Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2. A in Isolation by geographical distance after release from Pleistocene refugia explains genetic and phenotypic variation in Xylotrupes siamensis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

Figure 2. A, the sampling sites of Xylotrupes siamensis populations in this study. White circles indicate samples of the Tonkinensis form and grey circles the Siamensis form. The Mekong River is indicated using a thick grey line; elevational differences are shown via a coloured scale, where a lighter colour depicts higher elevation (maximum = 4000 m a.s.l.). B, location of the study area within the Asia–Pacific region. C–E, species distribution model predictions based on the Last Interglacial (C), the Last Glacial Maximum (D) and current climatic conditions (E) are shown, where darker blue indicates higher predicted climatic suitability.

Figure 6 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 6. Principal components analysis based on call frequencies of recorded Triaenops individuals (EndF, minimum frequency; FME, peak frequency; StartF, maximum frequency) and grouped by counties. Triaenops afer (Kilifi, Kwale and Laikipia) and Triaenops afer* (Nakuru). The first two principal components (PCs) account for 99.8% of the variation.

Figure 2 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences of Rhinonycteridae. The phylogeny was inferred in IQ-TREE, and its topology was similar to the Bayesian phylogeny calculated in MRBAYES. Filled red circles on nodes denote bootstrap values ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95. Filled black circles indicate bootstrap ≥ 70% and PP <0.95. Open circles indicate bootstrap <70% and PP ≥ 0.95. Unmarked nodes indicate bootstrap <70% and PP <0.95.

Figure 5 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 5. Linear discriminant function axes (DF1 and DF2) of craniodental and mandibular variables performed for all Triaenops samples after cross-validation tests. The density plot for the first and the second linear discriminants (LD1 and LD2, respectively) are presented on the right.

Figure 1 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 1. Distribution of genetic samples used in this study: inverted triangles, Paratriaenops auritus; triangles, Paratriaenops furcula; open squares, Triaenops afer; asterisk, Triaenops afer*; black circles, Triaenops menamena; blue circles, Triaenops parvus; open stars, Triaenops persicus.

Figure 4 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 4. Bayesian phylogeny of Rhinonycteridae based on four nuclear introns. The phylogeny was inferred in MRBAYES, and its topology closely resembled the maximum likelihood phylogeny calculated in IQ-TREE. Filled red circles on nodes denote bootstrap bootstrap values ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95. Filled black circles indicate bootstrap ≥ 70% and PP <0.95. Open circles indicate bootstrap <70% and PP ≥ 0.95. Unmarked nodes indicate bootstrap <70% and PP <0.95.

Figure 3 in Genetic, morphological and acoustic differentiation of African trident bats (Rhinonycteridae: Triaenops)

Figure 3. Substitution network plot for Cytb inferred in POPART v.1.7 for Triaenops afer, Triaenops afer*, Triaenops parvus and Triaenops persicus.

Figure 2 in Mitogenomics and the genetic differentiation of contemporary Balaena mysticetus (Cetacea) from Svalbard

Figure 2. Bayesian skyline plot illustrating the temporal changes in the genetic diversity of mitogenomes in Svalbard population bowhead whales. The top of the figure illustrates the time in years before present when using the 95% HPD interval of the estimated divergence time for the calculation of µ.

Figure 1 in Mitogenomics and the genetic differentiation of contemporary Balaena mysticetus (Cetacea) from Svalbard

Figure 1. Haplotype network of complete mitogenomes of 20 contemporary Svalbard bowhead whales. Each circle represents a distinct haplotype (I–IX). Circle sizes reflect the number of specimens sharing a haplotype. Numbers and black dots indicate the number of variable sites between haplotypes. Samples A–I are taken from Nyhus et al. (2016).

Figure 15. Pocillopora meandrina. A in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 15. Pocillopora meandrina. A, field appearance of P. meandrina (side view). B, skeleton of previous variation (MTQ-G65917). C and D, scanning electron micrographs of previous specimen. E, corallum of P. meandrina (side view) (MTQ-G66117). D, in situ appearance.

Figure 12 in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 12. Field appearance of taxa in partial sympatry, when growing as mosaic colonies or in approximate distance to each other. α, P. damicornis; β, P. acuta; γ, P. verrucosa; x, P. bairdi sp. nov.; e, P. eydouxi; m, P. meandrina.

Figure 9. Pocillopora aliciae. A, field appearance. B in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 9. Pocillopora aliciae. A, field appearance. B, skeleton of branch. C and D, scanning electron micrographs of corallite structure. E, corallum of holotype (MTQ-G65423) (Schmidt-Roach et al., 2013). F, typical growth from on reef slope.

Figure 7 in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 7. Illustration of morphological plasticity of the corallum of Pocillopora damicornis in different environments and at different latitudes (side views). MTQ-sample numbers: A, G66102; B, G66131; C, G66126; D, G66136; E, G66109; F, G66107; G, G66095; H, G66127; I, G66134; J, G66123; K, G66097; L, G66103; M, n/a; N, G66098; O, G66099; P, G66100; Q, G66093; R, G66094; S, G66121; T, G66091; U, G66090.

Figure 8. Pocillopora acuta. A in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 8. Pocillopora acuta. A, in situ appearance. B, skeleton of specimen. C and D, scanning electron micrographs of specimen (photos: Paul Muir). E, side view of corallum of holotype of Pocillopora acuta Lamarck, 1816 (photo: Michel Pichon). F, drawing by Esper (1791). G, P. acuta morph in situ. H, holotype of Pocillopora apiculata Ehrenberg, 1834. I, skeleton of compact morphology of P. acuta (MTQ-G66112).

Figure 13. P in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 13. P. bairdi sp. nov. A, in situ appearance. B, skeleton of specimen. C and D, scanning electron micrographs of specimen. E, corallum of holotype (side view) (MTQ-G65918). F, corallum of paratype (side view) (MTQ-G65919). G, mosaic colony including holotype (left), P. meandrina (upper right), and P. damicornis (lower right). H, previous colony in situ.

Figure 5. A in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 5. A, haplotype network based on ORF DNA sequence data and incorporating published Pocillopora sequence data from other locations across the Indian and Pacific Oceans (total alignment length 594 bp). B, geographical account of these lineages on a global scale based solely on genetic lineages.

Figure 3. A in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 3. A, DAPC of gross morphological characters. Bi-plot indication of character (see Table 1 for explanation of characters) contribution is shown in blue. Individuals are represented by dots and groups by elipses. Box, cluster-based reassignment probabilities (dotted lines indicate probabilities if Type α is excluded from calculations). B, branch-based reassignment probabilities for each cluster; bars indicate genetic lineages [probability of reassignment of a branch (N = 133) (horizontal bars, y-axis) to a certain cluster (genetic lineage) (vertical bars, x-axis) is indicated by shades: white = 0, dark grey = 1]. Clusters: α, Pocillopora damicornis; β, P. acuta; e, P. eydouxi; m, P. meandrina; δ, P. aliciae; γ, P. verrucosa; x, P. bairdi sp. nov.

Figure 1 in With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of morphometric measurements taken of corallum (side view). Numbers refer to morphometric measurements taken from each colony (see Table 1).

Figure 3 in Conservation genetics of native and European-introduced Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis)

Figure 3. Median-joining network analysis of control region haplotypes. Missing haplotypes are represented as black dots. Mutations are represented by hatch marks in connecting vectors and the size of circles is proportional to haplotype frequencies. Colours correspond to the source population. Haplotypes labelled under Unknown and listed by country correspond to the additional sequences taken from Genbank.

Figure 2 in Conservation genetics of native and European-introduced Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis)

Figure 2. Location of sampling sites and distribution of Hydropotes inermis in its native and introduced habitat. A, the range in the UK according to Dolman et al. (2010) is shown in blue, but please see Supporting Information, Figure S1 for a more detailed account of range expansion following records from the British Deer Society. B, the range in China and South Korea according to the IUCN Red List is shown in purple (Harris & Duckworth, 2015). Maps were produced in QGIS (v.3.12).