Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,172
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,172 results for “Publications”
Siderophores drive invasion dynamics in bacterial communities through their dual role as public good versus public bad
<p>Microbial invasions can compromise ecosystem services and spur dysbiosis and disease in hosts. Nevertheless, the mechanisms determining invasion outcomes often remain unclear. Here, we examine the role of iron-scavenging siderophores in driving invasions of <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> into resident communities of environmental pseudomonads. Siderophores can be "public goods" by delivering iron to individuals possessing matching receptors; but they can also be "public bads" by withholding iron from competitors lacking these receptors. Accordingly, siderophores should either promote or impede invasion, depending on their effects on invader and resident growth. Using supernatant feeding and invasion assays, we show that invasion success indeed increased when the invader could use its siderophores to inhibit (public bad) rather than stimulate (public good) resident growth. Conversely, invasion success decreased the more the invader was inhibited by the residents' siderophores. Our findings identify siderophores as a major driver of invasion dynamics in bacterial communities under iron-limited conditions.</p>
Dataset for the publication entitled: "Assessment of lithium ion battery ageing by combined impedance spectroscopy, functional microscopy and finite element modelling""
<p>Related to the publication: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230459">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230459</a></p> <p>Datasets for the following Figures:</p> <p>Figure 2.</p> <p>Figure 3.</p> <p>Figure 5.</p> <p>Figure 7.</p>
Dataset for publication "Measurement of Dynamic Voltage Variation Effect on Instrument Transformers for Power Grid Applications"
<p>This is dataset related to paper published in 2020 IEEE I2MTC Conference proceedings:</p> <p>Crotti G., Giordano D., Letizia P. S., Delle Femine A., Gallo D., Landi C., Luiso M., Barbieri L., Mazza P., Pallidini D., (2020, October 29). Measurement of Dynamic Voltage Variation Effect on Instrument Transformers for Power Grid Applications. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4154617</p> <p>Excel file contains the data for Figure 10 and following parameter evaluation.</p>
Data Set for Publication "Traceable Characterization of Low Power Voltage Instrument Transformers for PQ and PMU Applications"
<p>This is dataset for paper published in CPEM2020 Conference Proceedings:</p> <p>Crotti G., Delle Femine A., Gallo D., Giordano D., Landi C., Letizia P.,S., Luiso M., "Traceable Characterization of Low Power Voltage Instrument Transformers for PQ and PMU Applications".</p> <p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4153819</p> <p>Excel file provides data for Figure 2 and following evaluation</p> <p> </p>
Data for the publication "Impact of Enzymatic Degradation on the Material Properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)"
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>The data set contains raw data of fatigue crack propagation resistance measurements (da/dN), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), atomic-force microscopy (AFM), and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) of PET samples incubated with PETase. The experiments were done in the laboratory at the Department of Polymer Engineering and Department of Biochemistry, University of Bayreuth, Germany in 2020 and 2021.</p> <p>The data set was analysed in the publication: Menzel, T.; Weigert, S.; Gagsteiger, A.; Eich, Y.; Sittl, S.; Papastavrou, G.; Ruckdäschel, H.; Altstädt, V.; Höcker, B. Impact of Enzymatic Degradation on the Material Properties of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate). <em>Polymers</em> <strong>2021</strong>, 13(22), 3885. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223885</p> <p><strong>Disclaimer</strong></p> <p>The data are provided without any warranty. Details on the experimental setup are given in the publication.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Menzel, T.; Weigert, S.; Gagsteiger, A.; Eich, Y.; Sittl, S.; Papastavrou, G.; Ruckdäschel, H.; Altstädt, V.; Höcker, B. Impact of Enzymatic Degradation on the Material Properties of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate). <em>Polymers</em> <strong>2021</strong>, 13(22), 3885. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223885</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Datasets for publication: 'Measuring the excellence contribution at the journal level: An alternative to Garfield's Impact Factor'
<p>Datasets for publication: 'Measuring the excellence contribution at the journal level: An alternative to Garfield's Impact Factor'.</p> <p><strong>Overview.</strong> Overview of the number of journals, publications, excellent publications and multidisciplinarity for each category considered.</p> <p><strong>ALL.</strong> Journal indicators for all the document types by JCR category.</p> <p><strong>ALL_JCR.</strong> Journal indicators for all the document types by JCR category (only journals indexed in the JCR category are taken into account).</p> <p><strong>AR.</strong> Journal indicators for only articles and reviews by JCR category.</p> <p><strong>AR_JCR. </strong> Journal indicators for only articles and reviews by JCR category (only journals indexed in the JCR category are taken into account).</p>
Estimating historic N- and S-deposition with publicly available data – An example from Central Germany
<p>The deposition of reactive nitrogen and sulphur has profound effects on ecosystem functioning. In the last decades, monitoring networks providing high resolution spatio-temporal deposition estimates have been set up, but equivalent information on historic deposition is mostly missing. However, understanding vegetation change and mitigate future loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is only possible evaluating the effects of its strongest drivers, which includes deposition in many ecosystems. Here, we combine different data sources to provide estimates of historic deposition in forested ecosystems on a high spatio-temporal scale for a federal state in Central Germany from 1880 to present.</p> <p>We make use of data from field measurement stations together with elevation and precipitation data from the last three decades to build a simple deposition model, validate this model with a model publicly available covering the time range from 2000 to present, and extrapolate deposition from this joint model to the past using European deposition trends from the last 150 years.</p> <p>Our approach can easily be adapted to other data and spatial areas shows how to use raw deposition data together with publicly available data on elevation and precipitation to construct simple deposition models covering recent and historic times in areas and for times for which no data are available.</p>
Source data for the publication "Tracking excited state decay mechanisms of pyrimidine nucleosides in real time", Nature Communications, 2021
<p>The archives contain the raw data used to generate the transient absorption spectra for uridine (Figure 1) and 5-methyluridine (Figure 2) presented in the main paper, as well as the trajectory plots and auxiliary spectra presented in the Supplementary Information of the paper "Tracking excited state decay mechanisms of pyrimidine nucleosides in real time" authored by R. Borrego-Varillas et al. published in Nature Communications, 2021. Specifically:</p> <p><strong>URD</strong>: folder with raw data from the uridine trajectories (56 trajectories) performed at the SS-CASPT2/SA-2-CASSCF(10,8) and SS-CASPT2/SA-2-CASSCF(10,10) level of theory</p> <p><strong>5mURD</strong>: folder with raw data from the 5-methyluridine trajectories (57 trajectories) performed at the SS-CASPT2/SA-2-CASSCF(10,8) and SS-CASPT2/SA-2-CASSCF(10,10) level of theory</p> <p>The raw data of each trajectory is inside a folder named <em>geom_XXX</em> where <em>XXX</em> stands for a 3-digit label of the trajectory. The trajectories have been selected out of a pool of 500 trajectories according to the S0-S1 vertical gap so that only trajectories whose energy gap falls under the envelope of the pulse are selected</p> <p><strong>URD</strong>: 003 005 006 011 015 023 039 040 054 056 060 083 098 104 112 114 116 121 122 147 152 158 161 171 173 175 177 186 189 200 204 211 219 223 225 232 234 235 236 246 251 252 257 259 265 268 271 272 279 286 287 289 305 313 318 336</p> <p><strong>5mURD</strong>: 010 044 045 048 052 057 065 074 085 094 097 099 100 105 110 112 113 121 131 137 138 140 144 145 159 164 170 179 182 183 184 186 189 199 203 205 209 214 219 220 221 239 243 250 251 273 284 290 295 301 302 320 325 327 328 333 334</p> <p>In each geom_XXX folder there are following files:</p> <p><strong>S1-S<em>Y</em>.dat</strong>: ASCII files () in which the individual columns correspond to </p> <p>col1: time [fs] </p> <p>col2: transition energy of state S<em>Y</em> with respect to S1 [cm-1] where S0 is the ground state</p> <p>col3-5: X, Y and Z components of the transition dipole moment between S1 and S<em>Y</em> [a.u.]</p> <p>col6: magnitude of the transition dipole moment between S1 and S<em>Y</em> [a.u.] </p> <p>col7: angle between transition dipole moment at time t and t=0 [deg]</p> <p>Note that in URD S1-S0.dat contains in most cases about 500 data points (0-500 fs), in 5mURD S1-S0.dat contains 1000 data points (0-1000 fs) except for a few cases in which the trajectories were interrupted earlier. This data has been used to simulate the stimulated emission before the hopping event and the hot ground state photoinduced absorption after hopping. S1-S<em>Y</em>.dat () contain only data points until the hopping event which have been used to simulate the excited state photoinduced absorption.</p> <p>The spectra reported in the main article (Figs 1 & 2) as well as in the SI can be reproduced following eq. 13-18 in the Supplementary Information.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>HighMediumLayer_traj.xyz.zip</strong>: archived Cartesian coordinates of the High Layer (nucleobase) and Medium Layer (sugar and waters within 5 Å distance from nucleobase) along the dynamics</p> <p>Note that due to the different number of waters in each trajectory the size of the Medium layer (and thus the size of the system) may vary from trajectory to trajectory.</p> <p>Note that due to the different duration of each trajectory the number of geometries may vary from trajectory to trajectory.</p> <p><strong>LowLayer.xyz:</strong> Cartesian coordinates of the Low Layer (waters > 5 Å from the nucleobase); the coordinates of these waters are kept fixed along the trajectory.</p> <p>The coordinates of High, Medium and Low layers can be used to reproduce the QMMM calculations (energies, gradients and transition dipole moments along each trajectory) with the official COBRAMM release (<a href="https://gitlab.com/cobrammgroup/cobramm.git">https://gitlab.com/cobrammgroup/cobramm.git</a>) following the parameters provided in Supplementary Note 2 of the Supplementary Information.</p>
Supplementary Material for 'Benchmarking Explanatory Models for Inertia Forecasting using Public Data of the Nordic Area'
<p>This data set is supplementary material for the paper 'Benchmarking Explanatory Models for Inertia Forecasting using Public Data of the Nordic Area' by Jemima Sophie Graham, Evelyn Heylen, and Fei Teng.</p> <p>This data set is intended for day-ahead inertia forecasting in the Nordic (Eastern Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden). It contains hourly data for the inertial energy (MVAs), day-ahead national demand forecast (MW), day-ahead wind power forecast (MW), day-ahead solar power forecast (MW), and interconnection flow (MW) in the Nordic between January 2016 and August 2020. </p>
Which journal characteristics are crucial for scientists when selecting journals for their publications? Results tables of an online survey
<p>As part of the BMBF-funded project "B!SON - Bibliometric and Semantic Open Access Recommender Network", an online survey was conducted among scientists using SoSci Survey (Leiner, 2019). The aim of the survey was to determine the importance of various characteristics of scientific journals in the decision for a publication venue by scientists. The characteristics were determined by analysis of other recommender systems, literature research and discussion with scientists. The data published here are based on 884 completed questionnaires (only questionnaires in which at least 90% of the questions had been answered were included in the analysis).</p> <p>In the questionnaire, a distinction was made between those characteristics that scientists would like to use to limit the selection of eligible journals from the outset (table "B!SON_Survey_Filter_Criteria_EN") and those that scientists need for their final decision from a list of recommended journals ("B!SON_Survey_Journal_Selection_EN"). For each journal property, the respondents could choose between the categories of a 5-point Likert scale: "not at all important - not very important - somewhat important - very important - extremely important". If the scientists were not able to evaluate a characteristic, they could also select "I can't say". </p> <p>In the two tables of results, the approval percentage and the rank based on it are listed for all journal properties queried in the respective part of the survey. The approval percentage is calculated from the percentage of people who rated the respective property as "very important" or "extremely important". Approval rate and rank are presented across all respondents (overall column), as well as within the 4 science disciplines by DFG (Natural Sciences, Engineering Sciences, Life Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences) and the category "Other Sciences".</p> <p>Both tables can be sorted by approval rate and rank per scientific discipline or across disciplines.</p> <p>Note on the use of the HTML files: These can be downloaded via the download button and then opened and viewed with any web browser.</p> <p>A German version of the results tables is available under <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5412197">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5412197</a>.</p>
[Data set]for publication Acidification of Strawberry Puree Affects Color and Volatile Characteristics during Storage
<p>Color degradation of strawberry-based products negatively affects consumer acceptance of these products. To improve the color stability of strawberry puree during storage, an acidification step (pH 1.5 and 2.5) prior to pasteurization was performed and quality changes of strawberry puree during storage (35 °C, 40 days) were monitored. Acidification prior to pasteurization resulted in an improved color and anthocyanin stability. However, the volatile fraction of strawberry puree was negatively influenced by acidification of the puree. Low acidic conditions (pH 1.5) resulted in the hydrolysis of esters, oxidation of terpene oxides, and acid-catalyzed reactions of terpene alcohols during storage. The volatile fraction of strawberry puree stored at pH 2.5 and 3.5 (the latter being the original strawberry puree) were more similar. Furthermore, after 4 days of storage, the pH of the acidified purees was brought back to the natural pH of the system (3.5) and subsequently thermally treated and stored. During this second storage, color showed a slightly faster degradation rate in those purees that were previously acidified, whereas anthocyanins exhibited similar trends suggesting that the advantage of acidification to preserve color would be beneficial after thermal processing, but more limited during storage of the regenerated product (second storage).</p>
Database of digital media publications on maternal (family) capital in Russia in 2006-2019
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>The database contains data from publications of digital Russian-language media of the Russian Federation on the topic of maternity capital in the period from May 10, 2006 to June 30, 2019. The database includes uploading general data on publications on maternity capital in .xls formats (UTF-8 encoding) . Full texts of publications are presented in .xml format.</p> <p>A specialized request was generated for the aggregator of publications of Russian-language digital mass media <a href="https://vk.com/away.php?to=http%3A%2F%2Fpublic.ru&cc_key=">public.ru</a> . In total, the database consists of 457888 publications of 7665 publishing houses from 1251 settlements in Russia on the territory of 85 regions. The database includes information about the date, type, authors, publisher and place of publication (municipality, region of the publisher), as well as full texts of publications.</p> <p> </p> <p>Keywords: database, digital media, maternal (family) capital, central and municipal media, Russia</p> <p>JEL codes: J10, J13, Z18.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data format and access:</strong></p> <p>The database consists of full-text publications of digital media on the topic of maternity capital. Materials in Russian have been published in federal, regional and local digital media. Publication period: May 10, 2006 to June 30, 2019.</p> <p>The database consists of 457888 publications of 7665 publishing houses from 1251 settlements in Russia on the territory of 85 regions. Presentation format .csv, .xml (full texts). The file "Matkap_SMI_17_11_2021.csv" contains processed information from the extended full-text sample by years (contained in the "XML.rar" archive). </p> <p>pubData - date of publication (format "YYYY-MM-DD")</p> <p>text - text from "description" in xml-files after lemmatization (removal of punctuation, lowercase and remove punctuation, spaces, numbers)</p> <p>source - name of the electronic edition</p> <p>place - town or city in Russia</p> <p>type - type of electronic edition (newspaper, magazine, TV program, internet resource)</p> <p>period - frequency of publication</p> <p>positive - the number of unique positive words from the RuSentiLex2017 dictionary</p> <p>negative - the number of unique negative words from the RuSentiLex2017 dictionary</p> <p>neutral - the number of unique neutral words from the RuSentiLex2017 dictionary</p> <p><strong>Data collection methodology: </strong></p> <p>The aggregator of publications of Russian-language digital mass media <a href="https://vk.com/away.php?to=http%3A%2F%2Fpublic.ru&cc_key=">public.ru was used</a>. The selection of publications was limited to the time period from May 10, 2006 (Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin first announced the maternity capital programme in his message to the Federal Assembly, as one of the mechanisms to stimulate fertility and overcome the demographic crisis) to June 30, 2019 (until this date, the programme allowed full uploading of media publications without losses during the period of uploading publications from 01.08.2021 to 15.08.2021).</p> <p>Key words used to select articles on maternity capital: “maternal capital”, “maternity capital”, “family capital”, “paternal capital”. The publication had to repeat at least two phrases from the request, while the distance between the phrases had to be no more than 4 sentences. This excluded publications in which the topic of maternity capital was mentioned incidentally, indirectly.</p> <p>Duplicate articles were removed from the database. Duplicates related to publications that included a full repetition of the text of the publication itself, the publishing house and the municipality (location) of the publishing house. Duplications (reprints) of articles in other publishing houses or in other regions were not excluded. </p> <p>After lemmatization of the text (as well as after reducing the text to lower case, removing unnecessary spaces, numbers and punctuation), according to the RuSentiLex2017 dictionary (Loukachevitch N., Levchik A. Creating a General Russian Sentiment Lexicon. In Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference LREC-2016, 2016.) unique positive, negative and neutral words and phrases (variables) were counted. Repetitions of tonal words (stances) are <strong>not counted.</strong></p>
Citizen science at public libraries: Data on librarians and users perceptions of participating in a citizen science project in Catalunya, Spain
<p>As libraries struggle to keep pace with the changing societal landscape, emerging practices such as citizen science (CS) initiatives are being incorporated to reinforce the idea of public libraries as gathering, meeting, and collaboration spaces within the context of shared community and shared learning resources. However, there is little empirical evidence of whether the most open and participatory ways that CS puts forward can converge with and be nurtured by the essence of public libraries. Also, the roles of librarians and users in the ‘next generation public library’ have been under-developed. As the number of CS initiatives at public libraries grows, so does the need to collect evidence on the impact and the capacity of assimilation of CS practices. The data describes librarians and users' perceptions of participating in a citizen science project. Two hands-on activities for librarians of the Barcelona Network of Public Libraries were implemented. One was a training course for 30 librarians from 24 libraries which allowed them to envisage citizen science implementation in each library. The second activity consisted in the co-creation of a citizen social science project. 40 library users, 7 librarians from 3 different cities, and professional scientists, were involved. The data on librarians and users' perception was collected through participant observation, surveys, and a focus group to identify strengths and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries. The data covers librarians and users attitudes towards citizen science, their motivations to participate, their perceived ability to implement a citizen science project (as for librarians) or to contribute to science (as for library users), and the participants intention to keep engaged with citizen science, drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Responses to closed-ended survey questions are analyzed at a descriptive level. The qualitative feedback from the focus group and the open-ended survey question on motivations is subjected to a thematic analysis. The data offers interesting insights to identify opportunities and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries, contributing to the debate over the public library's mission as local community hub.</p> <p>The dataset is formed by 5 tables:</p> <ol> <li>Librarians_pre.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, expected impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Librarians_post.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, perceived impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the end of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Users_first_phase.csv: data on users profiles, motivation, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_second_phase.csv: data on users profiles and motivation collected at the middle of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_last_phase.csv: data on users profiles, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and perceived impact of the project collected at the end of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_pre)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [rol_1] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Director</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Support technician</li> <li>Service support</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_1] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_1] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [know_1] Have you already heard about citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_1] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_lib_pre1] Do you believe that library users are able to participate in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_lib_pre2] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Expected impacts</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [exp_lib_pre] To what extent do you believe that citizen science may bring positive impacts to your library?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_pre1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_lib_pre2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_post)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [years_2] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [back_2] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [sat_1] To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [att_lib_post1] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [att_lib_post2] What are/could be the potential barriers to users engagement in citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [imp_lib] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [se_lib_post1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_post2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Intention to keep engaged</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [eng_lib] To what extent are you motivated to keep engaged with citizen science?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Focus group guide (Librarians)</strong></p> <p><strong>Opening questions</strong></p> <p><strong>1.</strong> To start with…. Are you satisfied with the project?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Yes, no, why? Was it fun/interesting/challenging/enriching….</p> <p><strong>2.</strong> Do you feel you have learned something new?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> About your library’s environment, users, science and citizen science... Is there anything special that you will take with you after the project?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the cocreation process</strong></p> <p><strong>3.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt most comfortable?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> For example, has it been easier to lead the activity and/or involve and retain the community? Did you find it entertaining?</p> <p><strong>4.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt less at ease?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> What was challenging during the cocreation process?</p> <p><strong>5.</strong> To what extent do you feel more capable of implementing and leading a citizen science project in your library right now?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>For example, in the case of both more crowdsourcing and of cocreated projects that actively involve the community</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the perceived impact</strong></p> <p><strong>6. </strong>To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> in line with what you discussed at the beginning of the project, you expected it to promote participation, new connections among participants, improve the library perceptions and stimulate the participants’ critical thinking...Do you think that citizen science may meet these expectations?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on citizen science at public libraries</strong></p> <p><strong>7.</strong> To what extent can citizen science (in its most ‘extreme’ form of participation) be imagined as an activity within the library that promotes more active user participation?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Through for example cocreation, experimentation, and hands-on learning activities...</p> <p><strong>8. </strong>Do you think that the activity has brought new knowledge? What new knowledge has the activity brought from your perspective?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Knowledge of the scientific process, knowledge of the community or new users...</p> <p>9. What could be the opportunities and barriers of introducing citizen science at public libraries? And the barriers?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Like for example improving the perception of the library, actively involving certain users...What could be the ‘return’ for the community? What impact can citizen science projects have on making the environment more dynamic from libraries?</p> <p><strong>10. </strong>More generally, what could be the ‘added value’ of the introduction of citizen science within the library’s range of activities?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Is it a fun activity that promotes socialization, for example? Or that allows to generate new knowledge? Or that highlights the library’s social value? Or, also, that may offer new uses and new roles to the library? Can it foster a sense of community with the library as a connector? What other impacts can be generated in your environment?</p> <p><strong>Closing</strong></p> <p><strong>11.</strong> Do you see yourselves the next year, implementing a citizen science project as part of the library’s range of activities? And adopting an existing one?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>Are you motivated to get more involved with citizen science projects? What kind of projects? What level of user involvement do you expect? What barriers do you see to users’ involvement? What benefits and opportunities do you think you can bring to the library?</p> <p><strong>12.</strong> We have now reached the end of the discussion. Anyone want to add anything else?</p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_first_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_1] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_3] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_2] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user not associated with local associations</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [back_3] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_2] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Motivations to participate</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [mot_us] What did motivate you to participate in the project?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_us_pre1] To what extent do you believe that your library is responsive to the community needs?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [att_us_pre2] To what extent to you believe your library is able to face local challenges based on users' active participation?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [conf_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 4 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to positively contribute to the library and your community?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_second_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_3] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_5] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_4] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_5] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [mot_us2] To what extent are you motivated to carry out the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_last_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_2] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_4] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_3] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_4] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [part_3] To how many cocreation sessions have you participated?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>None</li> <li>1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [sat_2] To what extent are you satisfied with the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_us_post] To what extent do you believe that the project has positively changed your perception of the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [conf_us_post] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [imp_us] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Supplementary dataset for TeraTox publication: test
<p>Supplementary dataset for TeraTox publication</p>
Supporting data for the AI education publication statistics in "An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates"
<p>Supporting data for the AI education publication statistics presented in the paper "An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates" to be published at the Twelfth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-22). The data was used to plot the figure showing the cumulative number of publications from 1976 to 2020 relating to AI education.</p>
Dataset related to article "How Academics and the Public Experienced Immersive Virtual Reality for Geo-education"
<p>The dataset is associated with the paper entitled: How Academics and the Public Experienced Immersive Virtual Reality for Geo-education.</p> <p>It contains feedback regarding users’ experience with Immersive Virtual Reality for geological exploration, through a tailored approach developed by Tibaldi et al. (2020) where the Virtual Landscape is based on 3D photogrammetry-based high-resolution models.</p> <p>Such feedback has been acquired through anonymous questionnaires during nine dissemination events held in 2018 and 2019 in various locations (Vienna in Austria, Milan and Catania in Italy and Santorini in Greece), in the framework of the following projects: i) the MIUR project ACPR15T4_00098–Argo3D (http://argo3d.unimib.it/); ii) 3DTeLC Erasmus+Project 2017-1-UK01-KA203-036719 (<a href="http://www.3dtelc.com">http://www.3dtelc.com</a>); iii) EGU 2018 Public Engagement Grant (https://www.egu.eu/outreach/peg/) .</p> <p>In the dataset, feedback has been grouped into categories, based on users age and background:</p> <p>i) Middle and High School Students (Schools students, results in Sheet 1);</p> <p>ii) MSc Students in Earth Sciences (MSc, results in Sheet 2);</p> <p>iii) Academics/Researchers in Earth Sciences, that include PhD students and postdocs (Academics, results in Sheet 3);</p> <p>iv) Lay Public (i.e. participants that do not belong to the other groups, results in Sheet 4).</p> <p>It lists a total of 459 records; further details are available in the manuscript.</p> <p>If you use this dataset, please do cite the following papers:</p> <p>Bonali et al., How Academics and the Public Experienced Immersive Virtual Reality for Geo-education. Geosciences.</p> <p>Tibaldi, A.; Bonali, F.L.; Vitello, F.; Delage, E.; Nomikou, P.; Antoniou, V.; Becciani, U.; Van Wyk de Vries, B.; Krokos, M.; Whitworth, M. Real world–based immersive Virtual Reality for research, teaching and communication in volcanology. Bull. Volcanol. 2020, 82, 1–12.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Computational results for the publication "Evolution of water structures in metal-organic frameworks for improved atmospheric water harvesting"
<p>This upload contains the computationally obtained atomic coordinates for MOF-303 and MOF-333 at different water loadings.</p>
Number of public and private hospitals and number of beds available in the spanish sanitary system in 1986
<p>Number of public and private hospitals and number of beds avaiable in the spanish sanitary system in 1986.</p> <p>Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: Financial support from the European Union, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and Spain’s Ministry of Science and Innovation -State Research Agency- for the project entitled "The historical keys of hospital development in Spain and its international comparison during the twentieth century", Ref. RTI2018-094676-B-I00.</p>
Number of public and private hospitals and number of beds available in the spanish sanitary system in 1970
<p>Number of public and private hospitals and number of beds avaiable in the spanish sanitary system in 1970.</p> <p>Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: Financial support from the European Union, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and Spain’s Ministry of Science and Innovation -State Research Agency- for the project entitled "The historical keys of hospital development in Spain and its international comparison during the twentieth century", Ref. RTI2018-094676-B-I00.</p>
Dataset for "Evaluation of Publicly Available Information on Sex-related Differences in the Efficacy and Safety of New Molecular Entities and Therapeutic Biological Products"
<p>Contains our extraction sheets with additional documents/notes on methods used in our study.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.