Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 9 in A new bat species of the genus Myotis with comments on the phylogenetic placement of M. keaysi and M. pilosatibialis

Figure 9. Dorsal and ventral views of the skins of the holotype of M. armiensis sp. n. (MSB 262089), M. pilosatibialis str.(TCWC 24101, paratype), and M. keaysistr. (MSB 70381). Scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 8 in A new bat species of the genus Myotis with comments on the phylogenetic placement of M. keaysi and M. pilosatibialis

Figure 8. Dorsal (A) and ventral view (B) of the cranium,dorsal view of the mandible (C), and lateral view of the cranium (D) and mandible of the holotype of M. armiensis sp. n. (MSB 262089). Scale bar = 5 mm. Photograph taken by John Korbin (Sandia National Laboratory-New Mexico, USA).

Figure 7 in A new bat species of the genus Myotis with comments on the phylogenetic placement of M. keaysi and M. pilosatibialis

Figure 7. Adult female of Myotis armiensis sp. n. (QCAZ 17245) captured at Cabañas del Aliso, Cosanga, Napo Province, Ecuador. Photographed by Carlos Carrión Bonilla.

Figure 10 in A new bat species of the genus Myotis with comments on the phylogenetic placement of M. keaysi and M. pilosatibialis

Figure 10. Map of part of Central and South America showing localities examined for M. armiensis, with triangle (type locality) and distribution in Costa Rica, Panamá, and Ecuador with circles. See Appendix I for localities of examined in Panamá and Ecuador.

Fig. 9 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 9. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., paratype female. (A) Labium and maxillae, ventral view. (B) Left maxillae, ventral view. (C) Detail of spiniform setae on maxillae, ventral view. (D) Spermatheca, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 6 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 6. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., palp of holotype male. (A) Retrolateral view. (B) Ventral view (C) Prolateral view. (D) Detail of cymbium, retrolateral view (red square indicates the long spiniform setae area). (E) Detail of cymbium, ventral view (black arrow indicates the long spiniform setae). Cy = cymbium, Ti = tibia. Scale bars: 1 mm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 12 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 12. Most parsimonious cladogram using implied weighting. Black circles = exclusive synapomorphies; white circles = homoplasies; number above the circles = characters; number below the circles = states. Photo credit of male of Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov.: Juan C. Chaparro.

Fig. 4 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 4. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., holotype male. (A) Labium and maxillae, ventral view. (B) Left maxillae, ventral view. (C) Detail of spiniform setae on ventral maxillae, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 10 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 10. (A–B) Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., male, habitus. (C) Habitat from type locality (San Jos´e) of Chinchaysuyu gen. nov.

Fig. 8 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 8. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., paratype female. (A) Carapace, dorsal view. (B) Abdomen, dorsal view. (C) Abdomen, ventral view. (D) Sternum, labium and maxillae, ventral view. (E) Eyes, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 5. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., tibial apophysis of holotype male. (A) Retrolateral view. (B) Prolateral view. (C) Ventral view. (D) Detail of branches, proventral view. Me = metatarsus, PB = prolateral branch, RB = retrolateral branch, Ti = tibia. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 3. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., holotype male. (A) Carapace, dorsal view. (B) Abdomen, dorsal view. (C) Sternum, labium and maxillae, ventral view. (D) Eyes, dorsal view. (E) Abdomen, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 2. Scanning electron photographs from male of Chinchaysuyu gen. nov. and Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov. (A) Labial cuspules. (B) Tibial apophysis, ventral view. (C) Maxillary spiniform setae. (D) Detail of maxillary spiniform setae. (E) Cymbium, ventroretrolateral. (F) Detail of the long spiniform setae on cymbium, retrolateral.

Fig. 7 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 7. Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov., palpal bulb of holotype male. (A) Prolateral view. (B) Retrolateral view. (C) Ventral view. (D) Dorsal view. (E) Detail of prolateral distal area (F) Detail of ventral distal area. PACK = prolateral accessory central keel, PAIK = prolateral accessory inferior keel, PAKs = prolateral accessory keels, PI = prolateral inferior keel, PS = prolateral superior keel, R = retrolateral keel. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in A new tarantula (Mygalomorphae: Theraphosidae) genus endemic from Peru with a novel genitalic morphology among theraphosinae and its phylogenetic placement

Fig. 1. Scanning electron photographs from male palpal bulb of Chinchaysuyu gen. nov. and Chinchaysuyu spinosa sp. nov. (A) Prolateral view. (B) Detail of subtegulum, prolateral view. (C) Retrolateral view. (D) Detail of embolus, retrolateral view. (E) Detail of embolus, prolateral view. E = embolus, PACK = prolateral accessory central keel, PAIK = prolateral accessory inferior keel, PAKs = prolateral accessory keels, PI = prolateral inferior keel, PS = prolateral superior keel, R = retrolateral keel.

opennotspecifiedApr 2023View details →

Fig. 1. Bayesian 50 in A molecular phylogeny of Boronia (Rutaceae): placement of enigmatic taxa and a revised infrageneric classification

Fig. 1. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree from the combined analysis of two nuclear (ITS, ETS) and three plastid markers (psbA–trnH, trnL–trnF and rbcL), with thick lines showing supported clades (≥0.95 PP). Jackknife percentages from MP analysis are indicated with symbols above branches: 100% JK (closed triangle); 90–99% JK (closed circle); 75–89% JK (open triangle); 50–74% JK (open circle). New or revised sectional assignments are indicated in bold. Section Boronia clade has been collapsed and is shown in detail in Fig. 2.

FIGURE 3 in Range extension of the Mexican-endemic killifish Profundulus chimalapensis (Cyprinodontiformes: Profundulidae), with comments on its phylogenetic placement and possible intergeneric hybridization with Tlaloc Álvarez & Carranza 1951

FIGURE 3. Phylogeny of Profundulidae based on comparative COI sequence data, highlighting (in red) the phylogenetic position of samples from the newly discovered populations of P. chimalapensis (Sabinal, Suchiapa, and Ostuta rivers), as well as from the putative hybrids between P. chimalapensis and Tlaloc. For these samples, terminal labels consist of the species name followed by the voucher specimen in parentheses. For the remaining samples (in black), terminal labels consist of the species name followed by the GenBank accession number of the corresponding COI sequence. Outgroup (Fundulus heteroclitus) not shown. Nodal support as bootstrap values (B).

FIGURE 2 in Range extension of the Mexican-endemic killifish Profundulus chimalapensis (Cyprinodontiformes: Profundulidae), with comments on its phylogenetic placement and possible intergeneric hybridization with Tlaloc Álvarez & Carranza 1951

FIGURE 2. Photographs of the three collecting sites/areas representing the new records of P. chimalapensis that prompted the range extension reported here: A) Río Sabinal near the resurgence of the Paso Burro cave (featuring JA and SGH while electrofishing), B) Río Ostuta, and C) Río Suchiapa near the resurgence of the Chorro Grande cave.

FIGURE 1 in Range extension of the Mexican-endemic killifish Profundulus chimalapensis (Cyprinodontiformes: Profundulidae), with comments on its phylogenetic placement and possible intergeneric hybridization with Tlaloc Álvarez & Carranza 1951

FIGURE 1. Map of the study area showcasing the geographic distribution of P. chimalapensis based on records from the species description (Del Moral-Flores et al., 2020), a subsequent taxonomic synthesis of the family Profundulidae (DomínguezCisneros et al., 2023), and the new records herein reported.

FIGURE 4. Photographs from a in Range extension of the Mexican-endemic killifish Profundulus chimalapensis (Cyprinodontiformes: Profundulidae), with comments on its phylogenetic placement and possible intergeneric hybridization with Tlaloc Álvarez & Carranza 1951

FIGURE 4. Photographs from a selection of preserved specimens representing the newly discovered populations of P. chimalapensis from: Río Sabinal [CNPE-IBUNAM 24365] (A), including putative P. chimalapensis × Tlaloc hybrids (B), a stream draining from the Chorro Grande cave into the Río Suchiapa [CNPE-IBUNAM 24366] (C), and Río Ostuta [CNPEIBUNAM 24367] (D). Scale bar = 1 cm.