Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 10 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 10 - Distribution maps, and distribution over habitat and altitude classes, for Agama agama, Amphiglossus johannae and Blommersia sp.

Figure 1 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 1 - Habitats on the Comoro islands. Maps of habitat classes and relative land cover are given for each island.

Figure 7 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 7 - Species photographs. A Cryptoblepharus boutonii ater, Grand Comoro B Cryptoblepharus boutonii mohelicus, ZSM 1680/2008, Mohéli C Cryptoblepharus boutonii mayottensis, ZSM 1703/2008, Mayotte D Cryptoblepharus boutonii degrijsii, ZSM 63/2010, Anjouan E Amphiglossus johannae, ZSM 54/2010, Anjouan F Phelsuma laticauda, Anjouan G Phelsuma dubia, Mayotte H Phelsuma robertmertensi, Mayotte.

Figure 17 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 17 - Distribution maps, and distribution over habitat and altitude classes, for Phelsuma nigristriata, Phelsuma pasteuri and Phelsuma robertmertensi.

Figure 18 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 18 - Distribution maps, and distribution over habitat and altitude classes, for Phelsuma v-nigra, Ramphotyphlops braminus and Trachylepis comorensis.

Figure 13 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648

Figure 13 - Distribution maps, and distribution over habitat and altitude classes, for Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus mercatorius and Hemidactylus parvimaculatus.

Figure 3 from: Matern A, Drees C, Hardtle W, von Oheimb G, Assmann T (2011) Historical ecology meets conservation and evolutionary genetics: a secondary contact zone between Carabus violaceus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) populations inhabiting ancient and recent woodlands in north-western Germany. ZooKeys 100: 545-563. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1546

Figure 3 - Correlogram showing the result of spatial autocorrelation analysis at three allozyme loci. Genetic distances D (Nei 1972) are indicated for the population pairs of the respective distance classes (squares). Dashed lines show the 95% confidence interval (1000 permutations) under the null hypothesis of spatially random differentiation. Significant deviations from the mean are indicated by filled squares (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 from: Matern A, Drees C, Hardtle W, von Oheimb G, Assmann T (2011) Historical ecology meets conservation and evolutionary genetics: a secondary contact zone between Carabus violaceus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) populations inhabiting ancient and recent woodlands in north-western Germany. ZooKeys 100: 545-563. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1546

Figure 4 - Maximum width of the aedeagus tip A and the quotient of maximum and minimum width of the aedeagus tip B are plotted for each population. Boxes display 25–75%- quartiles and bars indicate medians. Whiskers show the total range of values without outliers. Outliers are indicated as circles and extreme outliers as diamonds. Numbers of measured individuals per population are shown in brackets. Pie charts show frequencies of elytral sculpture classes "0" (white), "1" (grey), and "2" (black) in each population. Significant differences between populations are indicated by the lines marked with asterisks.

Figure 1 from: Matern A, Drees C, Hardtle W, von Oheimb G, Assmann T (2011) Historical ecology meets conservation and evolutionary genetics: a secondary contact zone between Carabus violaceus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) populations inhabiting ancient and recent woodlands in north-western Germany. ZooKeys 100: 545-563. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1546

Figure 1 - Carabus violaceus populations studied and proportion of specimens with different elytron sculptures (pie charts). White sections indicate the frequencies of smooth elytra, black sections indicate the frequencies of more than three striae per elytron, and grey sections indicate the frequencies of intermediate phenotypes, i.e. class "1". Numbers next to the pie charts indicate population number followed by sample size in brackets. The location of the study area is indicated as a white square on the map of Germany. Woodlands in the study region northwest of the town of Bramsche according to TK 50 3512 Bramsche (Landesvermessungsamt Niedersachsen 1998) are presented as striped patches. Size and position of ancient woodlands (black patches) are taken from the map by LeCoq (1805). In this study, these are called "Börsteler Wald" (in the north) and "Gehn" (in the south). White patches within woodlands indicate openings. Hedges are not shown.

Figure 2 from: Matern A, Drees C, Hardtle W, von Oheimb G, Assmann T (2011) Historical ecology meets conservation and evolutionary genetics: a secondary contact zone between Carabus violaceus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) populations inhabiting ancient and recent woodlands in north-western Germany. ZooKeys 100: 545-563. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1546

Figure 2 - Aedeagus tip of Carabus violaceus. 1 Maximum aedeagus width (AedMax), 2 minimum aedeagus width (AedMin), and 3 preputial field.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Figure 2 from: Mankga L, Kowiyou Y, Moteetee A, Daru B, van der Bank M (2013) Efficacy of the core DNA barcodes in identifying processed and poorly conserved plant materials commonly used in South African traditional medicine. ZooKeys 365: 215-233. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5730

Figure 2 - Evaluation of barcode gaps in matK, rbcLa and rbcLa + matK for commonly used medicinal plants of South Africa. A Boxplots indicate the genetic variation between interspecific distance and intraspecific distance; the boxplots clearly shows significant differences between inter- and intraspecific distances for all gene regions tested (P < 0.001; see text) B Lineplot of the barcode gap for the commonly used plants in South African medicine. For each gene region, the grey lines correspond to the furthest intraspecific distance (bottom of line value), and the closest interspecific distance (top of line value). The red lines show where this relationship is reversed, i.e. cases where there is no barcode gap.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Figure 1 from: Mankga L, Kowiyou Y, Moteetee A, Daru B, van der Bank M (2013) Efficacy of the core DNA barcodes in identifying processed and poorly conserved plant materials commonly used in South African traditional medicine. ZooKeys 365: 215-233. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5730

Figure 1 - Examples ofmedicinal herbs bought at Faraday muthi market in Johannesburg A different medicinal herbs in bags B Seeds of Entada rheedii (tindili) C mixed herbs (fembo) D A twig of Adenia gummifera (mphinde umshaye) E Barks of Vachellia sp. (umkhanya-kute) F Bulb of Boophane disticha (umqotho) G mixed herbs H Myrothamnus flabellifolius (vuka) I Barks of Vachellia sp. (umkhanya-kute) J Sarcostemma viminale (ube nam) K Plant of Clivia sp. (mayime) L Stangeria eriopus (imfingo) M mixed herbs (isihlalakahle) N Tuber (umbonsi) O Helichrysum sp. (impepo) and P Twigs of Synadenium cupulare (umdletshane). Names in brackets are vernacular names in isiZulu.

Figure1 from: Bachman S, Moat J, Hill A, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109

Figure1 - GeoCAT workflow; Start a new project and add data to the map via the three options. Existing data may be derived from an output of an existing database or from an online source such as GBIF, Flickr or Scratchpads. Alternatively, click directly on the map to create markers to signify the occurrence of the taxon you wish to assess.The intuitive mapping interface allows interaction with the data to delete, move or hide points from analysis. The metadata window exposes the attributes of the occurrences e.g. date of collection, collector, location and provides a direct link to the raw data.<br> After editing the data the analysis can be enabled and the results are displayed as grpahics on the map and through a report window. The EOO/AOO values, preliminary IUCN categories and parameters are shown. AOO cell size can be adjusted.Statistics generated from the analysis and a basic map can be downloaded as a report. Occurrence data used in the analysis can be downloaded as a kml file for integration with Google Earth or as a CSV file. In addition, a single geocat. file encompassing all analysis results, parameters, map settings and occurrence data can be saved for later use, or to pass to collaborators for additional work.

Figure 2 from: Bachman S, Moat J, Hill A, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109

Figure 2 - Illustration of a convex hull of a set of points. Imagine stretching a rubber band so that all points are inside it, then releasing it; when it becomes tight, the area enclosed is the convex hull.

Figures 15-20 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 15-20 - 15, 16 Osmia calaminthae, females 15 Propodeal triangle of paratype specimen 16 T1–T3 of holotype specimen 17–20 Osmia calaminthae, male paratype 17 Dorsal habitus 18 Lateral habitus 19 Face 20 Mandibles

Figures 1-3 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 1-3 - 1 Flowers of Calamintha ashei (Weath.) Shinners (Lamiaceae) 2–3 Osmia calaminthae, sp. n., visiting flowers of Calamintha ashei at Lake Placid, Highlands County, Florida. Photographs by T. Lethbridge.

Figures 27-32 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 27-32 - Osmia conjunctoides (female holotype of Osmia subfasciata miamiensis) 27 Dorsal view. 28 Face 29 Mandible, showing the shape and placement of teeth 30 Mandible, showing outer and condylar ridges and overall shape 31 Propodeal triangle 32 T1–T3.

Figures 21-26 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 21-26 - Osmia calaminthae, male paratypes 21 Propodeal triangle 22 T6 and T7 23 S3 and S4, dorsal view 24 S3 and S4, oblique view 25 Genital capsule, dorsal view 26 Genital capsule, lateral view.

Figures 5-8 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 5-8 - Oblique view of female Osmia heads 5, 6 Osmia calaminthae, holotype specimen 6 Close up of clypeus and paraocular area 7 Osmia calaminthae, paratype specimen, showing pollen mass on face 8 Osmia conjunctoides (holotype specimen of Osmia subfasciata miamiensis).

Figures 9-14 from: Rightmyer M, Deyrup M, Ascher J (2011) Osmia species (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the southeastern United States with modified facial hairs: taxonomy, host plants, and conservation status. ZooKeys 148: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.148.1497

Figures 9-14 - Osmia calaminthae, holotype female 9 Dorsal habitus 10 Lateral habitus 11 Face 12 Close up of clypeus and paraocular area 13 Mandible, showing the shape and placement of teeth 14 Mandible, showing outer and condylar ridges and overall shape.