Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

690

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

690 results for “Geometric morphometric”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Fig. 3 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 3 RAxML based phylogenetic reconstruction (GTRGAMMA model and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates). COI barcodes were used to identify species and reconstruct relationships between species and genera.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 8 Shape variation along the positive RW2 (a), negative RW1 (b), and positive RW1 (c) extremes for P. machinosus, P. repens, and P. securicola, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 9 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 9 Ordination of the group means along the first two canonical variate axes (CV1 and CV2) based on the generalized distance matrix.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 7 Scatter plot of the first two principal components of the three species of Ash psyllids. Abbreviations: r = P. repens, s = P. securicola, and m = P. machinosus

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 6 Superimposed landmarks on the forewing of three species of ash psyllid: A P. machinosus B P. securicola, and C P. repens.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 5 Wing size comparison of the forewing of the males and females of P. repens, P. securicola, and P. machinosus. Means with the same letter are not significant from each other.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 4 Cluster analysis, using UPGMA method, of the males and females of P. repens, P. securicola, and P. machinosus.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 2 Detected shape differences of forewings in the female and male of P. machinosus (a Female b Male), P. securicola (c Female d Male) and P. repens (e Female f Male).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 3 Superimposed forewing shapes of male and females of P. machinosus, P. securicola, and P. repens.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 1 Position of landmarks (circles) in the right forewing of Psyllopsis machinosus. Position of landmarks follows that of Lashkari et al. (2013).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

: Data type: morphometric data

opencc-zeroApr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 7 Differences in elytron shape among each branch and ancestor, on the basis of principal component analysis. Empty dots indicate the number of the node on the phylogenetic tree; solid dots indicate the average shape of the extant subfamily/tribe of each branch.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 6 Differences in pronotum shape among each branch and ancestor, on the basis of principal component analysis. Empty dots indicate the number of the node on the phylogenetic tree; solid dots indicate the average shape of the extant subfamily/tribe of each branch.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 5 Reconstruction of ancestral groundplans of the elytron in Lucanidae and the outgroups. The splines indicate the deformation of the shapes relative to the reference configuration. The phylogenetic tree was summarized and reconstructed from earlier molecular results (Kim and Farrell 2015).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 3 Differences in elytron shape between outgroups and Lucanidae, on the basis of principal component analysis at the species level. The four circles are 90%-equal frequency ellipses of Lucanidae subfamilies.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 4 Reconstruction of ancestral groundplans of the pronotum in Lucanidae and the outgroups. The splines indicate deformation of the shapes relative to the reference configuration. The phylogenetic tree was summarized and reconstructed from earlier molecular results (Kim and Farrell 2015).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 2 Differences in pronotum shape between outgroups and Lucanidae, on the basis of principal component analysis at the species level. The four circles are 90%-equal frequency ellipses of Lucanidae subfamilies.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 1 Description of the curves used in geometric morphometric analysis. The positions selected for the pronotum and elytron curves are represented by Prosopocoilus sp. in dorsal view. The curves were resampled in 25 or 50 semi-landmarks (SLM).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 in Geometric morphometrics of Aedes aegypti populations and study of transmission of arboviral diseases in Barreiras, Brazil

Figure 3 Study of relationships among precipitation, building infestation index (BII) and notification of arboviral diseases.Values of precipitation, BII and notification are presented in square root (sqrt) from January 2016 to September 2017 (A). A positive correlation was calculated between precipitation and BII (B). These results indicate that infestation occurs in rain-dependent cycles.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 in Geometric morphometrics of Aedes aegypti populations and study of transmission of arboviral diseases in Barreiras, Brazil

Figure 6 UPGMA phenograms using the Mahalanobis distance among the diferent areas describing shape divergences. All distances were significant (p˂0.0001).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record