Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 2. Six meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of the homogeneity of the mesh.

FIGURE 1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 1. Twelve meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.

FIGURE 5 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 5. Evolution of the box-plots of the Von Mises stress distribution. X-axes refers to meshes S01 to S12: the size of the elements (1); and meshes SA to SF: the uniformity of the mesh (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates.

FIGURE 4 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 4. Evolution of the convergence error of each iteration of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Mesh-Weighted Arithmetic Mean (MWAM), Median (M), Mesh-Weighted Median (MWM) in front of the number of nodes (1) and the percentage of Refined Area (percent value of area with homogeneous mesh) (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates. S07 refers to Mesh S7 (mesh size), SE refers to Mesh SE (mesh homogeneity).

FIGURE S1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE S1. Map of Von Mises stress distribution in the 12 meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.

FIGURE 10. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 10. 1, Trackway Gl6; 2, Close up of the Gl6-Pd interference; 3, Interpretative drawing of Gl6-Pd interference; 4, Orthophoto of trackway Gl6; 5, Shaded grey photogrammetric model of the interference. White arrows and letters a, b and c indicate interruption (a), displacement (b) of the tail trace, and trackway Gl6 last set (c). Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 9. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 9. 1, Drawing of different parts making up the slab; 2, 3D photogrammetric false coloured model; 3, 3D photogrammetric shaded grey model. Scale bar is 0,5 m.

FIGURE 8 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 8. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Interference between trackways Gl4 and Pd indicating the relative antecedence of Gl4 trackmaker; 2, Trackway Pd, sets 2 and 3 interfering with Gl2, Gl4, Gl5 and Jb trackways. Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 7 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 7. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Swimming traces (indicated by black and white arrows) belonging to trackway Gl1; 2-3, Close-up of the best Gl1 tracks. Scale bar is 5 cm (1) and 1 cm (2-3).

FIGURE 4. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 4. 1, Ganasauripus ladinus; 2, Pachypes dolomiticus manus; 3-4, Pachypes dolomiticus pedes. Scale bar is 1 cm (1) and 5 cm (2-4). Roman numerals refer to digits.

FIGURE 5. Event timeline. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 5. Event timeline. 1, Ripple marks and Gl1 tracks formation; 2, Gl2 and Gl3 tracks formation; 3; Gl4 trackway formation; 4, Jb trackway formation; 5, Gl5 and Ct1 trackways formation; 6, Ct2 trackway formation; 7, Gl6 and Gl7 trackways formation; 8, Pd trackway formation; 9, Final interpretative drawing of the slab MPUR NS 34/28; 10, Trackmakers advancement directions. rip, ripple marks; Pd, Pachypes dolomiticus trackway; Ct1-Ct2, Chelichnus tazelwürmi trackways; Gl1-Gl7, Ganasauripus ladinus trackways; Jb, Janusichnus bifrons trackway; dcr,? desiccation cracks. Scale bar is 50 cm.

FIGURE 6 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 6. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Ripple marks counterprints; 2, Interference between ripple marks counterprints and Gl7 trackway. Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 3. 1-2 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 3. 1-2, Chelichnus tazelwürmi; 3, Janusichnus bifrons; 4, Ganasauripus ladinus. Scale bar is 1 cm. Roman numerals refer to digits.

FIGURE 1. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 1. 1, Location map of the Butterloch-Bletterbach area – Redagno; 2, Schematic drawing of the ButterlochBletterbach section with the distribution of ichnotaxa; red tracks indicates the stratigraphic level from which the studied footprints came (from Ceoloni et al., 1988, redrawn and slightly modified).

Fig.9 in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig.9.Diagram showing the percentages of flat versus globose morphotypes of encrusting foraminiferans within Facies 1, Facies 2, and Facies 3.

Fig.8 in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig.8.Encrusting foraminiferans of Facies 3. A.IPUM 27832, Solenomeris sp.encrusting the lower surface of the coral Actinacis rollei. B.IPUM 27833, Carpenteria sp.encrusting the upper surface of the coral Actinacisrollei. C.IPUM 27834, Acervulinalinearis Hanzawa, 1947 encrusting the upper surface of the coral Actinacisrollei. D.IPUM 27835, foralgal crust with Miniacina sp.1 on the upper surface of the coral Actinacisrollei. E.IPUM 27836, foralgal crust with Planorbulina aff. uva Scheibner, 1968 (a), Miniacina aff. multiformis Scheibner, 1968 (b), and Victoriellidae (c) on the upper surface of the coral Acropora. F.IPUM 27837, foralgal crust with Miniacina aff. multiformis Scheibner, 1968 on the upper surface of the coral Astreoporatecta.Scale bar 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig. 3. Encrusting foraminiferans recognized in the Nago section and their relative abundance within Facies 1, Facies 2, and Facies 3.

Fig.2. A in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig.2. A.The portion of the Nago Limestone type section corresponding to the second major cycle.Minor cycles and facies types are also indicated (from Bosellini 1998). B.Model of the uppermost shallowing−upward parasequence showing distribution of facies types along the Nago Limestone shelf−edge.

Fig.1. A in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig.1. A.Palaeogeographic reconstruction of the Lessini Shelf: 1) deep−water mudstones of the surrounding Jurassic basins; 2) Palaeogene lagoon and shelf−edge reefs; 3) Palaeogene pelagic claystones and marlstones (modified from Bosellini 1989). B.Location map of the study area with indication of the Nago Limestone type section (II° major cycle) (from Bosellini 1998).

Fig.6 in Palaeoecological significance of coral-encrusting foraminiferan associations: A case-study from the Upper Eocene of northern Italy

Fig.6.Diagram showing the percentages of isolated encrusting foramini − feran specimens versus foralgal crusts and their preferential attachment surface within Facies 1, Facies 2, and Facies 3.