Find research datasets worth reusing

Figures 3–4 in New records of Erythraeidae mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) from Syria with additional morphological data on some species

Figures 3–4. Abrolophus bochkovi (larva) – 3. Setae in scutal area; 4. Projection palpal femur. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figures 13–14 in New records of Erythraeidae mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) from Syria with additional morphological data on some species

Figures 13–14. Curteria duzgunesae (larva) – 13. Dorsal habitus;14. Setae in scutal area. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figures 11–12 in New records of Erythraeidae mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) from Syria with additional morphological data on some species

Figures 11–12. Balaustium ryszardi (larva) – 11. Dorsal habitus; 12. Setae in scutal area. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figures 7–8 in New records of Erythraeidae mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) from Syria with additional morphological data on some species

Figures 7–8. Abrolophus quisquiliarus (deutonymph) – 7. Dorsal opisthosomal setae; 8. Sensillary area of crista metopica. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figures 9–10 in New records of Erythraeidae mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) from Syria with additional morphological data on some species

Figures 9–10. Balaustium nikae (larva) – 9. Dorsal habitus; 10. Setae in scutal area. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figure 4 in Efficiency of some commercial stimulants in inducing tomato resistance to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)

Figure 4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the upper-surface of leaves sprayed with water (control), Silical®, Postar®, and Ultrafit® to visualize the diversity of trichome types (glandular: GT and non-glandular: NGT) and densities for tomato cultivars K-186 F1 and 023 F1.

Figure 2 in Efficiency of some commercial stimulants in inducing tomato resistance to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)

Figure 2. Population of movable stages of Tetranychus urticae on tomato leaves over old 3–13 weeks after transplanting for two cultivars treated with commercial stimulants during the 2017 and 2018 summer seasons. Ultrafat * applied by adding to soil below the plants. Columns with the same letter represent means that are not significantly different according to Tukey's multiple range test (p <0.05). Vertical bars represent ± standard error of the mean (n = 36).

Figure 1 in Efficiency of some commercial stimulants in inducing tomato resistance to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)

Figure 1. Population of movable stages of Tetranychus urticae on tomato leaves of several plant ages for cultivars K186 F1 and 023 F1 treated with some commercial stimulants during the 2017 (A) and 2018 (B) summer seasons. Population at three weeks after transplanting was immediately before treatment. Columns with the same letter represent means that are not significantly different according to Tukey's multiple range test (p <0.05). Vertical bars represent ± standard error of the mean (n = 21).

Figure 1. A in Evaluate the efficiency of releasing two predatory species at their optimal temperature for controlling Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in a croton greenhouse

Figure 1. A timeline representing the release of predatory species P. persimilis and S. punctillum to control the twospotted mite T. urticae in a croton greenhouse.

Figure 3 in Evaluate the efficiency of releasing two predatory species at their optimal temperature for controlling Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in a croton greenhouse

Figure 3. The comparison between the population of T. urticae in predators' greenhouse and control greenhouse.

Figure 3 in Efficiency of some commercial stimulants in inducing tomato resistance to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)

Figure 3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the lower-surface of leaves sprayed with water (control), Silical®, Postar®, and Ultrafit® to visualize the diversity of trichome types (glandular: GT and non-glandular: NGT) and densities for tomato cultivars K-186 F1 and 023 F1.

Figure 13 in New data on Marantelophus iranicus and Empitrombium makolae (Acari: Erythraeidae, Microtrombidiidae)

Figure 13. An unidentified nematoceran fly (Diptera: Chironomidae), the host of Empitrombium makolae.

Figures 9–12 in New data on Marantelophus iranicus and Empitrombium makolae (Acari: Erythraeidae, Microtrombidiidae)

Figures 9–12. Marantelophus iranicus (larva) – 9. Ti–Ta II; 10. Tr–Ge II; 11. Ti–Ta III; 12. Tr–Ge III.

Figures 5–8 in New data on Marantelophus iranicus and Empitrombium makolae (Acari: Erythraeidae, Microtrombidiidae)

Figures 5–8. Marantelophus iranicus (larva); 5. Dorsal view (right) and ventral view of gnathosoma (left); 6. Ventral view of palpal tarsus; 7. Ti–Ta I; 8. Tr–Ge I.

Figures 3–4 in New data on Marantelophus iranicus and Empitrombium makolae (Acari: Erythraeidae, Microtrombidiidae)

Figures 3–4. Marantelophus iranicus (larva) – 3. Ventral view of idiosoma; 4. Punctated area attached to the coxae II.

Figures 5–7 in Oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) from southeastern Iran, with supplementary description of Verachthonius cf. laticeps(Brachychthoniidae)

Figures 5–7. Verachthonius cf. laticeps (Strenzke, 1951) – 5. Subcapitulum, ventral view, distal palp segments (genu-

Figures 2–4 in Oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) from southeastern Iran, with supplementary description of Verachthonius cf. laticeps(Brachychthoniidae)

Figures 2–4. Verachthonius cf. laticeps (Strenzke, 1951) – 2. Dorsal view of body; 3. Ventral view of body (legs and distal palp segments not shown); 4. Lateral view of body (legs and palp not shown). Scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 1 in Effects of commercial oils on the camel tick, Hyalomma dromedarii (Acari: Ixodidae) and their enzyme activities

Figure 1. Mortality percentages of Hyalomma dromedarii semi-engorged females treated with different concentrations of four oils at five successive days after treatment – A. Rosemary; B. Garlic; C. Neem; D. Cyperus. a, b, … etc. indicate significant differences between concentrations (%) of each oil for each day according to Tukey test (P <0.001).

Figure 2 in Eriophyes urmiae sp. nov. (Acari: Eriophyidae) from spurge in Iran

Figure 2. Schematic drawings of Eriophyes urmiae Lotfollahi & Mohammad-Doustaresharaf sp. nov. nymph prodorsal shield. Scale bar: 10 µm.

Figure 3 in Eriophyes urmiae sp. nov. (Acari: Eriophyidae) from spurge in Iran

Figure 3. Schematic drawings of the prodorsal shields of: A. Eriophyes antiquorum Amrine & Stasny, 1994 (from Mohanasundaram 1983); B. Eriophyes septemlineatus Petanović, 1991 (from Petanović 1991); C. Eriophyes euphorbiae (Nalepa, 1890) (from Lotfollahi et al. 2020a).