Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
609
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
609 results for “morphometric analysis”
Figure 3 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)
Figure 3. Shape differentiation of the mandible on the first two axes of the PCA on mean species centroid coordinates. Outlines are reconstructed on the first two principal components; light grey outline represents the maximum values of the axes, dark grey outline corresponds to extreme reconstruction. Solid symbols indicate families with hystricomorphous skull: squares, Anomaluridae; rhombi, Ctenodactylidae; circles, Pedetidae; triangles, Dipodidae; stars, Graphiurinae. Open symbols indicate myomorph families: stars, Gliridae (Glirinae/Leithiinae); rhombi, Nesomyidae; circles, Muridae; triangles, Cricetidae. Upper left, mean projection for each family, with the minimum spanning tree.
Figure 5 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)
Figure 5. Mapping of the four infraorbital structures on a phylogenetic tree derived from Huchon et al. (2002) and Adkins et al. (2003). Boxes: dashed, protrogomorphous condition; white, sciuromorphous condition; light grey, hystricomorphous condition; dark grey, myomorphous condition. Abbreviations: iof, infraorbital foramen; zp, zygomatic plate.
Figure 2 from: Rao U, Rao S, Rathi A, Gothalwal R, Atkinson H (2011) A comparison of the variation in Indian populations of pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani revealed by morphometric and AFLP analysis. ZooKeys 135: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.135.1344
Figure 2 - AFLP Autoradiogram of pigeon pea cyst nematode Heterodera cajani with EcoRI (+AAG) + MseI, (+CAG) and EcoRI (+AAA) + MseI (CTA). Lane 1 to 11: Heterodera cajani populations from Andhra Pradesh, Allahabad, Bahadurgarh, Coimbatore, Kanpur-1, Ghaziabad, Gilberga, Hisar, Delhi, Kanpur-2, andMeja.
Figure 3 from: Rao U, Rao S, Rathi A, Gothalwal R, Atkinson H (2011) A comparison of the variation in Indian populations of pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani revealed by morphometric and AFLP analysis. ZooKeys 135: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.135.1344
Figure 3 - Dendograms from cluster analysis of Heterodera cajani a) for 1278 amplified restriction fragment digests using 24 primer pairs and b) the four primer pairs that suggest a similar dendogram to the full set. The using the upper tail rule the best cut procedure indicated the highest number of significant cluster partitions was 3 as in both cases with realised deviates and t statistics respectively of a) 1.47 and 4.66 and b) 1.59 and 5.04.
Figure 1 from: Rao U, Rao S, Rathi A, Gothalwal R, Atkinson H (2011) A comparison of the variation in Indian populations of pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani revealed by morphometric and AFLP analysis. ZooKeys 135: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.135.1344
Figure 1 - Dendograms from cluster analysis a) for the nine biometric measurements made on second stage juveniles of eleven populations of Heterodera cajani (see Table 2 for data) b) vulval cones of cysts of the same populations. (See Table 3 for data). The using the upper tail rule the best cut procedure indicated the highest number of significant cluster partitions was for a) 2 and for b) 3 with realized deviates and t- statistics respectively of a) 2.71 and 8.56 and b) 1.04 and 3.27.
Figure 4 from: Rao U, Rao S, Rathi A, Gothalwal R, Atkinson H (2011) A comparison of the variation in Indian populations of pigeonpea cyst nematode, Heterodera cajani revealed by morphometric and AFLP analysis. ZooKeys 135: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.135.1344
Figure 4 - India Map showing distances of collected 11 Heterodera cajani populations with distances in (Kilometres)
Figure 2 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 2 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the genera of Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (74.39% of total variation) and PC2 (8.52% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each genus is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 5 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 5 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Themus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (32.87% of total variation) and PC2 (16.48% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 4 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 4 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Prothemus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (38.40% of total variation) and PC2 (15.88% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 3 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 3 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Lycocerus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (49.02% of total variation) and PC2 (14.92% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 6 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 6 - Comparisons of centroid size variables among different groups: A Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus B Lycocerus asperipennis, Lycocerus metallescens and Lycocerus orientalis; Prothemus chinensis, Prothemus kiukiangensis and Prothemus purpuripennis; Themus licenti, Themus coelestis and Themus impressipennis.
Figure 9 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 9 - Mesosoma in dorsal view. A Camponotus androy (CASENT0453723) B Camponotus bevohitra (CASENT0437238).
Figure 6 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 6 - Individual minor worker in profile. A Camponotus ethicus (CASENT0409948) B Camponotus alamaina (CASENT0499291).
Figure 8 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 8 - Mesosoma in lateral view. A Camponotus alamaina (CASENT0499291) B Camponotus androy (CASENT0453723).
Figure 7 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 7 - Lateral view of mesosoma. A Camponotus ethicus (CASENT0409949) B Camponotus robustus (CASENT0066723).
Figure 5 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 5 - Mesosoma and petiolar node in profile. A Camponotus alamaina (CASENT0499291) B Camponotus zavo (CASENT0060041).
Figure 3 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 3 - Head in full-face view and body in lateral view of the worker castes of Camponotus alamaina. A, B minor worker (CASENT0499291) C, D major worker (CASENT0179431).
Figure 27 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 27 - Camponotus mifaka minor worker CASENT0217301. A lateral view B head in full-face view C dorsal view.
Figure 17 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 17 - Mesosoma in profile and in dorsal view. A, B Camponotus tratra (CASENT0763608) C, D Camponotus zavo (CASENT0060041).
Figure 22 from: Rakotonirina JC, Csősz S, Fisher BL (2016) Revision of the Malagasy Camponotus edmondi species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae): integrating qualitative morphology and multivariate morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 572: 81-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.572.7177
Figure 22 - Camponotus echinoploides minor worker CASENT0409171. A lateral view B head in full-face view C dorsal view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.