Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,155 results for “resolution”
Sensitivity of a Coarse-Resolution Global Ocean Model to a Spatially Variable Neutral Diffusivity - ACCESS-OM2 data and plotting routines
<p>This repository contains the processed data and plotting routines associated with the article</p> <p>Holmes, Groeskamp, Stewart and McDougall (2022), Sensitivity of a Coarse-Resolution Global Ocean Model to a Spatially Variable Neutral Diffusivity, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES), doi: 10.1029/2021MS002914, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002914</p> <p>The contents includes post-processed data output from the 1-degree ACCESS-OM2 ocean-sea-ice model simulations and the python/jupyter plotting routines required to make the plots.</p> <p>The processing script is Holmes2022JAMES_Neutral_Diffusion_ACCESS-OM2_Plotting_Script.ipynb. The data files consist of time-averages or time series of certain metrics processed using NCO tools from the raw ACCESS-OM2 simulation output.</p>
Dust extinction curves: Ferrara (1999) high resolution
<p>These datasets are based on the models described in <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RNAAS...2..188B">Benson (2018)</a>, and are intended to closely match the models run by <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..437F">Ferrara et al. (1999)</a> - they use the same dust grain properties and galactic geometry. However, they are tabulated using a much higher resolution grid of inclinations, optical depths, wavelengths, and morphologies than in <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..437F">Ferrara et al. (1999)</a>.</p> <p><strong>Dust Properties</strong></p> <p>Dust grain albedos, scattering asymmetries, and opacities to extinction are taken from <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...487..625G">Gordon et al. (1997)</a>, for either their Milky Way, “MW”, or Small Magellanic Cloud, “SMC”, models (as encoded in each file name), and assume Henyey-Greenstein scattering.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Stellar Geometry</strong></p> <p>Galactic disks follow exponential profiles in both radial and vertical directions, with the vertical scale height equal to 0.0875 times the radial scale length. Spheroids follow spherical <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.202..995J">Jaffe (1983)</a> profiles. Note that spheroid radii in this work are listed as the scale radius, <em>r</em><sub>s</sub>, while <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..437F">Ferrara et al. (1999)</a> listed the corresponding effective radius, <em>r</em><sub>e</sub>=<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>/1.16.</p> <p><strong>Dust Geometry</strong></p> <p>Dust is distributed in the disk, and follows exponential profiles in both radial and vertical directions. The vertical scale height is set to a multiple, <em>h</em><sub>z</sub>, of the stellar disk scale height. The value of <em>h</em><sub>z</sub> is encoded in each file name.</p>
Commodity Dataset | Retrieving the National Main Commodity Maps in Indonesia Based on High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data Using Cloud Computing Platform
<p>(Commodity data in raster format) Supplementary materials for “Retrieving the National Main Commodity Maps in Indonesia Based on High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data Using Cloud Computing Platform” that had been published on Land MDPI (2020). doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100377">10.3390/land9100377</a> </p> <p>The data included:</p> <p>1) Raster data of commodity maps (TIFF Compressed in ZIP)</p> <p>2) READ ME for the dataset (DOCX)</p> <p>3) Legend for raster data in ArcGIS Format (LYR)</p> <p> </p>
Dataset for Reference-free Isotropic Super-resolution For Volumetric Fluorescence Microscopy
<p>Dataset for a research paper titled "Deep learning enables reference-free isotropic super-resolution for volumetric fluorescence microscopy". The images were acquired using two modalities: confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) and open-top light-sheet microscopy (OT-LSM). For details about the imaging, please refer to the paper (Link to be uploaded later). </p> <p>A. CFM</p> <ul> <li>CFM image of a cortical region of a Thy 1-eYFP mouse brain. </li> <li>Lateral resolution estimated as 1.24 micron and Z-depth interval of 3 micron</li> </ul> <ol> <li>Input image ["CFM_input_xy-view.tif] [Figure 2] </li> <li>Reference image acquired by rotating the sample by 90 degrees ["CFM_rotated-and-registered_xz-view.tif'] [Figure 2] </li> </ol> <p>B. OT-LSM </p> <ul> <li>OT-LSM image of a cortical region of a Thy 1-eYFP mouse brain.</li> <li>Lateral resolution estimated as 0.5 micron and axial resolution estimated as 4.6 micron. </li> <li>For testing of artifact correction, the microscope was poorly calibrated on purpose. </li> </ul> <ol> <li>Input image for artifact correction ["OT-LSM_artifact-correction_input_volume_xy-view.tif"] [Figure 4]</li> <li>Ground-truth image for artificial blurring ["OT-LSM_artificial-blurring_GT.tif"][Supplementary Figure 14]</li> <li>Input image for artificial blurring ["OT-LSM_artificial-blurring_gau-z-blurred-std-10.tif"][Supplementary Figure 14]</li> <li>Input image for PSF deconvolution ["input_volume_PSF-deconvolution.tif"][Figure 3]</li> </ol> <p>C. Simulation </p> <ul> <li>Jupyter notebook to generate a 3D image volume for simulation ["Data Generator for Simulation.ipynb"] [Figure 1] </li> </ul>
Dataset of the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of a confocal point sensor with a type ASG material measure
<p>These original measurement data relate to the publication: J. Schaude, A. C. Gröschl, T. Hausotte: Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor, Metrology 2(1), p. 19-32, 2022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology2010002">https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology2010002</a>. Please refer to this open access publication for a detailed description of the measurement setup and procedure.</p> <p>All data are in ASCII-format. Each file contains four columns, where column one to three are the <em>x</em>, <em>y</em>, and <em>z</em>-coordinates of the positioning system and column four is the signal of the photodetector.</p> <p><strong>Content of the folders</strong></p> <p>10_Plane: Axial probings on 18 points just outside the grooves.</p> <p>20_Edges: Lateral probings from each point just outside the grooves in the direction of the roughly determined centre of the material measure.</p> <p>30_PlaneArea: Repeated axial probing on a plane area near the material measure.</p> <p>40_RadialMeasurement: Radial measurement of the material measure by lateral (radial) probings conducted on different heights (referring to the distance to the plane fitted to the measuring points of 10_Plane), and radii (referring to the centre of the circle fitted to the edges determined in 20_Edges). Each radial probing has its own data file, with the name of the data file being “radial_probing {radius in m} {height in m} {data and time of probing}.txt”.</p> <p>50_LineMeasurement: Lateral probings conducted on different heights (referring to the distance to the plane fitted to the measuring points of 10_Plane), different lateral offsets (referring to the centre of the circle fitted to the edges determined in 20_Edges) and on two angles (on the groove (0°) and the adjacent top level (10°)). Please refer to sec. 5.2 of the aforementioned publication for a detailed description. Each lateral probing has its own data file, with the name of the file being “lateral probing {angle in °} {offset in m} {height in m} {data and time of probing}.txt”.</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgement</strong></p> <p>This project 20IND07 TracOptic has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. Funder name: European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR); Funder ID: 10.13039/10001413</p>
High resolution maps of climatological parameters for analyzing the impacts of climatic changes on Swiss forests
<p>Assessing the impacts of climatic changes on forests requires the analysis of actual climatology within the forested area. In mountainous areas, climatological indices vary markedly with the micro-relief, i.e. with altitude, slope, and aspect. Consequently, when modelling potential shifts of altitudinal belts in mountainous areas due to climatic changes, maps with a high spatial resolution of the underlying climatological indices are fundamental. Here we present a set of maps of climatological indices with a spatial resolution of 25 by 25 m. The presented dataset consists of maps of the following parameters: average daily temperature high and low in January, April, July, and October as well as of the year; seasonal and annual thermal continentality; first and last freezing day; frost-free vegetation period; relative air humidity; solar radiation; and foehn conditions. The parameters represented in the maps have been selected in a knowledge engineering approach. The maps show the climatology of the periods 1961-1990 and 1981-2010. The data can be used for statistical analyses of forest climatology, for developing tree distribution models, and for assessing the impacts of climatic changes on Swiss forests.</p>
A 21st century high-resolution glacier and ice sheet fractional area dataset: Code and Data
<p>This resource contains code and input data to develop a high-resolution (0.1°) gridded global glacier and ice sheet fractional area dataset, which is also available in this resource. The dataset is developed from Randolph Glacier Inventory v6.0 shapefiles and supplementary shapefiles for the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets. The approach is adapted from Li et al., (2021; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.28">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.28</a>). The dataset provides estimates of the fraction (0 to 1) of land cover that is glaciated in each 0.1° x 0.1° grid cell. The dataset was designed for use in the SPEAR model (<a href="https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/spear/">https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/spear/</a>) from the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), but may be useful for other applications as well.</p> <p>This work is documented in a NOAA Technical Memorandum (citation information to follow).</p>
Millstätter See seismic and core data for the publication "High-resolution calibration of seismically-induced lacustrine deposits with historical earthquake data in the Eastern Alps (Carinthia, Austria)"
<p>This dataset comprises the core data and the 3.5 kHz seismic data of Millstätter See, a lake in the Eastern European Alps, Austria. Together with a bathymetric dataset (10.5281/zenodo.5875923) and a core/seismic dataset from Wörthersee (10.5281/zenodo.5875576), this is the basis for the publication Daxer et al. "High-resolution calibration of seismically-induced lacustrine deposits with historical earthquake data in the Eastern Alps (Carinthia, Austria)".</p> <p>28 core sections (individual short cores or sections of long cores - see <em>MillstaetterSee_core_data.xlsx</em> for information) were analysed with a multi-sensor core logger (MSCL) and photographed with a smartcube camera image scanner and an ITRAX core scanner. The generated data are available in the folders <em>MSCL.zip</em> and <em>Photos.zip</em>. Some core sections were also analysed with a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 and/or CT scanning. The generated data are provided in the folders <em>Grain Size.zip </em>and<em> CT data MI17-04.zip </em>(as .dcm files).</p> <p>The seismic profiles are provided as .SGY files (<em>Seismic Pinger Data.zip</em>).</p>
Woerthersee seismic and core data for the publication "High-resolution calibration of seismically-induced lacustrine deposits with historical earthquake data in the Eastern Alps (Carinthia, Austria)"
<p>This dataset comprises the core data and the 3.5 kHz seismic data of Wörthersee, a lake in the Eastern European Alps, Austria. Together with a dataset from Millstättersee (core and seismic data: 10.5281/zenodo.5875911; bathymetric data: 10.5281/zenodo.5875923), this is the basis for the publication Daxer et al. "High-resolution calibration of seismically-induced lacustrine deposits with historical earthquake data in the Eastern Alps (Carinthia, Austria)".</p> <p>24 short cores were analysed with a multi-sensor core logger (MSCL) and photographed with a smartcube camera image scanner and an ITRAX core scanner. The generated data are available in the folders <em>MSCL.zip</em> and <em>Photos.zip</em>. Some core sections were also analysed with a Malvern Mastersizer 3000. The generated grain-size data are provided in the folder <em>Grain Size.zip</em>.</p> <p>The seismic profiles are provided as .SGY files (<em>Seismic Pinger Data.zip</em>).</p>
SROADEX: Dataset for binary recognition and semantic segmentation of road surface areas from high resolution Aerial Orthoimages Covering Approximately 8,650 km2 of the Spanish Territory Tagged with Road Information
<p>The data have been generated using scripts developed in Python using Open Source libraries (GDAL/OGR and MapScript) for rasterization of vector cartography representing the axes of the different types of roads (urban, interurban and rural). This cartography has been obtained from different Spanish official sources (National Geographic Institute and autonomic cartographic agencies) that we have revised and edited in a meticulous and systematic way to verify that the roads are represented on the cartography according to the orthoimages, available on January 1, 2021 in the download center of the National Center of Geographic Information (CNIG), on 16 rectangular areas (28,5 km * 18,5 km) of the Spanish territory (insular and peninsular).</p> <p>The dataset consists of 777599 images in png format of 256x256 pixels, organized in folders for the different trainings, separating those corresponding to training, testing and validation.</p> <p>The structure of the data is as follows:<br> 1-Road-Ortho and 1-Road-Mask contain the images and ground true for training the semantic segmentation networks.<br> 1-Road-Ortho and 2-NoRoad-Ortho contain aerial images containing or not containing vials, for the training of binary tessellation networks identifying tessellations with vials.<br> Moreover, in each folder the structure is the same: train, test, validation containing 90%, 5% and 5% of the total images and masks of each type.</p> <p>1-Road-Ortho</p> <p> |----Train</p> <p> |----Test</p> <p> -----Validation</p> <p>1-Road-Mask</p> <p> |----Train</p> <p> |----Test</p> <p> -----Validation</p> <p>2-NoRoad-Ortho</p> <p> |----Train</p> <p> |----Test</p> <p> -----Validation</p> <p> </p>
Shedding Light on Metal-Based Nanoparticles in Zebrafish by Computed Tomography with Micrometer Resolution
<p>Supplementary 3D image stacks of microtomography data.</p> <p>100 layer xy, xz, and yz image stacks</p> <p>Publication included as PDF file (open access, DOI: 10.1002/smll.202000746)</p> <p>********************************************</p> <p>Metal-based nanoparticles are clinically used for diagnostic and therapeutic<br> applications. After parenteral administration, they will distribute throughout<br> different organs. Quantification of their distribution within tissues in the 3D<br> space, however, remains a challenge owing to the small particle diameter.<br> In this study, synchrotron radiation-based hard X-ray tomography (SRμCT)<br> in absorption and phase contrast modes is evaluated for the localization of<br> superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) in soft tissues based<br> on their electron density and X-ray attenuation. Biodistribution of SPIONs<br> is studied using zebrafish embryos as a vertebrate screening model. This<br> label-free approach gives rise to an isotropic, 3D, direct space visualization<br> of the entire 2.5 mm-long animal with a spatial resolution of around 2<br> μm. High resolution image stacks are available on a dedicated internet<br> page (http://zebrafish.pharma-te.ch). X-ray tomography is combined with<br> physico-chemical characterization and cellular uptake studies to confirm the<br> safety and effectiveness of protective SPION coatings. It is demonstrated<br> that SRμCT provides unprecedented insights into the zebrafish embryo<br> anatomy and tissue distribution of label-free metal oxide nanoparticles.</p>
Monthly averaged lightning and LCC lightning data extracted from present-day (2009-2011) and projected (2090-2095) EMAC simulations (T42L90MA resolution)
<pre>About Dataset Monthly averaged lightning and LCC lightning data extracted from present-day (2009-2011) and projected (2090-2095) EMAC simulations (T42L90MA resolution). Authors: Francisco J. Perez-Invernon, Francisco J. Gordillo-Vazquez, Patrick Joeckel and Heidi Huntrieser Description of the data PaR_T: Lightning parameterization based on cloud top height. PaR_L: Lightning parameterization based on cloud top height and modified over the oceans. Grewe: Lightning parameterization based on updraft velocity. AaP_P: Lightning parameterization based on convective precipitation. A AaP_M: Lightning parameterization based on Updraft strength at 440~hPa. PRaAP: Lightning parameterization based on cloud top height and updraft velocity. FinIF: Lightning parameterization based on updraft mass flux of ice at 440 hPa. extIF: Lightning parameterization based on updraft mass flux of ice at 440 hPa an isotherm. File format: netcdf Example: netcdf </pre> <p>2009_10h_______20090701_0000_mmlb_PRaAP.nc<br> netcdf \2009_10h_______20090701_0000_mmlb_PRaAP {<br> dimensions:<br> time = UNLIMITED ; // (1 currently)<br> lon = 128 ;<br> lat = 64 ;<br> tbnds = 2 ;<br> variables:<br> double time(time) ;<br> time:long_name = "time" ;<br> time:bounds = "time_bnds" ;<br> time:units = "day since 2009-01-01 00:00:00" ;<br> time:calendar = "gregorian" ;<br> double YYYYMMDD(time) ;<br> YYYYMMDD:long_name = "time" ;<br> YYYYMMDD:units = "days as %Y%m%d.%f" ;<br> YYYYMMDD:calendar = "gregorian" ;<br> double dt(time) ;<br> dt:long_name = "delta_time" ;<br> dt:units = "s" ;<br> double nstep(time) ;<br> nstep:long_name = "current time step" ;<br> float lon(lon) ;<br> lon:long_name = "longitude" ;<br> lon:units = "degrees_east" ;<br> float lat(lat) ;<br> lat:long_name = "latitude" ;<br> lat:units = "degrees_north" ;<br> float aps(time, lat, lon) ;<br> aps:long_name = "surface pressure" ;<br> aps:units = "Pa" ;<br> aps:representation = "GP_2D_HORIZONTAL" ;<br> aps:grid_type = "gaussian" ;<br> aps:table = 128 ;<br> aps:code = 134 ;<br> aps:REFERENCE_TO = "g3b: aps" ;<br> aps:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> aps:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float aps_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> aps_ave:long_name = "surface pressure" ;<br> aps_ave:units = "Pa" ;<br> aps_ave:representation = "GP_2D_HORIZONTAL" ;<br> aps_ave:grid_type = "gaussian" ;<br> aps_ave:table = 128 ;<br> aps_ave:code = 134 ;<br> aps_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "g3b: aps" ;<br> aps_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> aps_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpscg(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpscg:long_name = "CG flash frequency" ;<br> fpscg:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpscg:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpscg" ;<br> fpscg:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpscg:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpscg_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpscg_ave:long_name = "CG flash frequency" ;<br> fpscg_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpscg_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpscg" ;<br> fpscg_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpscg_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsic(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsic:long_name = "IC flash frequency" ;<br> fpsic:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpsic:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsic" ;<br> fpsic:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsic:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsic_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsic_ave:long_name = "IC flash frequency" ;<br> fpsic_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpsic_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsic" ;<br> fpsic_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsic_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsm2cg(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2cg:long_name = "CG flash density" ;<br> fpsm2cg:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2cg:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2cg" ;<br> fpsm2cg:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2cg:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsm2cg_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2cg_ave:long_name = "CG flash density" ;<br> fpsm2cg_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2cg_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2cg" ;<br> fpsm2cg_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2cg_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsm2ic(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2ic:long_name = "IC flash density" ;<br> fpsm2ic:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2ic:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2ic" ;<br> fpsm2ic:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2ic:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsm2ic_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2ic_ave:long_name = "IC flash density" ;<br> fpsm2ic_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2ic_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2ic" ;<br> fpsm2ic_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2ic_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpslcc10(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpslcc10:long_name = "LCC(>10 ms) flash frequency" ;<br> fpslcc10:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpslcc10:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpslcc10" ;<br> fpslcc10:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpslcc10:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpslcc10_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpslcc10_ave:long_name = "LCC(>10 ms) flash frequency" ;<br> fpslcc10_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpslcc10_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpslcc10" ;<br> fpslcc10_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpslcc10_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpslcc20(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpslcc20:long_name = "LCC(>20 ms) flash frequency" ;<br> fpslcc20:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpslcc20:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpslcc20" ;<br> fpslcc20:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpslcc20:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpslcc20_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpslcc20_ave:long_name = "LCC(>20 ms) flash frequency" ;<br> fpslcc20_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpslcc20_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpslcc20" ;<br> fpslcc20_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpslcc20_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsm2lcc10(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2lcc10:long_name = "LCC(>10 ms) flash density" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2lcc10" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsm2lcc10_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2lcc10_ave:long_name = "LCC(>10 ms) flash density" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2lcc10" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2lcc10_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsm2lcc20(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2lcc20:long_name = "LCC(>20 ms) flash density" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2lcc20" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsm2lcc20_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2lcc20_ave:long_name = "LCC(>20 ms) flash density" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2lcc20" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2lcc20_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpssprite(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpssprite:long_name = "Sprites flash frequency" ;<br> fpssprite:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpssprite:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpssprite" ;<br> fpssprite:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpssprite:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpssprite_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpssprite_ave:long_name = "Sprites flash frequency" ;<br> fpssprite_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> fpssprite_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpssprite" ;<br> fpssprite_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpssprite_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float fpsm2sprite(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2sprite:long_name = "Sprites flash density" ;<br> fpsm2sprite:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2sprite:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2sprite" ;<br> fpsm2sprite:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2sprite:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float fpsm2sprite_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> fpsm2sprite_ave:long_name = "Sprites flash density" ;<br> fpsm2sprite_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> fpsm2sprite_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "lnox_PRaAP_gp: fpsm2sprite" ;<br> fpsm2sprite_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> fpsm2sprite_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float bps(time, lat, lon) ;<br> bps:long_name = "BJ flash frequency" ;<br> bps:units = "1/s" ;<br> bps:REFERENCE_TO = "bluejetbPRaAP_gp: bps" ;<br> bps:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> bps:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float bps_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> bps_ave:long_name = "BJ flash frequency" ;<br> bps_ave:units = "1/s" ;<br> bps_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "bluejetbPRaAP_gp: bps" ;<br> bps_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> bps_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> float bpsm2(time, lat, lon) ;<br> bpsm2:long_name = "BJ flash density" ;<br> bpsm2:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> bpsm2:REFERENCE_TO = "bluejetbPRaAP_gp: bpsm2" ;<br> bpsm2:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> bpsm2:cell_methods = "time: point" ;<br> float bpsm2_ave(time, lat, lon) ;<br> bpsm2_ave:long_name = "BJ flash density" ;<br> bpsm2_ave:units = "1/s/m2" ;<br> bpsm2_ave:REFERENCE_TO = "bluejetbPRaAP_gp: bpsm2" ;<br> bpsm2_ave:coordinates = "lon lat" ;<br> bpsm2_ave:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;<br> double time_bnds(time, tbnds) ;<br> time_bnds:long_name = "time bounds" ;<br> time_bnds:units = "days since 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z" ;<br> time_bnds:cell_methods = "time: point" ;</p> <p>// global attributes:<br> :MESSy = "MESSy version d2.55.1-62-g7ea171fc6-dirty_7ea171fc682744f70976123b863cca166dd2023b_2021-05-19T16:21:08+00:00_2021-06-04T13:28:34+0200, http://www.messy-interface.org" ;<br> :MESSy_switch = "version 1.0" ;<br> :MESSy_channel = "version 2.4.3" ;<br> :MESSy_tracer = "version 2.6" ;<br> :MESSy_timer = "version 0.1" ;<br> :MESSy_qtimer = "version 3.0" ;<br> :MESSy_import = "version 1.0" ;<br> :MESSy_grid = "version v1.5" ;<br> :MESSy_rnd = "version 1.1" ;<br> :MESSy_aeropt = "version 2.0.2" ;<br> :MESSy_cloud = "version 2.2" ;<br> :MESSy_cloudopt = "version 2.1b" ;<br> :MESSy_convect = "version 2.0" ;<br> :MESSy_gwave = "version 1.0" ;<br> :MESSy_lnox = "version 3.0" ;<br> :MESSy_orbit = "version 0.9" ;<br> :MESSy_orogw = "version 1.1" ;<br> :MESSy_rad = "version 2.2" ;<br> :MESSy_e5vdiff = "version 1.2" ;<br> :MESSy_surface = "version 1.2" ;<br> :MESSy_tropop = "version 2.1" ;<br> :MESSy_viso = "version 2.3" ;<br> :MESSy_experiment = "2009_10h" ;<br> :EXEC_CHECKSUM = "45e5ddd17ae5992f931a9ba4bab4a921 bin/echam5.exe (md5sum)" ;<br> :GCM = "ECHAM5 version 5.3.02, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg" ;<br> :GCM_spherical_trunc_n = 42 ;<br> :GCM_spherical_trunc_m = 42 ;<br> :GCM_spherical_trunc_k = 42 ;<br> :GCM_vertical_mode = "middle atmosphere (MA)" ;<br> :GCM_horizontal_mode = "global" ;<br> :GCM_advection = "Lin&Rood" ;<br> :GCM_start_date_time = "20090101 000000" ;<br> :GCM_timestep = 900.f ;<br> :F95_COMPILER_VERSION = "ifort (IFORT) 17.0.2 20170213" ;<br> :F95_COMPILER_CALL = "/opt/mpi/bullxmpi_mlx/1.2.9.2/bin/mpif90" ;<br> :F95_COMPILER_FLAGS = "-sox -fpp -g -O2 -xCORE-AVX2 -fp-model strict -align all -save-temps -DBULL -I/sw/rhel6-x64/sys/bullxlib-1.0.0/include -L/sw/rhel6-x64/sys/bullxlib-1.0.0/lib -Wl,-rpath,/sw/rhel6-x64/sys/bullxlib-1.0.0/lib -lbullxMATH -no-wrap-margin" ;<br> :F95_PREPROC_DEFINITIONS = "-DMESSY -DLITTLE_ENDIAN -D_LINUX64 -DHAVE_PNETCDF -DPNCREGRID -DMPIOM_13B -D_VCSREV_=\'d2.55.1-62-g7ea171fc6-dirty_7ea171fc682744f70976123b863cca166dd2023b_2021-05-19T16:21:08+00:00_2021-06-04T13:28:34+0200\'" ;<br> :F95_COMPILER_INCLUDES = "-I/sw/rhel6-x64/netcdf/netcdf_fortran-4.4.2-intel14/include -I/sw/rhel6-x64/netcdf/netcdf_fortran-4.4.2-intel14/include -I/sw/rhel6-x64/netcdf/parallel_netcdf-1.6.0-bullxmpi-intel14/include" ;<br> :operating_date_time = "20210615 081833" ;<br> :operating_system = "Linux 2.6.32-754.33.1.el6.x86_64 on x86_64" ;<br> :operating_host = "mlogin102" ;<br> :operating_user = "Francisco-Javier Perez-Invernon (b309171)" ;<br> :channel_io_pe = 172 ;<br> :channel_time_slo = 5182200.f ;<br> :channel_name = "mmlb_PRaAP" ;<br> :channel_file_type = "output" ;<br> :channel_file_name = "2009_10h_______20090701_0000_mmlb_PRaAP.nc" ;<br> :channel_netcdf_lib = "4.3.2 of May 5 2015 13:21:25 $" ;</p>
Building fraction map of Germany (Sentinel-1/-2 based, 10m and 100m resolution)
<p>This dataset features a map of building fractions (as opposed to built-up fractions including other impervious surfaces such as roads) for Germany on a 10m grid based on Sentinel-1A/B and Sentinel-2A/B time series. The data were created by using machine learning regression and spectral unmixing, using synthetically mixed training data. The dataset is completely based on freely accessible satellite imagery, and was validated with freely available building footprint reference data for three federal states.</p> <p>We recommend to use data at an aggregated resolution of 20m, 50m, or 100m, and to clip data at about 20% building fraction when using 10m resolution maps (or roughly the corresponding RMSE at any other resolution).</p> <p><strong>Temporal extent</strong><br> Used Sentinel-2 data were acquired in 2018, and Sentinel-1 data were acquired in 2017 (see publication). The map is, thus, representative for 2017/2018. Validation results can be affected by building footprint reference data from different years.</p> <p><strong>Data format</strong><br> The data come in tiles of 30x30km (see shapefile). The projection is EPSG:3035. The images are compressed GeoTiff files (*.tif). There is a mosaic in GDAL Virtual format (*.vrt), which can readily be opened in most Geographic Information Systems. Building fraction values are in percent, from 0 to 100. In the original dataset with 10m spatial resolution, fraction values are equivalent to area in m². In the aggregated dataset with 100m spatial resolution, the values must be multiplied with 100 in order to see area in m².</p> <p><strong>Further information</strong><br> For further information, please see the publication or contact Franz Schug (franz.schug@geo.hu-berlin.de). A web-visualization of this dataset is available <a href="https://ows.geo.hu-berlin.de/webviewer/building-area/">here</a>.</p> <p><strong>Publication</strong><br> Schug, F.; Frantz, D.; Okujeni, A.; Hostert, P. (2022). Sub-pixel building area mapping based on synthetic training data and regression-based unmixing using Sentinel-1 and -2 data. Remote Sensing Letters. DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2022.2088253</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong><br> The dataset was generated by FORCE v. 3.6.1 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091124">paper</a>, <a href="https://github.com/davidfrantz/force">code</a>), which is freely available software under the terms of the GNU General Public License v. >= 3. Sentinel imagery were obtained from the <a href="https://scihub.copernicus.eu/">European Space Agency and the European Commission</a>. Sentinel-1 data were provided by <a href="https://eodc.eu/">EODC</a>. We thank the providers of the building footprint reference data (see publication).</p> <p><strong>Funding</strong><br> This dataset was produced with funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (<a href="https://boku.ac.at/understanding-the-role-of-material-stock-patterns-for-the-transformation-to-a-sustainable-society-mat-stocks">MAT_STOCKS</a>, grant agreement No 741950).</p> <p> </p>
HTW Berlin weather data with a temporal resolution of 1 Hz and 1/60Hz (2017-2021)
<p>These data sets from 2017-2021 contain the weather data measured on the roof at the University of Applied Sciences for Engineering and Economics in Berlin (HTW Berlin). <br> The data sets have a resolution of 1 Hz and 1/60 Hz and are stored in a Matlab .mat and .csv files.<br> <br> The data sets contain the solar irradiance, wind speed (x,y,z), air pressure, air temperature and humidity.<br> The documentation has more detailed information about the equipment used and the data collected.</p> <p>The homepage of our research group: https://solar.htw-berlin.de/</p>
Gastruloids as in vitro models of embryonic blood development with spatial and temporal resolution
<p>Rawdata (images and flow cytometry) for the manuscript "Gastruloids as in vitro models of embryonic blood development with spatial and temporal resolution". <br> </p>
High resolution global mass coral bleaching dataset Version 2.0
<p>This two-part database is version 2.0 of the global mass coral bleaching database presented in <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175490">Donner et al. (2017)</a>. The updated database is documented in <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281719">Virgen-Urcelay and Donner (2023)</a>.</p><p>The first part is a spreadsheet listing raw bleaching observations from 1963 to 2017, developed through outreach to the coral reef research and monitoring community and from observations available in the literature. The spreadsheet in .xlsx format lists each individual bleaching observation and a database legend (see "README").</p><p>The second part is the annual probability of bleaching occurrence in a given year between 1985 and 2017 at 0.05° X 0.05° latitude-longitude resolution for all warmwater reef cells, developed via spatial modelling. Probabilities were not estimated for years in which there were no reports or the modeled semi-variograms failed to converge due to the low number of bleaching observations that year. The annual gridded maps are provided in .geotiff format within the zip file.</p><p>Please consult the manuscript and the authors before employing this data.</p>
Dataset of very-high-resolution satellite RGB images to train deep learning models to detect and segment high-mountain juniper shrubs in Sierra Nevada (Spain)
<p>This dataset provides annotated very-high-resolution satellite RGB images extracted from Google Earth to train deep learning models to perform instance segmentation of Juniperus communis L. and Juniperus sabina L. shrubs. All images are from the high mountain of Sierra Nevada in Spain. The dataset contains 810 images (.jpg) of size 224x224 pixels. We also provide partitioning of the data into Train (567 images), Test (162 images), and Validation (81 images) subsets. Their annotations are provided in three different .json files following the COCO annotation format.</p>
Dataset of very-high-resolution satellite RGB images to train deep learning models to recognize high-mountain juniper shrubs from Sierra Nevada (Spain)
<p>This dataset provides annotated very-high-resolution satellite RGB images extracted from Google Earth to train deep learning models to recognize Juniperus communis L. and Juniperus sabina L. shrubs. All images are from the high mountain of Sierra Nevada in Spain. The dataset contains 2000 images (.jpg) of size 512x512 pixels partitioned into two classes: Shrubs and NoShrubs. We also provide partitioning of the data into Train (1800 images), Test (100 images), and Validation (100 images) subsets.</p>
Shoreline data at 30-m spatial resolution for regions of the USA, in geoJSON format. Region 3: Lousiana/Florida border to Georgia/South Carolina border
<p>Data file: SE_USA_Louisiana_Georgia_ref_shoreline.geojson</p> <p>Region: Lousiana/Florida border to Georgia/South Carolina border</p> <p>Data fields:</p> <ol> <li>MEAN_SIG_WAVEHEIGHT</li> <li>TIDAL_RANGE</li> <li>CHLOROPHYLL</li> <li>TURBIDITY</li> <li>TEMP_MOISTURE</li> <li>EMU_PHYSICAL</li> <li>REGIONAL_SINUOSITY</li> <li>GHM</li> <li>MAX_SLOPE %</li> <li>OUTFLOW_DENSITY</li> <li>ERODIBILITY</li> <li>LENGTH_GEO</li> <li>ch_label</li> <li>river_label</li> <li>sinuosity_label</li> <li>slope_label</li> <li>tidal_label</li> <li>turbid_label</li> <li>wave_label</li> <li>CSU_Descriptor</li> <li>CSU_ID</li> </ol> <p>The data originally come from https://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/outgoing/ecosystems/Global/USGSEsriGlobalCoastalSegmentsv1.mpk</p> <p>The data are described in the following publication</p> <p>Roger Sayre, Suzanne Noble, Sharon Hamann, Rebecca Smith, Dawn Wright, Sean Breyer, Kevin Butler, Keith Van Graafeiland, Charlie Frye, Deniz Karagulle, Dabney Hopkins, Drew Stephens, Kevin Kelly, Zeenatul Basher, Devon Burton, Jill Cress, Karina Atkins, D. Paco Van Sistine, Beverly Friesen, Rebecca Allee, Tom Allen, Peter Aniello, Irawan Asaad, Mark John Costello, Kathy Goodin, Peter Harris, Maria Kavanaugh, Helen Lillis, Eleonora Manca, Frank Muller-Karger, Bjorn Nyberg, Rost Parsons, Justin Saarinen, Jac Steiner & Adam Reed (2019) A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized ecological coastal units, Journal of Operational Oceanography, 12:sup2, S47-S56, DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714">10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714</a></p> <p>ABSTRACT</p> <p>A new 30-m spatial resolution global shoreline vector (GSV) was developed from annual composites of 2014 Landsat satellite imagery. The semi-automated classification of the imagery was accomplished by manual selection of training points representing water and non-water classes along the entire global coastline. Polygon topology was applied to the GSV, resulting in a new characterisation of the number and size of global islands. Three size classes of islands were mapped: continental mainlands (5), islands greater than 1 km<sup>2</sup> (21,818), and islands smaller than 1 km<sup>2</sup> (318,868). The GSV represents the shore zone land and water interface boundary, and is a spatially explicit ecological domain separator between terrestrial and marine environments. The development and characteristics of the GSV are presented herein. An approach is also proposed for delineating standardised, high spatial resolution global ecological coastal units (ECUs). For this coastal ecosystem mapping effort, the GSV will be used to separate the nearshore coastal waters from the onshore coastal lands. The work to produce the GSV and the ECUs is commissioned by the Group on Earth Observations (GEO), and is associated with several GEO initiatives including GEO Ecosystems, GEO Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and GEO Blue Planet.</p> <p>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714</p>
Shoreline data at 30-m spatial resolution for regions of the USA, in geoJSON format. Region 4: Mexico/Texas border to Lousiana/Georgia border
<p>Data file: S_USA_Texas_Louisiana_ref_shoreline.geojson</p> <p>Region: Mexico/Texas border to Lousiana/Georgia border</p> <p>Data fields:</p> <ol> <li>MEAN_SIG_WAVEHEIGHT</li> <li>TIDAL_RANGE</li> <li>CHLOROPHYLL</li> <li>TURBIDITY</li> <li>TEMP_MOISTURE</li> <li>EMU_PHYSICAL</li> <li>REGIONAL_SINUOSITY</li> <li>GHM</li> <li>MAX_SLOPE %</li> <li>OUTFLOW_DENSITY</li> <li>ERODIBILITY</li> <li>LENGTH_GEO</li> <li>ch_label</li> <li>river_label</li> <li>sinuosity_label</li> <li>slope_label</li> <li>tidal_label</li> <li>turbid_label</li> <li>wave_label</li> <li>CSU_Descriptor</li> <li>CSU_ID</li> </ol> <p>The data originally come from https://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/outgoing/ecosystems/Global/USGSEsriGlobalCoastalSegmentsv1.mpk</p> <p>The data are described in the following publication</p> <p>Roger Sayre, Suzanne Noble, Sharon Hamann, Rebecca Smith, Dawn Wright, Sean Breyer, Kevin Butler, Keith Van Graafeiland, Charlie Frye, Deniz Karagulle, Dabney Hopkins, Drew Stephens, Kevin Kelly, Zeenatul Basher, Devon Burton, Jill Cress, Karina Atkins, D. Paco Van Sistine, Beverly Friesen, Rebecca Allee, Tom Allen, Peter Aniello, Irawan Asaad, Mark John Costello, Kathy Goodin, Peter Harris, Maria Kavanaugh, Helen Lillis, Eleonora Manca, Frank Muller-Karger, Bjorn Nyberg, Rost Parsons, Justin Saarinen, Jac Steiner & Adam Reed (2019) A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized ecological coastal units, Journal of Operational Oceanography, 12:sup2, S47-S56, DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714">10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714</a></p> <p>ABSTRACT</p> <p>A new 30-m spatial resolution global shoreline vector (GSV) was developed from annual composites of 2014 Landsat satellite imagery. The semi-automated classification of the imagery was accomplished by manual selection of training points representing water and non-water classes along the entire global coastline. Polygon topology was applied to the GSV, resulting in a new characterisation of the number and size of global islands. Three size classes of islands were mapped: continental mainlands (5), islands greater than 1 km<sup>2</sup> (21,818), and islands smaller than 1 km<sup>2</sup> (318,868). The GSV represents the shore zone land and water interface boundary, and is a spatially explicit ecological domain separator between terrestrial and marine environments. The development and characteristics of the GSV are presented herein. An approach is also proposed for delineating standardised, high spatial resolution global ecological coastal units (ECUs). For this coastal ecosystem mapping effort, the GSV will be used to separate the nearshore coastal waters from the onshore coastal lands. The work to produce the GSV and the ECUs is commissioned by the Group on Earth Observations (GEO), and is associated with several GEO initiatives including GEO Ecosystems, GEO Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and GEO Blue Planet.</p> <p>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.