Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
30,817
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
30,817 results for “type”
FIGURES 69–74 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-23. Physodeutera (Toxoma) lokobensis sp nov., a new species close to Ph. (T.) conturbata Moravec, Ph. (T.) sulcoprothoracica (W. Horn) and Ph. (T.) dubia (Mařan), with revised type designation of the latter (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
FIGURES 69–74. Physodeutera (Toxoma) lokobensis sp. nov., type locality. 69–73—elytron: 69—♂, HT (NMPC); 70— ditto, detail of elytral disc; 71—♀, AT (CJVB); 72—♀, PT (CCJM); 73—ditto, detail of posterior elytral area; 74—labels of HT. Bars = 1 mm.
FIGURE 106 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-23. Physodeutera (Toxoma) lokobensis sp nov., a new species close to Ph. (T.) conturbata Moravec, Ph. (T.) sulcoprothoracica (W. Horn) and Ph. (T.) dubia (Mařan), with revised type designation of the latter (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
FIGURE 106. Distribution of four Physodeutera (Toxoma) species in northern part of Madagascar. Adopted from the map of preserved areas in Madagascar according to Moat & Smith (2007), adapted and published previously (Moravec 2010) under permission of the trustee of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, GB.
FIGURES 90–92 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-23. Physodeutera (Toxoma) lokobensis sp nov., a new species close to Ph. (T.) conturbata Moravec, Ph. (T.) sulcoprothoracica (W. Horn) and Ph. (T.) dubia (Mařan), with revised type designation of the latter (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
FIGURES 90–92. Physodeutera (Toxoma) sulcoprothoracica W. Horn. ♂, "Ambre" (CCJM ex APCA). 90— habitus, 9.9 mm; 91— antennomeres 1–5; 92—antennomeres 1–6. Bars = 1 mm.
FIGURES 102–105 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-23. Physodeutera (Toxoma) lokobensis sp nov., a new species close to Ph. (T.) conturbata Moravec, Ph. (T.) sulcoprothoracica (W. Horn) and Ph. (T.) dubia (Mařan), with revised type designation of the latter (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
FIGURES 102–105. Physodeutera (Toxoma) sulcoprothoracica W. Horn. 102–104—elytra: 102—♂, "Ambre" (CCJM ex APCA); 103—♀, LT (SDEI), adopted from SDEI database; 104—apical area, ♂, "Ambre" (CCJM ex APCA); 105—labels of HT (SDEI). Bar = 1 mm.
Figure 4 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of the Unionidae+Margaritiferidae estimated from 28 concatenated individual mtDNA gene sequences, i.e. 14 from female-type (12 protein-coding and 2 rRNA genes) and 14 (12 protein-coding and 2 rRNA genes) from male-type mitochondria. Values for branch support above each node represent Bayesian posterior probabilities percentage/ maximum likelihood bootstrap.
Figure 3 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the Unionidae+Margaritiferidae estimated from 14 concatenated individual mtDNA gene sequences (12 protein-coding and 2 rRNA genes). Values for branch support above each node represent Bayesian posterior probabilities percentage/maximum likelihood bootstrap support. *Supported values ≥ 95 are represented by an asterisk.
Figure 1 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 1. Recent multi-locus phylogenetic hypotheses on Gonideinae sensu Pfeiffer et al. (2019). Vertical bars indicate subfamilies recognized in respective publications. Note that Froufe et al. (2020) adopted a new systematic framework with three instead of two family-group levels, and thus, traditional tribes (ending -ini) are considered subtribes (ending -ina) in that study.
Figure 6 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 6. Relationship between (A) mean Ka/Ks and substitution rate (μ) per female-type (full circles) and male-type (empty circles) mtDNA protein-coding gene; and (B) differences between male- and female-type K a /K s and μ per proteincoding mtDNA gene.
Figure 2 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 2. Gene maps of the F- and M-type mitochondrial genomes of Lens contradens, Physunio superbus, Hyriopsis bialata and Rectidens sumatrensis. Genes positioned inside the circle are encoded on the heavy strand, and genes outside the circle are encoded on the light strand. Colour codes: small and large ribosomal RNAs (red); transfer RNAs (purple); M-orf, F-specific open reading frame (yellow); M-orf, M-specific open reading frame (yellow); protein-coding genes (green).
Figure 5 in Mitogenomic phylogeny and fossil-calibrated mutation rates for all F- and M-type mtDNA genes of the largest freshwater mussel family, the Unionidae (Bivalvia)
Figure 5. Fossil-calibrated ultrametric chronogram of the Unionidae calculated under a lognormal relaxed clock model and a Yule process speciation implemented in BEAST v.1.10.1 and obtained for the complete F-type mitogenome data set. The newly sequenced tribe-level taxa are coloured red. An outgroup sample (Margaritiferidae) has been removed for better visualization (but see original BEAST tree in Supporting Information, Fig. S1A). Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals of the estimated divergence times between lineages (Mya). Black numbers near nodes are mean ages (Mya). Colour labels indicate the F-mtDNA gene order (UF1, UF2, and UF3). Stratigraphic chart according to the International Commission on Stratigraphy v.2018/08 (www.stratigraphy.org). Abbreviations: J, Jurassic; K, Cretaceous; N, Neogene; Pg, Palaeogene; Q, Quaternary.
FIGURE. The Bayesian tree of the Adaintum pedatum complex based on chloroplast markers and corresponding rhizome type. Support values (Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP) (upper) ≥ 0.5, and maximum likelihood bootstrap support (MLBS) (nether) ≥ 50%) are shown above the main branches, the thickened branches indicate MLBS=100 and BIPP=1. Yellow bar means erect rhizome; blue bar means creeping rhizome; gray bar means decumbent or short-creeping rhizome. in Adiantum japonicum, a new species of the Adiantum pedatum complex (Pteridaceae) from Japan
FIGURE. The Bayesian tree of the Adaintum pedatum complex based on chloroplast markers and corresponding rhizome type. Support values (Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP) (upper) ≥ 0.5, and maximum likelihood bootstrap support (MLBS) (nether) ≥ 50%) are shown above the main branches, the thickened branches indicate MLBS=100 and BIPP=1. Yellow bar means erect rhizome; blue bar means creeping rhizome; gray bar means decumbent or short-creeping rhizome.
FIGURES 9–18 in Identity of the millipede genus Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892, the type genus of the family Pyrgodesmidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)
FIGURES 9–18. Pyrgodesmus permutatus (Attems, 1936), comb. nov., habituses of two male syntypes, one coated with earth (10–12) and the other clean (13–18). All after Silvestri (1920), drawn not to scale.
FIGURES 1–8. Pyrgodesmus obscurus Pocock, 1892, male syntypes. 1. Original labels. 2 in Identity of the millipede genus Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892, the type genus of the family Pyrgodesmidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)
FIGURES 1–8. Pyrgodesmus obscurus Pocock, 1892, male syntypes. 1. Original labels. 2. Both syntypes pierced with glass minutiae, shown relative to the length of an insect pin. 3. Habitus of a syntype, lateral view (after Pocock (1892)). 4. Picture of the same, lateral view. 5. Body rings 5–7 and gonopods in situ, ventral view. 6. Body rings 6–9 and gonopods in situ, ventrolateral view. 7 & 8. Enlarged gonopods in situ, ventral and ventrolateral views, respectively. Figs 1–3, 7 and 8 not to scale. Images courtesy Dmitry Telnov.
FIGURES 19–30 in Identity of the millipede genus Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892, the type genus of the family Pyrgodesmidae (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)
FIGURES 19–30. Pyrgodesmus permutatus (Attems, 1936), comb. nov., male syntype. 19. Head, dorsal view. 20. Anterior part of body, ventral view. 21. Antenna, lateral view. 22. Gnathochilarium, ventral view. 23. Anteromedial part of gnathochilarium, ventral view. 24. Right paraterga 11 and 12, dorsal view. 25. Cross-section of body ring 8, posterior view. 26. Posterior part of body, ventral view. 27. Fine structure of limbus, dorsal view. 28. Leg of body ring 8. 29. Left gonopod, mesal view. 30. Telopodite of right gonopod, mesal view. All after Silvestri (1920), drawn not to scale.
1864 radio variable galaxies with classifications for activity types.
<p>1864 radio variable galaxies with classifications for activity types.</p>
Distribution. Myanmar, Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Sumatra, and Borneo. There is one skin from N Vietnam (Tonkin, the type locality of C. lowei) and a possible skin record in China (S Yunnan). However, there have been no further confirmed records from these two areas. in Viverridae
Distribution. Myanmar, Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Sumatra, and Borneo. There is one skin from N Vietnam (Tonkin, the type locality of C. lowei) and a possible skin record in China (S Yunnan). However, there have been no further confirmed records from these two areas.
Distribution. Discontinuous and limited to wetland environments in two areas of S Sudan: small swamps in SW Sudan near the DR Congo border, where the type specimen was collected, and the Sudd Swamps (Bahr-el-Ghazal) of the upper White Nile. Maps and distributional information here are provisional pending future research. in Bovidae
Distribution. Discontinuous and limited to wetland environments in two areas of S Sudan: small swamps in SW Sudan near the DR Congo border, where the type specimen was collected, and the Sudd Swamps (Bahr-el-Ghazal) of the upper White Nile. Maps and distributional information here are provisional pending future research.
Subspecies and Distribution. T.n.napuF.Cuvier,1822—SMyanmar,Thai/MalayPeninsula,islandsoffWMalayPeninsula(Langkawi&Pangkor),Borneo,SSumatra,BangkaI,islandsoffBorneo(Laut&Serasan). T.n.bangue:Chasen&Kloss,1931—BanggiIandBalembanganI,offNBorneo. T.n.bunguranensisMiller,1901—NatunaIs(=Bunguran),oftWBorneo. T.n.neubronneriSody,1931—NSumatra. T.n.nmiasisLyon,1916—NiasI,offWSumatra. T.n.rufulusMiller,1900—TiomanI,offEMalayPeninsula,RiauandLinggaArchipelagos. T. n. terutus Thomas & Wroughton, 1909 — Terutau I, off W Malay Peninsula. The species was recently reconfirmed for Singapore. Maps that include Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the distribution range are based on the earlier assumption that 7. versicolor was a subspecies of 1. napu. Subsequent studies have indicated that 7. versicolor is a distinct species, and that the range of 1. napu therefore does not extend into Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. The northern limit on the Thai-Malay peninsula is not well defined. Specimens of 1. napu have been collected from as far north as Bankachon in southern Myanmar (10° 08" N), but despite fairly intensive camera-trapping in Kui Buri National Park, Thailand (12° N), 7. napu has not been photographed there. At the northern margin ofits range, it is generally rare. It has been reported, for example, that during the flooding of the Chiew Larn Reservoir (Surat Thani Province; about 9° N, 98° 45' E), only six 7. napu were rescued compared with 172 71. kanchil. This area is the transition zone from wetter evergreen forest to drier deciduous types, and it might be that 7° napu is not well adapted to the drier forest types towards the northern limit ofits range. There are unconfirmed reports of the species on Java, where it may have been confused with one of the two color morphs of 7. javanicus. As explained in the Taxonomy section, the subspecific status of the populations of several islands remains unclear. in Tragulidae
Subspecies and Distribution. T.n.napuF.Cuvier,1822—SMyanmar,Thai/MalayPeninsula,islandsoffWMalayPeninsula(Langkawi&Pangkor),Borneo,SSumatra,BangkaI,islandsoffBorneo(Laut&Serasan). T.n.bangue:Chasen&Kloss,1931—BanggiIandBalembanganI,offNBorneo. T.n.bunguranensisMiller,1901—NatunaIs(=Bunguran),oftWBorneo. T.n.neubronneriSody,1931—NSumatra. T.n.nmiasisLyon,1916—NiasI,offWSumatra. T.n.rufulusMiller,1900—TiomanI,offEMalayPeninsula,RiauandLinggaArchipelagos. T. n. terutus Thomas & Wroughton, 1909 — Terutau I, off W Malay Peninsula. The species was recently reconfirmed for Singapore. Maps that include Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the distribution range are based on the earlier assumption that 7. versicolor was a subspecies of 1. napu. Subsequent studies have indicated that 7. versicolor is a distinct species, and that the range of 1. napu therefore does not extend into Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. The northern limit on the Thai-Malay peninsula is not well defined. Specimens of 1. napu have been collected from as far north as Bankachon in southern Myanmar (10° 08" N), but despite fairly intensive camera-trapping in Kui Buri National Park, Thailand (12° N), 7. napu has not been photographed there. At the northern margin ofits range, it is generally rare. It has been reported, for example, that during the flooding of the Chiew Larn Reservoir (Surat Thani Province; about 9° N, 98° 45' E), only six 7. napu were rescued compared with 172 71. kanchil. This area is the transition zone from wetter evergreen forest to drier deciduous types, and it might be that 7° napu is not well adapted to the drier forest types towards the northern limit ofits range. There are unconfirmed reports of the species on Java, where it may have been confused with one of the two color morphs of 7. javanicus. As explained in the Taxonomy section, the subspecific status of the populations of several islands remains unclear.
Subspecies and Distribution. H.b.bruceiGray,1868—Ethiopia. H.b.albipesHollister,1922—Kenya. H.b.bakeriGray,1874—Uganda. H.b.bocageiGray,1869—Angola. H.b.chapiniHatt,1933—DRCongo. H.b.dieseneriBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.fromm:Brauer,1913—Tanzania. H.b.grantiWroughton,1910—SouthAfrica. H.b.hindeiWroughton,1910—Kenya. H.b.hoogstraaliSetzer,1956—Sudan. H.b.kemp:Thomas,1910—Kenya. H.b.lademanniBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.manningiWroughton,1910—Malawi. H.b.mossambicusPeters,1870—Mozambique. H.b.muenzneriBrauer,1913—Tanzania. H.b.princepsThomas,1910—Ethiopia. H.b.prittwitziBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.pumilusThomas,1910—Somaliland. H.b.rudd:Wroughton,1910—Mozambique. H.b.rudolfiThomas,1910—Ethiopia. H.b.somalicusThomas,1892—Somaliland. H.b.ssongeaeBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.thomasiNeumann,1901—Sudan. H. b. victorianjansae Brauer, 1917 — Tanzania. Endemic to Africa from NE Sudan throughout the Horn of Africa, south to Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces in South Africa, and also isolated populations in Angola. Determining the limits of subspecific distribution is not possible for the moment, but the subspecies and the countries bearing their type localities are included above. in Procaviidae
Subspecies and Distribution. H.b.bruceiGray,1868—Ethiopia. H.b.albipesHollister,1922—Kenya. H.b.bakeriGray,1874—Uganda. H.b.bocageiGray,1869—Angola. H.b.chapiniHatt,1933—DRCongo. H.b.dieseneriBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.fromm:Brauer,1913—Tanzania. H.b.grantiWroughton,1910—SouthAfrica. H.b.hindeiWroughton,1910—Kenya. H.b.hoogstraaliSetzer,1956—Sudan. H.b.kemp:Thomas,1910—Kenya. H.b.lademanniBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.manningiWroughton,1910—Malawi. H.b.mossambicusPeters,1870—Mozambique. H.b.muenzneriBrauer,1913—Tanzania. H.b.princepsThomas,1910—Ethiopia. H.b.prittwitziBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.pumilusThomas,1910—Somaliland. H.b.rudd:Wroughton,1910—Mozambique. H.b.rudolfiThomas,1910—Ethiopia. H.b.somalicusThomas,1892—Somaliland. H.b.ssongeaeBrauer,1917—Tanzania. H.b.thomasiNeumann,1901—Sudan. H. b. victorianjansae Brauer, 1917 — Tanzania. Endemic to Africa from NE Sudan throughout the Horn of Africa, south to Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces in South Africa, and also isolated populations in Angola. Determining the limits of subspecific distribution is not possible for the moment, but the subspecies and the countries bearing their type localities are included above.
FIGURE 11. Type localities for new species. A. P in Two new species of Pyrgulopsis Call & Pilsbry, 1886 (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae) from springs in the Rio Grande watershed in Texas
FIGURE 11. Type localities for new species. A. P. harrymilleri sp. nov., Vasquez Spring, Presidio Co., TX. Photo by B. Schwartz. B. P. rubra sp. nov., Palo Amarillo Springs, Presidio Co., TX. Photo by K. Perez.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.