Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2013View details →

Fig. 22 in Revision Of The Asian Catfish Genus Hemibagrus Bleeker, 1862 (Teleostei: Siluriformes: Bagridae)

Fig. 22. Map showing collection localities of Hemibagrus nemurus, H. capitulum and H. filamentus specimens examined in this study.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2013View details →

Fig. 19. a in Revision Of The Asian Catfish Genus Hemibagrus Bleeker, 1862 (Teleostei: Siluriformes: Bagridae)

Fig. 19. a, Hemibagrus punctatus, ZSI FF 1223, 193.1 mm SL; India: Hemavathy River; b, Specimen (not preserved) from Cauvery River, Karnataka (approx. 250 mm SL) showing live colouration. (Photograph courtesy of Johnny Jensen; copyright www.jjphoto.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2012View details →

Fig. 2 in Feeding Biology Of Eel Catfish Plotosus Canius Hamilton In A Malaysian Mangrove Estuary And Mudflat

Fig. 2. PCA biplots based on composition of food items (percentage volume) consumed by P. canius in Sementa Kecil estuary (K) and Sungai Buloh mudflat (B). Dotted arrows denote major food items: Sesar = Sesarminae, Rhizo = Rhizopinae, Bra = other brachyurans, Prawn = prawns and shrimps, Amphi = hyperiid amphipods, Iso = Isopoda, Crust = miscellaneous crustaceans, Poly = Polychaeta, Gas = Gastropoda, Bv = Bivalvia, Pisces = Pisces, Detri = mangrove detritus, Others = others. Symbols denote size classes as in Table 2: Sungai Buloh mudflat: B1 to B11 size classes from 41–480 mm at 40 mm intervals. Sungai Sementa Kecil: K1 to K12 size classes from 41–480 mm at 40 mm intervals. Ontogenetic shift in food composition is indicated by solid thin arrows.

Fig. 4 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 4. Comparison of skeleton system of some Oreoglanis spp. in Thailand. A, O.siamensis MARNM 6338; B, O. laciniosus MARNM 6345; C, O. sudarai MARNM 6332; D, O. nakasathiani MARNM 6340; E, O. suraswadii MARNM 6339; F, O. omkoiense, new species, MARNM 6334.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2012View details →

Fig. 1 in Feeding Biology Of Eel Catfish Plotosus Canius Hamilton In A Malaysian Mangrove Estuary And Mudflat

Fig. 1. The mangrove estuary of Sungai Sementa Kecil (K) and a mudflat at Sungai Buloh (B) in Selangor, Malaysia.

Fig. 8 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 8. Comparison of adipose fin base length of A, Oreoglanis siamensis MARNM 6338, juvenile 32.33 mm SL; B, Oreoglanis siamensis MARNM 7144, adult 74.19 mm SL, Meklang River, Inthanon Moutain, Jomtong, Chiangmai, (18°32′30.8″N 98°31′03.8″E), date 23 September 2008; and C, O. omkoiense, new species, holotype, MARNM 6333, adult, 91.86 mm SL, Huai Jino, Omkoi district, Chiangmai.

Fig. 3 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 3. Tooth on upper jaw (A) and lower jaw (B) with outer spatula teeth and inner pointed teeth in Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species (uncatalogued).

Fig. 2 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 2. Comparison of lower lip with median notch and posterior margin entire in Siamensis species group: A, Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species, paratypes, MARNM 4334, 78.54 mm SL; and B, O. siamensis MARNM 6338, 87.18 mm SL, and Delacouri species group: C, O. laciniosus MARNM 6345, 73.41 mm SL; and D, O. tenuicauda MARNM 6339, 61.90 mm SL.

Fig. 7 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 7. Type locality of holotype of Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species, MARNM 6333, 91.86 mm SL, Huai Jino, Baan Huai Jino, Omkoi Subdistrict, Omkoi District, Chiangmai Province.

Fig. 1 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 1. Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species, Huai Jino, Baan Huai Jino, Omkoi Subdistrict, Omkoi District, Chiangmai Province. Holotype, MARNM 6447, 91.86 mm SL. (A = lateral view, B = dorsal view and C = ventral view)

Fig. 6 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 6. Map of type locality of Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species, holotype, MARNM 6333, 91.86 mm SL. Thailand: Chiangmai: Omkoi District.

Fig. 5 in Oreoglanis omkoiense: a new torrent catfish from northern Thailand (Pisces: Siluriformes, Sisoridae)

Fig. 5. Ventral view of anus and external genital papilla of Oreoglanis omkoiense, new species. A, MARNM 7141, paratype, female, 90.26 mm SL; B, MARNM 6333, holotype, male, 91.86 mm SL.

Figure 9 in Phylogenetic relationships of thorny catfishes (Siluriformes: Doradidae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

Figure 9. Unrooted maximum parsimony trees of Doradidae inferred from molecular and morphological data. (A) Molecular tree based on 3833 bp of 12S, 16S and EF1a exons + introns sequence data; the black star indicates the hypothetical attachment point of the root (see Fig. 7). (B) Morphological tree based on 95 morphological characters (Higuchi, 1992); the black star indicates the hypothetical attachment point of the root (see Fig. 1). Numbers at nodes are bootstrap percentages based on 1000 pseudoreplicates. Support values <50% are not shown.

Figure 8 in Phylogenetic relationships of thorny catfishes (Siluriformes: Doradidae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

Figure 8. Maximum likelihood tree of Doradidae inferred from analysis of combined 12S, 16S and EF1a (exons + introns) sequence data. Numbers at nodes represent percentage Bayesian posterior probabilities, ML bootstrap (500 pseudoreplicates) and MP bootstrap (1000 pseudoreplicates). This is an unrooted tree; the black star indicates the hypothetical attachment point of the root (see Fig. 7).

Figure 2. Proposed 12S in Phylogenetic relationships of thorny catfishes (Siluriformes: Doradidae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

Figure 2. Proposed 12S rRNA secondary structure model for Doradidae. Single bases enclosed in squares indicate positions thought to be involved in the decoding mechanism.

Figure 1 in Phylogenetic relationships of thorny catfishes (Siluriformes: Doradidae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

Figure 1. Higuchi's (1992) phylogeny of Doradidae based on osteological characters. Subfamilies are labelled on the right. Unpublished genus–group names are indicated by A, B and C.

Figure 40 in Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae

Figure 40. Examples of the Hypostomini. A, Hypostomus emarginatus 2, INHS 29085; 196.4 mm SL. B, Hypostomus plecostomus (type species of genus), ZMA 105.306, 111.2 mm SL. Photographs by K. S. Cummings.

Figure 39 in Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae

Figure 39. Examples of the Hypostomini. A, Hypostomus ammophilus (holotype), INHS 32035, 86.0 mm SL. B, Hypostomus cochliodon, UMMZ 206338, 139.8 mm SL. Photographs by K. S. Cummings.

Figure 38 in Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae

Figure 38. Relationships of the taxa within the Ancistrini based on the ordered analysis. This is part of the strict consensus of 5098 most parsimonious trees of trees of 1328 steps, CI = 0.203, remainder of the strict consensus tree is in Figs 36 and 37. Numbers above the branches are clade numbers, numbers below are decay indices. 1Hemiancistrus landoni represents an undescribed genus. 2Oligancistrus is placed in Spectracanthicus. 3Lithoxancistrus is transferred to Pseudancistrus. 4Cordylancistrus platyrhynchus is transferred to Chaetostoma.

Figure 36 in Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae

Figure 36. Relationships of Astroblepus, Lithogenes, hypostomine tribes, and the nonhypostomine loricariids based on the ordered analysis. This is part of the strict consensus of 5098 most parsimonious trees of trees of 1328 steps, CI = 0.203, remainder of the consensus tree is in Figs 37 and 38. Numbers above the branches are clade numbers, numbers below are decay indices.