Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 4. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis albilabris (ZSM 588/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 5 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 5. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis pyrrhus (ZSM 580/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 6 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 6. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis marojezensis (ZSM 523/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view, note that the hindlimb has been removed from the specimen for better visibility of structures; (c) oral disc.

Figure 1 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 1. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis boehmei (ZSM 534/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 2 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 2. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis reticulatus (ZSM 525/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 22 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 22. Niphargus polymorphus sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Retinacle of pleopod II. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 18 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 18. Niphargus lourensis sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 14 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 14. Niphargus dabarensis sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 3. Distribution of characters ''antenna I-length'' (character 19, CI50.18, RI50.53; left) and ''gnathopod II article 6 size'' (character 39, CI50.33, RI50.7; right). Long antennae are considered as troglomorphic, whereas a large-sized gnathopod II is supposed to be a synapomorphy of ''Orniphargus'' (S. Karaman (1950c)).

Figure 10. N in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 10. N. dolichopus sp. n., holotype. Pereopods III–IV, detail of pereopod IV dactylus. Retinacle of pleopod II. Uropods I–III. Telson.

Figure 2 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 2. Distribution of characters ''body shape'' (character 2, CI51, RI51; left) and ''body size'' (character 1, CI50.28, RI50.37; right). Note that the body shape is plesiomorphic in most of the ''Orniphargus'' taxa, and large body size is a highly convergent (possibly troglomorphic) character.

Figure 1. A in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 1. A strict consensus tree of 34 most parsimonious trees (length5472; CI50.26, RI50.60). Values of Bremer support index (decay index) are indicated below branches. Taxa traditionally assigned to the ''Orniphargus'' species aggregate, as well as clades for which character analysis was performed, are encircled in boxes. Note 1: Despite of its position on the cladogram N. pectinicauda has never been considered as an ''Orniphargus'' taxon. Note 2: Taxa are named according to their lowest rank. For full names, see Tables I and II.

Figure 5 in Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species- aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa

Figure 5. Distribution of characters ''type of setae/spines along postero-dorsal margin of pleonites'' (character 14, CI50.2, RI50.5; left) and ''uropod I rami-spines'' (character 58, CI50.37, RI50.73; right). Both characters are supposed to be characteristics of ''Orniphargus'' (S. Karaman (1950c)).

Figure 6 in On a new species and genus in the Cypridini (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Cyprididae) from South Africa, with a phylogenetic analysis of the tribe and a discussion on the genus concept in this group

Figure 6. Phylogenetic analyses of matrix given in Appendix 1. Trees are phylograms computed by NJ method, but for all three situations at least some of the equally parsimonious MP phylograms (as computed by branch-andbound routine) had an identical topology. Values without brackets represent distance bootstraps (10,000 replicates) using NJ, values in brackets are MP bootstrap values (10,000 replicates) using full heuristic method. (A) Weight of all characters (1–17)51; (B) weight of valve characters (1–9)55, of soft part characters (10–17)51; (C) weight of all soft part characters (10–17)55, of valves characters (1–9)51.

Figure 9 in Phylogenetic relationships within Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae), description of five new species from Australia, a new species from Japan, and comments on previously described species

Figure 9. Amphiglena nishii sp. nov. SEM preparation, paratype, AM W30485. (A) Whole specimen, ventral view; (B) anterior segments and base of crown, ventral view; (C) crown and anterior segments, dorsal view; (D) first and second thoracic chaetigers, ventral view; (E) uncini and companion chaetae second thoracic chaetiger; (F) parapodia, mid-abdominal segment; (G) uncini, mid-abdominal segment.

Figure 5. Mnementh brennei n. gen. n in On a new species and genus in the Cypridini (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Cyprididae) from South Africa, with a phylogenetic analysis of the tribe and a discussion on the genus concept in this group

Figure 5. Mnementh brennei n. gen. n. sp., male, Western Cape, South Africa. (A) T3 (OC.2917); (B) T2 (OC.2915); (C) attachment of caudal ramus (OC.2915); (D) caudal ramus (OC.2915). Scale: 20× (A, B); 10× (C, D).

Figure 8 in Phylogenetic relationships within Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae), description of five new species from Australia, a new species from Japan, and comments on previously described species

Figure 8. Amphiglena maiteae sp. nov. SEM preparation, paratypes, AM W30399, AM W30400. (A) Whole specimen, ventral view; (B) anterior segments and base of crown, ventral view; (C) same, dorsal view; (D) second thoracic chaetigers, ventral view; (E) notochaetae, second thoracic chaetiger; (F) uncini and companion chaetae, second thoracic segment; (G) mid-abdominal segment, dorsal view; (H) mid abdominal uncini.

Figure 5 in Phylogenetic relationships within Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae), description of five new species from Australia, a new species from Japan, and comments on previously described species

Figure 5. Amphiglena bondi sp. nov. SEM preparation, paratypes, AM W30480. (A) Whole specimen, ventral view; (B) anterior segments and base of crown, ventral view; (C) anterior segments, dorsal view; (D) first and second thoracic chaetigers, ventral view; (E) uncini and companion chaetae second thoracic chaetiger; (F) parapodia, first abdominal segment; (G) uncini, first abdominal segment.

Figure 4 in Phylogenetic relationships within Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae), description of five new species from Australia, a new species from Japan, and comments on previously described species

Figure 4. Line drawings of uncini. (A, B) A. gracilis sp. nov.: (A) thoracic uncini, seventh chaetiger; (B) midabdominal chaetiger. (C, D) A. bondi sp. nov.: (C) thoracic uncini, seventh chaetiger; (D) mid-abdominal chaetiger. (E, F) A. lenae sp. nov.: (E) thoracic uncini, seventh chaetiger; (F) mid-abdominal chaetiger. (G, H) A. magna sp. nov.: (G) thoracic uncini, seventh chaetiger; (H) mid-abdominal chaetiger. (I, J) A. maiteae sp. nov.: (I) seventh chaetiger; (J) mid-abdominal chaetiger. (K–N) A. nishii sp. nov.: (K, L) seventh chaetiger; (M, N) midabdominal chaetiger. Scale bar: 10 Mm.

Figure 1 in Phylogenetic relationships within Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae), description of five new species from Australia, a new species from Japan, and comments on previously described species

Figure 1. (A) One of the most parsimonious cladograms (L 95, CI 0.62, RI 0.73) from the matrix in Appendix 3. Black circles indicate synapomorphies and white circles homoplasies showing unambiguous changes only. (B) Strict consensus of five most parsimonious trees.