Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2A- B from: Bochud E, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Neubert E (2021) A new Diancta species of the family Diplommatinidae (Cyclophoroidea) from Vanua Levu Island, Fiji. ZooKeys 1073: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1073.73241

Figure 2A- B Diancta phoenix sp. nov., change in coiling axis by 45 degrees A Tilted view of the left coiled shell B Micro-CT picture, visualisation of the columella.

Figure 1A- B from: Bochud E, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Neubert E (2021) A new Diancta species of the family Diplommatinidae (Cyclophoroidea) from Vanua Levu Island, Fiji. ZooKeys 1073: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1073.73241

Figure 1A- B Diancta phoenix sp. nov. Holotype, MCZ 394198, SH = 2.59 mm A Different external views of the shell B Micro-CT views.

Supplementary material 2 from: Bochud E, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Neubert E (2021) A new Diancta species of the family Diplommatinidae (Cyclophoroidea) from Vanua Levu Island, Fiji. ZooKeys 1073: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1073.73241

Movie 2

Figure 5A-D from: Bochud E, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Neubert E (2021) A new Diancta species of the family Diplommatinidae (Cyclophoroidea) from Vanua Levu Island, Fiji. ZooKeys 1073: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1073.73241

Figure 5A-D Comparison of D. phoenix sp. nov. with other Fijian species AD. phoenix sp. nov., with simple peristome, SH = 2.59 mm BD. rotunda Neubert and Bouchet, 2015, with bulbous penultimate whorl, SH = 2.65 mm CD. macrostoma (Mousson, 1870), SH = 2.84 mm and DD. martensi (H. Adams, 1866), SH = 2.62 mm, with strong ascending last whorl and double peristome.

Supplementary material 3 from: Bochud E, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Neubert E (2021) A new Diancta species of the family Diplommatinidae (Cyclophoroidea) from Vanua Levu Island, Fiji. ZooKeys 1073: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1073.73241

Movie 3

Supplementary material 1 from: Bartolucci F, Domina G, Argenti C, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, Banfi E, Barberis D, Barberis G, Bertolli A, Bolpagni R, Bonari G, Bonini F, Briozzo I, Brundu G, Bruschi T, Calbi M, Callegari M, Calvia G, Campoccia D, Cancellieri L, Cangelmi G, Carfagno S, Carruggio F, Casazza G, Cavallaro V, Cherchi S, Ciocia B, Conti F, Crisafulli A, Dagnino D, Vecchia AD, De Fine G, Del Nero V, Di Filippo A, Dunkel FG, Festi F, Filibeck G, Fois M, Forte L, Fratolin F, Galasso G, Gigante D, Gottschlich G, Gubellini L, Hofmann N, Jiménez-Mejías P, Laface VLA, Lonati M, Lozano V, Mainetti A, Mariotti M, Mei G, Minutillo F, Minuto L, Musarella CM, Nota G, Orsenigo S, Pallanza M, Passalacqua NG, Pazienza G, Pinzani L, Pittarello M, Podda L, Prosser F, Enri SR, Riva G, Santi F, Scoppola A, Selvaggi A, Selvi F, Spampinato G, Stinca A, Tomaselli V, Tomasi G, Tondi G, Turcato C, Wilhalm T, Lastrucci L (2021) Notulae to the Italian native vascular flora: 12. Italian Botanist 12: 85-103. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.12.78038

Supplementary data

Supplementary material 1 from: Galasso G, Domina G, Angiolini C, Bacchetta G, Banfi E, Barberis D, Bardi S, Bartolucci F, Bonari G, Bovio M, Briozzo I, Brundu G, Buono S, Calvia G, Celesti-Grapow L, Cozzolino A, Cuena-Lombraña A, Curuzzi M, D'Amico FS, Dagnino D, De Fine G, Fanfarillo E, Federici A, Ferraris P, Fiacchini D, Fiaschi T, Fois M, Gubellini L, Guidotti E, Hofmann N, Kindermann E, Laface VL.A, Lallai A, Lanfredini P, Lazzaro L, Lazzeri V, Lonati M, Loreti M, Lozano V, Magrini S, Mainetti A, Marchini M, Marignani M, Martignoni M, Mei G, Minutillo F, Mondino GP, Motti R, Musarella CM, Nota G, Olivieri N, Pallanza M, Passalacqua NG, Patera G, Pilon N, Pinzani L, Pittarello M, Podda L, Probo M, Enri SR, Rosati L, Salerno P, Selvaggi A, Soldano A, Cocco GS, Spampinato G, Stinca A, Terzi M, Tondi G, Turcato C, Wellstein C, Lastrucci L (2021) Notulae to the Italian alien vascular flora: 12. Italian Botanist 12: 105-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.12.78010

Supplementary data

Figure 4 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 4 Portion of the tree of highest posterior probability from a 10 million-generation Bayes analysis of COI. The numbers of specimens of each species are collapsed (when possible) into single terminals (terminal triangles), with the number of specimens/OTUs for each collapsed species in parentheses. The length of the triangles represents the branch length from the node to the tip of the longest branch for that species. The numbers above the branches are the posterior probabilities × 100. The red dots indicate the three species that could not be differentiated morphologically. Modified from Sharkey et al. (2018).

Figure 37 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 37 Exit hole, left side, cut by the wasp Triraphis doncombi (DHJPAR0038023) to exit the mummified body wall of the parasitized host caterpillar Euclea mesoamericana (Limacodidae) in its last instar.

Figure 36 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 36 White pupa of wasp Triraphis doncombi (DHJPAR0038023) visible through the translucent body wall of the parasitized host caterpillar Euclea mesoamericana (Limacodidae) in its last instar.

Figure 39 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 39 Yelicones mayrabonillae, remains of host caterpillar, epipajanzen01 Janzen882 (Pyralidae); note mummified host caterpillar curved into a distinctive "C" shape, characteristic of other species of pyralid caterpillars attacked by species of Yelicones.

Figure 24 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 24 Tough-walled silk cocoon of Homolobus stevestroudi. Note shiny surface of the inside visible just inside the cut off right-hand end. That hard smooth surface makes the cocoon wall extremely tough and difficult to penetrate with an insect pin. The terminal circular cut exit hole is characteristic of most genera of large bodied ACG Braconidae and many small ones as well.

Figure 2 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 2 Portion of the NJ tree generated from BOLD showing additions of sequences with barcodes shorter than 650bp. These are highlighted in blue.

Figure 13 from: Sharkey MJ, Baker A, McCluskey K, Smith A, Naik S, Ratnasingham S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Sones J, D'Souza M, Jacques BS, Hebert P, Hallwachs W, Janzen D (2021) Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys 1075: 77-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Figure 13 Communal and jointly constructed cocoon of at least 56 sibling larvae of Bracon andreamezae, one of which is DHJPAR0031182, displaying adult exit holes through the tough silk roof of the same consistency as the floor of the chamber; multiple wasps exited through a single hole. This species of wasp has been reared only twice among 1,391 rearings of solitary Yanguna cosyra caterpillars for more than 34 years.

Figure 3 from: Zembrzuski D, Woller DA, Jech L, Black LR, Reuter KC, Overson R, Cease A (2021) Establishing the nutritional landscape and macronutrient preferences of a major United States rangeland pest, Melanoplus sanguinipes, in field and lab populations. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 163-172. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.61605

Figure 3 Performance experiments. Survival and specific growth rates of grasshoppers from the long-term lab colony no-choice diet experiments. A. The specific growth rates for each diet treatment. Diamonds indicate the mean and bolded lines indicate the median. Boxes are +/- 25%, lines represent minimum and maximum values excluding extreme values, and dots indicate data points > 1.5 farther from the box edge than the interquartile range. Lower case letters indicate differences from Mann-Whitney post-hoc analyses. B. The proportion of grasshoppers surviving through time on each diet treatment. Most diet treatments did not have individuals die until the 5th day of the experiment, and most treatments except 7p:35c had minimal deaths (although there were no significant differences among treatments). C. Proportion of grasshoppers molting to adults over time. Most of the diets saw increases in molting from days 5–7, except diet treatment 7p:35c, which was delayed and had the least number of grasshoppers successfully molt (significantly different from all other treatments).

Figure 2 from: Zembrzuski D, Woller DA, Jech L, Black LR, Reuter KC, Overson R, Cease A (2021) Establishing the nutritional landscape and macronutrient preferences of a major United States rangeland pest, Melanoplus sanguinipes, in field and lab populations. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 163-172. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.61605

Figure 2 Field IT compared to nutritional landscape. A, B. Grasshopper intake targets of the field populations (black solid line) alongside the nutrient contents of grasses (triangles) and forbs (circles) collected from the same fields. The grey solid line represents the intake target from the other field population. The dotted line represents a 1p:1c ratio. C, D. The average Euclidean distance between the plants (triangles and circles in A and B) and either the grasshopper IT from each location or the 1p:1c line. * denotes a significant difference between the Euclidean distances calculated from the IT and the 1p:1c line.

Figure 1 from: Zembrzuski D, Woller DA, Jech L, Black LR, Reuter KC, Overson R, Cease A (2021) Establishing the nutritional landscape and macronutrient preferences of a major United States rangeland pest, Melanoplus sanguinipes, in field and lab populations. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 163-172. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.61605

Figure 1 Field populations and lab population ITs. Average intake target (+/- SEM) for two field populations, Bliss and Boise, ID, and the lab colony. The dashed line represents a 1:1 ratio of protein and carbohydrates, and the crosses on the data points represent SE.

Figure 2 from: Liu D-H, Xu X-M, He Y, Liu Q-R (2021) A new combination in Pseudolappula (Boraginaceae, Rochelieae) based on morphological, molecular and palynological evidence. PhytoKeys 187: 77-92. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.187.75346

Figure 2 Maximum Likelihood tree of subtribe Eritrichiinae inferred from ITS + trnL-F. The tree topology was constructed using RAxML. Bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated above branches. Note that the Lappula occultata (Huang et al. 2013) is a misidentified voucher from previous studies (Huang et al. 2013).

Figure 1 from: Liu D-H, Xu X-M, He Y, Liu Q-R (2021) A new combination in Pseudolappula (Boraginaceae, Rochelieae) based on morphological, molecular and palynological evidence. PhytoKeys 187: 77-92. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.187.75346

Figure 1 Nutlet morphology of Pseudolappula and LappulaA–DPseudolappula sinaicaA fruit lateral view B fruit polar view (growth direction of nutlets indicated by arrows) C nutlet abaxial view D nutlet adaxial view E–HLappula occultataE fruit lateral view F fruit polar view (arrangement of nutlets indicated by cross lines) G nutlet abaxial view H nutlet adaxial view I–LLappula patulaI fruit lateral view J fruit polar view (arrangement of nutlets indicated by cross lines) K nutlet abaxial view L nutlet adaxial view M adaxial keel of P. sinaica (adaxial view) N adaxial keel of L. occultata (lateral view) O attachment scar of Lappula balchaschensisP attachment scar of Lappula brachycentra. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figure 3 from: Liu D-H, Xu X-M, He Y, Liu Q-R (2021) A new combination in Pseudolappula (Boraginaceae, Rochelieae) based on morphological, molecular and palynological evidence. PhytoKeys 187: 77-92. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.187.75346

Figure 3 Scanning electron micrographs. A, BPseudolappula sinaicaC, DLappula occultataE, FL. shanhsiensisG, HL. redowskiiI, JL. macranthaK, LL. tianschanicaM, NRochelia bungeO, PPseudoheterocaryum rigidum. Scale bars: 5 μm.