Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,059
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,059 results for “Journal”
Figure 2 from: Starr CK, Bhukal R, Ballah ST (2020) Observations of neotropical social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) preying on eggs and tadpoles of the frog Engystomops pustulosus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 78: 91-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.78.54409
Figure 2 Angiopolybia pallens burrowing into an Engystomops pustulosus foam nest.
Figure 2 from: Chan-Canche R, Ballina-Gómez H, Leirana-Alcocer J, Bordera S, González-Moreno A (2020) Sampling of parasitoid Hymenoptera: influence of the height on the ground. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 78: 19-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.78.54309
Figure 2 Measurement of FW: fore wing, using millimeter sheet.
Figure 4 from: Cruz-Bustos J, Montoya P, Pérez-Lachaud G, Valle-Mora J, Liedo P (2020) Biological attributes of diapausing and non-diapausing Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a parasitoid of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera, Tephritidae) fruit flies. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 78: 41-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.78.52269
Figure 4 Female survival of Doryctobracon areolatus parasitoids in the fecundity bioassays.
Figure 2 from: Gardiner T (2020) Slipping a disc! Utilisation of harrowed strips by Orthoptera on a Breckland grass-heath. Journal of Orthoptera Research 29(2): 127-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.51900
Figure 2 Nymph (both species combined) and adult density for two grasshopper species.
Figure 3 from: Żurawlew P, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Szymański P, Herman DB (2020) New records of exotic crickets in Europe: Homoeogryllus species (Orthoptera: Gryllidea: Phalangopsidae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 29(2): 121-125. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.50387
Figure 3 Homoeogryllus tessellatus (Serville, 1838) male observed in Warsaw (Poland).
Fig 4 from: Wang T, Shi F (2020) New taxa of the tribe Meconematini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Meconematinae) and the male song characters from China. Journal of Orthoptera Research 29(2): 115-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.49821
Fig 4 Spectrum of male calling song of P. yaoluopingensissp. nov. (Hanning window, 512 points).
Supplementary Video Material (S1, S2) for manuscript submission to JCM (Journal of Clinical Medicine)
<p><strong>Video S1</strong>: Execution of Le Fort 1 osteotomy under VOSTARS guidance.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Video S2</strong>: Augmentation of anatomical facial structures using the VOSTARS device</p>
Figure 11 from: Sun S-P, Wang T, Li T, Sheng M-L (2020) Two new species of Strongylopsis Brauns (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae) from Beijing, and a key to all species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 79: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.79.57726
Figure 11 Strongylopsis punctata Sheng & Sun, sp. nov. Holotype. Female. Habitus, lateral view.
Figure 18 from: Sun S-P, Wang T, Li T, Sheng M-L (2020) Two new species of Strongylopsis Brauns (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae) from Beijing, and a key to all species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 79: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.79.57726
Figure 18 Strongylopsis punctata Sheng & Sun, sp.n. Holotype. Female. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Figure 1 from: Cassar T, Mifsud D (2020) The introduction and establishment of Sceliphron caementarium (Drury, 1773) (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) in Malta (Central Mediterranean). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 79: 163-168. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.79.58659
Figure 1 Female Sceliphron caementarium collecting mud in Ħ'Attard, Malta.
NVivo files for paper on Corporate Social (ir)Responsibility and Dam Building (Journal of Business Ethics)
<p>These NVivo (.npv) files contain the coded sources in .pdf format for a paper to be submitted to the Journal of Business Ethics on 25 December 2020</p>
Figure 3 from: Noyes JS, Else GR (2020) Michael Charles Day (1942–2020). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 193-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.60742
Figure 3 Mick outside his home in Pen y Cae, April 2015 (Photo George Else).
Figure 19-20 from: Gates MW, Zhang YM, Buffington ML (2020) The great greenbriers gall mystery resolved? New species of Aprostocetus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) gall inducer and two new parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Eurytomidae) associated with Smilax L. in southern Florida, USA. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 71-98. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59466
Figure 19-20 Phylloxeroxenus smilax19 female habitus 20 male habitus.
Figure 2-3 from: Gates MW, Zhang YM, Buffington ML (2020) The great greenbriers gall mystery resolved? New species of Aprostocetus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) gall inducer and two new parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Eurytomidae) associated with Smilax L. in southern Florida, USA. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 71-98. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59466
Figure 2-3 Aprostocetus smilax2 female habitus 3 male habitus.
Figure 35-36 from: Gates MW, Zhang YM, Buffington ML (2020) The great greenbriers gall mystery resolved? New species of Aprostocetus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) gall inducer and two new parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Eurytomidae) associated with Smilax L. in southern Florida, USA. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 71-98. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59466
Figure 35-36 Sycophila smilax35 female habitus 36 male habitus.
Figure 4 from: Coelho JR, Hastings JM, Holliday CW (2020) Nesting ecology of the Pacific cicada killer, Sphecius convallis Patton (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae), in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59206
Figure 4 The timing of burrow construction in Sphecius convallis.
Figure 3 from: Coelho JR, Hastings JM, Holliday CW (2020) Nesting ecology of the Pacific cicada killer, Sphecius convallis Patton (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae), in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59206
Figure 3 The timing of male emergence, female emergence and mating in Sphecius convallis.
Figure 1 from: Coelho JR, Hastings JM, Holliday CW (2020) Nesting ecology of the Pacific cicada killer, Sphecius convallis Patton (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae), in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.59206
Figure 1 Map of burrow aggregation sites on the Ruby mine tailings.
Data from: Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010
Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and "withdraw" from it by submitting manuscripts that are subsequently reviewed. So far as we are aware, there has been no quantification of the balance of individual's contributions and withdrawals. We compared the number of reviews provided by individual researchers (i.e., their contribution) to the number required by their submissions (i.e. their withdrawals) in a large and anonymised database provided by the British Ecological Society. The database covered the Journal of Ecology, Journal of Animal Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology, and Functional Ecology from 2003–2010. The majority of researchers (64%) did not have balanced contributions and withdrawals. Depending on assumptions, 12% to 44% contributed more than twice as much as required; 20% to 52% contributed less than half as much as required. Balance, or lack thereof, varied little in relation to the number of years a researcher had been active (reviewing or submitting). Researchers who contributed less than required did not lack the opportunity to review. Researchers who submitted more were more likely to accept invitations to review. These finding suggest overall that peer review of the four analysed journals is not in crisis, but only due to the favourable balance of over- and under-contributing researchers. These findings are limited to the four journals analysed, and therefore cannot include researcher's other peer review activities, which if included might change the proportions reported. Relatively low effort was required to assemble, check, and analyse the data. Broader analyses of individual researcher's peer review activities would contribute to greater quality, efficiency, and fairness in the peer review system.
Data from: Comparison of methodological quality of positive versus negative comparative studies published in Indian medical journals: a systematic review
Objectives: Published negative studies should have the same rigour of methodological quality as studies with positive findings. However, the methodological quality of negative versus positive studies is not known. The objective was to assess the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies published in Indian medical journals. Design: A systematic review (SR) was performed of all comparative studies published in Indian medical journals with a clinical science focus and impact factor >1 between 2011 and 2013. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The results were considered positive if the primary outcome was statistically significant and negative otherwise. When the primary outcome was not specified, we used data on the first outcome reported in the history followed by the results section. Differences in various methodological quality domains between positive versus negative studies were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Results: Seven journals with 259 comparative studies were included in this SR. 24% (63/259) were RCTs, 24% (63/259) cohort studies, and 49% (128/259) case–control studies. 53% (137/259) of studies explicitly reported the primary outcome. Five studies did not report sufficient data to enable us to determine if results were positive or negative. Statistical significance was determined by p value in 78.3% (199/254), CI in 2.8% (7/254), both p value and CI in 11.8% (30/254), and only descriptive in 6.3% (16/254) of studies. The overall methodological quality was poor and no statistically significant differences between reporting of methodological quality were detected between studies with positive versus negative findings. Conclusions: There was no difference in the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies. However, the uneven reporting of positive versus negative studies (72% vs 28%) indicates a publication bias in Indian medical journals with an impact factor of >1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.