Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →

Figure 1 in Testing the Temporal Limits of Lures and Toxicants for Trapping Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Additional Weathering Studies of Solid Bactrocera and Zeugodacus Male Lures and Associated Insecticidal Strips

Figure 1. Captures of Zeugodacus cucurbitae males in Jackson traps containing toxicants of variable age deployed at Aloun Farm, Oahu, Hawaii. The lures were fresh in all traps and were prepared in Hawaii at the start of the test. Two fresh toxicants were included: naled in liquid CL (bar labelled L) and a DDVP strip with a CL plug (bar labelled P). The DDVP strips weathered in Arizona and Florida were tested during the same 1-day period (December 9–10, 2015). Values represent means (+ 1 SE); 12 traps were deployed per treatment. Bars marked by different letters were significantly different (Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test).

Fig. 6 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 6. The concentration of rotenone in brain tissue afer treatment.* indicates significant difference between the 2 treatments at the same point in time (P <0.05, Tukey honest significant difference tests).

Fig. 4 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 4. The concentration of rotenone in hemolymph afer treatment.* indicates significant difference between the 2 treatments at the same point in time (P <0.05, Tukey honest significant difference tests).

Fig. 3 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 3. The concentration of rotenone in midgut tissue afer treatment.* indicates significant difference between the 2 treatments at the same point in time (P <0.05, Tukey honest significant difference tests).

Fig. 1 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 1. Liquid chromatogram (A: rotenone standard, B: excreta, C: hemolymph, D: brain, E: ventral nerve cord, F: midgut).

Fig. 2 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 2. The concentration of rotenone in excreta afer treatment.* indicates significant difference between the 2 treatments at the same point in time (P <0.05, Tukey honest significant difference tests).

Fig. 7 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 7. Cells of Spodoptera litura midgut peritrophic membrane (A: control, B: rotenone, C: rotenone + cinnamon oil). The arrows show the change in cell structure in response to treatment. Note that in A the cells are single, packed, and clearly visible, whereas in B the cell spacing is wider, and in C there is slightly wider cell spacing, and abnormality of the membrane.

Fig. 5 in Addition of cinnamon oil improves toxicity of rotenone to Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae

Fig. 5. The concentration of rotenone in ventral nerve cord tissue afer treatment.* indicates significant difference between the 2 treatments at the same point in time (P <0.05, Tukey honest significant difference tests).

Figure 6 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 6: (A–E) Xiphinema index Thorne and Allen, 1950, (A) Anterior end; (B) Tubular part of uterus; (C) Vagina; (D) Pars dilatata oviductus; (E) Tail, (F–H) X. pachtaicum (Tulaganov, 1938) Kirjanova, 1951, (F) Anterior end; (G) Anterior genital branch; (H) Tail, (I–N) X. vuittenezi Luc, Lima, Weischer and Flegg, 1964, (I) Anterior end; (J, L) Uterine differentiation spines; (K) Vagina; (M, N) Tail. (Scale bars =10 μm).

Figure 5 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 5: Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from 28S rDNA D2–D3 expansion domains of X. barooghii n. sp. and X. index (−lnL = 9,085.8555; AIC = 18,191.7109; freqA = 0.2402; freqC = 0.2341; freqG = 0.2885; freqT = 0.2373; R (a) = 1.0503; R (b) = 2.8325; R (c) = 2.6784; R (d) = 0.5047; R (e) = 4.0878; R (f) = 1.0000). Posterior probabilities are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated by bold letters.

Figure 1 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 1: Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (A) Amphidial pouch; (B) Entire body; (C) Neck region; (D) Female tail; (E) Anterior end; (F) Posterior genital branch; (G–J) Tail of juveniles from J1–J4, respectively.

Figure 3 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 3: Juvenile stages of Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. Anterior region and tail shape of (A, B) first; (C, D) second; (E, F) third and (G, H) fourth juvenile stages, respectively (Scale bars =10 μm).

Figure 2 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 2: Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. Female (A, B) anterior end; (C, G) uterine differentiation spines; (D) entire body; (E) reproductive system; (F) vagina; (H) tail; (I) caudal pores in lateral optical view; (J) amphidial pouch; (K) pharyngeal expansion. (Scale bars: A–K = 10 μm, D = 70 μm).

Figure 4 in Description of a new dagger nematode, Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) and additional data on the three known species of the genus from northwest of Iran

Figure 4: Xiphinema barooghii n. sp. Graph of correlation of functional and replacement odontostyle to body length in all developmental stages from Jl to mature females.

Fig. 2 in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 2. Reconstructed skeleton of Candelaria barbouri depicting the preserved elements (in brown) of CAPPA/UFSM 0225 (by Maurício S. Garcia).

Fig. 1. A in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 1. A. Map of the "Posto" site and the surface distribution of the geologic units in the area (modified from Müller et al. 2020). Location of the study area within South America (inset). B. General view of the "Posto" site.

Fig. 5 in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 5. Dendrogram from the updated dataset of Martinelli et al. (2017) of main localities of the state of Rio Grande do Sul yielding fossil tetrapods of the Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone. The silhouette represents the presence ofCandelaria barbouri.

Fig. 6 in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 6. Bivariate plot showing the results of the morphospace occupation analysis. Red convex hull corresponds to morphospace of owenettids and blue convex hull corresponds to morphospace of procolophonids.

Fig. 4 in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 4. Results of the phylogenetic analyses. A. Strict consensus tree of the first analysis depicting the phylogenetic position of CAPPA/UFSM 0225. B. Abbreviated strict consensus tree of the second analysis depicting the phylogenetic position of CAPPA/UFSM 0225. Numbers on nodes represent Bremer support values higher than one and Bootstrap values higher than 50%.

Fig. 3 in An additional specimen of owenettid procolophonoid from the Middle Triassic of Southern Brazil

Fig. 3. Owenettid procolophonoid Candelaria barbouri (CAPPA/UFSM 0225) from the "Posto" site, Dona Francisca, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Ladinian, Middle Triassic. Skull and mandible in dorsal (A1, A2), ventral (A3. A4), and left lateral (A5, A6) views. Photographs (A1, A3, A5) and explanatory drawings (A2, A4, A6).