Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 10 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 10. Outline-based discriminant analysis. Factor map of canonical variates (i.e. discriminant factors) derived from the principal components of the Normalised Elliptic Fourier coefficients of three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 6 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 6. Configurations of the ten anatomical landmarks connected by a straight line after procrustes superimposition of three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 2 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 2. Morphological characters of tibia and tarsus used to separate Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909 (A), S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 (B) and S. indicus Picard, 1908 (C).

Fig. 3 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 3. Ten landmarks digitised on wings of species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 flies for landmark-based geometric morphometrics analysis (see Table 2 for description).

Fig. 9 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 9. Configurations of the outlines after Elliptic Fourier Analysis of Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909, S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 and S. indicus Picard, 1908, in males (A) and females (B). Areas outlined by different colours represent shape, not size.

Fig. 5 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 5. Centroid size variation of the wings between species and sexes, shown as quartile boxes. Each box shows the group median separating the 25th and 75th quartiles. Vertical bars under the boxes represent the wing (units as mm).

Fig. 1 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 1. Morphological characters of palpi used to separate Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909 (A), S. uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966 (B) and S. indicus Picard, 1908 (C).

Fig. 8 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 8. Perimeter variation of the wings between species and sexes, shown as quartile boxes. Each box shows the group median sepa- rating the 25th and 75th quartiles. Vertical bars under the boxes represent the wing (units as mm).

Fig. 7 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 7. Landmark-based discriminant analysis. Factor map of canonical variates resulting from comparison among the three species of Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, in males (A) and females (B).

Fig. 4 in Landmark and outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis of three Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fig. 4. Contour digitised on Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 flies wing for outline-based geometric morphometrics analysis. A short, artificial segment is computed by the digitising program to completely close the contour.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Рис. 2. Ширина трофической ниши паукообразных в биотопах трех типов: I – поΛупустынная равнина; II – каменистые скΛоны пΛато; III – ΔоΛина со скопΛениями скаΛьных останцев. Fig. 2. The width of the trophic niche of arachnids in biotopes of three types: I – semidesert plain; II – stony slopes of the plateau; III – valley with clusters of rocks. in Comparison of trophic spectra and hunting strategies of some large arachnids (Arachnida: Scorpiones, Solifugae, Aranei) in semi-desert biocenoses of Gobustan (Eastern Azerbaijan)

Рис. 2. Ширина трофической ниши паукообразных в биотопах трех типов: I – поΛупустынная равнина; II – каменистые скΛоны пΛато; III – ΔоΛина со скопΛениями скаΛьных останцев. Fig. 2. The width of the trophic niche of arachnids in biotopes of three types: I – semidesert plain; II – stony slopes of the plateau; III – valley with clusters of rocks.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →

Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Matrix Imaging

Ultrasound data associated to the paper "Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Matrix Imaging", Nature Communications, 2023.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract : "Matrix imaging paves the way towards a next revolution in wave imaging. Based on the response matrix recorded between a set of sensors, it enables an optimized compensation of aberration phenomena and multiple scattering events that usually drastically hinder the focusing process in heterogeneous media. Although it gave rise to spectacular results in optical microscopy or seismic imaging, the success of matrix imaging has been so far relatively lim- ited with ultrasonic waves because wave control is generally only performed with a linear array of transducers. In this paper, we extend ultrasound ma- trix imaging to a 3D geometry. Switching from a 1D to a 2D probe enables a much sharper estimation of the transmission matrix that links each trans- ducer and each medium voxel. Here, we first present an experimental proof of concept on a tissue-mimicking phantom through ex-vivo tissues and then, show the potential of 3D matrix imaging for transcranial applications." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data corresponding to the pork tissue experiment:  - Raw data: "1_PorkChop_on_Phantom.mat" [Fig. 1, 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. S3, S4, S5] - Focused reflection matrix (after beamforming): "1bis_PorkChop_on_Phantom_Focused_reflection_Matrix_Rdrr.mat"  Raw data corresponding to the head phantom experiment:  - "2_HeadPhantom_position1.mat" [Fig. 4 & 5, S6, S7] - "2_HeadPhantom_position2.mat" [Fig. 6] Raw data corresponding to the tissue mimicking phantom without aberrations:  - "4_Phantom_withtout_aberrations.mat" [supplementary Fig. S8] In each case :  - "rfr" contains the raw ultrasound data; - "p" is a structure that contains all the parameters used during acquisition.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Figures 7–10 in Description of three new Acanthocinini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) species from Ecuador

Figures 7–10. Anisopodus micromaculatus sp. nov., paratypes, dorsal habitus. 7) Male. 8) Male. 9) Female. 10) Female.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Figures 18–24 in Description of three new Acanthocinini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) species from Ecuador

Figures 18–24. Paracleodoxus minutus sp. nov. 18–22) Holotype male. 18) Dorsal habitus. 19) Ventral habitus. 20) Lateral habitus. 21) Head, frontal view. 22) Centrobasal crest of the elytra. 23–24) Paratype female. 23) Dorsal habitus. 24) Ventral habitus.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Figures 11–17 in Description of three new Acanthocinini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) species from Ecuador

Figures 11–17. Parabaryssinus katerinae sp. nov. 11–15) Holotype male. 11) Dorsal habitus. 12) Ventral habitus. 13) Lateral habitus. 14) Head, frontal view. 15) Centrobasal crest of the elytra. 16–17) Paratypes male, dorsal habitus. 16) Specimen 1. 17) Specimen 2.

Figure 6 in Three new Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and redescription of one other, gill parasites of five Labeo spp. (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Sanaga basin (Cameroon, Central Africa)

Figure 6. Drawing of sclerotized parts of Dactylogyrus yassensis. (DA) dorsal anchor, (DB) Dorsal bar, (VB) ventral bar, (Pe) penis, (AP) accessory piece, (Vg) vagina, (N) needle. Scale bar: 20 Μm.

Figure 3 in Three new Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and redescription of one other, gill parasites of five Labeo spp. (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Sanaga basin (Cameroon, Central Africa)

Figure 3. Drawing of sclerotized parts of Dactylogyrus sanagaensis sp. nov.: (DA) dorsal anchor, (DB) Dorsal bar, (VB) ventral bar, (Pe) penis, (AP) accessory piece, (Vg) vagina, (N) needle. Scale bar: 20 Μm.

Figure 2 in Three new Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and redescription of one other, gill parasites of five Labeo spp. (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Sanaga basin (Cameroon, Central Africa)

Figure 2. Measurements taken on sclerotized parts according to Gussev (1962). Anchor: (a) total length, (b) length to notch, (c) outer root length, (d) inner root length, (e) point length; (DB) Dorsal bar and (VB) ventral bar: (x) length, (w) width; (H) hook I to VII: length ("larval hook" + shank = proximal + distal subunit); Male copulatory organ (MCO): (TL) total length, (Pe) penis, (L) length, (APb) accessory piece base length; (Vg) vagina: (L) length, (l) width. Scale bar: 20 Μm.

Figure 7 in Three new Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and redescription of one other, gill parasites of five Labeo spp. (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Sanaga basin (Cameroon, Central Africa)

Figure 7. Result of the principal component analysis performed on measurements (Μm) of sclerotized parts of monogeneans.

Figure 5 in Three new Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) and redescription of one other, gill parasites of five Labeo spp. (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Sanaga basin (Cameroon, Central Africa)

Figure 5. Drawing of sclerotized parts of Dactylogyrus djimensis sp. nov.: (DA) dorsal anchor, (DB) Dorsal bar, (VB) ventral bar, (Pe) penis, (AP) accessory piece, (Vg) vagina, (N) needle. Scale bar: 20 Μm.