Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1. A in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 1. A. Lithological succession and biostratigraphy of the Owadów-Brzezinki Quarry. The topmost part of the Pałuki Formation and overlying limestone of the Kcynia Formation (Units I–IV). B. Road map with the location of the Owadów-Brzezinki site and its proximity to Tomaszów Mazowiecki in Central Poland. C. General view of the Owadów-Brzezinki section (i.e., Unit III and most fossiliferous Corbulomima Limestone occurring in the middle of the quarry wall).

Fig. 2 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 2. Studied specimens of actinopterygian fishes from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), OwadówBrzezinki, Poland. A–C. Loose teeth of Caturoidea indet. A. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/FT1. B. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/FT2. C. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/FT3. D. Caturoid Strobilodus sp., ZPAL P. 16/O-B/2, right dentary in lateral view. E. Pachycormid Orthocormus teyleri Lambers, 1988, ZPAL P. 16/O-B/3, left dentary (E1) and right dentary (E2) in lateral view. Dashed white lines indicate thin-sectioning plane; white arrows indicate which teeth were sampled for thin-sectioning (TS), black arrows indicate which samples were chosen for SEM analysis.

Fig. 4 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 4. Cross-sections of teeth caturoidean fishes Strobilodus sp. from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A–C. NG/PAL/VERT/OB/C1–C3, respectively, thin sections from ZPAL P.16./O-B/2, in apical (A1), mid-crown (B1), and basal (C) planes, documenting relative increase in dental pulp cavity diameter in basal direction. Incremental growth lines: irregular (A2) and more regular B2) patterns of growth are documented. Dentin drillings (arrows) present sub-superficially (B3) and superficially (B4).

Fig. 7 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 7. Teeth eruption from alveolar bone of Orthocormus teyleri Lambers, 1988, NG/PAL/VERT/OB/O4 thin section from ZPAL P. 16/O-B/3 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A1, numerous teeth erupting in posterior tooth row; A2, A3, case of rapid teeth eruption, evidence of odontogenesis of one teeth specimen atop on the another tooth. Arrows indicate the observed phenomenon.

Fig. 3 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 3. Thin sections of teeth of caturoidean fishes Caturoidea indet. (A) and Strobilodus sp. (B, C) from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A. NG/PAL/VERT/OB/C5 thin section from ZPAL P.16./O-B/FT1. A1, general view of vertical thin section with orthodentin histology (ort) and thin enameloid layer (en); A2, close view of apical section, with prominent acrodin cap (ac); A3, A4, crown mid-section with angled orthodentin tubules (highlighted) present. B, C. Horizontal cross section of Strobilodus sp. teeth in apical plane. Arrows indicate phenomena. B. NG/PAL/VERT/OB/C7 thin section from ZPAL P.16./O-B/FT3. B1, overview of teeth structure, with slight mesiodistal compression and mostly solid structure; B2, carinae present as a perturbances in mesial and distal planes of teeth. C. NG/PAL/VERT/OB/C1 thin section from ZPAL P.16./O-B/O2, small central canal surrounded by prominent dental tubules of orthodentin.

Fig. 11 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 11. Microstructure of teeth of pachycormid fish Orthocormus teyleri Lambers, 1988, ZPAL P. 16/O-B/3 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A, B. General view. C. Enameloid (en) and orthodentin (ort) surface with visible longitudinal ridging (marked by arrows). D. View of singular denteonal canal of orthodentin. E–G. Visible structure of orthodentin layer in vertical view, developed as series of winding, ridged irregular cannals. H. Basal cross section in transverse plane, with visible osteodentin (H1), arrows indicating denteonal canals (H2).

Fig. 6 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 6. Horizontal cross sections of teeth of pachycormid fish Orthocormus teyleri Lambers, 1988. A–C. NG/PAL/VERT/OB/O2–4, respectively, thin sections from ZPAL P. 16/O-B/3 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A. Apical plane with visible osteodentin (ost), surrounded by orthodentin (ort), and outermost enameloid (en). B. Mid-crown plane. B1, general view; B2, osteodentin layer encircled by marginal capillaries (arrows), which contact with orthodentin; B3, osteodentin densely packed with denteons with central denteonal canals (arrows). C. Basal plane. C1, general view; C2, individual denteons pronounced due to diagenetic processes (arrows).

Fig. 10 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 10. Structure of orthodentin of tooth of caturoid fish Strobilodus sp. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/2 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A. Boundary between orthodentin (ort) and enameloid (en). B, C. Overview of horizontal surface of orthodentin with dental tubuli (arrows). D. Vertical view of boundary between enameloid and orthodentin, with compact, regular enameloid and (E) irregular, rugose, porous orthodentin surface.

Fig. 9 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications

Fig. 9. Examples of superficial penetrations present in orthodentin of caturoid fish Strobilodus sp. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/2 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A. Overview of penetrated teeth with exposed dentin (borings marked by arrows). B. Close view of structure with visible bifurcating canals. C. Example of advanced bioerosion, with substantial surface area of orthodentin penetrated.

Fig. 4 in New material of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: Comparison with Origolestes and implications for mammal evolution

Fig. 4. Upper molars of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens sheni Han and Meng, 2016, from Aptian, Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation, Caoyang City, Liaoning Province, China. A. Holotype (HG-M016) from Shangheshou area; right ultimate premolar and M1–M6 in buccal (A1) and occlusal (A2) views, showing the corresponding cusps on different teeth. B. ZGY0053 from Dapingfang; left upper molars (M1–M6) in occlusal (B1), buccal (B2), and lingual (B3) views. Image in B3 is horizontally flipped for convenience of comparison.

Fig. 9 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 9. Wood sections of Xenoxylon hopeiense Chang, 1929 (ISTO-FW-00243) from Jurassic of the Yesilbaglar locality of the province of Erzurum, Turkey. A1–A2, transversal sections with distinct growth ring boundary; A3, predominantly uniseriate rays in tangential section.

Fig. 5 in New material of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: Comparison with Origolestes and implications for mammal evolution

Fig. 5. Lower teeth of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens sheni Han and Meng, 2016 (ZGY0053) from Aptian, Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Dapingfang, Caoyang City, Liaoning Province, China), right c–m6 in lingual (A1) and occlusal (A2) views (with the dentary bone segmented away) and in posterobuccal view (A5), left p5–m6 in buccal (A3) and occlusal (A4) views. See also Figs. 3 and 7.

Fig. 12 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 12. The sampling localities of the identified fossil genera of Protelicoxylon and Xenoxylon from the Jurassic age of the World. A. The palaeofloristic divisions of the Early–Middle Jurassic and the palaeo-locations of the fossil sites (modified after Vakhrameev 1991) and the fossil sites for NE France, Alborz, Kerman Basin, Phu Qoc, and Khorat Basins (i.e., where Protelicoxylon and Xenoxylon are documented). B. Global palaeogeographic reconstruction of the Earth in the Late Jurassic period (from Ron Blakey https://paleonerdish.wordpress.com/2015/06/01/the-real-jurassic-world/). C. Detailed palaeogeographic map of the eastern Sakarya Zone (after Şengör and Yilmaz 1981).

Fig. 5 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 5. Araucariacean wood sections of Agathoxylon sp. type 2 from Jurassic of the Beycam locality of the province of Gümüshane, Turkey.A. ISTO-FW-00235, transversal sections with distinct growth ring boundary. B. ISTO-FW-00234, short rays in tangential section (B1), intertracheary pits on tangential walls (B2). C. ISTO-FW-00239, predominantly uniseriate of intertracheary radial wall pits (C1, C2). D. ISTO-FW-00232, araucarioid type cross-field pits.

Fig. 7 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 7. Taxacean wood sections of Protelicoxylon asiaticum (Serra, 1969) Philippe, 1995 (ISTO-FW-00242) from Jurassic of the Yesilbaglar locality of the province of Erzurum, Turkey. A1, A2, axial parenchyma in tangential sections; A3, intertracheary pits in tangential section; A4, A5, spiral thickening on tracheid walls; A6, homogenous ray, araucarian and uniseriate intertracheary pits on radial walls.

Fig. 6 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 6. Taxacean wood sections of Protelicoxylon asiaticum (Serra, 1969) Philippe, 1995 (ISTO-FW-00242) from Jurassic of the Yesilbaglar locality of the province of Erzurum, Turkey. A1,A2, transversal sections with distinct growth ring boundary; A3,A4, tangential sections with predominantly uniseriate and short rays.

Fig. 8 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 8. Taxacean wood sections of Protelicoxylon asiaticum (Serra, 1969) Philippe, 1995 (ISTO-FW-00242) from Jurassic of the Yesilbaglar locality of the province of Erzurum, Turkey. A1–A4, homogenous ray, araucarian and uniseriate intertracheary pits on radial walls; A1, A3, A4, araucarian cross-fields pits with 3-13, each of them cupressoid in cross-fields.

Fig. 3 in New material of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: Comparison with Origolestes and implications for mammal evolution

Fig. 3. CT-rendered lower jaws and dentitions of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens sheni Han and Meng, 2016 (ZGY0053), from Aptian, Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Dapingfang, Caoyang City, Liaoning Province, China. A1–A3, left upper and lower dentition and dentary in medial (only teeth), lateral, and occlusal views, respectively. A4–A6, right upper and lower dentition and dentary in lateral, medial, and occlusal views, respectively. Note: angular end is not the mandibular condyle (see Fig. 6); coronoid tubercle, mis-labelled as "cp" in Han and Meng (2016: fig. 10). Upper and lower teeth in A1, A2, A4, A5 are in the original position that were preserved. Arrows in A2, A4 point to mental foramina (note the difference between the two mandibles). Question mark in A5 points to a faint groove that is not the Meckelian groove (compared to that of Origolestes lii in Fig. 6B).

Fig. 1 in New material of the trechnotherian mammal Lactodens from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: Comparison with Origolestes and implications for mammal evolution

Fig. 1. New specimen of Lactodens sheni Han and Meng, 2016 (ZGY0053) from Aptian, Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Dapingfang, Caoyang City, Liaoning Province, China. A. Partial skeleton in dorsal view that is preserved in the main slab. B. CT rendered partial skull; mostly ventral portion with teeth in dorsal (B1) and ventral (B2) views and mainly the skull roof in dorsal (B3) and ventral (B4) views.

Fig. 11 in Palaeobiogeographical implications of the first fossil wood flora from the Jurassic of Turkey

Fig. 11. Wood sections of Xenoxylon hopeiense Chang, 1929 (ISTO-FW-00243) from Jurassic of the Yesilbaglar locality of the province of Erzurum, Turkey. A1–A3, intertracheary pits on radial walls uniseriate or in some cases biseriate opposite, intertracheary pits locally xenoxylean, mostly strongly flattened, pit rows locally interrupted, rims of Sanio commonly present between both uniseriate and biseriate pits; A4–A6, window-like cross-field pits.