Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 1 Examples of impaired and attaining riffle-run stream habitats in central Pennsylvania. a – Warriors Mark Run, impaired stream; b – Muddy Run, impaired stream; c – Spruce Run, attaining stream; d – Laurel Run, attaining stream.

Figure 5 in First data on water mite (Acari, Hydrachnidia) assemblages of Point Rosa Marsh, Harrison Township, Michigan, USA, and their use as environmental bioindicators of aquatic health

Figure 5 Frequency of water mite genera collected from habitats surrounding Point Rosa Marsh including Lake St. Clair. Comparable samples were collected on ten collection dates during 2017, 2018 and 2019. Graphs are arranged (left to right, and then by row) in the order of the overall frequency of each genus. Each bar graph shows the number of taxa collected on the six collection dates with bars color-coded to assist in comparing graphs on various dates. Dark blue (B) [Oct. 18 2017], red (A) [Oct. 20 2017 (1)], light green (B) [Oct. 20 2017], dark green (D&C) [Oct. 27 2017], black (A) [Aug. 7 2018], orange (A) [Aug. 21 2018], grey (D&C) [Aug. 31 2018], yellow (A) [Sept. 16 2019], light

Figure 4 in First data on water mite (Acari, Hydrachnidia) assemblages of Point Rosa Marsh, Harrison Township, Michigan, USA, and their use as environmental bioindicators of aquatic health

Figure 4 Frequency of water mite genera collected in Point Rosa Marsh. Comparable samples were collected on nine collection dates during 2017, 2018 and 2019. Graphs are arranged (left to right, and then by row) in the order of the overall frequency of each genus. Each bar graph shows the number of taxa collected on the six collection dates with bars color-coded to assist in comparing graphs on various dates. Dark blue (1&2) [Oct. 18 2017], red (4) [Oct. 19 2017], light green (3) [Oct. 18 2017 (2)], no data (1&2) [Aug. 7 2018], black (1&2) [Aug. 21 2018],

Figure 3 What a in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 3 What a single collection site should look like after the proposed three-minute collection effort. The blue arrows indicate stacked rocks that were stacked upstream of the net to better direct flow into the net. Large rocks were moved before digging into the substrate, while medium-sized and smaller rocks were placed as the substrate was dug up.

Figure 10 A in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 10 A final, picked water mite sample preserved in 80% ethanol ready for identification and enumeration.

Figure 7 After sieving, the collector removes the contents from the 250 in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 7 After sieving, the collector removes the contents from the 250 μm sieve and places them into the final sample jar. a – fine sediment

Figure 4 in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 4 An example of the collection process proposed in this manuscript. a – the collector stands upstream of the net and disturbs the substrate; b – a typical collection setup that includes one person shoveling and another holding the net; c – water mites become suspended in the water column and flow downstream into the net.

Figure 9 in A quantitative method for collecting water mites in lotic, riffle-run habitats for water quality biomonitoring

Figure 9 The picking process proposed in this manuscript. a – the picker empties the contents of the sample container into the white photographic

Figure 21 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 21 A – Recifella sp. 2, female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-4; B – Recifella sp. 2, male, dorsal and ventral view, sample

Figure 20 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 20 A – Koenikea sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-8a; B – Recifella sp. 1, female, dorsal and ventral view, sample

Figure 1 in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 1 Map of sample sites in Belize, along with inset of Belize, showing the location of the map within the country. A: Monkey Bay, a meander in the Sibun River, sample site Be18-1a, 22 February 2018. B: Monkey Bay, sample site Be18- 1b, 22 February 2018. C: Tributary

Figure 19 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 19 A – Hygrobates sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-5c; B –Paraschizobates sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-1b.

Figure 18 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 18 A – Atractidella sp., female, dorsal and ventro-lateral view, sample site Be18-5c; B –Atractides sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-5b; C – Corticacarus sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-3.

Figure 23 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 23 A – Stygarrenurus sp., female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-7a; B – Stygarrenurus sp., male, dorsal view, sample site Be18-7a.

Figure 22 A in Hidden treasures - a first study on the unexplored diversity of water mites (Acari; Hydrachnidia) from Belize

Figure 22 A – Arrenurus sp. 1, male, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-1b; B –Arrenurus sp. 1, female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-1b; C – Arrenurus sp. 2, female, dorsal and ventral view, sample site Be18-8c.

Figure 10 in Checklist of the water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of Korea, with description of one new subgenus and two new species

Figure 10. Photographs ofArrenurus(Truncaturus) sp. near corsicus (E. Angelier, 1951), female, stream in Odaesan NP: A = dorsal shield; B = ventral shield.

Figure 6 in Checklist of the water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of Korea, with description of one new subgenus and two new species

Figure 6. Photographs of dorsal (A, C) and ventral shields (B, D). AB Ljania propinqua Kim & Chung, 1996, male, CR9 (stream in Mudeung Mt). CD Ljania orientalis Tuzovskij, 2012, male, CR11 (stream in Naebyeansan NP).

Figure 7 in Checklist of the water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of Korea, with description of one new subgenus and two new species

Figure 7. Photographs of Woolastookia elongata (Sokolow, 1934), male, CR1, stream Dobong: A = dorsal shield; B = ventral shield; C = IVL5 and 6.

Figure 2 in Checklist of the water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of Korea, with description of one new subgenus and two new species

Figure 2.Atractides gracilis (Sokolow, 1934), male (A, C, E – specimen from CR1; B, D – specimen from CR9): A = coxal field; B = genital field, Vgl1/2 and excretory pore; C = IL5 and 6; D = palp, medial view (P1 lacking); E = palp, lateral view. Scale bars = 100µm.

Figure 5. Photographs. AC in Checklist of the water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of Korea, with description of one new subgenus and two new species

Figure 5. Photographs. AC Albia (Albiella) kseniae n. sp. (AB – holotype, C – paratype; A mounted in Hoyer's medium, C photographed immediately after dissection): A, C = dorsal shield, B = ventral shield.D F Momonia koreana n. sp. holotype: D = idiosoma, dorsal view; E = palp; F = posterior part of venter.