Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
64
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
64 results for “859”
Figure 4 from: Medina D, Ibáñez R, Lips KR, Crawford AJ (2019) Amphibian diversity in Serranía de Majé, an isolated mountain range in eastern Panamá. ZooKeys 859: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32869
Figure 4 Diagram showing a decrease with elevation in the similarities of amphibian species assemblages associated with sites from the Serranía de Piedras-Pacora mountain range and the isolated Serranía de Majé mountain range. The numbers represent the shared species between sites (N), Jaccard similarity coefficients (N) and total number of species at the site level (N). Each color represents an elevation category, where the lowlands (< 400 m) are represented in yellow, mid-elevation sites (400–800 m) in green, and highlands (> 800 m) in blue. NA = no data available.
Figure 2 from: Zhao Q-H, Xu W, Yin Z-W (2019) A new species of Linan Hlaváč (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) from Shenzhen, China. ZooKeys 859: 63-68. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.35465
Figure 2 Male diagnostic features of Linanqiniangmontis sp. nov. A antennal club B pronotum C metaventral process, lateral D protrochanter and profemur E apex of protibia F mesotrochanter and mesofemur G metacoxa, metatrochanter, and metafemur H sternite IX I–K aedeagus, dorsal (I), lateral (J), and ventral (K). Scale bars: 0.3 mm (A, B, D, F, G); 0.2 mm (C, I, J, K); 0.1 mm (H); 0.05 mm (E).
Figure 3 from: Lavesque N, Daffe G, Grall J, Zanol J, Gouillieux B, Hutchings P (2019) Guess who? On the importance of using appropriate name: case study of Marphysa sanguinea (Montagu, 1813). ZooKeys 859: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.34117
Figure 3 SEM images of Marphysasanguinea: A isodont, symmetrical pectinate chaetae from anterior chaetiger (AM W.49086, 3rd chaetiger) B isodont, symmetrical pectinate chaetae from mid-body chaetiger (AM W.49086, chaetiger 108) C the two types of pectinate chaetae (AM W.49086, far posterior chaetiger) D subacicular bifid hook (AM W.49086, chaetiger 142). Numbers in white circles indicate the type of pectinate chaetae.
Figure 1 from: Medina D, Ibáñez R, Lips KR, Crawford AJ (2019) Amphibian diversity in Serranía de Majé, an isolated mountain range in eastern Panamá. ZooKeys 859: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32869
Figure 1 Map showing the location of the study sites in the Serranía de Majé and the Serranía de Piedras-Pacora across the valley of the Chepo River.
Supplementary material 1 from: Medina D, Ibáñez R, Lips KR, Crawford AJ (2019) Amphibian diversity in Serranía de Majé, an isolated mountain range in eastern Panamá. ZooKeys 859: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32869
: Data type: specimen list.
Figure 13 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 13 Radiographs of first anal pterygiophores in Lateolabraxjaponicus (A–D), L.maculatus (E–H) and L.latus (I–L), according to body size by species. AKAUM–I. 82683 (65.6 mm SL) BBSKU 100883 (96.8 mm SL) CBSKU 100756 (252.4 mm SL) DKPM-NI 9697 (317.0 mm SL) E uncatalogued specimen (58.4 mm SL) FTKPM-P 1655-6 (95.2 mm SL) GBSKU 100771 (250.8 mm SL) HKPM-NI 9686 (364.0 mm SL) IKAUM–I. 1895-4 (70.3 mm SL) JKAUM–I. 64737 (SL 94.2 mm) KKPM-NI 24650 (265.4 mm SL) LKAUM–I. 57963 (342.0 mm SL).
Figure 14 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 14 Proportional range comparisons of head length [HL, % of standard length (SL)] in Lateolabraxjaponicus (upper graph, axis labelled BD / SL) and orbital diameter (OD, % of HL) in L.maculatus (lower graph, axis labelled OD / HL) in the present study and previous literature. Data based on A present study BKatayama (1960a)CLindberg and Krasyukova (1969)DChyung (1977)EYokogawa (1995)FNozaka (1995)GYamada et al. (2007)HBae et al. (2016)IChu et al. (1962)JChu (1985)KChen (1987)LZheng (1987)MChen et al. (1990)NMao et al. (1991)OGao (1991)PCheng and Zhou (1997). 1 Proportional percentages were calculated as reciprocal numbers from proportional data (multiple numbers) therein given. 2 Despite descriptions as "L. japonicus," synonymized as L.maculatus by Yokogawa (2013b). 3 Provisionally referred to as Lateolabrax sp., which was identical with L.maculatus.
Figure 12 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 12 Squamation on dorsal head regions of Lateolabraxjaponicus (A, B), L.maculatus (C, D) and L.latus (E, F). Thick arrows indicate anterior nostrils, thin arrows indicate anterior edges of dorsocephalic scale rows. AKAUM–I. 93435 (137.0 mm SL) BBSKU 100803 (265.2 mm SL) C uncatalogued specimen (104.9 mm SL) DBSKU 100773 (254.2 mm SL) EKAUM–I. 39058 (114.2 mm SL) FKPM-NI 24255 (240.1 mm SL).
Figure 11 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 11 Relationships between standard length and dot / spot counts on lateral body regions of Lateolabraxjaponicus (A), L.maculatus (B) and L.latus (C). Solid lines indicate linear regressions (parameters given in Table 4).
Figure 10 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 10 Histograms of meristic characters of three Lateolabrax species. For character abbreviations, see Figure 3 and Table 1. Vertical axes indicate frequencies (%).
Figure 1 from: Yokogawa K (2019) Morphological differences between species of the sea bass genus Lateolabrax (Teleostei, Perciformes), with particular emphasis on growth-related changes. ZooKeys 859: 69-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.32624
Figure 1 General aspects of small (fingerling) and large (adult) individuals of Lateolabraxjaponicus (A, B), L.maculatus (C, D) and L.latus (E, F) in fresh condition. AKPM-NI 27449 (91.9 mm SL) BKPM-NI 30671 (331.0 mm SL) C uncatalogued specimen (94.3 mm SL) DBSKU 100776 (265.0 mm SL) EKPM-NI 29044 (97.1 mm SL) FKPM-NI 24656 (369.0 mm SL). A, B, E and F were photographed by Hiroshi Senou (KPM), C and D were photographed by K. Yokogawa.
Figure 8-14 from: Zhang W, Song D, Chen J (2019) Two new species of the genus Microplitis Förster, 1862 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from China. ZooKeys 859: 49-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.31720
Figure 8-14 Microplitisbomiensis, sp. nov. (female) 8 Habitus, lateral view 9 Wings 10 Head, anterior view 11 Head, dorsal view 12 Mesoscutum and scutellum 13 Propodeum and basal tergites of metasoma 14 Apex of metasoma (showing ovipositor).
Figure 1-7 from: Zhang W, Song D, Chen J (2019) Two new species of the genus Microplitis Förster, 1862 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from China. ZooKeys 859: 49-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.31720
Figure 1-7 Microplitispaizhensis, sp. nov. (female) 1 Habitus, lateral view 2 Head, anterior view 3 Propodeum and basal tergites of metasoma 4 Wings 5 Head, dorsal view 6 Mesoscutum 7 Apex of metasoma (showing ovipositor).
Figure 2 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 2 GC/MS chromatogram of bound amino acids of Tagetes lucida herb.
Figure 3 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 3 GC/MS chromatogram of free amino acids of Tagetes lucida flowers.
Figure 6 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 6 GC/MS chromatogram of bound amino acids of Tagetes lucida leaves.
Figure 5 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 5 GC/MS chromatogram of free amino acids of Tagetes lucida leaves.
Figure 4 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 4 GC/MS chromatogram of bound amino acids of Tagetes lucida flowers.
Figure 1 from: Slobodianiuk L, Budniak L, Marchyshyn S, Kostyshyn L, Ezhned M (2021) Determination of amino acids content of the Tagetes lucida Cav. by GC/MS. Pharmacia 68(4): 859-867. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e73325
Figure 1 GC/MS chromatogram of free amino acids of Tagetes lucida herb.
Figure 1 from: Lim JHC, Azman BAR, Othman BHR (2019) A new species of Aciconula (Amphipoda, Senticauda, Caprellidae) from Sultan Iskandar Marine Park, Malaysia. ZooKeys 859: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.859.33284
Figure 1 Pulau Tinggi of Sultan Iskandar Marine Park (SIMP), Malaysia.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.