Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
199
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
199 results for “Adaptive Systems”
Figure 11 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 11. Summary of the main structures related with piercing-sucking feeding mechanism, SEM micrograph. A, B, Berosus sp., third-instar larva: A, lobular-mandibular coupling system, dorsal view; B, detail of lobular-mandibular coupling system, ventral view. C, Laccobius (Microlaccobius) sp., third-instar larva, left epistomal lobe, dorsal view.
Figure 10 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 10. Frame sequences of videos showing feeding behavior. A, Tropisternus latus Brullé, 1837, note that the larvae raise the head out of water while feeding. B, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837. C, Hemiosus dejeanii (Solier, 1849). D, Oocyclus magnifica Hebauer & Wang, 1998. See also Supporting Information, Videos S1–S4.
Figure 5 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 5. Labroclypeal region of larvae with chewing feeding system, SEM micrograph, dorsal view. A, Tropisternus acaragua Bachmann, 1969, first-instar larva. B, Hydrochara caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758), first-instar larva. C, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837, second-instar larva. D, Derallus paranensis Oliva, 1981, first instar larva. E, Helochares ventricosus Bruch, 1915, first-instar larva. F, Hydroglobus puncticolle Bruch, 1915, third-instar larva. G, Dactylosternum cacti (LeConte, 1855), third-instar larva. H, Cercyon quisquilius (Linnaeus, 1761), third-instar larva, white arrow indicates labroclypeal notch. Colours: light blue, frontoclypeal region; green, gFR1, group of sensilla of nasale; violet, gFR2, group of sensilla of epistomal lobe.
Figure 1 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 1. Head capsule of larvae with chewing (A–C) and piercing-sucking (D–I) feeding system, SEM micrograph, dorsal view. A, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837, second-instar larva. B, Tropisternus setiger Germar, 1824, firstinstar larva. C, Derallus paranensis Oliva, 1981, first instar larva. D, Berosus sp., third-instar larva. E, Hemiosus bruchi Knisch, 1924, third-instar larva. F, Oocyclus iguazu (Oliva 1996), third-instar larva. G, Laccobius kunashiricus Shatrovskiy, 1984, third-instar larva. H, Hybogralius hartmeyeri (Régimbart, 1908), third-instar larva, light microscope photograph. I, Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček et al. 2011, first-instar larva.
Figure 6 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 6. Labroclypeal region of Hemiosus larvae. A, B, Hemiosus bruchi Knisch, 1924, third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: A, labroclypeus; B, left epistomal lobe. C–E, Hemiosus multimaculatus (Jensen-Haarup, 1910), third-instar larva, dorsal view: C, left epistomal lobe, SEM micrograph; D, detail of gFR2 serrated setae, SEM micrograph; E, left epistomal lobe, light microscope photograph. Abbreviations: EpLb, epistomal lobe; NS, nasale. Colours: light blue, frontoclypeal region; green, gFR1, group of sensilla of nasale; violet, gFR2, group of sensilla of epistomal lobe.
Figure 9 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 9. Labium of larvae with chewing (A–B) and piercing-sucking (C–D) feeding system, dorsal view. A, Enochrus sp., first-instar larva, SEM micrograph. B, Derallus sp., first-instar larva, SEM micrograph. C, Berosus sp., third-instar larva, SEM micrograph. D, Oocyclus sapphirus Short & García, 2010, first-instar larva, light microscope photograph.
Figure 3. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 3. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C, Berosus patruelis Berg, 1885, first-instar larva, SEM micrograph: A, left mandible, ventral view; B, detail of mandibular teeth, ventral view; C, right mandible, dorsal view. D–F, Laccobius hammondi Gentili, 1984, third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: D, left mandible; E, detail of mandibular teeth; F, right mandible. G–I, Oocyclus iguazu (Oliva, 1996) third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view; G, left mandible; H, detail of mandibular teeth; I, right mandible.
Figure 4. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 4. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C, Hybogralius hartmeyeri (Régimbart, 1908), third-instar larva, light microscope photographs, dorsal view: A, left mandible; B, detail of mandibular teeth; C, right mandible. D–F, Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček et al. 2011, first-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: D, left mandible; E, detail of mandibular teeth; F, right mandible. Abbreviations: rc1, first retinaculum; rc2, second retinaculum; rc3, third retinaculum; pt, prostheca.
Figure 2 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 2. Chewing mandibles, SEM micrograph, dorsal view. A, Derallus sp., first-instar larva. B, Enochrus sp., firstinstar larva. C, Tropisternus sp., second-instar larva. D, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837, first-instar larva. E, Dactylosternum cacti (LeConte, 1855), third-instar larva. F, Cercyon quisquilius (Linnaeus, 1761), third-instar larva. Abbreviations: rc1, first retinaculum; rc2, second retinaculum; rc3, third retinaculum.
Figure 7 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 7. Labroclypeal region of Laccobius larvae. A, B, Laccobius kunashiricus Shatrovskiy, 1984, third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: A, labroclypeus; B, left epistomal lobe. C–E, Laccobius (Microlaccobius) sp., third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: C, left epistomal lobe; D; detail of gFR2 setae; E, seta-like cuticular projections of the latero-ventral membranous lobe. Abbreviations: EpLb, epistomal lobe; NS, nasale. Colours: light blue, frontoclypeal region; green, gFR1, group of sensilla of nasale; violet, gFR2, group of sensilla of epistomal lobe.
Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems
<p>This is the code and data for paper "Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems".</p>
Distribution. Now restricted to the Channel Country of SW Queensland and the Lake Eyre Basin in NE South Australia. Descriptive notes. Head-body 95-120 mm, tail 105-160 mm, ear 23-29 mm, hindfoot 32-37 mm; weight 30-50 g. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has body form typical of hopping mice, with very long hindfeet, long tail with distal brush of longer hairs, very long ears, and large protruberant eyes. Dorsal fur is of variable color, from pale pinkish fawn to gray; ventral fur white. Unlike most other hopping mice, it has no throat pouch, but males have a glandular area of naked skin on the chest. Habitat. Occurs in low shrublands and tussock grasslands on stony ("gibber") plains and claypans. Shows marked habitat segregation from the Dusky Hopping Mouse (N. fuscus), which is closely associated with sandy substrates. Food and Feeding. The Fawn Hopping Mouse is mostly granivorous, but also eats other plant material (stems, leaves) and occasionally invertebrates. It uses succulent, salt-adapted plants around edges of claypans as a source of water. Breeding. Reproduction is probably largely opportunistic and aseasonal, with high reproductive output from near-continuous breeding after periods of high rainfall; reported littersize is 1-5, most commonly three; gestation period 38-43 days for nonlactating females. Females may mature later than other hopping mice, with reproductive maturity reached at about six months. Activity patterns. Terrestrial and nocturnal. Fawn Hopping Mice shelter during day in burrow systems that are typically simpler and shallower than those of other hopping mice. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Fawn Hopping Mice generally live singly or in small groups; typically uncommon within range, but population density may increase by an order of magnitude following periods of high rainfall. Status and Conservation. Classified as Near Threatened on The IUCN Red List. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has shown marked decline in range (estimated at greater than 50%), and presumably population size, since European settlement of Australia. This is mostlikely due to predation by the introduced house cat and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), and to habitat degradation associated with pastoralism. Bibliography. Brazenor (1934), Burbidge et al. (2008), Finlayson (1939), Gould (1853), Jackson & Groves (2015), Murray et al. (1999), Ogilby (1892), Thomas (1921h), Van Dyck & Strahan (2008), Waite (1898), Watts & Aslin (1981), Woinarski et al. (2014), Wood Jones (1925). in Muridae
Distribution. Now restricted to the Channel Country of SW Queensland and the Lake Eyre Basin in NE South Australia. Descriptive notes. Head-body 95-120 mm, tail 105-160 mm, ear 23-29 mm, hindfoot 32-37 mm; weight 30-50 g. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has body form typical of hopping mice, with very long hindfeet, long tail with distal brush of longer hairs, very long ears, and large protruberant eyes. Dorsal fur is of variable color, from pale pinkish fawn to gray; ventral fur white. Unlike most other hopping mice, it has no throat pouch, but males have a glandular area of naked skin on the chest. Habitat. Occurs in low shrublands and tussock grasslands on stony ("gibber") plains and claypans. Shows marked habitat segregation from the Dusky Hopping Mouse (N. fuscus), which is closely associated with sandy substrates. Food and Feeding. The Fawn Hopping Mouse is mostly granivorous, but also eats other plant material (stems, leaves) and occasionally invertebrates. It uses succulent, salt-adapted plants around edges of claypans as a source of water. Breeding. Reproduction is probably largely opportunistic and aseasonal, with high reproductive output from near-continuous breeding after periods of high rainfall; reported littersize is 1-5, most commonly three; gestation period 38-43 days for nonlactating females. Females may mature later than other hopping mice, with reproductive maturity reached at about six months. Activity patterns. Terrestrial and nocturnal. Fawn Hopping Mice shelter during day in burrow systems that are typically simpler and shallower than those of other hopping mice. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Fawn Hopping Mice generally live singly or in small groups; typically uncommon within range, but population density may increase by an order of magnitude following periods of high rainfall. Status and Conservation. Classified as Near Threatened on The IUCN Red List. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has shown marked decline in range (estimated at greater than 50%), and presumably population size, since European settlement of Australia. This is mostlikely due to predation by the introduced house cat and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), and to habitat degradation associated with pastoralism. Bibliography. Brazenor (1934), Burbidge et al. (2008), Finlayson (1939), Gould (1853), Jackson & Groves (2015), Murray et al. (1999), Ogilby (1892), Thomas (1921h), Van Dyck & Strahan (2008), Waite (1898), Watts & Aslin (1981), Woinarski et al. (2014), Wood Jones (1925).
Supplementary Information - Circulating insulin-like growth factor system adaptations in hibernating brown bears indicate increased tissue IGF availability
<p>Supplementary figures and tables for the manuscript entitled “Circulating insulin-like growth factor system adaptations in hibernating brown bears indicate increased tissue IGF availability”.</p>
MAgPIE model runs outputs: Climate change-driven global land-use system adaptation under CMIP6-based crop model projections
<p>Each folder contains the fulldata.gdx and the configuration files for each MAgPIE run based on the nine crop impact models and 5 gcms used in the paper.</p>
Ripple: A Long-Sighted Self-Adaptation Approach to Retrain Machine-Learning-Enabled Systems
<p>Data files required to reproduce the results of paper "Ripple: A Long-Sighted Self-Adaptation Approach to Retrain Machine-Learning-Enabled Systems" submitted to ICSME 2025</p>
Rationalizing Systems Analysis for the Evaluation of Adaptation Strategies in Complex Human-Water Systems - Outputs Dataset
<p>Dataset containing the outputs of the paper entitled Rationalizing Systems Analysis for the Evaluation of Adaptation Strategies in Complex Human-Water Systems. Outputs are subdivided into PMAUP and SWAT-PMAUP folders. Scenario runs are available in the folder scenario, inside SWAT-PMAUP, together with the SWAT model setup used throughout the manuscript.</p>
Figure 10 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 10. Frame sequences of videos showing feeding behavior. A, Tropisternus latus Brullé, 1837, note that the larvae raise the head out of water while feeding. B, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837. C, Hemiosus dejeanii (Solier, 1849). D, Oocyclus magnifica Hebauer & Wang, 1998. See also Supporting Information, Videos S1–S4.
Figure 7 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 7. Labroclypeal region of Laccobius larvae. A, B, Laccobius kunashiricus Shatrovskiy, 1984, third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: A, labroclypeus; B, left epistomal lobe. C–E, Laccobius (Microlaccobius) sp., third-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: C, left epistomal lobe; D; detail of gFR2 setae; E, seta-like cuticular projections of the latero-ventral membranous lobe. Abbreviations: EpLb, epistomal lobe; NS, nasale. Colours: light blue, frontoclypeal region; green, gFR1, group of sensilla of nasale; violet, gFR2, group of sensilla of epistomal lobe.
Figure 4. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 4. Piercing-sucking mandibles. A–C, Hybogralius hartmeyeri (Régimbart, 1908), third-instar larva, light microscope photographs, dorsal view: A, left mandible; B, detail of mandibular teeth; C, right mandible. D–F, Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček et al. 2011, first-instar larva, SEM micrograph, dorsal view: D, left mandible; E, detail of mandibular teeth; F, right mandible. Abbreviations: rc1, first retinaculum; rc2, second retinaculum; rc3, third retinaculum; pt, prostheca.
Figure 1 in REVIEW Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)
Figure 1. Head capsule of larvae with chewing (A–C) and piercing-sucking (D–I) feeding system, SEM micrograph, dorsal view. A, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis Brullé, 1837, second-instar larva. B, Tropisternus setiger Germar, 1824, firstinstar larva. C, Derallus paranensis Oliva, 1981, first instar larva. D, Berosus sp., third-instar larva. E, Hemiosus bruchi Knisch, 1924, third-instar larva. F, Oocyclus iguazu (Oliva 1996), third-instar larva. G, Laccobius kunashiricus Shatrovskiy, 1984, third-instar larva. H, Hybogralius hartmeyeri (Régimbart, 1908), third-instar larva, light microscope photograph. I, Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček et al. 2011, first-instar larva.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.