Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11. A in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 11. A. Thyropygus navychula sp. nov., specimen from Surin Islands, living ♂ (paratype, CUMZ-D00089-1). B. Thyropygus forceps sp. nov., specimen from Namwang Srithammasokrach, living ♂ (paratype, CUMZ-D00073-1).

Fig. 5 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 5. Thyropygus mesocristatus sp. nov., from Srikasorn, holotype (CUMZ-D00094), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Lateral view. D. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. E. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 2 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 2. Thyropygus cimi sp. nov., from Namwang Srithammasokrach, holotype (CUMZ-D00086), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Lateral view. D. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. E. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 1 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Thyropygus species based on maximum likelihood analysis (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) of 1147 bp of concatenated gene fragments of COI (660 bp) and 16S rRNA (487 bp). Numbers at nodes indicate branch support based on bootstrapping (ML) / posterior probability (BI). Scale bar = 0.06 substitutions/site. # indicates branches which received <50% ML bootstrap support, - indicates non-supported branches by posterior probability. Clade memberships and designations are shown as vertical bars; 1A1 = T. allevatus, 1A2 = cuisinieri subgroup, 1A3 = opinatus subgroup and 1A4 = induratus subgroup. The coloured area marks the T. opinatus subgroup. Abbreviations after species names refer to locality names as shown in Table 1.

Fig. 7 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 7. Thyropygus planispina sp. nov., from Tham Sua temple, holotype (CUMZ-D00088), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Lateral view. D. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. E. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 6 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 6. Thyropygus navychula sp. nov., from Surin Islands, holotype (CUMZ-D00095), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. D. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 4 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 4. Thyropygus forceps sp. nov., gonopods. – A, C–E. Holotype (CUMZ-D00092), ♂, from Namwang Srithammasokrach. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. D. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. E. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view. – B. Specimen from Tham Pha Deang temple (CUMZ-D00093), ♂. Anterior view, left telopodite removed.

Fig. 10 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 10. Thyropygus ursus sp. nov., from Lanta Islands, holotype (NMHW-Inv.7855), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. D. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 9 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 9. Thyropygus undulatus sp. nov., from Khao Phanom Bencha, holotype (CUMZ-D00087), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Lateral view. D. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. E. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 3 in A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part V: Nine new species of the extended opinatus subgroup, based on morphological and DNA sequence data (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae)

Fig. 3. Thyropygus culter sp. nov., from Rorn waterfall, holotype (CUMZ-D00091), ♂, gonopods. A. Anterior view, left telopodite removed. B. Posterior view, left telopodite removed. C. Left telopodite, posterior-mesal view. D. Left telopodite, anterior-lateral view.

Fig. 5 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 5. Flavalona rustica (Scott, 1895) comb. nov. A–N. Labrum, antennule and thoraciс limbs of parthenogenetic ♀ from Bol'shoe Torfyanoe lake, Bolshoi Solovetskiy Island (White Sea), Russia. A–B. Labrum. C. Antennule. D. Limb I. E. IDL and ODL of limb I. F. Scrapers of limb II. G. Gnathobase of limb II. H. Exopodite of limb III. I. Inner portion of limb III. J. Exopodite of limb IV. K. Inner portion of limb IV. L. Limb V. M. Gnathobase of limb V. N. Limb VI. O–P. Adult ♁. O. Lateral view. P. Postabdomen. Figure O redrawn from Alonso (1996) and P from Sinev (1999a).

Fig.3. A in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig.3. A. Flavalona cheni (Sinev, 1999) comb. nov., head pores of parthenogenetic ♀. B–C. Flavalona natalensis (Sinev, 2008) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀. B. Lateral view. C. Head pores. D. Flavalona setigera (Brehm, 1931) comb. nov., head pores of parthenogenetic ♀. E–F. Flavalona weltneri (Keilhack, 1905) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀. E. Head pores. F. Postabdomen. Figures A and D from Sinev (1999a), B–C from Sinev (2008), E redrawn from Flössner (2000) and F redrawn from Van Damme et al. (2010).

Fig. 2 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 2. Flavalona costata (Sars, 1862) comb. nov., Randsfjorden Lake, Norway. A–L. Labrum and thoraciс limbs of parthenogenetic ♀. A. Labrum. B. Limb I. C. ODL of limb I. D. Ejector hooks of limb I. E. Limb II. F. Exopodite of limb III. G–H. Inner portion of limb III. I. Exopodite of limb IV. J. Inner portion of limb IV. K. Limb V. L. Limb VI. M–N. Thoracic limb I of adult ♁.

Fig. 1 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 1. Flavalona costata (Sars, 1862) comb. nov., Randsfjorden Lake, Norway. A–K. Parthenogenetic ♀. A. Lateral view. B. Ventral margin of valves. C. Anterior setae of valves. D. Posterior setae of valves. E. Posteroventral corner and posterior margin of valves. F. Head shield. G–H. Head pores. I. Postabdomen. J. Antennule. K. Antenna. L. Ephippial ♀. M. Ephippium. N–P. ♁. N. Lateral view. O. Postabdomen. P. Antennule and outline of rostrum.

Fig. 6 in Revision of the costata-group of Alona s. lato (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) confirms its generic status

Fig. 6. Flavalona bicolor (Frey, 1965) comb. nov. A–E. Parthenogenetic ♀. A. Lateral view (specimen retaining valves from previous moult). B. Head shield. C. Head pores. D. Labrum. E. Postabdomen. F. Postabdomen of adult ♁. — G–J. Flavalona hudeci (Sinev, 1999) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀ G. Lateral view. H. Head pores. I. Posteroventral corner of valves. J. Thoracic limb V. — K–O. Flavalona iheringula (Sinev & Kotov, 2004) comb. nov. K–M. Parthenogenetic ♀. K. Lateral view. L. Head pores. M. Thoracic limb V. N–O. Adult ♁. N. Lateral view. O. Postabdomen. — P. Flavalona sphagnophila (Van Damme & Eggermont, 2011) comb. nov., parthenogenetic ♀, head pores. Figures A–F from Sinev (2009), G–J redrawn from Hudeč (1998), K–M from Sinev (2001), N–O from Kotov & Sinev (2004) and P redrawn from Van Damme & Eggermont (2011).

Fig. 4 in The Leiobunum rupestre species group: resolving the taxonomy of four widespread European taxa (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae)

Fig. 4. Pedipalps of the Leiobunum rupestre group, whole pedipalps in lateral view, single femora in medial view. — A–F. ♁♁. A–B. Leiobunum rupestre Herbst, 1799, Germany, Baden-Württemberg, CJM1954. A. Pedipalpus lateral. B. Femur medial. C–D. L. gracile Thorell, 1876, Denmark, Asp, CJM3531. C. Pedipalpus lateral. D. Femur medial. — E–F. Leiobunum apenninicum (Martens, 1969), France, Alpes- Maritimes, CJM2747. E. Pedipalpus lateral. F. Femur medial. — G–M. ♀♀. G–H. Leiobunum rupestre Herbst, 1799, Germany, Mt. Arber, CJM136. G. Pedipalpus lateral. H. Femur medial. J–K. L. gracile Thorell, 1876, Denmark, Asp, CJM3531. J. Pedipalpus lateral. K. Femur medial. L–M. L. apenninicum (Martens, 1969), France, Alpes-Maritimes, CJM2747. L. Pedipalpus lateral. M. Femur medial. Arrows indicate characters mentioned in the descriptions.

Fig. 1 in The Leiobunum rupestre species group: resolving the taxonomy of four widespread European taxa (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae)

Fig. 1. Habit of Leiobunum rupestre species group. A–B. Leiobunum rupestre Herbst, 1799, Slovenia, Pohorje Mountains, resting at rock faces. A. ♁. B. ♀. C–D. Leiobunum apenninicum (Martens, 1969), Italy, Monesi di Triora, at night. C. ♁. D. ♀. E–F. Leiobunum gracile Thorell, 1876, Denmark. E. ♁. F. ♀. Photographs: A–D by A.L.Schönhofer; E–F by S. Toft, all taken in the field.

Fig. 3 in The Leiobunum rupestre species group: resolving the taxonomy of four widespread European taxa (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae)

Fig. 3. Body of Leiobunum C.L. Koch, 1839, dorsal view. A–B. Leiobunum rupestre Herbst, 1799, Germany, Mt. Arber, CJM136. A. ♁. B. ♀. — C–D. Leiobunum gracile Thorell, 1876, Denmark. C. ♁, 2 km N of Skaerbaek, CJM3530. D. ♀, Asp, CJM3531. — E–F. Leiobunum apenninicum (Martens, 1969), France, Alpes-Maritimes. E. ♁, CJM1508. F. ♀, CJM2747. Drawings by K. Rehbinder.

Fig. 5. Leiobunum, male genitalia. A–C. L. rupestre Herbst, 1799 in The Leiobunum rupestre species group: resolving the taxonomy of four widespread European taxa (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae)

Fig. 5. Leiobunum, male genitalia. A–C. L. rupestre Herbst, 1799, Germany, Baden-Württemberg, CJM1954. A. Ventral view. B. Lateral view. C. Cross-section. — D–F. L. gracile Thorell, 1876, Denmark, 2 km N of Skaerbaek, CJM3530. D. Ventral view. E. Lateral view. F. Cross-section. — G–J. L. apenninicum (Martens, 1969), France, Alpes-Maritimes, CJM1508. G. Ventral view. H. Lateral view. J. Cross-section. Arrows indicate the area of the respective cross-sections.