Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 9. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 9. A, Syntype of Crotalus jimenezii (HE 356); B, Syntype of Crotalus jimenezii, skull, ventral view (HE 1141); C, Syntype of Crotalus jimenezii, skull, dorsal view (HE 1142). D, Specimen erroneously catalogued as Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis (HE 1184). Neither specimen coincides with Maldonado-Koerdell's description (1948b).

FIGURE 10. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 10. A, Specimen erroneously catalogued as Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis (HE 1185, see comment on Figure 9D); B, C, Specimens of Sceloporus intermedius (HE 369, 370); D, Specimen of Adelophis copei (HE 963).

FIGURE 5. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 5. A, Jar containing three syntypes of Hemitriton asper (HE 1219–1221); B, Holotype of Hemichirotes tridactylus (HE 127); C, Syntype of Hemidactylus navarri, adult (HE 647); D, Syntype of Hemidactylus navarri, juvenile (HE 1222).

FIGURE 1. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 1. A, Hylodes augusti (HE 324) neotype designated by Smith & Necker (1943), and as precious assets by CDBPUG (2009); B, C, Skeletons of Hylodes augusti (HE 999, 1000, Holotype); D, Syntype of Ambystoma altamirani (HE 314).

FIGURE 8. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 8. A, Holotype of Oreophis boulengeri (HE 103); B, Holotype of Rhinocheilus antonii (HE 1223); C, Neotype of Elaps diastema michoacanensis (HE 1); D, Syntype of Crotalus jimenezii (HE 55).

FIGURE 4. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 4. A, Syntype of Amblystoma velasci, adult (HE 580); B, Syntype of Amblystoma velasci, larvae (HE 581); C, Syntype of Siredon dumerilii (HE 315); D, Specimen of Siredon dumerilii (HE 546) incorrectly labeled as Colima, Mexico. It has no type status.

FIGURE 7. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 7. A, Mandible of the holotype Erythrolamprus grammophrys (HE 1094); B, Parts of the skeleton of the type specimen of Geophis tecpanecus (HE 1139).C, Type specimen of Liophis janii (HE 102); D, Lectotype of Morenoa orizabensis (HE 126).

FIGURE 3. A, B in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 3. A, B, Skeletons of Ambystoma altamirani (HE 964, 965); C, Syntype of Ambystoma altamirani (HE 322); D, Syntype of Amblystoma velasci, adult (HE 579).

FIGURE 6. A in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 6. A, Holotype of Tapaya orbicularis longicaudatus (HE 422); B, Holotype of Eumeces altamirani (HE 397); C, Holotype of Eumeces rovirosae (HE 189); D, Holotype of Erythrolamprus grammophrys (HE 112).

FIGURE 11. A, B in Alfredo Dugès' type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited

FIGURE 11. A, B, Specimens erroneously designated types of Hylodes alfredi (HE 1038, 1039), see text; C, Specimen of Phrynosoma taurus (HE 446).

Figures 43–45. Neolucanus tao, types. 43–44. Aedeagus. 45. Female genitalia. 43, 45. Ventral view. 44 in Taxonomic notes on some species of Neolucanus Thomson (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) from China

Figures 43–45. Neolucanus tao, types. 43–44. Aedeagus. 45. Female genitalia. 43, 45. Ventral view. 44. Lateral view. Scale bars = 1 mm.

FIGURE 2. A in Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)

FIGURE 2. A. Hemidactylus brookii adult male lectotype (BMNH 1947.3.6.47) by present designation; B. H. gleadowi adult male neotype (BMNH [18]84.7.25.8) by present designation; C. H. subtriedroides adult male lectotype (BMNH 1946.8.25.54) by present designation; D. H. kushmorensis adult male neotype (BMNH [18]87.9.22.8) by present designation. E & F. Ventral view of the original tails showing the difference of subcaudal proportions and tail shape between the "litter-dwelling" and "rock-dwelling" morphotypes: E. H. kushmorensis adult male neotype (BMNH [18]87.9.22.8); F. H. tenkatei adult male (BMNH 1926.10.30.47) from Timor.

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)

FIGURE 1. Historical figures of the Hemidactylus brookii group taxa: A. H. brookii adult male lectotype (BMNH 1947.3.6.47) by present designation, from Gray (1867:Pl. 15, Fig. 2), later reprinted in Gray (1875:Pl. 15, Fig. 2); B. H. subtriedroides adult male paralectotype (ZSI 4135) by present designation, from Annandale (1905b:Pl. II, Fig. 1); C. H. gleadowi not based on the original type series, from Boulenger (1890:86, Fig. 27), later reprinted as H. brookii (Boulenger 1912:42, Fig. 14; Smith 1935:90, Fig. 28); D. H. gleadowi a syntype from Murray (1884a:Fig. 3).

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)

FIGURE 4. Photos of live uncollected examples of Indian Hemidactylus brookii group taxa: A, B. unsexed adult (dark phase) and adult male (light phase) from Auroville, Viluppuram District, Tamil Nadu State, south India; C. adult female from Guwahati city, Assam State, northeast India; D. adult female from Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh State, central India.

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)

FIGURE 3. Gular region showing differences of mental and postmental shield arrangements, and ventral view of cloacal and femoral regions: A, B. Hemidactylus brookii adult male lectotype (BMNH 1947.3.6.47) by present designation; C, D. H. gleadowi adult male neotype (BMNH [18]84.7.25.8) by present designation; E, F. H. kushmorensis adult male neotype (BMNH [18]87.9.22.8) by present designation; G, H. H. subtriedroides adult male lectotype (BMNH 1946.8.25.54) by present designation.

FIGURE 1 in Type specimens and type localities of birds collected during the Hemprich and Ehrenberg expedition to Lebanon in 1824

FIGURE 1. Localities in Lebanon visited by Hemprich and Ehrenberg in 1824. Geographic coordinates and names used by Hemprich and Ehrenberg (see Stresemann 1962, 1963) are given in parentheses. Numbering of localities approximates Hemprich and Ehrenberg's itinerary. 1—Beirut [33.87°N, 35.51°E, Beirut], 2—Zouq Mkayel [33.97°N, 35.62°E, Suk], 3—Aïntoûra [33.96°N, 35.63°E, Antura], 4—Harîssa [33.98°N, 35.65°E, Harissa], 5—Al Manţarah [33.98°N, 35.65°E, Marra], 6—Aïn Jraïn [34.07°N, 35.76°E, Ajem Rian—identification uncertain], 7—Jisr el Hajar [34.00°N, 35.83°E, Sir el Hagar], 8—Jabal Şannīn [33.95°N, 35.87°E, Sanin], 9—Zahlé [33.85°N, 35.90°E, Sahhla], 10—Ablaj [33.87°N, 35.97°E, Ablasch], 11—Nahrou [34.0°N, 36.15°E, Nehr; not Niha as believed by Stresemann 1962: 383], 12—Baalbek [34.00°N, 36.22°E], 13—Dahr el Hoûoui [34.16°N. 35.99°E, Deir-el-Ahmar], 14—Aïnâta [34.19°N, 36.08°E, Ainata], 15—Bcharré [34.25°N, 36.01°E, Bischerre], 16—Ehden [34.29°N, 35.97°E, Eden], 17—Tripoli [34.43°N, 35.85°E, Tripolis], 18—Hadet ej Jobb [34.25°N, 35.93°E, Hadet], 19—Hâqel [34.17°N, 35.75°E, Hakil], 20—Batroûn [34.26°N, 35.66°E, Batrun], 21—Amchît [34.15°N, 35.65°E, Amschit], 22—Tabarja [34.03°N, 35.63°E, Miniab Barga].

FIGURES 1–10. 1–8 in The type of the enigmatic creeping water bug Naucoris sumatranus FIEBER, 1851 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Naucoridae)

FIGURES 1–10. 1–8 Naucoris sumatranus, lectotype, female. 9, 10 Naucoris obscuripennis, female from Luzon, the Philippines (Natural History Museum Vienna). 1 Habitus, dorsal aspect. 2 Head, prothorax and forelegs, ventral aspect. 3 Abdomen, ventral aspect). 4 Labels. 5 Part of plate I from Fieber (1851); figs. 11 and 12 refer to N. sumatranus. 6 Right foreleg, ventral aspect. 7, 9 Metaxiphus, lateral (left) aspect. 8, 10 Subgenital plate (sternum 7) of female, ventral aspect. (Figs. 1–4: © NHMW Hemiptera Image Collection, published with permission.)

FIGURES 5–14. Envia moleque n in On a second species of Envia Ott & Höfer, 2003 (Araneae, Microstigmatidae), with notes on the sympatric type species

FIGURES 5–14. Envia moleque n. sp.: 5–9, 11,12, male holotype; 10, female paratype (MPEG 15644). 5. Body, dorsal; 6. Chelicera, labium and endites, ventral; 7–9. Copulatory bulb: 7. Prolateral; 8. Ventral; 9. Retrolateral; 10. Spermathecae, dorsal; 11–12. Tibiae and metatarsi of left leg I: 11. Retrolateral; 12. Prolateral. Envia garciai male, (MPEG 15648): 13–14. Tibiae and metatarsi of left leg I: 13. Retrolateral; 14. Prolateral. Scales: 5–6, 11–14: 0,5 mm; and 7–10: 0,1 mm.

FIGURES 21–26. Envia moleque n in On a second species of Envia Ott & Höfer, 2003 (Araneae, Microstigmatidae), with notes on the sympatric type species

FIGURES 21–26. Envia moleque n. sp.: 21. Abdomen, ventral, female; 22. Abdomen, dorsal, posterior end of scutum, male. 23–24. Copulatory bulb, retrolateral. 25–26. Spermatheca: 25. Ventral, 26. Pore field at base of spermathecal duct, anterior view. Abbreviations: SC, Scutum; PA, Paraembolic apophysis; sPA, apical spine of paraembolic Apophysis.

FIGURES 1–4. Envia moleque n in On a second species of Envia Ott & Höfer, 2003 (Araneae, Microstigmatidae), with notes on the sympatric type species

FIGURES 1–4. Envia moleque n. sp.: 1–2, male holotype: 1. Body, dorsal; 2. Abdomen, lateral. 3–4, female paratype (MPEG 15644): 3. Body, dorsal; 4. Abdomen, lateral.