Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,021
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,021 results for “valley”
FIG. 6 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 6. — Biometric values of Lychnothamnus barbatus var. antiquus Soulié-Märsche, 1989 from sample Zahle 2 (n = 40 gyrogonites): A, gyrogonite height (µm); B, gyrogonite width (µm); C, number of convolutions visible in lateral view; D, isopolarity index (ISI = h/w × 100).
FIG. 2 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 2. — Stratigraphic log for Zahle section (base of the lacustrine deposits of Zahle) showing a detail of a shallowing sedimentary cycle.
FIG. 1 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 1. — Geological sketch of the western part of the Bekaa Valley showing the location of the studied section (modified from Dubertret 1945).
FIG. 5 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 5. — Charophytes from the lacustrine deposits of Zahle, sample Zahle 2: A-H, Lychnothamnus barbatus var. antiquus Soulié-Märsche, 1989; A, apical view, no. 2017010 AUBGM; B, apical view, no. 2017011 AUBGM; C, basal view, no. 2017012 AUBGM; D, lateral view, no. 2017013 AUBGM; E, lateral view, no. 2017014 AUBGM; F, lateral view, no. 2017015 AUBGM; G, lateral view, no. 2017016 AUBGM; H, lateral view, no. 2017017 AUBGM. Scale bar: 500 μm.
FIG. 4 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 4. — Biometric values of Chara aff. microcera Grambast & Paul, 1965 from sample Zahle 1 (n = 39 gyrogonites): A, gyrogonite height (µm); B, gyrogonite width (µm); C, number of convolutions visible in lateral view; D, isopolarity index (ISI = h/w × 100).
FIG. 8 in Charophyte flora from the Miocene of Zahle (Beeka Valley, Lebanon). Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographical implications
FIG. 8. — Biometric values of Nitellopsis (T.) merianii (Al. Braun ex Unger, 1852) Grambast & Soulié-Märsche, 1972 from sample Zahle 2 (n = 100 gyrogonites): A, gyrogonite height (µm); B, gyrogonite width (µm); C, number of convolutions visible in lateral view; D, isopolarity index (ISI = h/w × 100).
Fig. 12 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 12. Lateral views of mandibles from the Leadu colobine AL2–34 (above) and Kuseracolobus aramisi ARAVP1/87 (below).
Fig. 8 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 8. Profile views of symphyses of Pliopapio alemui, Parapapio ado from Laetoli, and P. ado from Kanapoi. Top: MB 1938–1 (cast, reversed), ARAVP1/563. Middle: NMTLAET 74/322b (cast), ARAVP1/73. Bottom: KNMKP286 (reversed).
Fig. 9 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 9. Holotype of Kuseracolobus aramisi ARAVP1/87. Occlusal view. Opposite page: lateral views, left side above, right (reversed) below.
Fig. 6 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 6. Box and whisker plot of the ratio: length inion–nasion/length nasion–prosthion. Labeling is the same as in Fig. 3.
Fig. 4 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 4. Box and whisker plot of the ratio: length nasion–rhinion/length nasion–prosthion. Labeling is the same as in fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The x in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 3. The xaxis represents different papionin genera or subgenera as follows: Ccb, Cercocebus; Din, Papio (Dinopithecus); Lop, Lophocebus; Mac, Macaca; Man, Mandrillus; Omo, Theropithecus (Omopithecus); Pap, Papio (Papio); Pdo, Paradolichopithecus; Ppa, Parapapio; Pli, Pliopapio; Smo, Theropithecus oswaldi; The, T. gelada. Sample size for each (sub)genus is given in parentheses below each label. The yaxis plots values of centroid size computed from 45 cranial landmarks. Centroid sizes were computed using Morpheus (Slice, 1998). The central bar represents the median, or 50th percentile. The bottom and top of each box represent the value at the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and the whiskers extend to the farthest observation that is less than 1.5 times the length of the box. Any individuals outside of the whisker range are marked separately.
Fig. 7 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 7. Mandibles of Pliopapio alemui. Top row left to right: ARAVP1/73, ARAVP1/133, ARA VP1/1006 (two pieces). 2nd row: ARAVP1/563, ARAVP1/740, ARAVP1/548, ARAVP1/740,
Fig. 11 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 11. Mandibles of Kuseracolobus aramisi. Top row: ARAVP1/7, ARAVP1/70, ARAVP1/ 564, ARAVP1/1774, 2nd row: ARAVP6/796, ARAVP1/5, ARAVP1/290. 3rd row: ARAVP6/ 796, ARAVP1/5, ARAVP1/290. Bottom row: ARAVP6/796, ARAVP1/1774 (reversed).
Fig. 2 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 2. Maxillae of Pliopapio alemui. Counterclockwise from top left: ARAVP1/1007 lateral view, ARAVP1/1723 (reversed), ARAVP6/437 lateral view (reversed), ARAVP6/437 frontal view, ARA VP1/1007 occlusal view, ARAVP1/1723 occlusal view.
Fig. 1 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 1. Holotype of Pliopapio alemui ARAVP6/933. All views are in Frankfurt orientation. Lateral view of the left side. Opposite page: dorsal view (above); lateral view of the right side (below).
Fig. 10 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 10. Maxillae of Kuseracolobus aramisi. Top row: KUSVP2/70, ARAVP6/1686. Middle row: ARAVP1/87, ARAVP1/6, ARAVP1/1686. Bottom row: KUSVP2/70, ARAVP1/1686 (reversed).
Fig. 5 in New Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae (Mammalia: Primates) from Aramis, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia
Fig. 5. Box and whisker plot of the ratio: width of muzzle at M1/M2 contact/biporionic width. Labeling is the same as in fig. 3.
Text-fig. 1. Sampling areas in Çankırı province: the village of Sakarcaören near to the town of Orta (green circle) in the east of GVP, and the other sites (yellow circles), volcanic centers (red circles) and the border of GVP. The sites marked as yellow circles: ELM, Elmali village; SOG, Soguksu National Park; BUG, Bugralar village; INO, Inozu Valley South Side; INL, Inozu Valley North Side; KAR, Karasar village; MEN, Menceler Plateau; KIR, Kiraluc Site near Nuhhoca village; AGU, Asagiguney village; KUZ, Kuzca village (Bayam et al. 2018); PEL, Pelitcik village (Akkemik et al. 2009); GUD, Gudul (Akkemik et al. 2017); HOC, Hoçaş village and KOZ, Kozyaka village (Akkemik et al. 2016). The sites located in the western part (INO, INL, KAR, MEN, KIR, AGU, KUZ, HOC and KUZ) are from early – middle Burdigalian and Hancili Formation (Altun et al. 2002, Akbaş et al. 2002). The sites in the central part (GUD, BUG, ELM, PEL and SOG) are from middle – late Burdigalian, Pazar Formation (Kazancı 2012, Sen et al. 2017), and finally the fossil site in the east part of GVP is the late Miocene, Hüyükköy Formation (Sengüler 2007). in The First Glyptostroboxylon And Taxodioxylon Descriptions From The Late Miocene Of Turkey And Palaeoclimatological Evaluation
Text-fig. 1. Sampling areas in Çankırı province: the village of Sakarcaören near to the town of Orta (green circle) in the east of GVP, and the other sites (yellow circles), volcanic centers (red circles) and the border of GVP. The sites marked as yellow circles: ELM, Elmali village; SOG, Soguksu National Park; BUG, Bugralar village; INO, Inozu Valley South Side; INL, Inozu Valley North Side; KAR, Karasar village; MEN, Menceler Plateau; KIR, Kiraluc Site near Nuhhoca village; AGU, Asagiguney village; KUZ, Kuzca village (Bayam et al. 2018); PEL, Pelitcik village (Akkemik et al. 2009); GUD, Gudul (Akkemik et al. 2017); HOC, Hoçaş village and KOZ, Kozyaka village (Akkemik et al. 2016). The sites located in the western part (INO, INL, KAR, MEN, KIR, AGU, KUZ, HOC and KUZ) are from early – middle Burdigalian and Hancili Formation (Altun et al. 2002, Akbaş et al. 2002). The sites in the central part (GUD, BUG, ELM, PEL and SOG) are from middle – late Burdigalian, Pazar Formation (Kazancı 2012, Sen et al. 2017), and finally the fossil site in the east part of GVP is the late Miocene, Hüyükköy Formation (Sengüler 2007).
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.