Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedOct 2019View details →

FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 2. Adult Datnioides pulcher, ca. 250 mm SL, aquarium specimen. Photo by B. Lee.

opennotspecifiedOct 2019View details →

FIGURE 4. Larval Lobotes surinamensis, 5.9 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 4. Larval Lobotes surinamensis, 5.9 mm SL (after Watson 1996).

opennotspecifiedOct 2019View details →

FIGURE 6. Larval Hapalogenys nitens, 7.3 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 6. Larval Hapalogenys nitens, 7.3 mm SL, from Japan (after Kinoshita 1988).

Figures 25-34 from: Valentas-Romera BL, Simone LRL, Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R (2019) Anatomical redescription of Cyrenoida floridana (Bivalvia, Cyrenoididae) from the Western Atlantic and its position in the Cyrenoidea. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 517-534. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.38456

Figures 25-34 Anatomy of Cyrenoida floridana (FMNH 328260). 25. Right view valve removed, some structures seen by transparency of mantle lobe; 26. Same, with mantle and gill removed; 27. Incurrent and excurrent siphons, posterolateral view, right mantle lobe partially removed, some adjacent structures shown; 28. Siphonal tips; right view, both partially sectioned longitudinally; 29. Mantle border, section in its ventromedial portion; 30. Gill, transverse section in its central portion; 31. Incurrent and excurrent siphons, interior view, with details of their base and siphonal muscles; 32. Labial palps, ventral view, outer hemipalps deflected dorsally; 33. Posteroventral visceral region, ventral view, showing fusion of inner demibranchs in siphonal base; 34. Pericardial region, posterodorsal view, dorsal mantle wall partially removed. Scale bars: 2 mm (25–28, 31, 33–34); 1 mm (29, 30, 32).

Figures 35-41 from: Valentas-Romera BL, Simone LRL, Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R (2019) Anatomical redescription of Cyrenoida floridana (Bivalvia, Cyrenoididae) from the Western Atlantic and its position in the Cyrenoidea. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 517-534. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.38456

Figures 35-41 Anatomy of Cyrenoida floridana (FMNH 328260). 35. Digestive tubes as in situ; right lateral view; 36. Stomach, left lateral view; 37. Stomach, right lateral view, right wall opened and deflected to show inner gastric surface; 38. Cerebral ganglia, ventral view; 39. Visceral ganglia, ventral view; 40. Pedal ganglia; right figure in lateral right view, left figure in dorsal view; 41. Nervous system topology, right lateral view. Scale bars: 2 mm (35–41, 40); 0.5 mm (38–40).

Figures 11-24 from: Valentas-Romera BL, Simone LRL, Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R (2019) Anatomical redescription of Cyrenoida floridana (Bivalvia, Cyrenoididae) from the Western Atlantic and its position in the Cyrenoidea. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 517-534. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.38456

Figures 11-24 Cyrenoida floridana, shell and gills details. 11–22, 23.UF 246126; 24.FMNH 328260. 11. Left valve, external view; 12. Right valve, external view; 13. Dorsal view of shell; 14. Anterior view of shell; 15. Posterior view of shell; 16. Left valve, internal view, muscle scars and pallial line outlined; 17. Right valve, internal view; 18. Left hinge, SEM; 19. Right hinge, SEM; 20. Internal surface of shell, SEM, showing microtubule orifices; 21. Detail of microtubule patch; 22. Fractured shell showing microtubules partially through shell thickness; 23. Detail of nodules at shell internal surface; 24. Gill fragment, transverse section, SEM. Scale bars: 1 mm (11–17, 23); 200 µm (18, 19); 20 µm (20–22), 0.5 mm (23); 10 µm (24).

Figures 1-10 from: Valentas-Romera BL, Simone LRL, Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R (2019) Anatomical redescription of Cyrenoida floridana (Bivalvia, Cyrenoididae) from the Western Atlantic and its position in the Cyrenoidea. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 517-534. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.38456

Figures 1-10 Syntypes of Cyrenoida floridana and lectotype of C. guatemalensis. 1–4.Cyrenoida floridana (USNM 46846, length 12 mm, height 13 mm). 1. Left valve, external view; 2. Right valve, external view; 3. Left valve, internal view; 4. Right valve, internal view; 5–10.Cyrenoida guatemalensis (ANSP 107532; length 8.6 mm, height 8.9 mm). 5. Left valve, external view; 6. Right valve, external view; 7. Left valve, internal view; 8. Right valve, internal view; 9. Detail of left hinge; 10. Detail of right hinge. Scale bar: 2 mm.

Fig. 14 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 14. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov. A–E. Egg seen in PCM (IZiBB). A. Midsection under 400× magnification. B. Surface under 400 × magnification. C–D. Midsection under 1000 × magnification. E. Surface under 1000 × magnification. F. Male testis seen in PCM, with visible spermatozoa in a freshly mounted male in Hoyer's medium (paratype, IZiBB). Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 16 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 16. The Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogeny constructed from COI sequences of the Macrobiotus hufelandi group species. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probability. Two previously recognized clades, one grouping mostly species with typical inverted goblet-shaped processes and the second grouping mostly species with morphological modifications of egg processes, are marked in blue and red, respectively. Species of the hufelandi group with atypical egg processes are indicated by underlined font. Please see Appendix 1 for details on species sequences used in the analysis. The outgroup is marked with grey. The scale bar represents substitutions per position.

Fig. 1 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 1. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., habitus. A. Dorso-ventral projection (holotype, Hoyer's medium, PCM, IZiBB AU.031.12). B–C. Cuticular pores on the dorsal part of the body seen in PCM (B: holotype) and in SEM (C: paratype, IZiBB). Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 10 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 10. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., dorso-lateral patches of body granulation (paratypes, IZiBB). A. A semi-schematic drawing of a laterally positioned animal showing all patches of cuticular granulation: numbers indicate three dorso-lateral patches of body granulation (the granule sizes are not to scale, they have been enlarged in order to make them identifiable on the drawing). B. Three patches of dorso-lateral granulation visible in PCM. C–E. Magnifications of three patches of dorso-lateral granulation visible in SEM (C–E correspond to the patch numbers presented above). Please also note a cribriform area, which is external evidence of a muscle attachment in the centre of Fig. 10D. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 7 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 7. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., egg chorion morphology seen in SEM (IZiBB). A. Entire egg. B. Magnification of the egg surface. C–D. Details of the egg processes. E. Terminal disc. F. Details of the reticulation between egg processes. Arrowheads indicate scattered granulation on the terminal disc surface. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 15 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 15. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., egg chorion morphology seen in SEM (IZiBB). A. Entire egg. B–C. Magnifications of the egg surface. D. Egg process morphology. E. Terminal disc. F. Details of the reticulation between egg processes. Arrowheads indicate scattered granules on the terminal disc surface. Scale bars in μm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →

Trust is Essential: Positive Effects of Information Systems on Users' Memory require Trust in the System

<p>This dataset contains raw data collected in an experimental study at the University of Muenster, Germany. The study is part of a larger research project and examined trust effects on “intentional forgetting” in a simulated sales planning scenario. Intentional forgetting was operationalized via computer-based decision support system that enabled users to forget decision-relevant background information. Based on initial findings demonstrating that trust in the system increased intentional forgetting (Hertel et al., 2019, doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1574361; Hertel et al., 2018, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1237684), we aimed to replicate this effect. Moreover, we assumed that trust in the system increases the related release of memory resources for additional tasks, decision quality, decision makers' well-being, and actual use of the system. We induced different levels of trust in the system by manipulating the reliability of the system and the credibility of information provided by the system. Moreover, we manipulated the framing (gains vs. losses) of decision outcomes as potential moderator.</p>

Fig. 7. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A in The ultrastructure, development, and systematic position of the graptolite genus Mastigograptus

Fig. 7. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A. Small autothecal stolon in triad of stolotheca of Fig. 6A. Scale bar 10 µm. B, C. Autothecal stolon in triad on main stem (ZPAL G.30/16). Scale bars: B, 10 µm; C, 50 µm. D, F. Crassal lining of portion of stolotheca, with fractured diaphragm (arrowed),aneedlepreparationfromZPALG.30/10.Scalebars 10 µm. E. Crassal lining of portion of stolotheca, a needle preparation from ZPAL G.30/12. Scale bar 20 µm.

Fig. 5 in The ultrastructure, development, and systematic position of the graptolite genus Mastigograptus

Fig. 5. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. Diagram showing internal structure of stem with thecal triads and thecal base. Not to scale.

Fig. 6. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A in The ultrastructure, development, and systematic position of the graptolite genus Mastigograptus

Fig. 6. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A. Stereopair of triad of stolotheca; diaphragm of stolon leading to thecal base arrowed (ZPAL G. 30/15). Scale bar 10 µm. B. Stolonal triad on main stem, close to thecal base. Lower canal leads to the next section of the stem; upper canal (arrowed) leads to the thecal base, a needle preparation from ZPAL G. 30/10. Scale bar 50 µm. C. Stereopair of stolonal triad in thecal base, including occluded autotheca (arrowed), looking proximally (ZPAL G. 30/15). Scale bar 10 µm.

Fig. 1. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A in The ultrastructure, development, and systematic position of the graptolite genus Mastigograptus

Fig. 1. Mastigograptus aff. tenuiramosus. A. Holdfast with two siculae (ZPAL G.30/1). Scale bar 100 µm. B. Spongy meshwork texture of the basal layer "a" of holdfast (ZPALG.30/1). Scale bar 10 µm. C. Spongy meshwork of basal layer "a" with fibrils forming clumps or "trabeculae" (ZPALG.30/2). Scale bar 100 µm. D, F, G. Holdfast and two stems: lateral view with inclined sicula; lower surface of holdfast with imprint of the ribs of a shell; lateral view. Arrows show position of sicular aperture (ZPAL G.30/2). Scale bars: D, 100 µm; F, 500 µm; G, 1 mm. E. Parallel fibrils in holdfast, with coating of small "blebs" of material (ZPAL G.30/2). Scale bar 500 µm. H. Light micrograph of section through holdfast. a, irregular basal layer; b, thin parallel laminae; c, thicker peripheral laminae. Scale bar 10 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 4 in New systematic position of Itatingamyia Albuquerque (Diptera, Muscidae) based on molecular evidence, and description of the female of I. couriae

Fig. 4. Itatingamyia couriae Haseyama and de Carvalho, 2011, female genitalia UFMG-IDI-1600467.(A) Ovipositor, dorsal view.Scale:1 mm; (B) Ovipositor,ventral view. Scale: 1 mm; (C) Spermathecae. Scale: 0.2 mm.