Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

4,243

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

4,243 results for “seasonality”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Effect of season and housing systems on various physiobehavioral attributes of local breed of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Southern Punjab, Pakistan

Figure 4. Effect of housing system on various physiological attributes of rabbits. Data is mean (± SE). Similar letters on the bars indicate non-significant (p ≥ 0.05) difference within caged and colony reared rabbits for rectal temperature. Different letters on the bars indicate significant (p ≤ 0.05) difference within caged and colony reared rabbits for respiration rate.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Seasonal distribution and habitat use preference of Barking deer (Muntiacus vaginalis) in Murree-Kotli Sattian-Kahuta National Park, Punjab Pakistan

Figure 2. Vegetation composition of Barking deer habitat in Murree-Kotli Sattian-Kahuta National Park.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Seasonal analysis of food items and feeding habits of endangered riverine catfish Rita rita (Hamilton, 1822)

Figure 3. Seasonal variation in frequency of food items assessed by non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) analysis in R. rita sampled from Padma River.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Seasonal analysis of food items and feeding habits of endangered riverine catfish Rita rita (Hamilton, 1822)

Figure 2. Fullness index of fish stomach in different seasons (a) and size groups (b) of R. rita sampled from Padma River.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Seasonal analysis of food items and feeding habits of endangered riverine catfish Rita rita (Hamilton, 1822)

Figure 6. Canonical correspondence analysis of food items and morphometric measures of R. rita sampled from Padma river (TL = Total length; BW = Body weight; HG = horizontal mouth gape; VG = vertical mouth gape; MA = mouth area)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Seasonal analysis of food items and feeding habits of endangered riverine catfish Rita rita (Hamilton, 1822)

Figure 4. Principle component analysis (PCA) on fish size groups and food items in R. rita sampled from Padma River (Roman numbers indicated the different size group of fish, such as I = 9-14 cm, II =>14-19 cm, III =>19-24 cm, IV =>24-29 cm and V =>29-34 cm).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Seasonality and forest edge as drivers of Tradescantia zebrina Hort. ex Bosse invasion in the Atlantic Forest

Figure 1. Mean numbers of leaves (A) and dry biomass (B) ofTradescantia zebrina in the spatial treatment (forest edge and interior) in invaded areas of the Iguaçu National Park. Error bars are standard deviation. Different letters indicate a significant difference between treatments.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Dataset for Publication "Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia"

<p>This is the dataset presented in:</p> <p>Alves, E. G., Jardine, K., Tota, J., Jardine, A., Y&atilde;nez-Serrano, A. M., Karl, T., Tavares, J., Nelson, B., Gu, D., Stavrakou, T., Martin, S., Artaxo, P., Manzi, A., and Guenther, A.: Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3903&ndash;3925, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016, 2016.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2 in Flexibility is everything: prey capture throughout the seasonal habitat switches in the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris

Fig. 2 Frame shots showing the four feeding modes in the smooth newt. In the aquatic stage: a suction feeding under water and b jaw prehension on land. In the terrestrial stage: c suction feeding under water and d tongue prehension on land. The prey (maggot) is indicated by the arrow.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2014View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 Landmarks used for the kinematic analyses. 1 upper jaw tip, 2 lower jaw tip, 3 in Flexibility is everything: prey capture throughout the seasonal habitat switches in the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris

Fig. 1 Landmarks used for the kinematic analyses. 1 upper jaw tip, 2 lower jaw tip, 3 hyoid (throat), 4 jaw joint, 5 nape, 6 dorsal trunk reference, 7 tongue tip (only digitized when visible)

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2014View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in Flexibility is everything: prey capture throughout the seasonal habitat switches in the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris

Fig. 4 Scatter plot of the first two principal components. Principal component 1 (PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2) are derived from the 12 kinematic variables to illustrate the relationship among kinematic patterns for the four feeding modes coded by symbols and the ten individuals coded by color. Each data point represents one feeding event, and the ellipses indicate 95 % confidence interval in the four feeding modes. P@1 explains 57 % and P@2 explains 15.5 % of the total variance. See Table 3 for complete loadings of each principal component

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2014View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3 in Flexibility is everything: prey capture throughout the seasonal habitat switches in the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris

Fig. 3 Kinematic profiles of the four feeding modes. Kinematic means (dark and bold curves)±SD (pale and slim curves) of gape (blue), hyoid (Vreen), head rotation (oranVe), and tongue movement (Vray, only shown

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2014View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3. Tallies within each Tennessee county indicate the total buprestid species recorded from specimen label records spanning 1934 in Seasonal flight activity and distribution of metallic woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) collected in North Carolina and Tennessee

Fig. 3. Tallies within each Tennessee county indicate the total buprestid species recorded from specimen label records spanning 1934 to 2013. When presented across Tennessee, species yields indicate areas of greatest and least collection activity and highlight regions of future collection interest. This figure is displayed in color online at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1B in Seasonal flight activity and distribution of metallic woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) collected in North Carolina and Tennessee

Fig. 1B. Seasonal flight activities recorded for Agrilinae (Coraebini and Trachyini), Polycestinae, and Chrysocrhoinae metallic woodboring beetle species collected across North Carolina (1901–2013) and Tennessee (1934–2013). Collection records frequently included trapping yield results from multi-day deployments; thus, data for individual specimens were pooled within 1 of 4 weeks for each month. Dated records for specimens with labels that noted specimen emergence from infested trunk, stem, firewood, and branch sections are not included within the seasonal ranges presented. Dashed vertical lines (at May and Jul) indicate approximate flight activity period (in North Carolina) for Cerceris fumipennis (Say) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) wasps. Asterisks indicate species collected by the wasps during biosurveillance in North Carolina (Nalepa et al. 2013; Swink et al. 2013, 2014). This figure is displayed in color online at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1C in Seasonal flight activity and distribution of metallic woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) collected in North Carolina and Tennessee

Fig. 1C. Seasonal flight activities recorded for Buprestinae metallic woodboring beetle species collected across North Carolina (1901–2013) and Tennessee (1934–2013). Collection records frequently included trapping yield results from multi-day deployments; thus, data for individual specimens were pooled within 1 of 4 weeks for each month. Dated records for specimens with labels that noted specimen emergence from infested trunk, stem, firewood, and branch sections are not included within the seasonal ranges presented. Dashed vertical lines (at May and Jul) indicate approximate flight activity period (in North Carolina) for Cerceris fumipennis (Say) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) wasps. Asterisks indicate species collected by the wasps during biosurveillance in North Carolina (Nalepa et al. 2013; Swink et al. 2013, 2014). This figure is displayed in color online at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1A in Seasonal flight activity and distribution of metallic woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) collected in North Carolina and Tennessee

Fig. 1A. Seasonal flight activities recorded for Agrilinae: Agrilini metallic woodboring beetle species collected across North Carolina (1901–2013) and Tennessee (1934–2013). Collection records frequently included trapping yield results from multi-day deployments; thus, data for individual specimens were pooled within 1 of 4 weeks for each month. Dated records for specimens with labels that noted specimen emergence from infested trunk, stem, firewood, and branch sections are not included within the seasonal ranges presented. Dashed vertical lines (at May and Jul) indicate approximate flight activity period (in North Carolina) for Cerceris fumipennis (Say) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) wasps. Asterisks indicate species collected by the wasps during biosurveillance in North Carolina (Nalepa et al. 2013; Swink et al. 2013, 2014). This figure is displayed in color online at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2. Tallies within each North Carolina county indicate the total buprestid species recorded from specimen label records spanning 1901 in Seasonal flight activity and distribution of metallic woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) collected in North Carolina and Tennessee

Fig. 2. Tallies within each North Carolina county indicate the total buprestid species recorded from specimen label records spanning 1901 to 2013. When presented across North Carolina, species yields indicate areas of greatest and least collection activity and highlight regions of future collection interest. This figure is displayed in color online at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 4. Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. cra`ssiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery–forest interface at 2 sites in South Carolina in 2011 and 2012.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 3. Mean captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 1. Satellite image of the Mississippi research site (Google, Mountain View, California, USA) with an overlay showing a randomized complete block design of 5 blocks. Representing the 2013 test, each block shown here had a trap placed at −25, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m from the nursery–forest interface.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2015View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record