Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of El Ventorrillo Biological Station, Madrid province, Spain: a perspective from a late twentieth century inventory

Fig. 2. El Ventorrillo in summer (Sierra de Guadarrama, Spain). Malaise trap placed in grassland/mix-forest edge.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 6 in Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of El Ventorrillo Biological Station, Madrid province, Spain: a perspective from a late twentieth century inventory

Fig. 6. Hoverfly species from Sierra de Guadarrama. (A) Milesia crabroniformis, female, Puerto de Navacerrada. (B) Sericomyia hispanica, female, Puerto de Navacerrada. (C) Chrysotoxum sp. near vernale, male, Puerto de la Morcuera. (D) Dasysyrphus albostriatus, female. Photos A, B, D by Piluca Álvarez-Fidalgo, C by Marián Álvarez-Fidalgo.

Fig. 10 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 10. Monthly absolute frequency distribution of juveniles and adult individuals of Etropus crossotus in the shallow infralittoral areas of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex. Total amostral N = 419. *Significant values (p <0.05) for chi-square test.

Fig. 8 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 8. First maturation length for females (a) and males (b) of Etropus crossotus in the shallow infralittoral areas of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex. L 50 = the shortest total length (Lt), in which 50% of the individuals sampled were adults. L 100 = the shortest total length (Lt), in which 100% of the individuals sampled were adults. Female amostral N = 171, and male amostral N = 218.

Fig. 6 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 6. Monthly percentage frequency distribution of the gonadal maturation stages of females (a) and males (b) of Etropus crossotus in the shallow infralittoral areas of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex. A = immature; B = maturation; C = mature; PS = partially spawned; D = spawned/emptied. The numbers indicated above the bars refer to absolute frequency.

Fig. 1 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling sites in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil.

Fig. 5 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 5. Monthly variation of the mean GSI of females (a) and males (b) of Etropus crossotus in the shallow infralittoral areas of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex. GSI = gonadosomatic index. The error bars correspond to the standard deviation. The numbers indicated above the error bars refer to absolute frequency.

Fig. 9 in Reproductive biology of the flatfish Etropus crossotus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná State, subtropical region of Brazil

Fig. 9. Monthly sex ratio (a) per length class (b) of Etropus crossotus in the shallow infralittoral areas of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex. (a) Female amostral N = 184, and male amostral N = 237; (b) Female amostral N = 184, male amostral N = 237, and unsexed amostral N = 5. *Significant values (p <0.05) for chi-square test.

Fig. 9 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 9. Profile the temperature and salinity of the water column (Diagram TS) recorded in Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) region during winter/2007 (a), winter/2008 (b), summer/2008 (c), and summer/2009 (d).

Fig. 8 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 8. Temperature and salinity of the water column (Diagram TS) recorded in Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) region during winter/2007 (a), winter/2008 (b), summer/2008 (c), and summer/2009 (d). CW = Coastal Water; SACW = South Atlantic Central Water; STSW = Subtropical Shelf Water.

Fig. 5 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 5. Relative abundance (%) of larvae collected in Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) during winter (a) and summer (b). In campaign 1 (1997/1998), 2 (2007/2008) and 3 (2008/2009).

Fig. 1 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of sampling stations in the Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve region and adjacent areas in campaign 1 (1997/ 1998) (stations 7-12), campaign 2 (2007/2008) (stations 1-12) and campaign 3 (2008/2009) (stations 1-12).

Fig. 10 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 10. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of the (a) eight most abundant families, and (b) stations in Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) region in relation to temperature, salinity and chlorophyll-a. Note: W-07 - Winter/2007; S-08 - Summer/ 2008; W-08 - Winter/2008 and S-09 - Summer/2009

Fig. 6 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 6. Cluster analysis of 59 samples collected in theArvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) region during the summer (1998, 2008 and 2009) and winter (1997, 2007, and 2008), based on relative abundance of the different taxa fish larvae identified. Note: w - Winter; s - Summer

Fig. 7 in Ichthyoplankton of Arvoredo Biological Marine Reserve, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Fig. 7. Rarefaction curve of larval fish species collected during six sampling periods in the Arvoredo Biology Marine Reserve (Brazil) region.

Fig. 4 in Distribution and reproductive biology of the Electric ray Discopyge tschudii Heckel, 1846 in San Matías Gulf, Northern Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 4. Size frequency distribution of Discopyge tschudii sampled during 2004-2007. Males (dotted line) n= 564 and females (continuous line) n= 523.

Fig. 9 in Distribution and reproductive biology of the Electric ray Discopyge tschudii Heckel, 1846 in San Matías Gulf, Northern Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 9. Relationship between total length of the female (TL) and number of embryos (N e) for Discopyge tschudii. N e (dotted line)= 0.221 X exp(0.589 X TL); R²= 0.57; n= 27.

Fig. 10 in Distribution and reproductive biology of the Electric ray Discopyge tschudii Heckel, 1846 in San Matías Gulf, Northern Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 10. Relationship between total length (TLe) and weight (We) for embryos of Discopyge tschudii. W e(dotted line)= 7 x 10-0.5 X TL 2.63; R2= 0.80; n= 178.

Fig. 1 in Distribution and reproductive biology of the Electric ray Discopyge tschudii Heckel, 1846 in San Matías Gulf, Northern Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 1. Study area and design of bottom trawl surveys. Strata I, II, and III: 90-130 m; stratum IV:>130 m; stratum V: 50-89 m and stratum VI: 20-49 m.

Fig.2 in Distribution and reproductive biology of the Electric ray Discopyge tschudii Heckel, 1846 in San Matías Gulf, Northern Patagonia, Argentina

Fig.2. Proportion of individuals recorded in each stratum during bottom trawl surveys. Surveys carried out in the 1980´s: REDE 1986 and Gallo 1986; surveys carried out in the 1990´s: REDE 1995 and 1996; surveys carried out in the 2000´s: REDEs 2004 to 2007.