Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 6. Four examples of the tissue expression profiling of unknown distinct unigenes (>500 bp) expressed highly in male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis. Relative expression levels were determined as described in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 4. Kyoto encyclopedia of gene and genomes (KEGG) analysis of unigenes expressed highly in male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis. Each category contains more than 1 unigene sequences.

Fig. 2 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 2. Clusters of orthologous groups (COG) functional classification of unigenes expressed highly and specifically in male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis.

Fig. 1 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 1. Statistics of sequences expressed specifically in each analyzed tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis.

Fig. 5 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 5. Six examples of the tissue expression profiling of predicted distinct unigenes (>500 bp) expressed highly in male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis. Relative expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR in head (HE), thorax (TH), abdomen (AB), midgut (MG), fat body (FB), Malpighian tubules (MT), testes (TE), and male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct (MAG) samples from B. dorsalis males. Relative expression levels were calculated based on the value in head, which was ascribed an arbitrary value of 1. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences based on Tukey's test (P ≤ 0.05).

Fig. 3 in Comparative transcriptome analysis of three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) organs to identify functional genes in the male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct

Fig. 3. Gene ontology (GO) classification of unigenes expressed highly in male accessory glands and ejaculatory duct tissue of Bactrocera dorsalis.

Fig. 2. Chromatograph comparing original and redesigned primers for Ccmic3 in Inheritance of fifeen microsatellite loci in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 2. Chromatograph comparing original and redesigned primers for Ccmic3 on sample A1-F1-07, Family A1. Both reactions were run simultaneously on the same fragment analysis plate using the same PCR conditions, DNA concentrations, and dilution factor. a) Chromatograph of progeny exhibiting an allele call of 74/74. Parents are 74/76 and 76/76. The observed 76 bp peak was considered to be weak. Cloning and sequencing confirmed the existence of this 76 bp fragment. b) Chromatograph of the same progeny as in Fig. 2a now exhibiting an allele call of 72/74 afer primer modification. Parents are now 72/74 and 74/74. The observed 74 bp peak is more pronounced compared to the previous 76 bp call. The intensity of the 74 bp peak also increased while the other 3 visible peaks decreased. This suggests an increase in adenylation has occurred.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in A comparative analysis of resistance testing methods in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from St. Johns County, Florida

Fig. 1. Collection site locations in St. Johns County, Florida, for the 3 Aedes albopictus field strains tested for resistance in this study. RAYS is 14.7 km from ELKTON. RAYS is 6.6 km from BEACH. ELKTON and BEACH are 18.0 km apart. ELKTON and RAYS were the F1 and F2 sites in Marcombe et al. (2014).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig. 1. A in Endoparasites of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark 2009-2012 - A comparative study

Fig. 1. A map of Denmark showing the regions where the animals were sampled from 2009 to 2012. The grey shading indicates the mainland (Jutland), and the black shading the islands (Zealand, Funen, MØn, Lolland). Numbers above the bars are the sample sizes of each host species in each region.

Fig. 6 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 6. Termination-associated sequences (TAS), conserved sequence blocks (CSB-1, CSB-2, and CSB-3) and central conserved sequences (CSB-D) and GTGGG box in control region of two Oxyurichthys species mitogenomes.

Fig. 8 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 8. Phylogenetic trees of goby derived from Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on 13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs. The numbers at nodes are ultrafast bootstrap values. GenBank accession numbers are placed in front of species names.

Fig. 7 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 7. Phylogenetic trees of goby derived from Bayesian Inference (BI) method based on 13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs. The numbers at nodes are posterior probability values. GenBank accession numbers are placed in front of species names.

Fig. 5 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 5. The putative origin of L-strand replication (OL) of Oxyurichthys ophthalmonema (a) and Oxyurichthys microlepis (b).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 6. МоΔеΛирование экоΛогических ниш коΛораΔского жука ΔΛя ΔаΛьневосточного, европейского и североамериканского ареаΛов метоΔом метрического Δвухмерного шкаΛирования с применением коэффициента Жаккара Fig. 6. Models of ecological niches of the Colorado potato beetle for the Far Eastern, European, and North-American habitats (metric multidimensional scaling, Jaccard index) in Comparative characterization of the ecology of native (Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata) and invasive (Leptinoatrsa decemlineata) species under the conditions of the monsoon climate in the southern part of the Russian Far East

Рис. 6. МоΔеΛирование экоΛогических ниш коΛораΔского жука ΔΛя ΔаΛьневосточного, европейского и североамериканского ареаΛов метоΔом метрического Δвухмерного шкаΛирования с применением коэффициента Жаккара Fig. 6. Models of ecological niches of the Colorado potato beetle for the Far Eastern, European, and North-American habitats (metric multidimensional scaling, Jaccard index)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 1. ЗасеΛенность посаΔок картофеΛя коΛораΔским жуком в Приморском крае (2008-2011 гг.) (по: Мацишина, Рогатных 2013) Примечание. БаΛΛ поврежΔения привеΔен по 6-баΛΛьной шкаΛе ВИЗР (Шапиро и Δр., 1980; 1993) in Comparative characterization of the ecology of native (Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata) and invasive (Leptinoatrsa decemlineata) species under the conditions of the monsoon climate in the southern part of the Russian Far East

Рис. 1. ЗасеΛенность посаΔок картофеΛя коΛораΔским жуком в Приморском крае (2008-2011 гг.) (по: Мацишина, Рогатных 2013) Примечание. БаΛΛ поврежΔения привеΔен по 6-баΛΛьной шкаΛе ВИЗР (Шапиро и Δр., 1980; 1993)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Figure 1 in Comparative floristic diversity of Southwest Primorye and neighboring areas of the Russian Far East

Figure 1. Geographical location of Southwest Primorye, structured in administrative units, and floristic regionalization of the southern part of the Russian Far East (RFE). 1 - national boundary of the Russian Federation; 2 - boundaries of administrative units; 3 boundaries of floristic districts; 4 boundaries of floristic subdistricts; 5 - boundary of Amur River basin (watershed line); 6 - boundaries of Southwest Primorye. Floristic districts: Okh. - Okhotsk (with subdistricts: C - central, S - southern), Ald. - Aldan, Nyuk. - Nyukzha, Daur. - Dauria, N. Sakh. - North-Sakhalin, U.Z. - Upper-Zeya, L.Z. - Low-Zeya, Bur. - Bureya, Amg. - Amgun, Uss. - Ussuri (with subdistricts: N - northern, C - central, S - southern), S. Sakh. - South Sakhalin. Floristic regionalization is given according to edition "Vascular plants of Soviet Far East" (Kharkevich, 1985-1996; Kharkevich and Tzvelev, 2003).

Fig. 10. A in Megascolex (Perichaeta) diffringens Baird, 1869 and Pheretima pingi Stephenson, 1925 types compared to the Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, 1867) and A. carnosus (Goto & Hatai, 1899) species-groups (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Megascolecidae)

Fig. 10. A. corticis - Ohfuchi's (1937: fig. 4) three representative forms of his 'P. heteropoda' from Japan that is now a synonym of A. corticis. However, the central figure agrees almost exactly with A. diffringens types (as described herein) having markings just above spermathecal pores (Fig. 9) while the outer two specimens seem to agree with those A. corticis Korean specimens figured that provided DNA sample WO4- WO5 (Figs. 1, 5).

Fig. 6 in Megascolex (Perichaeta) diffringens Baird, 1869 and Pheretima pingi Stephenson, 1925 types compared to the Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, 1867) and A. carnosus (Goto & Hatai, 1899) species-groups (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Megascolecidae)

Fig. 6. Amynthas corticis - specimen from Incheon (NIBRIV261267, DNA sample w59) with enlargements of main characteristics; [boxed are sketches of GMs of two other sympatric specimens - IV261270]. The unusual arrangement of GMs around male pores suggested a new taxon but DNA did not differ from other A. corticis specimens (Fig. 1; Appendix and cf. A. hongkongensis, A. hatomajimensis and A. cruxus).

Fig. 5 in Megascolex (Perichaeta) diffringens Baird, 1869 and Pheretima pingi Stephenson, 1925 types compared to the Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, 1867) and A. carnosus (Goto & Hatai, 1899) species-groups (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Megascolecidae)

Fig. 5. Amynthas corticis - specimen from Korea (DNA sample WO4) showing X2 enlargement of aberrant spermatheca and the male pore 18rhs; second specimen (DNA sample WO5) and [boxed] the male pore 18rhs of third specimen (DNA WO6). Note: these specimens with superficially different GMs comply genetically (see Fig. 1 and cf Fig. 10).

Fig. 12 in Megascolex (Perichaeta) diffringens Baird, 1869 and Pheretima pingi Stephenson, 1925 types compared to the Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, 1867) and A. carnosus (Goto & Hatai, 1899) species-groups (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Megascolecidae)

Fig. 12. Amynthas fornicatus showing Gates' (1935: figs. 5-6) most uninformative and irrelevant details of spermathecae invoking adage "missing the forest for the trees".