mandibles; (E) details of antenna (arrows indicate sensilla); (F) antennae.

opennotspecifiedDec 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Two new species of Hymenoepimecis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) with notes on their spider hosts and behaviour manipulation

Figure 1. (A–E) Hymenoepimecis japi sp. nov. (A) Female, dorsal view; (B) fore- and hind wings; (C) metasoma dorsal view; (D) sternite I, lateral view; (E) head. (F–L). Webs of Leucauge roseosignata. (F) Normal web; (G) egg of H. japi sp. nov. attached on the abdomen of a female; (H) third instar larva consuming the host; (I) third instar larva holding the threads of the web hub; (J) cocoon web; (K) fixation point of the axial threads of the cocoon web on vegetation; (L) hub of the cocoon web. Scale bars: (A, G, H) 5 mm; (B, C, I, K, L) 1 mm; (D, E) 0.5 mm; (F) 10 cm; (J) 1 cm.

opennotspecifiedOct 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Two new species of Hymenoepimecis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) with notes on their spider hosts and behaviour manipulation

Figure 3. Webs of Manogea porracea. (A) Normal web showing the positions occupied by the female and by the male. (B) Cocoon web showing the positions occupied by the male, the horizontal sheet of the female (arrow close to male), and the cocoon (arrow below). Scale bars: 1 cm.

opennotspecifiedOct 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Two new species of Hymenoepimecis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) with notes on their spider hosts and behaviour manipulation

Figure 2. (A–F) Hymenoepimecis sooretama sp. nov. (A) Male lateral view; (B) female lateral view; (C) fore- and hind wings; (D) metasoma dorsal view; (E) sternite I lateral view; (F) head. (G–I) Webs of Manogea porracea. (G) Parasitoid invading a web; (H) larva of H. sooretama sp. nov. attached on the abdomen of a host female; (I) cocoon. Scale bars: (A–D) 1 mm; (E) 0.5 mm; (F) 0.1 mm; (G–I) 5 mm.

opennotspecifiedOct 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 11 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 11. Relationships between length of egg string and number of eggs per string (A) and between numbers of eggs per right and left egg strings (B) in females of Pseudocaligus fugu obtained at a culture area off Kosasa Town, Sasebo City on 29 May 2008.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 9 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 9. Pseudocaligus fugu, young adult female. (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) frontal filament; (C) genital compound somite, ventral view, note sinuate lateral margins of somite and attachment of paired spermatophores; (D) spermatophore; (E) right leg 4. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 8 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 8. Pseudocaligus fugu, fourth chalimus stage. Female (A–N), male (O–R). (A, O) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) frontal filament; (C) left caudal ramus, ventral view; (D) antennule, antenna and postantennary process in situ; (E) distal segment of antennule; (F) maxillule; (G) maxilla; (H) maxilliped; (I) right leg 1, anterior surface; (J) endopod of right leg 1, anterior surface; (K) leg 2, anterior surface; (L) leg 3, anterior surface; (M, Q) left leg 4; (N, R) leg 5; (P) antenna and postantennary process. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 7 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 7. Pseudocaligus fugu, third chalimus stage. Male (A–P), female (Q–S). (A, Q) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) frontal filament; (C) right caudal ramus, ventral view; (D) antennule; (E) antenna; (F) postantennary process; (G) mandible; (H) maxillule; (I) maxilla; (J) maxilliped; (K) leg 1, anterior surface; (L) endopod of right leg 1, anterior surface; (M) leg 2, anterior surface; (N) leg 3, anterior surface; (O) leg 4; (P, S) leg 5; (R) antenna and postantennary process. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 6 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 6. Pseudocaligus fugu, second chalimus stage. (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) frontal filament; (C) left caudal ramus, dorsal surface; (D) antennule, antenna and postantennary process in situ; (E) mandible; (F) maxillule; (G) maxilla; (H) maxilliped; (I) leg 1, anterior surface; (J) leg 2, anterior surface; (K).leg 3, anterior surface; (L) leg 4. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Developmental stages and growth of Pseudocaligus fugu Yamaguti, 1936 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) host-specific to Puffer

Figure 5. Pseudocaligus fugu, first chalimus stage. (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) right caudal ramus, dorsal surface; (C) antennule; (D) antenna; (E) mandible; (F) maxillule; (G) maxilla; (H) maxilliped; (I) leg 1, anterior surface; (J) endopod of right leg 1, anterior surface; (K) leg 2, anterior surface; (L) endopod of right leg 2, anterior surface; (M) leg 3, anterior surface. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedJul 2009View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.